Quantifying Resistance to Isoxaflutole and Mesotrione and Investigating Their Interactions with Metribuzin POST in Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus)
Greenhouse experiments were conducted to quantify resistance levels to the 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibiting herbicides mesotrione (MES) and isoxaflutole (IFT) in NEB (Nebraska HPPD- and atrazine-resistant) and SIR (Stanford, IL, HPPD- and atrazineresistant) waterhemp [Amaranthus...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weed science 2018-09, Vol.66 (5), p.586-594 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 594 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 586 |
container_title | Weed science |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | O'Brien, Sarah R Davis, Adam S Riechers, Dean E |
description | Greenhouse experiments were conducted to quantify resistance levels to the 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibiting herbicides mesotrione (MES) and isoxaflutole (IFT) in NEB (Nebraska HPPD- and atrazine-resistant) and SIR (Stanford, IL, HPPD- and atrazineresistant) waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J. D. Sauer] populations. These populations differ in their field-use histories and resistance levels to MES. Foliar growth responses were compared with ACR (HPPD sensitive; metabolic atrazine-resistant) and SEN (sensitive to HPPD and photosystem II [PSII] inhibitors). A greenhouse dose–response study was conducted with each herbicide at two POST timings: early (EPOST) (5 cm; 4 to 5 true leaves) and POST (10 cm; 8 to 9 true leaves). At the EPOST timing, SIR was 10-fold resistant to IFT and 32-fold resistant to MES, while NEB was 4-fold resistant to IFT and 7-fold resistant to MES when compared with ACR. At the POST timing, SIR was 17-fold resistant to IFT and 21-fold resistant to MES, while NEB was 3-fold resistant to IFT and 7-fold resistant to MES when compared with ACR. Results overall indicated greater fold-resistance levels to MES relative to IFT at each timing. However, POST treatments to SIR showed contrasting effects on resistance levels relative to EPOST. To investigate potential management strategies for resistant A. tuberculatus populations, a POST interaction study was conducted using combinations of metribuzin and either IFT or MES. A metribuzin rate (191 g ai ha-1) causing an approximately 20% biomass reduction was chosen for interaction studies and combined with varying rates of either IFT or MES. Results indicated 52.5 g ai ha-1 of MES combined with metribuzin displayed a synergistic effect on biomass reduction in SIR. However, other combinations of either MES or IFT and metribuzin resulted in additive effects on biomass reduction in both HPPD-resistant populations. These results provide insights into the joint activity between HPPD and PSII inhibitors for controlling metabolism-based, multiple herbicide–resistant A. tuberculatus. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/wsc.2018.36 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2101829897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_wsc_2018_36</cupid><jstor_id>26505882</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26505882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b355t-10a81d8c919259535c26fac22a8d084229db48fcb11f046dfbddcb81fa1b8b663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB8r10LAjSJTk8xkmllK8VFQfFVcDkkmaVPaSc3D1w_x95oyohtxdUnynXNuDgB7GPUxwoOTVy_7BGHWz8s10MOUoowMaLUOeggVeYYHBd0EW97PEMIlwVUPfN5F3gaj3007gffKGx94KxUMFo68feN6HoOdK8jbBl4rb4Mztu2Oo_ZF-WAmPKy046kyLt0F5bgMCfLw1YRpEiWJiB-mhbc3D2OY5hNP0FQtlvDwdMFdyp9GD0MUysk45yH6ox2wofncq93vuQ0ez8_Gw8vs6uZiNDy9ykROacgw4gw3TFa4IrSiOZWk1FwSwlmDWEFI1YiCaSkw1qgoGy2aRgqGNceCibLMt8FB57t09jmm79QzG12bImuSGmWkYtUgUccdJZ313ildL51Jm7_XGNWr4utUfL0qvs5XnvsdPfPBuh-UlBRRxkh6z77d-EI400zUb-jffkcdL4xN3f-b_QVZGaAC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2101829897</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying Resistance to Isoxaflutole and Mesotrione and Investigating Their Interactions with Metribuzin POST in Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus)</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>O'Brien, Sarah R ; Davis, Adam S ; Riechers, Dean E</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Sarah R ; Davis, Adam S ; Riechers, Dean E</creatorcontrib><description>Greenhouse experiments were conducted to quantify resistance levels to the 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibiting herbicides mesotrione (MES) and isoxaflutole (IFT) in NEB (Nebraska HPPD- and atrazine-resistant) and SIR (Stanford, IL, HPPD- and atrazineresistant) waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J. D. Sauer] populations. These populations differ in their field-use histories and resistance levels to MES. Foliar growth responses were compared with ACR (HPPD sensitive; metabolic atrazine-resistant) and SEN (sensitive to HPPD and photosystem II [PSII] inhibitors). A greenhouse dose–response study was conducted with each herbicide at two POST timings: early (EPOST) (5 cm; 4 to 5 true leaves) and POST (10 cm; 8 to 9 true leaves). At the EPOST timing, SIR was 10-fold resistant to IFT and 32-fold resistant to MES, while NEB was 4-fold resistant to IFT and 7-fold resistant to MES when compared with ACR. At the POST timing, SIR was 17-fold resistant to IFT and 21-fold resistant to MES, while NEB was 3-fold resistant to IFT and 7-fold resistant to MES when compared with ACR. Results overall indicated greater fold-resistance levels to MES relative to IFT at each timing. However, POST treatments to SIR showed contrasting effects on resistance levels relative to EPOST. To investigate potential management strategies for resistant A. tuberculatus populations, a POST interaction study was conducted using combinations of metribuzin and either IFT or MES. A metribuzin rate (191 g ai ha-1) causing an approximately 20% biomass reduction was chosen for interaction studies and combined with varying rates of either IFT or MES. Results indicated 52.5 g ai ha-1 of MES combined with metribuzin displayed a synergistic effect on biomass reduction in SIR. However, other combinations of either MES or IFT and metribuzin resulted in additive effects on biomass reduction in both HPPD-resistant populations. These results provide insights into the joint activity between HPPD and PSII inhibitors for controlling metabolism-based, multiple herbicide–resistant A. tuberculatus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wsc.2018.36</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: The Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase ; Amaranthus tuberculatus ; Atrazine ; Binding sites ; Biomass ; Biosynthesis ; Carotenoids ; Chlorophyll ; Corn ; Cytochrome ; detoxification ; Dioxygenase ; Enzymes ; Greenhouses ; Herbicide resistance ; herbicide synergism ; Herbicides ; Inhibitors ; Investigations ; Leaves ; Metabolism ; Metribuzin ; Mutation ; Photosystem II ; Physiology/Chemistry/Biochemistry ; pigment inhibitors ; Population ; Population studies ; Populations ; Pyruvic acid ; Reduction ; Soybeans ; Synergistic effect ; triazines ; Weed Management ; weed resistance</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 2018-09, Vol.66 (5), p.586-594</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2018.</rights><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b355t-10a81d8c919259535c26fac22a8d084229db48fcb11f046dfbddcb81fa1b8b663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b355t-10a81d8c919259535c26fac22a8d084229db48fcb11f046dfbddcb81fa1b8b663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6081-5629</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26505882$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S004317451800036X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,27923,27924,55627,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Adam S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riechers, Dean E</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying Resistance to Isoxaflutole and Mesotrione and Investigating Their Interactions with Metribuzin POST in Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus)</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed Sci</addtitle><description>Greenhouse experiments were conducted to quantify resistance levels to the 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibiting herbicides mesotrione (MES) and isoxaflutole (IFT) in NEB (Nebraska HPPD- and atrazine-resistant) and SIR (Stanford, IL, HPPD- and atrazineresistant) waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J. D. Sauer] populations. These populations differ in their field-use histories and resistance levels to MES. Foliar growth responses were compared with ACR (HPPD sensitive; metabolic atrazine-resistant) and SEN (sensitive to HPPD and photosystem II [PSII] inhibitors). A greenhouse dose–response study was conducted with each herbicide at two POST timings: early (EPOST) (5 cm; 4 to 5 true leaves) and POST (10 cm; 8 to 9 true leaves). At the EPOST timing, SIR was 10-fold resistant to IFT and 32-fold resistant to MES, while NEB was 4-fold resistant to IFT and 7-fold resistant to MES when compared with ACR. At the POST timing, SIR was 17-fold resistant to IFT and 21-fold resistant to MES, while NEB was 3-fold resistant to IFT and 7-fold resistant to MES when compared with ACR. Results overall indicated greater fold-resistance levels to MES relative to IFT at each timing. However, POST treatments to SIR showed contrasting effects on resistance levels relative to EPOST. To investigate potential management strategies for resistant A. tuberculatus populations, a POST interaction study was conducted using combinations of metribuzin and either IFT or MES. A metribuzin rate (191 g ai ha-1) causing an approximately 20% biomass reduction was chosen for interaction studies and combined with varying rates of either IFT or MES. Results indicated 52.5 g ai ha-1 of MES combined with metribuzin displayed a synergistic effect on biomass reduction in SIR. However, other combinations of either MES or IFT and metribuzin resulted in additive effects on biomass reduction in both HPPD-resistant populations. These results provide insights into the joint activity between HPPD and PSII inhibitors for controlling metabolism-based, multiple herbicide–resistant A. tuberculatus.</description><subject>4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase</subject><subject>Amaranthus tuberculatus</subject><subject>Atrazine</subject><subject>Binding sites</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biosynthesis</subject><subject>Carotenoids</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Cytochrome</subject><subject>detoxification</subject><subject>Dioxygenase</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>herbicide synergism</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metribuzin</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Photosystem II</subject><subject>Physiology/Chemistry/Biochemistry</subject><subject>pigment inhibitors</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Pyruvic acid</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Synergistic effect</subject><subject>triazines</subject><subject>Weed Management</subject><subject>weed resistance</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB8r10LAjSJTk8xkmllK8VFQfFVcDkkmaVPaSc3D1w_x95oyohtxdUnynXNuDgB7GPUxwoOTVy_7BGHWz8s10MOUoowMaLUOeggVeYYHBd0EW97PEMIlwVUPfN5F3gaj3007gffKGx94KxUMFo68feN6HoOdK8jbBl4rb4Mztu2Oo_ZF-WAmPKy046kyLt0F5bgMCfLw1YRpEiWJiB-mhbc3D2OY5hNP0FQtlvDwdMFdyp9GD0MUysk45yH6ox2wofncq93vuQ0ez8_Gw8vs6uZiNDy9ykROacgw4gw3TFa4IrSiOZWk1FwSwlmDWEFI1YiCaSkw1qgoGy2aRgqGNceCibLMt8FB57t09jmm79QzG12bImuSGmWkYtUgUccdJZ313ildL51Jm7_XGNWr4utUfL0qvs5XnvsdPfPBuh-UlBRRxkh6z77d-EI400zUb-jffkcdL4xN3f-b_QVZGaAC</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>O'Brien, Sarah R</creator><creator>Davis, Adam S</creator><creator>Riechers, Dean E</creator><general>The Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6081-5629</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Quantifying Resistance to Isoxaflutole and Mesotrione and Investigating Their Interactions with Metribuzin POST in Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus)</title><author>O'Brien, Sarah R ; Davis, Adam S ; Riechers, Dean E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b355t-10a81d8c919259535c26fac22a8d084229db48fcb11f046dfbddcb81fa1b8b663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase</topic><topic>Amaranthus tuberculatus</topic><topic>Atrazine</topic><topic>Binding sites</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biosynthesis</topic><topic>Carotenoids</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Cytochrome</topic><topic>detoxification</topic><topic>Dioxygenase</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>herbicide synergism</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metribuzin</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Photosystem II</topic><topic>Physiology/Chemistry/Biochemistry</topic><topic>pigment inhibitors</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Pyruvic acid</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Synergistic effect</topic><topic>triazines</topic><topic>Weed Management</topic><topic>weed resistance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Adam S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riechers, Dean E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Brien, Sarah R</au><au>Davis, Adam S</au><au>Riechers, Dean E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying Resistance to Isoxaflutole and Mesotrione and Investigating Their Interactions with Metribuzin POST in Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus)</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed Sci</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>586</spage><epage>594</epage><pages>586-594</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>Greenhouse experiments were conducted to quantify resistance levels to the 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibiting herbicides mesotrione (MES) and isoxaflutole (IFT) in NEB (Nebraska HPPD- and atrazine-resistant) and SIR (Stanford, IL, HPPD- and atrazineresistant) waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J. D. Sauer] populations. These populations differ in their field-use histories and resistance levels to MES. Foliar growth responses were compared with ACR (HPPD sensitive; metabolic atrazine-resistant) and SEN (sensitive to HPPD and photosystem II [PSII] inhibitors). A greenhouse dose–response study was conducted with each herbicide at two POST timings: early (EPOST) (5 cm; 4 to 5 true leaves) and POST (10 cm; 8 to 9 true leaves). At the EPOST timing, SIR was 10-fold resistant to IFT and 32-fold resistant to MES, while NEB was 4-fold resistant to IFT and 7-fold resistant to MES when compared with ACR. At the POST timing, SIR was 17-fold resistant to IFT and 21-fold resistant to MES, while NEB was 3-fold resistant to IFT and 7-fold resistant to MES when compared with ACR. Results overall indicated greater fold-resistance levels to MES relative to IFT at each timing. However, POST treatments to SIR showed contrasting effects on resistance levels relative to EPOST. To investigate potential management strategies for resistant A. tuberculatus populations, a POST interaction study was conducted using combinations of metribuzin and either IFT or MES. A metribuzin rate (191 g ai ha-1) causing an approximately 20% biomass reduction was chosen for interaction studies and combined with varying rates of either IFT or MES. Results indicated 52.5 g ai ha-1 of MES combined with metribuzin displayed a synergistic effect on biomass reduction in SIR. However, other combinations of either MES or IFT and metribuzin resulted in additive effects on biomass reduction in both HPPD-resistant populations. These results provide insights into the joint activity between HPPD and PSII inhibitors for controlling metabolism-based, multiple herbicide–resistant A. tuberculatus.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>The Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1017/wsc.2018.36</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6081-5629</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1745 |
ispartof | Weed science, 2018-09, Vol.66 (5), p.586-594 |
issn | 0043-1745 1550-2759 1550-2759 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2101829897 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase Amaranthus tuberculatus Atrazine Binding sites Biomass Biosynthesis Carotenoids Chlorophyll Corn Cytochrome detoxification Dioxygenase Enzymes Greenhouses Herbicide resistance herbicide synergism Herbicides Inhibitors Investigations Leaves Metabolism Metribuzin Mutation Photosystem II Physiology/Chemistry/Biochemistry pigment inhibitors Population Population studies Populations Pyruvic acid Reduction Soybeans Synergistic effect triazines Weed Management weed resistance |
title | Quantifying Resistance to Isoxaflutole and Mesotrione and Investigating Their Interactions with Metribuzin POST in Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A36%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20Resistance%20to%20Isoxaflutole%20and%20Mesotrione%20and%20Investigating%20Their%20Interactions%20with%20Metribuzin%20POST%20in%20Waterhemp%20(Amaranthus%20tuberculatus)&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=O'Brien,%20Sarah%20R&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=586&rft.epage=594&rft.pages=586-594&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wsc.2018.36&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26505882%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2101829897&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_wsc_2018_36&rft_jstor_id=26505882&rfr_iscdi=true |