Shadow markets and hierarchies: comparing and modeling networks in the Dark Net
This paper analyzes the determinants of network structure, as measured by hierarchy and monopolization, by examining various black market networks. We examine structures of networks on the Internet Dark Net (Virtual) and compare it to network structures of traditional black markets (Ground), using a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of institutional economics 2018-10, Vol.14 (5), p.877-899 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 899 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 877 |
container_title | Journal of institutional economics |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | NORGAARD, JULIA R. WALBERT, HAROLD J. HARDY, R. AUGUST |
description | This paper analyzes the determinants of network structure, as measured by hierarchy and monopolization, by examining various black market networks. We examine structures of networks on the Internet Dark Net (Virtual) and compare it to network structures of traditional black markets (Ground), using agent-based modeling. The purpose of modeling these two different types of illicit markets is to understand the network structure that emerges from the interactions of the agents in each environment. Traditional black markets are relatively hierarchical, with high degree and high betweenness. We compare the density and average length of the shortest path of the simulated Ground black market networks with our simulated Virtual network. We find that hierarchy and monopolization tendencies in networks are products of different transaction costs and information asymmetries. The Internet is an effective way to lower multiple aspects of network structure. We observe that the network structure surrounding the interactions in the Virtual black market is less hierarchical and slightly more monopolistic than the network structure of the Ground market. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1744137417000613 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2101141071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1744137417000613</cupid><sourcerecordid>2101141071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4fdc187855698f9186f9729bcb84a6dbc8b6d1c988bb0dbf299f12dc3ef30fe03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEOeCN3djmhspTquihcI78bNM2cbFTVfw9Ca3ggDjNPmZmtYPQJZBrIMBvZsAZA8oZcEJIAfQIDfpRBlTkxz81Z6foLKUlIaygohig6WyhbNjhWsWVaxNWjcWLykUVTQfpFptQb1Ssmvn3qg7Wrfumce0uxFXCVYPbhcP3nR6_uvYcnXi1Tu7igEP0_vjwNn7OJtOnl_HdJDOMkjZj3hoQXIxGhRRegii85LnURgumCquN0IUFI4XQmljtcyk95NZQ5ynxjtAhutr7bmL42LrUlsuwjU13ssy7QIAB4dCxYM8yMaQUnS83sepe_SyBlH1u5Z_cOg09aFStY2Xn7tf6f9UXf7Zu_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2101141071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shadow markets and hierarchies: comparing and modeling networks in the Dark Net</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>NORGAARD, JULIA R. ; WALBERT, HAROLD J. ; HARDY, R. AUGUST</creator><creatorcontrib>NORGAARD, JULIA R. ; WALBERT, HAROLD J. ; HARDY, R. AUGUST</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyzes the determinants of network structure, as measured by hierarchy and monopolization, by examining various black market networks. We examine structures of networks on the Internet Dark Net (Virtual) and compare it to network structures of traditional black markets (Ground), using agent-based modeling. The purpose of modeling these two different types of illicit markets is to understand the network structure that emerges from the interactions of the agents in each environment. Traditional black markets are relatively hierarchical, with high degree and high betweenness. We compare the density and average length of the shortest path of the simulated Ground black market networks with our simulated Virtual network. We find that hierarchy and monopolization tendencies in networks are products of different transaction costs and information asymmetries. The Internet is an effective way to lower multiple aspects of network structure. We observe that the network structure surrounding the interactions in the Virtual black market is less hierarchical and slightly more monopolistic than the network structure of the Ground market.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-1374</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-1382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1744137417000613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Black markets ; Economic theory ; Hypotheses ; Internet ; Law enforcement ; Organized crime ; Privacy ; Search engines</subject><ispartof>Journal of institutional economics, 2018-10, Vol.14 (5), p.877-899</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4fdc187855698f9186f9729bcb84a6dbc8b6d1c988bb0dbf299f12dc3ef30fe03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4fdc187855698f9186f9729bcb84a6dbc8b6d1c988bb0dbf299f12dc3ef30fe03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137417000613/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,27905,27906,55609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>NORGAARD, JULIA R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALBERT, HAROLD J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARDY, R. AUGUST</creatorcontrib><title>Shadow markets and hierarchies: comparing and modeling networks in the Dark Net</title><title>Journal of institutional economics</title><addtitle>Journal of Institutional Economics</addtitle><description>This paper analyzes the determinants of network structure, as measured by hierarchy and monopolization, by examining various black market networks. We examine structures of networks on the Internet Dark Net (Virtual) and compare it to network structures of traditional black markets (Ground), using agent-based modeling. The purpose of modeling these two different types of illicit markets is to understand the network structure that emerges from the interactions of the agents in each environment. Traditional black markets are relatively hierarchical, with high degree and high betweenness. We compare the density and average length of the shortest path of the simulated Ground black market networks with our simulated Virtual network. We find that hierarchy and monopolization tendencies in networks are products of different transaction costs and information asymmetries. The Internet is an effective way to lower multiple aspects of network structure. We observe that the network structure surrounding the interactions in the Virtual black market is less hierarchical and slightly more monopolistic than the network structure of the Ground market.</description><subject>Black markets</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Organized crime</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><issn>1744-1374</issn><issn>1744-1382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEOeCN3djmhspTquihcI78bNM2cbFTVfw9Ca3ggDjNPmZmtYPQJZBrIMBvZsAZA8oZcEJIAfQIDfpRBlTkxz81Z6foLKUlIaygohig6WyhbNjhWsWVaxNWjcWLykUVTQfpFptQb1Ssmvn3qg7Wrfumce0uxFXCVYPbhcP3nR6_uvYcnXi1Tu7igEP0_vjwNn7OJtOnl_HdJDOMkjZj3hoQXIxGhRRegii85LnURgumCquN0IUFI4XQmljtcyk95NZQ5ynxjtAhutr7bmL42LrUlsuwjU13ssy7QIAB4dCxYM8yMaQUnS83sepe_SyBlH1u5Z_cOg09aFStY2Xn7tf6f9UXf7Zu_w</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>NORGAARD, JULIA R.</creator><creator>WALBERT, HAROLD J.</creator><creator>HARDY, R. AUGUST</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Shadow markets and hierarchies: comparing and modeling networks in the Dark Net</title><author>NORGAARD, JULIA R. ; WALBERT, HAROLD J. ; HARDY, R. AUGUST</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4fdc187855698f9186f9729bcb84a6dbc8b6d1c988bb0dbf299f12dc3ef30fe03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Black markets</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Organized crime</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NORGAARD, JULIA R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALBERT, HAROLD J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARDY, R. AUGUST</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of institutional economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NORGAARD, JULIA R.</au><au>WALBERT, HAROLD J.</au><au>HARDY, R. AUGUST</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shadow markets and hierarchies: comparing and modeling networks in the Dark Net</atitle><jtitle>Journal of institutional economics</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Institutional Economics</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>877</spage><epage>899</epage><pages>877-899</pages><issn>1744-1374</issn><eissn>1744-1382</eissn><abstract>This paper analyzes the determinants of network structure, as measured by hierarchy and monopolization, by examining various black market networks. We examine structures of networks on the Internet Dark Net (Virtual) and compare it to network structures of traditional black markets (Ground), using agent-based modeling. The purpose of modeling these two different types of illicit markets is to understand the network structure that emerges from the interactions of the agents in each environment. Traditional black markets are relatively hierarchical, with high degree and high betweenness. We compare the density and average length of the shortest path of the simulated Ground black market networks with our simulated Virtual network. We find that hierarchy and monopolization tendencies in networks are products of different transaction costs and information asymmetries. The Internet is an effective way to lower multiple aspects of network structure. We observe that the network structure surrounding the interactions in the Virtual black market is less hierarchical and slightly more monopolistic than the network structure of the Ground market.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1744137417000613</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1744-1374 |
ispartof | Journal of institutional economics, 2018-10, Vol.14 (5), p.877-899 |
issn | 1744-1374 1744-1382 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2101141071 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Black markets Economic theory Hypotheses Internet Law enforcement Organized crime Privacy Search engines |
title | Shadow markets and hierarchies: comparing and modeling networks in the Dark Net |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T03%3A29%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shadow%20markets%20and%20hierarchies:%20comparing%20and%20modeling%20networks%20in%20the%20Dark%20Net&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20institutional%20economics&rft.au=NORGAARD,%20JULIA%20R.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=877&rft.epage=899&rft.pages=877-899&rft.issn=1744-1374&rft.eissn=1744-1382&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1744137417000613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2101141071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2101141071&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1744137417000613&rfr_iscdi=true |