Advances in surrogate modeling for storm surge prediction: storm selection and addressing characteristics related to climate change

This paper establishes various advancements for the application of surrogate modeling techniques for storm surge prediction utilizing an existing database of high-fidelity, synthetic storms (tropical cyclones). Kriging, also known as Gaussian process regression, is specifically chosen as the surroga...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2018-12, Vol.94 (3), p.1225-1253
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Jize, Taflanidis, Alexandros A., Nadal-Caraballo, Norberto C., Melby, Jeffrey A., Diop, Fatimata
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1253
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1225
container_title Natural hazards (Dordrecht)
container_volume 94
creator Zhang, Jize
Taflanidis, Alexandros A.
Nadal-Caraballo, Norberto C.
Melby, Jeffrey A.
Diop, Fatimata
description This paper establishes various advancements for the application of surrogate modeling techniques for storm surge prediction utilizing an existing database of high-fidelity, synthetic storms (tropical cyclones). Kriging, also known as Gaussian process regression, is specifically chosen as the surrogate model in this study. Emphasis is first placed on the storm selection for developing the database of synthetic storms. An adaptive, sequential selection is examined here that iteratively identifies the storm (or multiple storms) that is expected to provide the greatest enhancement of the prediction accuracy when that storm is added into the already available database. Appropriate error statistics are discussed for assessing convergence of this iterative selection, and its performance is compared to the joint probability method with optimal sampling, utilizing the required number of synthetic storms to achieve the same level of accuracy as comparison metric. The impact on risk estimation is also examined. The discussion then moves to adjustments of the surrogate modeling framework to support two implementation issues that might become more relevant due to climate change considerations: future storm intensification and sea level rise (SLR). For storm intensification, the use of the surrogate model for prediction extrapolation is examined. Tuning of the surrogate model characteristics using cross-validation techniques and modification of the tuning to prioritize storms with specific characteristics are proposed, whereas an augmentation of the database with new/additional storms is also considered. With respect to SLR, the recently developed database for the US Army Corps of Engineers’ North Atlantic Comprehensive Coastal Study is exploited to demonstrate how surrogate modeling can support predictions that include SLR considerations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11069-018-3470-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2100938935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2100938935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-96bf7572119419157f81ad05c50adac6ffc957fee59ed933dfa7a51e2042f7823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLBDEQhIMouK7-AG8Bz6Pdk3nF27L4AsGLgrcQk846y-xkTWYFz_5xM47iyVOgUlXd_TF2inCOAPVFRIRKZoBNJooaMtxjMyxrkUFTwD6bgcwxAwHPh-woxjUAYpXLGftc2HfdG4q87XncheBXeiC-8Za6tl9x5wOPgw-b8XNFfBvItmZofX_5q1NH3wLXveXa2kAxjlHzqoM2A4U2Dq2JPFCXqi0fPDdduxnHJEu_omN24HQX6eTnnbOn66vH5W12_3Bzt1zcZ0ZgNWSyenF1WeeIskCZjnMNagulKUFbbSrnjEwiUSnJSiGs07UukXIoclc3uZizs6l3G_zbjuKg1n4X-jRS5QmiFI0UZXLh5DLBxxjIqW1I24YPhaBG1mpirRJrNbJWmDL5lInJmy4Kf83_h74A5KiEcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2100938935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advances in surrogate modeling for storm surge prediction: storm selection and addressing characteristics related to climate change</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zhang, Jize ; Taflanidis, Alexandros A. ; Nadal-Caraballo, Norberto C. ; Melby, Jeffrey A. ; Diop, Fatimata</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jize ; Taflanidis, Alexandros A. ; Nadal-Caraballo, Norberto C. ; Melby, Jeffrey A. ; Diop, Fatimata</creatorcontrib><description>This paper establishes various advancements for the application of surrogate modeling techniques for storm surge prediction utilizing an existing database of high-fidelity, synthetic storms (tropical cyclones). Kriging, also known as Gaussian process regression, is specifically chosen as the surrogate model in this study. Emphasis is first placed on the storm selection for developing the database of synthetic storms. An adaptive, sequential selection is examined here that iteratively identifies the storm (or multiple storms) that is expected to provide the greatest enhancement of the prediction accuracy when that storm is added into the already available database. Appropriate error statistics are discussed for assessing convergence of this iterative selection, and its performance is compared to the joint probability method with optimal sampling, utilizing the required number of synthetic storms to achieve the same level of accuracy as comparison metric. The impact on risk estimation is also examined. The discussion then moves to adjustments of the surrogate modeling framework to support two implementation issues that might become more relevant due to climate change considerations: future storm intensification and sea level rise (SLR). For storm intensification, the use of the surrogate model for prediction extrapolation is examined. Tuning of the surrogate model characteristics using cross-validation techniques and modification of the tuning to prioritize storms with specific characteristics are proposed, whereas an augmentation of the database with new/additional storms is also considered. With respect to SLR, the recently developed database for the US Army Corps of Engineers’ North Atlantic Comprehensive Coastal Study is exploited to demonstrate how surrogate modeling can support predictions that include SLR considerations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-018-3470-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Amplification ; Civil Engineering ; Climate change ; Coastal engineering ; Cyclones ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Management ; Exploitation ; Frameworks ; Gaussian process ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Hurricanes ; Hydrogeology ; Iterative methods ; Kriging interpolation ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Natural Hazards ; Original Paper ; Probability theory ; Sea level ; Sea level rise ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Storm forecasting ; Storm surge prediction ; Storm surges ; Storms ; Tidal waves ; Tropical climate ; Tropical cyclones ; Tuning</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2018-12, Vol.94 (3), p.1225-1253</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>Natural Hazards is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-96bf7572119419157f81ad05c50adac6ffc957fee59ed933dfa7a51e2042f7823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-96bf7572119419157f81ad05c50adac6ffc957fee59ed933dfa7a51e2042f7823</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9784-7480</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11069-018-3470-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-018-3470-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jize</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taflanidis, Alexandros A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadal-Caraballo, Norberto C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melby, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diop, Fatimata</creatorcontrib><title>Advances in surrogate modeling for storm surge prediction: storm selection and addressing characteristics related to climate change</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>This paper establishes various advancements for the application of surrogate modeling techniques for storm surge prediction utilizing an existing database of high-fidelity, synthetic storms (tropical cyclones). Kriging, also known as Gaussian process regression, is specifically chosen as the surrogate model in this study. Emphasis is first placed on the storm selection for developing the database of synthetic storms. An adaptive, sequential selection is examined here that iteratively identifies the storm (or multiple storms) that is expected to provide the greatest enhancement of the prediction accuracy when that storm is added into the already available database. Appropriate error statistics are discussed for assessing convergence of this iterative selection, and its performance is compared to the joint probability method with optimal sampling, utilizing the required number of synthetic storms to achieve the same level of accuracy as comparison metric. The impact on risk estimation is also examined. The discussion then moves to adjustments of the surrogate modeling framework to support two implementation issues that might become more relevant due to climate change considerations: future storm intensification and sea level rise (SLR). For storm intensification, the use of the surrogate model for prediction extrapolation is examined. Tuning of the surrogate model characteristics using cross-validation techniques and modification of the tuning to prioritize storms with specific characteristics are proposed, whereas an augmentation of the database with new/additional storms is also considered. With respect to SLR, the recently developed database for the US Army Corps of Engineers’ North Atlantic Comprehensive Coastal Study is exploited to demonstrate how surrogate modeling can support predictions that include SLR considerations.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Amplification</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coastal engineering</subject><subject>Cyclones</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Iterative methods</subject><subject>Kriging interpolation</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>Sea level rise</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Storm forecasting</subject><subject>Storm surge prediction</subject><subject>Storm surges</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Tidal waves</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Tropical cyclones</subject><subject>Tuning</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLBDEQhIMouK7-AG8Bz6Pdk3nF27L4AsGLgrcQk846y-xkTWYFz_5xM47iyVOgUlXd_TF2inCOAPVFRIRKZoBNJooaMtxjMyxrkUFTwD6bgcwxAwHPh-woxjUAYpXLGftc2HfdG4q87XncheBXeiC-8Za6tl9x5wOPgw-b8XNFfBvItmZofX_5q1NH3wLXveXa2kAxjlHzqoM2A4U2Dq2JPFCXqi0fPDdduxnHJEu_omN24HQX6eTnnbOn66vH5W12_3Bzt1zcZ0ZgNWSyenF1WeeIskCZjnMNagulKUFbbSrnjEwiUSnJSiGs07UukXIoclc3uZizs6l3G_zbjuKg1n4X-jRS5QmiFI0UZXLh5DLBxxjIqW1I24YPhaBG1mpirRJrNbJWmDL5lInJmy4Kf83_h74A5KiEcQ</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Zhang, Jize</creator><creator>Taflanidis, Alexandros A.</creator><creator>Nadal-Caraballo, Norberto C.</creator><creator>Melby, Jeffrey A.</creator><creator>Diop, Fatimata</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9784-7480</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Advances in surrogate modeling for storm surge prediction: storm selection and addressing characteristics related to climate change</title><author>Zhang, Jize ; Taflanidis, Alexandros A. ; Nadal-Caraballo, Norberto C. ; Melby, Jeffrey A. ; Diop, Fatimata</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-96bf7572119419157f81ad05c50adac6ffc957fee59ed933dfa7a51e2042f7823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Amplification</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coastal engineering</topic><topic>Cyclones</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Iterative methods</topic><topic>Kriging interpolation</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>Sea level rise</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Storm forecasting</topic><topic>Storm surge prediction</topic><topic>Storm surges</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Tidal waves</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Tropical cyclones</topic><topic>Tuning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jize</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taflanidis, Alexandros A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadal-Caraballo, Norberto C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melby, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diop, Fatimata</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Jize</au><au>Taflanidis, Alexandros A.</au><au>Nadal-Caraballo, Norberto C.</au><au>Melby, Jeffrey A.</au><au>Diop, Fatimata</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advances in surrogate modeling for storm surge prediction: storm selection and addressing characteristics related to climate change</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1225</spage><epage>1253</epage><pages>1225-1253</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>This paper establishes various advancements for the application of surrogate modeling techniques for storm surge prediction utilizing an existing database of high-fidelity, synthetic storms (tropical cyclones). Kriging, also known as Gaussian process regression, is specifically chosen as the surrogate model in this study. Emphasis is first placed on the storm selection for developing the database of synthetic storms. An adaptive, sequential selection is examined here that iteratively identifies the storm (or multiple storms) that is expected to provide the greatest enhancement of the prediction accuracy when that storm is added into the already available database. Appropriate error statistics are discussed for assessing convergence of this iterative selection, and its performance is compared to the joint probability method with optimal sampling, utilizing the required number of synthetic storms to achieve the same level of accuracy as comparison metric. The impact on risk estimation is also examined. The discussion then moves to adjustments of the surrogate modeling framework to support two implementation issues that might become more relevant due to climate change considerations: future storm intensification and sea level rise (SLR). For storm intensification, the use of the surrogate model for prediction extrapolation is examined. Tuning of the surrogate model characteristics using cross-validation techniques and modification of the tuning to prioritize storms with specific characteristics are proposed, whereas an augmentation of the database with new/additional storms is also considered. With respect to SLR, the recently developed database for the US Army Corps of Engineers’ North Atlantic Comprehensive Coastal Study is exploited to demonstrate how surrogate modeling can support predictions that include SLR considerations.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-018-3470-1</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9784-7480</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-030X
ispartof Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2018-12, Vol.94 (3), p.1225-1253
issn 0921-030X
1573-0840
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2100938935
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Accuracy
Amplification
Civil Engineering
Climate change
Coastal engineering
Cyclones
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environmental Management
Exploitation
Frameworks
Gaussian process
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hurricanes
Hydrogeology
Iterative methods
Kriging interpolation
Mathematical models
Modelling
Natural Hazards
Original Paper
Probability theory
Sea level
Sea level rise
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Storm forecasting
Storm surge prediction
Storm surges
Storms
Tidal waves
Tropical climate
Tropical cyclones
Tuning
title Advances in surrogate modeling for storm surge prediction: storm selection and addressing characteristics related to climate change
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T01%3A31%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advances%20in%20surrogate%20modeling%20for%20storm%20surge%20prediction:%20storm%20selection%20and%20addressing%20characteristics%20related%20to%20climate%20change&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Jize&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1225&rft.epage=1253&rft.pages=1225-1253&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-018-3470-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2100938935%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2100938935&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true