Dietary Laws in Medieval Christian-Jewish Polemics: A Survey 1
"7 Christians, however, received the moral instruction but repudiated the dietary restriction upon pork, often eliciting criticism from Jewish polemicists.8 Other Christian writers exploited the figurative sense of the dietary prohibitions. [...]in a common medieval trope, Bruno of Segni (d. 11...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in Christian-Jewish relations 2011-01, Vol.6 (1), p.1-15 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 15 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Studies in Christian-Jewish relations |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Resnick, Irven |
description | "7 Christians, however, received the moral instruction but repudiated the dietary restriction upon pork, often eliciting criticism from Jewish polemicists.8 Other Christian writers exploited the figurative sense of the dietary prohibitions. [...]in a common medieval trope, Bruno of Segni (d. 1123) suggests that Christians are themselves the kosher, ruminant animals identified in the Bible because they-and not the Jews-twice "digest" the text of Scripture, locating in it the spiritual and not merely the literal sense.9 This allowed Christians to identify themselves with the clean animals, while at the same time compare Jews generally to unclean animals, and especially to pigs, as obstacles to holiness.10 Such animal images were useful instruments to illustrate the Jews' intellectual and moral shortcomings. John Carpenter's 1419 compilation of London town ordinances includes an entry "Of Jews, Lepers and Swine that are to be removed from the City." Since there had been no Jews in England for more than a century, Carpenter's compilation likely served to reinforce existing notions that associated Jews and swine (and lepers) as sources of filth or impurity.14 Finally, a late fifteenth-century engraving of the ritual murder of Simon of Trent depicts Jews whose garments display the Jews' badge or rota;15 inside the badge is a picture of a pig, likely evoking a link between Jews and the homicidal and infanticidal behavior attributed to pigs.16 The question remained, however: for what purpose were the dietary laws given to the Jews? According to Abravanel, the Jews form a category above the rest of humanity, and that is why they observe a special diet. Tomás rebuffs this explanation, but treats the dietary laws as necessary for Jews because of their natural imperfection, and unnecessary for Christians because of their natural superiority. [...]he alleges, although typically pork increases sexual desire, "Christians because of their humours and perfection change everything to accord with their humours, just as honey changes the bitterness of the orange's peel into sweetness. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2099846059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2099846059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20998460593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tDQ20DU2NzfnYOAqLs4yMDAxNjcz42Swc8lMLUksqlTwSSwvVsjMU_BNTclMLUvMUXDOKMosLslMzNP1Si3PLM5QCMjPSc3NTC62UnBUCC4tKkutVDDkYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMym6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4IwNLSwsTMwNTS2PiVAEA2vY2uQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2099846059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dietary Laws in Medieval Christian-Jewish Polemics: A Survey 1</title><source>Open Access Journals at Boston College</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Resnick, Irven</creator><creatorcontrib>Resnick, Irven</creatorcontrib><description>"7 Christians, however, received the moral instruction but repudiated the dietary restriction upon pork, often eliciting criticism from Jewish polemicists.8 Other Christian writers exploited the figurative sense of the dietary prohibitions. [...]in a common medieval trope, Bruno of Segni (d. 1123) suggests that Christians are themselves the kosher, ruminant animals identified in the Bible because they-and not the Jews-twice "digest" the text of Scripture, locating in it the spiritual and not merely the literal sense.9 This allowed Christians to identify themselves with the clean animals, while at the same time compare Jews generally to unclean animals, and especially to pigs, as obstacles to holiness.10 Such animal images were useful instruments to illustrate the Jews' intellectual and moral shortcomings. John Carpenter's 1419 compilation of London town ordinances includes an entry "Of Jews, Lepers and Swine that are to be removed from the City." Since there had been no Jews in England for more than a century, Carpenter's compilation likely served to reinforce existing notions that associated Jews and swine (and lepers) as sources of filth or impurity.14 Finally, a late fifteenth-century engraving of the ritual murder of Simon of Trent depicts Jews whose garments display the Jews' badge or rota;15 inside the badge is a picture of a pig, likely evoking a link between Jews and the homicidal and infanticidal behavior attributed to pigs.16 The question remained, however: for what purpose were the dietary laws given to the Jews? According to Abravanel, the Jews form a category above the rest of humanity, and that is why they observe a special diet. Tomás rebuffs this explanation, but treats the dietary laws as necessary for Jews because of their natural imperfection, and unnecessary for Christians because of their natural superiority. [...]he alleges, although typically pork increases sexual desire, "Christians because of their humours and perfection change everything to accord with their humours, just as honey changes the bitterness of the orange's peel into sweetness.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1930-3777</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chestnut Hill: Center for Christian-Jewish Learning at Boston College Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations</publisher><subject>Abelard, Peter (1079-1142) ; Albertus Magnus, Saint (Albert Graf von Bollstadt) (1200?-80) ; Animals ; Bible ; Christian Jewish relations ; Christianity ; Circumcision ; Diet ; Jewish life & ethics ; Jewish people ; Kosher food ; Literary devices ; Maimonides (Moses ben Maimon) (1135-1204) ; Middle Ages ; Morality ; Murders & murder attempts ; Religious history ; Restrictions ; Rhetoric ; Spirituality</subject><ispartof>Studies in Christian-Jewish relations, 2011-01, Vol.6 (1), p.1-15</ispartof><rights>2011. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Resnick, Irven</creatorcontrib><title>Dietary Laws in Medieval Christian-Jewish Polemics: A Survey 1</title><title>Studies in Christian-Jewish relations</title><description>"7 Christians, however, received the moral instruction but repudiated the dietary restriction upon pork, often eliciting criticism from Jewish polemicists.8 Other Christian writers exploited the figurative sense of the dietary prohibitions. [...]in a common medieval trope, Bruno of Segni (d. 1123) suggests that Christians are themselves the kosher, ruminant animals identified in the Bible because they-and not the Jews-twice "digest" the text of Scripture, locating in it the spiritual and not merely the literal sense.9 This allowed Christians to identify themselves with the clean animals, while at the same time compare Jews generally to unclean animals, and especially to pigs, as obstacles to holiness.10 Such animal images were useful instruments to illustrate the Jews' intellectual and moral shortcomings. John Carpenter's 1419 compilation of London town ordinances includes an entry "Of Jews, Lepers and Swine that are to be removed from the City." Since there had been no Jews in England for more than a century, Carpenter's compilation likely served to reinforce existing notions that associated Jews and swine (and lepers) as sources of filth or impurity.14 Finally, a late fifteenth-century engraving of the ritual murder of Simon of Trent depicts Jews whose garments display the Jews' badge or rota;15 inside the badge is a picture of a pig, likely evoking a link between Jews and the homicidal and infanticidal behavior attributed to pigs.16 The question remained, however: for what purpose were the dietary laws given to the Jews? According to Abravanel, the Jews form a category above the rest of humanity, and that is why they observe a special diet. Tomás rebuffs this explanation, but treats the dietary laws as necessary for Jews because of their natural imperfection, and unnecessary for Christians because of their natural superiority. [...]he alleges, although typically pork increases sexual desire, "Christians because of their humours and perfection change everything to accord with their humours, just as honey changes the bitterness of the orange's peel into sweetness.</description><subject>Abelard, Peter (1079-1142)</subject><subject>Albertus Magnus, Saint (Albert Graf von Bollstadt) (1200?-80)</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bible</subject><subject>Christian Jewish relations</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Circumcision</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Jewish life & ethics</subject><subject>Jewish people</subject><subject>Kosher food</subject><subject>Literary devices</subject><subject>Maimonides (Moses ben Maimon) (1135-1204)</subject><subject>Middle Ages</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Murders & murder attempts</subject><subject>Religious history</subject><subject>Restrictions</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><issn>1930-3777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>LD.</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0tDQ20DU2NzfnYOAqLs4yMDAxNjcz42Swc8lMLUksqlTwSSwvVsjMU_BNTclMLUvMUXDOKMosLslMzNP1Si3PLM5QCMjPSc3NTC62UnBUCC4tKkutVDDkYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMym6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4IwNLSwsTMwNTS2PiVAEA2vY2uQ</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Resnick, Irven</creator><general>Center for Christian-Jewish Learning at Boston College Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Dietary Laws in Medieval Christian-Jewish Polemics: A Survey 1</title><author>Resnick, Irven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20998460593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Abelard, Peter (1079-1142)</topic><topic>Albertus Magnus, Saint (Albert Graf von Bollstadt) (1200?-80)</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bible</topic><topic>Christian Jewish relations</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Circumcision</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Jewish life & ethics</topic><topic>Jewish people</topic><topic>Kosher food</topic><topic>Literary devices</topic><topic>Maimonides (Moses ben Maimon) (1135-1204)</topic><topic>Middle Ages</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Murders & murder attempts</topic><topic>Religious history</topic><topic>Restrictions</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Resnick, Irven</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><jtitle>Studies in Christian-Jewish relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Resnick, Irven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dietary Laws in Medieval Christian-Jewish Polemics: A Survey 1</atitle><jtitle>Studies in Christian-Jewish relations</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><eissn>1930-3777</eissn><abstract>"7 Christians, however, received the moral instruction but repudiated the dietary restriction upon pork, often eliciting criticism from Jewish polemicists.8 Other Christian writers exploited the figurative sense of the dietary prohibitions. [...]in a common medieval trope, Bruno of Segni (d. 1123) suggests that Christians are themselves the kosher, ruminant animals identified in the Bible because they-and not the Jews-twice "digest" the text of Scripture, locating in it the spiritual and not merely the literal sense.9 This allowed Christians to identify themselves with the clean animals, while at the same time compare Jews generally to unclean animals, and especially to pigs, as obstacles to holiness.10 Such animal images were useful instruments to illustrate the Jews' intellectual and moral shortcomings. John Carpenter's 1419 compilation of London town ordinances includes an entry "Of Jews, Lepers and Swine that are to be removed from the City." Since there had been no Jews in England for more than a century, Carpenter's compilation likely served to reinforce existing notions that associated Jews and swine (and lepers) as sources of filth or impurity.14 Finally, a late fifteenth-century engraving of the ritual murder of Simon of Trent depicts Jews whose garments display the Jews' badge or rota;15 inside the badge is a picture of a pig, likely evoking a link between Jews and the homicidal and infanticidal behavior attributed to pigs.16 The question remained, however: for what purpose were the dietary laws given to the Jews? According to Abravanel, the Jews form a category above the rest of humanity, and that is why they observe a special diet. Tomás rebuffs this explanation, but treats the dietary laws as necessary for Jews because of their natural imperfection, and unnecessary for Christians because of their natural superiority. [...]he alleges, although typically pork increases sexual desire, "Christians because of their humours and perfection change everything to accord with their humours, just as honey changes the bitterness of the orange's peel into sweetness.</abstract><cop>Chestnut Hill</cop><pub>Center for Christian-Jewish Learning at Boston College Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1930-3777 |
ispartof | Studies in Christian-Jewish relations, 2011-01, Vol.6 (1), p.1-15 |
issn | 1930-3777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2099846059 |
source | Open Access Journals at Boston College; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Abelard, Peter (1079-1142) Albertus Magnus, Saint (Albert Graf von Bollstadt) (1200?-80) Animals Bible Christian Jewish relations Christianity Circumcision Diet Jewish life & ethics Jewish people Kosher food Literary devices Maimonides (Moses ben Maimon) (1135-1204) Middle Ages Morality Murders & murder attempts Religious history Restrictions Rhetoric Spirituality |
title | Dietary Laws in Medieval Christian-Jewish Polemics: A Survey 1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A11%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dietary%20Laws%20in%20Medieval%20Christian-Jewish%20Polemics:%20A%20Survey%201&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20Christian-Jewish%20relations&rft.au=Resnick,%20Irven&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.eissn=1930-3777&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2099846059%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2099846059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |