What is the Optimal FIT of Sedentary Interruption Bouts to Improve Cardiometabolic Health?
Keeling SM, Buchanan CA, Dalleck LC. What is the Optimal FIT of Sedentary Interruption Bouts to Improve Cardiometabolic Health? JEPonline 2018;21(2):1-18. The purpose of this study was to quantify differences in markers of cardiometabolic health with different frequency, intensity, and time (FIT) pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of exercise physiology online 2018-04, Vol.21 (2), p.1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of exercise physiology online |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Keeling, Shawn M Buchanan, Christina A Dalleck, Lance C |
description | Keeling SM, Buchanan CA, Dalleck LC. What is the Optimal FIT of Sedentary Interruption Bouts to Improve Cardiometabolic Health? JEPonline 2018;21(2):1-18. The purpose of this study was to quantify differences in markers of cardiometabolic health with different frequency, intensity, and time (FIT) parameters to reduce sedentary behavior. The subjects consisted of 7 men and 6 women (with a mean age [+ or -] SD of 74.2 [+ or -] 7.8 yrs >6 hrs of sedentary behavior per day) who performed 4 treatments of sedentary interruption bouts (SIB) lasting one week each. The FIT of the SIB differed across each program. There were 1-wk long washout/control periods between each of the SIB treatments. Cardiometabolic risk factors were measured weekly. The subjects performed a consistent exercise training program throughout the intervention to permit examination of the independent effect of reducing sedentary behavior through different SIB programs on cardiometabolic health. SIB1 (every 60 min, 2 METs, 5 min) elicited a significant increase (P60 min), a longer duration of interruption bout activities (i.e., 10 min) is more likely to be favorable to cardiometabolic health. Key Words: Metabolic Syndrome, Risk Factor, Sitting Time |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2099976649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A535825171</galeid><sourcerecordid>A535825171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1269-b51520b6647c68fe7664aada5f93e9344b5d30b087c9ae725413bb12084405653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkN9LwzAQx4soOKf_Q0DwrZKkSdM8yRzOFQZ7cCL4UpL2uma0zWxSwf_eTAUnyD3ccfe57_04iSYESxFLwcnpUXweXTi3w5hilolJ9PrSKI-MQ74BtN5706kWLfINsjV6ggp6r4YPlPcehmEMZdujezv6wFuUd_vBvgOaq6EytgOvtG1NiZagWt_cXUZntWodXP34afS8eNjMl_Fq_ZjPZ6t4S2gqY80Jp1inKRNlmtUgQqRUpXgtE5AJY5pXCdY4E6VUIChnJNGaUJwxhnnKk2l0_a0btnkbwfliZ8ehDyMLiqWUB0H5S21VC4Xpa-sHVXbGlcWMJzyjnAgSqNt_qGAVdKa0PdQm5P803Bw1NF-XO9uOh0-5Y_ATJ2B2Hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2099976649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is the Optimal FIT of Sedentary Interruption Bouts to Improve Cardiometabolic Health?</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Keeling, Shawn M ; Buchanan, Christina A ; Dalleck, Lance C</creator><creatorcontrib>Keeling, Shawn M ; Buchanan, Christina A ; Dalleck, Lance C</creatorcontrib><description>Keeling SM, Buchanan CA, Dalleck LC. What is the Optimal FIT of Sedentary Interruption Bouts to Improve Cardiometabolic Health? JEPonline 2018;21(2):1-18. The purpose of this study was to quantify differences in markers of cardiometabolic health with different frequency, intensity, and time (FIT) parameters to reduce sedentary behavior. The subjects consisted of 7 men and 6 women (with a mean age [+ or -] SD of 74.2 [+ or -] 7.8 yrs >6 hrs of sedentary behavior per day) who performed 4 treatments of sedentary interruption bouts (SIB) lasting one week each. The FIT of the SIB differed across each program. There were 1-wk long washout/control periods between each of the SIB treatments. Cardiometabolic risk factors were measured weekly. The subjects performed a consistent exercise training program throughout the intervention to permit examination of the independent effect of reducing sedentary behavior through different SIB programs on cardiometabolic health. SIB1 (every 60 min, 2 METs, 5 min) elicited a significant increase (P<0.05) in plasma HDL by 21.2%, decrease in plasma triglyceride by 24.6%, and decrease in blood glucose by 6.1%, compared to the control. SIB4 (every 120 min, 2 METs, 10 min) resulted in a significant increase (P<0.05) in plasma HDL by 18.4%, decrease in plasma triglyceride by 23.0%, and a decrease in blood glucose by 7.8%, compared to the control. Lastly, SIB2 (every 120 min, 2 METs, 5 min) and SIB3 (every 120 min, 3 METs, 5 min) elicited no significant (P>0.05) cardiometabolic changes when compared to the control. More frequent bouts of SIB (every 60 min) is most beneficial to cardiometabolic health. If the SIB is less frequent (such as >60 min), a longer duration of interruption bout activities (i.e., 10 min) is more likely to be favorable to cardiometabolic health. Key Words: Metabolic Syndrome, Risk Factor, Sitting Time</description><identifier>ISSN: 1097-9751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-9751</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Duluth: American Society of Exercise Physiologists</publisher><subject>Circulatory system ; Exercise ; Health aspects ; Metabolism ; Methods ; Plasma ; Sedentary behavior</subject><ispartof>Journal of exercise physiology online, 2018-04, Vol.21 (2), p.1</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 American Society of Exercise Physiologists</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Exercise Physiologists Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keeling, Shawn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Christina A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalleck, Lance C</creatorcontrib><title>What is the Optimal FIT of Sedentary Interruption Bouts to Improve Cardiometabolic Health?</title><title>Journal of exercise physiology online</title><description>Keeling SM, Buchanan CA, Dalleck LC. What is the Optimal FIT of Sedentary Interruption Bouts to Improve Cardiometabolic Health? JEPonline 2018;21(2):1-18. The purpose of this study was to quantify differences in markers of cardiometabolic health with different frequency, intensity, and time (FIT) parameters to reduce sedentary behavior. The subjects consisted of 7 men and 6 women (with a mean age [+ or -] SD of 74.2 [+ or -] 7.8 yrs >6 hrs of sedentary behavior per day) who performed 4 treatments of sedentary interruption bouts (SIB) lasting one week each. The FIT of the SIB differed across each program. There were 1-wk long washout/control periods between each of the SIB treatments. Cardiometabolic risk factors were measured weekly. The subjects performed a consistent exercise training program throughout the intervention to permit examination of the independent effect of reducing sedentary behavior through different SIB programs on cardiometabolic health. SIB1 (every 60 min, 2 METs, 5 min) elicited a significant increase (P<0.05) in plasma HDL by 21.2%, decrease in plasma triglyceride by 24.6%, and decrease in blood glucose by 6.1%, compared to the control. SIB4 (every 120 min, 2 METs, 10 min) resulted in a significant increase (P<0.05) in plasma HDL by 18.4%, decrease in plasma triglyceride by 23.0%, and a decrease in blood glucose by 7.8%, compared to the control. Lastly, SIB2 (every 120 min, 2 METs, 5 min) and SIB3 (every 120 min, 3 METs, 5 min) elicited no significant (P>0.05) cardiometabolic changes when compared to the control. More frequent bouts of SIB (every 60 min) is most beneficial to cardiometabolic health. If the SIB is less frequent (such as >60 min), a longer duration of interruption bout activities (i.e., 10 min) is more likely to be favorable to cardiometabolic health. Key Words: Metabolic Syndrome, Risk Factor, Sitting Time</description><subject>Circulatory system</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Sedentary behavior</subject><issn>1097-9751</issn><issn>1097-9751</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkN9LwzAQx4soOKf_Q0DwrZKkSdM8yRzOFQZ7cCL4UpL2uma0zWxSwf_eTAUnyD3ccfe57_04iSYESxFLwcnpUXweXTi3w5hilolJ9PrSKI-MQ74BtN5706kWLfINsjV6ggp6r4YPlPcehmEMZdujezv6wFuUd_vBvgOaq6EytgOvtG1NiZagWt_cXUZntWodXP34afS8eNjMl_Fq_ZjPZ6t4S2gqY80Jp1inKRNlmtUgQqRUpXgtE5AJY5pXCdY4E6VUIChnJNGaUJwxhnnKk2l0_a0btnkbwfliZ8ehDyMLiqWUB0H5S21VC4Xpa-sHVXbGlcWMJzyjnAgSqNt_qGAVdKa0PdQm5P803Bw1NF-XO9uOh0-5Y_ATJ2B2Hg</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Keeling, Shawn M</creator><creator>Buchanan, Christina A</creator><creator>Dalleck, Lance C</creator><general>American Society of Exercise Physiologists</general><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>What is the Optimal FIT of Sedentary Interruption Bouts to Improve Cardiometabolic Health?</title><author>Keeling, Shawn M ; Buchanan, Christina A ; Dalleck, Lance C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1269-b51520b6647c68fe7664aada5f93e9344b5d30b087c9ae725413bb12084405653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Circulatory system</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Sedentary behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keeling, Shawn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Christina A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalleck, Lance C</creatorcontrib><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of exercise physiology online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keeling, Shawn M</au><au>Buchanan, Christina A</au><au>Dalleck, Lance C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is the Optimal FIT of Sedentary Interruption Bouts to Improve Cardiometabolic Health?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of exercise physiology online</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>1097-9751</issn><eissn>1097-9751</eissn><abstract>Keeling SM, Buchanan CA, Dalleck LC. What is the Optimal FIT of Sedentary Interruption Bouts to Improve Cardiometabolic Health? JEPonline 2018;21(2):1-18. The purpose of this study was to quantify differences in markers of cardiometabolic health with different frequency, intensity, and time (FIT) parameters to reduce sedentary behavior. The subjects consisted of 7 men and 6 women (with a mean age [+ or -] SD of 74.2 [+ or -] 7.8 yrs >6 hrs of sedentary behavior per day) who performed 4 treatments of sedentary interruption bouts (SIB) lasting one week each. The FIT of the SIB differed across each program. There were 1-wk long washout/control periods between each of the SIB treatments. Cardiometabolic risk factors were measured weekly. The subjects performed a consistent exercise training program throughout the intervention to permit examination of the independent effect of reducing sedentary behavior through different SIB programs on cardiometabolic health. SIB1 (every 60 min, 2 METs, 5 min) elicited a significant increase (P<0.05) in plasma HDL by 21.2%, decrease in plasma triglyceride by 24.6%, and decrease in blood glucose by 6.1%, compared to the control. SIB4 (every 120 min, 2 METs, 10 min) resulted in a significant increase (P<0.05) in plasma HDL by 18.4%, decrease in plasma triglyceride by 23.0%, and a decrease in blood glucose by 7.8%, compared to the control. Lastly, SIB2 (every 120 min, 2 METs, 5 min) and SIB3 (every 120 min, 3 METs, 5 min) elicited no significant (P>0.05) cardiometabolic changes when compared to the control. More frequent bouts of SIB (every 60 min) is most beneficial to cardiometabolic health. If the SIB is less frequent (such as >60 min), a longer duration of interruption bout activities (i.e., 10 min) is more likely to be favorable to cardiometabolic health. Key Words: Metabolic Syndrome, Risk Factor, Sitting Time</abstract><cop>Duluth</cop><pub>American Society of Exercise Physiologists</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1097-9751 |
ispartof | Journal of exercise physiology online, 2018-04, Vol.21 (2), p.1 |
issn | 1097-9751 1097-9751 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2099976649 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Circulatory system Exercise Health aspects Metabolism Methods Plasma Sedentary behavior |
title | What is the Optimal FIT of Sedentary Interruption Bouts to Improve Cardiometabolic Health? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A38%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20the%20Optimal%20FIT%20of%20Sedentary%20Interruption%20Bouts%20to%20Improve%20Cardiometabolic%20Health?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20exercise%20physiology%20online&rft.au=Keeling,%20Shawn%20M&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=1097-9751&rft.eissn=1097-9751&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA535825171%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2099976649&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A535825171&rfr_iscdi=true |