Can Riparian Forest Buffers Increase Yields From Oil Palm Plantations?
Forests on tropical floodplains across Southeast Asia are being converted to oil palm plantations. Preserving natural riparian forest corridors along rivers that pass through oil palm plantations has clear benefits for ecological conservation, but these corridors (also called buffers) use land that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth's future 2018-08, Vol.6 (8), p.1082-1096 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1096 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1082 |
container_title | Earth's future |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Horton, Alexander J. Lazarus, Eli D. Hales, Tristram C. Constantine, José Antonio Bruford, Michael W. Goossens, Benoît |
description | Forests on tropical floodplains across Southeast Asia are being converted to oil palm plantations. Preserving natural riparian forest corridors along rivers that pass through oil palm plantations has clear benefits for ecological conservation, but these corridors (also called buffers) use land that is potentially economically valuable for agriculture. Here we examine how riparian forest buffers reduce floodplain land loss by slowing rates of riverbank erosion and lateral channel migration, thus providing the fundamentally geomorphic ecosystem service of erosion regulation. Using satellite imagery, assessments of oil palm plantation productivity, and a simplified numerical model of river channel migration, we estimate the economic value of the ecosystem service that riparian buffers provide by protecting adjacent plantation land from bank erosion. We find that cumulative economic losses from bank erosion are higher in the absence of a forest buffer than when a buffer is left intact. Our exploratory analysis suggests that retaining riparian forest buffers along tropical rivers can enhance the viability of floodplain plantations, particularly over time scales (approximately decades) commensurate with the lifetime of a typical oil palm plantation. Ecosystem services that stem directly from geomorphic processes could play a vital role in efforts to guide the long‐term environmental sustainability of tropical river systems. Accounting for landscape dynamics in projections of economic returns could help bring palm oil industry goals into closer alignment with environmental conservation efforts.
Plain Language Summary
Tropical meandering rivers and their floodplains provide habitats to many of the planet's critically endangered species, but they are now being threatened by recently intensified rates of deforestation driven by global demands for food and biofuels. We report that preserving tropical forest buffers along the margins of large meandering rivers can both enhance the profitability of floodplain plantations while maintaining conservation benefits by reducing the area of land lost to the river though bank erosion, which may help to bring palm‐oil industry goals into closer alignment with environmental conservation efforts.
Key Points
We estimate the value of the ecosystem service that riparian forest buffers provide by protecting adjacent plantations from riverbank erosion
We find that wide riparian buffers (order tens of meters) may enhance the long‐term |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018EF000874 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2101153556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2101153556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3430-838dfefbf2688b3a066f881a7a99097d0bcc1f7bc6b449145072cf0e0a9c3e0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOOZu_oCAV6tfkrZJT6Jj1cFgQ-bBU0jSBDK6tiYrsn9vZB528vS9h4f3e3gRuiXwQIBWjxSIWNQAIHh-gSaUUZHllPPLs3yNZjHuEgMVB1bwCarnqsPvflDBp1D3wcYDfhmdsyHiZWeCVdHiT2_bJuI69Hu89i3eqHaPN63qDurg-y4-3aArp9poZ393ij7qxXb-lq3Wr8v58yozLGeQCSYaZ512tBRCMwVl6YQgiquqSkoNaGOI49qUOs8rkhfAqXFgQVWGWdBsiu5OvUPov8bkKnf9GLr0UlIChBSsKMpE3Z8oE_oYg3VyCH6vwlESkL9jyfOxEk5O-Ldv7fFfVi7qLU1a7AdaWGhf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2101153556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Riparian Forest Buffers Increase Yields From Oil Palm Plantations?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Horton, Alexander J. ; Lazarus, Eli D. ; Hales, Tristram C. ; Constantine, José Antonio ; Bruford, Michael W. ; Goossens, Benoît</creator><creatorcontrib>Horton, Alexander J. ; Lazarus, Eli D. ; Hales, Tristram C. ; Constantine, José Antonio ; Bruford, Michael W. ; Goossens, Benoît</creatorcontrib><description>Forests on tropical floodplains across Southeast Asia are being converted to oil palm plantations. Preserving natural riparian forest corridors along rivers that pass through oil palm plantations has clear benefits for ecological conservation, but these corridors (also called buffers) use land that is potentially economically valuable for agriculture. Here we examine how riparian forest buffers reduce floodplain land loss by slowing rates of riverbank erosion and lateral channel migration, thus providing the fundamentally geomorphic ecosystem service of erosion regulation. Using satellite imagery, assessments of oil palm plantation productivity, and a simplified numerical model of river channel migration, we estimate the economic value of the ecosystem service that riparian buffers provide by protecting adjacent plantation land from bank erosion. We find that cumulative economic losses from bank erosion are higher in the absence of a forest buffer than when a buffer is left intact. Our exploratory analysis suggests that retaining riparian forest buffers along tropical rivers can enhance the viability of floodplain plantations, particularly over time scales (approximately decades) commensurate with the lifetime of a typical oil palm plantation. Ecosystem services that stem directly from geomorphic processes could play a vital role in efforts to guide the long‐term environmental sustainability of tropical river systems. Accounting for landscape dynamics in projections of economic returns could help bring palm oil industry goals into closer alignment with environmental conservation efforts.
Plain Language Summary
Tropical meandering rivers and their floodplains provide habitats to many of the planet's critically endangered species, but they are now being threatened by recently intensified rates of deforestation driven by global demands for food and biofuels. We report that preserving tropical forest buffers along the margins of large meandering rivers can both enhance the profitability of floodplain plantations while maintaining conservation benefits by reducing the area of land lost to the river though bank erosion, which may help to bring palm‐oil industry goals into closer alignment with environmental conservation efforts.
Key Points
We estimate the value of the ecosystem service that riparian forest buffers provide by protecting adjacent plantations from riverbank erosion
We find that wide riparian buffers (order tens of meters) may enhance the long‐term viability of floodplain plantations
Accounting for geomorphic contributions to ecosystem services may help align palm oil industry goals with environmental conservation</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-4277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-4277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018EF000874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Agricultural economics ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Alignment ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Bank erosion ; Biofuels ; Borneo ; Buffers ; Conservation ; Corridors ; coupled human‐landscape systems ; Deforestation ; Economic impact ; Economic models ; Economics ; Ecosystem services ; Endangered species ; Erosion ; Erosion rates ; Floodplains ; forest conservation ; Forests ; Geomorphology ; Landscape ; Mathematical models ; Migration ; Numerical models ; Oil and gas industry ; Palm oil ; Petroleum industry ; Plantations ; Profitability ; Riparian buffers ; Riparian environments ; Riparian forests ; River banks ; River channels ; River ecology ; River systems ; Rivers ; Satellite imagery ; social‐ecological systems ; socio‐hydrology ; Sustainability ; Tropical forests ; Viability ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Earth's future, 2018-08, Vol.6 (8), p.1082-1096</ispartof><rights>2018. The Authors.</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3430-838dfefbf2688b3a066f881a7a99097d0bcc1f7bc6b449145072cf0e0a9c3e0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3430-838dfefbf2688b3a066f881a7a99097d0bcc1f7bc6b449145072cf0e0a9c3e0b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2404-9661 ; 0000-0001-6357-6080 ; 0000-0002-3330-3302 ; 0000-0003-3067-7138 ; 0000-0003-0243-3662 ; 0000-0003-2360-4643</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018EF000874$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018EF000874$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horton, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazarus, Eli D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hales, Tristram C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constantine, José Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruford, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goossens, Benoît</creatorcontrib><title>Can Riparian Forest Buffers Increase Yields From Oil Palm Plantations?</title><title>Earth's future</title><description>Forests on tropical floodplains across Southeast Asia are being converted to oil palm plantations. Preserving natural riparian forest corridors along rivers that pass through oil palm plantations has clear benefits for ecological conservation, but these corridors (also called buffers) use land that is potentially economically valuable for agriculture. Here we examine how riparian forest buffers reduce floodplain land loss by slowing rates of riverbank erosion and lateral channel migration, thus providing the fundamentally geomorphic ecosystem service of erosion regulation. Using satellite imagery, assessments of oil palm plantation productivity, and a simplified numerical model of river channel migration, we estimate the economic value of the ecosystem service that riparian buffers provide by protecting adjacent plantation land from bank erosion. We find that cumulative economic losses from bank erosion are higher in the absence of a forest buffer than when a buffer is left intact. Our exploratory analysis suggests that retaining riparian forest buffers along tropical rivers can enhance the viability of floodplain plantations, particularly over time scales (approximately decades) commensurate with the lifetime of a typical oil palm plantation. Ecosystem services that stem directly from geomorphic processes could play a vital role in efforts to guide the long‐term environmental sustainability of tropical river systems. Accounting for landscape dynamics in projections of economic returns could help bring palm oil industry goals into closer alignment with environmental conservation efforts.
Plain Language Summary
Tropical meandering rivers and their floodplains provide habitats to many of the planet's critically endangered species, but they are now being threatened by recently intensified rates of deforestation driven by global demands for food and biofuels. We report that preserving tropical forest buffers along the margins of large meandering rivers can both enhance the profitability of floodplain plantations while maintaining conservation benefits by reducing the area of land lost to the river though bank erosion, which may help to bring palm‐oil industry goals into closer alignment with environmental conservation efforts.
Key Points
We estimate the value of the ecosystem service that riparian forest buffers provide by protecting adjacent plantations from riverbank erosion
We find that wide riparian buffers (order tens of meters) may enhance the long‐term viability of floodplain plantations
Accounting for geomorphic contributions to ecosystem services may help align palm oil industry goals with environmental conservation</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Bank erosion</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Borneo</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Corridors</subject><subject>coupled human‐landscape systems</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Erosion rates</subject><subject>Floodplains</subject><subject>forest conservation</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Oil and gas industry</subject><subject>Palm oil</subject><subject>Petroleum industry</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Riparian buffers</subject><subject>Riparian environments</subject><subject>Riparian forests</subject><subject>River banks</subject><subject>River channels</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>River systems</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>social‐ecological systems</subject><subject>socio‐hydrology</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>Viability</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>2328-4277</issn><issn>2328-4277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOOZu_oCAV6tfkrZJT6Jj1cFgQ-bBU0jSBDK6tiYrsn9vZB528vS9h4f3e3gRuiXwQIBWjxSIWNQAIHh-gSaUUZHllPPLs3yNZjHuEgMVB1bwCarnqsPvflDBp1D3wcYDfhmdsyHiZWeCVdHiT2_bJuI69Hu89i3eqHaPN63qDurg-y4-3aArp9poZ393ij7qxXb-lq3Wr8v58yozLGeQCSYaZ512tBRCMwVl6YQgiquqSkoNaGOI49qUOs8rkhfAqXFgQVWGWdBsiu5OvUPov8bkKnf9GLr0UlIChBSsKMpE3Z8oE_oYg3VyCH6vwlESkL9jyfOxEk5O-Ldv7fFfVi7qLU1a7AdaWGhf</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Horton, Alexander J.</creator><creator>Lazarus, Eli D.</creator><creator>Hales, Tristram C.</creator><creator>Constantine, José Antonio</creator><creator>Bruford, Michael W.</creator><creator>Goossens, Benoît</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-9661</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6357-6080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3330-3302</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3067-7138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0243-3662</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2360-4643</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Can Riparian Forest Buffers Increase Yields From Oil Palm Plantations?</title><author>Horton, Alexander J. ; Lazarus, Eli D. ; Hales, Tristram C. ; Constantine, José Antonio ; Bruford, Michael W. ; Goossens, Benoît</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3430-838dfefbf2688b3a066f881a7a99097d0bcc1f7bc6b449145072cf0e0a9c3e0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Bank erosion</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Borneo</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Corridors</topic><topic>coupled human‐landscape systems</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Erosion rates</topic><topic>Floodplains</topic><topic>forest conservation</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Oil and gas industry</topic><topic>Palm oil</topic><topic>Petroleum industry</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Riparian buffers</topic><topic>Riparian environments</topic><topic>Riparian forests</topic><topic>River banks</topic><topic>River channels</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>River systems</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>social‐ecological systems</topic><topic>socio‐hydrology</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>Viability</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horton, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazarus, Eli D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hales, Tristram C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constantine, José Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruford, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goossens, Benoît</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Earth's future</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horton, Alexander J.</au><au>Lazarus, Eli D.</au><au>Hales, Tristram C.</au><au>Constantine, José Antonio</au><au>Bruford, Michael W.</au><au>Goossens, Benoît</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Riparian Forest Buffers Increase Yields From Oil Palm Plantations?</atitle><jtitle>Earth's future</jtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1082</spage><epage>1096</epage><pages>1082-1096</pages><issn>2328-4277</issn><eissn>2328-4277</eissn><abstract>Forests on tropical floodplains across Southeast Asia are being converted to oil palm plantations. Preserving natural riparian forest corridors along rivers that pass through oil palm plantations has clear benefits for ecological conservation, but these corridors (also called buffers) use land that is potentially economically valuable for agriculture. Here we examine how riparian forest buffers reduce floodplain land loss by slowing rates of riverbank erosion and lateral channel migration, thus providing the fundamentally geomorphic ecosystem service of erosion regulation. Using satellite imagery, assessments of oil palm plantation productivity, and a simplified numerical model of river channel migration, we estimate the economic value of the ecosystem service that riparian buffers provide by protecting adjacent plantation land from bank erosion. We find that cumulative economic losses from bank erosion are higher in the absence of a forest buffer than when a buffer is left intact. Our exploratory analysis suggests that retaining riparian forest buffers along tropical rivers can enhance the viability of floodplain plantations, particularly over time scales (approximately decades) commensurate with the lifetime of a typical oil palm plantation. Ecosystem services that stem directly from geomorphic processes could play a vital role in efforts to guide the long‐term environmental sustainability of tropical river systems. Accounting for landscape dynamics in projections of economic returns could help bring palm oil industry goals into closer alignment with environmental conservation efforts.
Plain Language Summary
Tropical meandering rivers and their floodplains provide habitats to many of the planet's critically endangered species, but they are now being threatened by recently intensified rates of deforestation driven by global demands for food and biofuels. We report that preserving tropical forest buffers along the margins of large meandering rivers can both enhance the profitability of floodplain plantations while maintaining conservation benefits by reducing the area of land lost to the river though bank erosion, which may help to bring palm‐oil industry goals into closer alignment with environmental conservation efforts.
Key Points
We estimate the value of the ecosystem service that riparian forest buffers provide by protecting adjacent plantations from riverbank erosion
We find that wide riparian buffers (order tens of meters) may enhance the long‐term viability of floodplain plantations
Accounting for geomorphic contributions to ecosystem services may help align palm oil industry goals with environmental conservation</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2018EF000874</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-9661</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6357-6080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3330-3302</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3067-7138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0243-3662</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2360-4643</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2328-4277 |
ispartof | Earth's future, 2018-08, Vol.6 (8), p.1082-1096 |
issn | 2328-4277 2328-4277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2101153556 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Accounting Agricultural economics Agriculture Agronomy Alignment Aquatic ecosystems Bank erosion Biofuels Borneo Buffers Conservation Corridors coupled human‐landscape systems Deforestation Economic impact Economic models Economics Ecosystem services Endangered species Erosion Erosion rates Floodplains forest conservation Forests Geomorphology Landscape Mathematical models Migration Numerical models Oil and gas industry Palm oil Petroleum industry Plantations Profitability Riparian buffers Riparian environments Riparian forests River banks River channels River ecology River systems Rivers Satellite imagery social‐ecological systems socio‐hydrology Sustainability Tropical forests Viability Wildlife conservation |
title | Can Riparian Forest Buffers Increase Yields From Oil Palm Plantations? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T14%3A57%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Riparian%20Forest%20Buffers%20Increase%20Yields%20From%20Oil%20Palm%20Plantations?&rft.jtitle=Earth's%20future&rft.au=Horton,%20Alexander%20J.&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1082&rft.epage=1096&rft.pages=1082-1096&rft.issn=2328-4277&rft.eissn=2328-4277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018EF000874&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2101153556%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2101153556&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |