Comparative analysis of foraging behavior and bite mechanics reveals complex functional diversity among Caribbean parrotfishes

Parrotfishes are a diverse group of herbivores that can influence benthic community dynamics and ecosystem function on coral reefs. Different species and size classes of parrotfishes vary in their feeding ecology and can impact reef ecosystems in distinct ways. We documented differences in the feedi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2018-06, Vol.597, p.207-220
Hauptverfasser: Adam, Thomas C., Duran, Alain, Fuchs, Corinne E., Roycroft, Madelyn V., Rojas, Maria C., Ruttenberg, Benjamin I., Burkepile, Deron E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 220
container_issue
container_start_page 207
container_title Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)
container_volume 597
creator Adam, Thomas C.
Duran, Alain
Fuchs, Corinne E.
Roycroft, Madelyn V.
Rojas, Maria C.
Ruttenberg, Benjamin I.
Burkepile, Deron E.
description Parrotfishes are a diverse group of herbivores that can influence benthic community dynamics and ecosystem function on coral reefs. Different species and size classes of parrotfishes vary in their feeding ecology and can impact reef ecosystems in distinct ways. We documented differences in the feeding ecology of 9 species of parrotfishes in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS). Many of the key differences can be summarized by assigning species to functional groups (e.g. scrapers, excavators, croppers, macroalgae browsers), which are differentially responsible for carrying out specific ecological processes. For example, we found that Sparisoma viride, Scarus coelestinus, Sc. guacamaia, Sc. taeniopterus, and Sc. vetula feed on short turfs with few sediments, while Sp. aurofrenatum, Sp. chrysopterum, and Sp. rubripinne feed on longer sediment-laden turfs in addition to macroalgae. Further, parrotfishes use distinct bite types that indicate contrasting impacts on the benthos. Species that feed on short turfs scrape and excavate epilithic and endolithic algae, while species that feed on longer turfs and macroalgae tend to tear or crop algae from the reef. These distinct feeding behaviors result in different rates of algae removal, carbonate erosion, and sediment production. Recognizing that different species of parrotfishes interact with the benthos in fundamentally different ways will enable scientists and managers to better predict how changes in the structure of parrotfish assemblages may affect benthic communities and ecosystem processes.
doi_str_mv 10.3354/meps12600
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2099461961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26503070</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26503070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-77670a6785ef149393c3bc0197d25962da174bba322c31266e2cfbc4274962ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsHf4AQ8ORhNR-7SXOUxS8oeNHzMskmbUp3U5O02Iu_3Uilpzm8D8_MvAhdU3LPeVM_DHaTKBOEnKAJFVRUtFHqFE0IlbSaCU7O0UVKK0KoqKWYoJ82DBuIkP3OYhhhvU8-4eCwCxEWflxgbZew8yGWtMfaZ4sHa5YwepNwtDsL64RNkaztN3bb0WQfigb3RRiTz3sMQyiaFqLX2sKIy7oYsvNpadMlOnNFYK_-5xR9Pj99tK_V_P3lrX2cV4ZJlSsphSQg5KyxjtaKK264NoQq2bNGCdYDlbXWwBkzvLwvLDNOm5rJuqSg-RTdHrybGL62NuVuFbax3Jk6RpSqBVWCFuruQJkYUorWdZvoB4j7jpLur97uWG9hbw7sKuUQjyATDeFEEv4Lz355bw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2099461961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis of foraging behavior and bite mechanics reveals complex functional diversity among Caribbean parrotfishes</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Inter-Research</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Adam, Thomas C. ; Duran, Alain ; Fuchs, Corinne E. ; Roycroft, Madelyn V. ; Rojas, Maria C. ; Ruttenberg, Benjamin I. ; Burkepile, Deron E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adam, Thomas C. ; Duran, Alain ; Fuchs, Corinne E. ; Roycroft, Madelyn V. ; Rojas, Maria C. ; Ruttenberg, Benjamin I. ; Burkepile, Deron E.</creatorcontrib><description>Parrotfishes are a diverse group of herbivores that can influence benthic community dynamics and ecosystem function on coral reefs. Different species and size classes of parrotfishes vary in their feeding ecology and can impact reef ecosystems in distinct ways. We documented differences in the feeding ecology of 9 species of parrotfishes in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS). Many of the key differences can be summarized by assigning species to functional groups (e.g. scrapers, excavators, croppers, macroalgae browsers), which are differentially responsible for carrying out specific ecological processes. For example, we found that Sparisoma viride, Scarus coelestinus, Sc. guacamaia, Sc. taeniopterus, and Sc. vetula feed on short turfs with few sediments, while Sp. aurofrenatum, Sp. chrysopterum, and Sp. rubripinne feed on longer sediment-laden turfs in addition to macroalgae. Further, parrotfishes use distinct bite types that indicate contrasting impacts on the benthos. Species that feed on short turfs scrape and excavate epilithic and endolithic algae, while species that feed on longer turfs and macroalgae tend to tear or crop algae from the reef. These distinct feeding behaviors result in different rates of algae removal, carbonate erosion, and sediment production. Recognizing that different species of parrotfishes interact with the benthos in fundamentally different ways will enable scientists and managers to better predict how changes in the structure of parrotfish assemblages may affect benthic communities and ecosystem processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps12600</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oldendorf: Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Algae ; Benthic communities ; Benthos ; Carbonates ; Comparative analysis ; Coral reefs ; Corals ; Dynamics ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Endolithic algae ; Environmental changes ; Environmental impact ; Erosion ; Excavators ; Feeding ; Feeds ; Foraging ; Foraging behavior ; Functional groups ; Herbivores ; Keys (islands) ; Labroidei ; Marine invertebrates ; Mechanics ; Nature conservation ; Removal ; Sanctuaries ; Scrapers ; Seaweeds ; Sediment ; Sediments ; Species</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2018-06, Vol.597, p.207-220</ispartof><rights>Inter-Research 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Inter-Research Science Center 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-77670a6785ef149393c3bc0197d25962da174bba322c31266e2cfbc4274962ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-77670a6785ef149393c3bc0197d25962da174bba322c31266e2cfbc4274962ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26503070$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26503070$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3746,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adam, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duran, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Corinne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roycroft, Madelyn V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojas, Maria C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruttenberg, Benjamin I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkepile, Deron E.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of foraging behavior and bite mechanics reveals complex functional diversity among Caribbean parrotfishes</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>Parrotfishes are a diverse group of herbivores that can influence benthic community dynamics and ecosystem function on coral reefs. Different species and size classes of parrotfishes vary in their feeding ecology and can impact reef ecosystems in distinct ways. We documented differences in the feeding ecology of 9 species of parrotfishes in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS). Many of the key differences can be summarized by assigning species to functional groups (e.g. scrapers, excavators, croppers, macroalgae browsers), which are differentially responsible for carrying out specific ecological processes. For example, we found that Sparisoma viride, Scarus coelestinus, Sc. guacamaia, Sc. taeniopterus, and Sc. vetula feed on short turfs with few sediments, while Sp. aurofrenatum, Sp. chrysopterum, and Sp. rubripinne feed on longer sediment-laden turfs in addition to macroalgae. Further, parrotfishes use distinct bite types that indicate contrasting impacts on the benthos. Species that feed on short turfs scrape and excavate epilithic and endolithic algae, while species that feed on longer turfs and macroalgae tend to tear or crop algae from the reef. These distinct feeding behaviors result in different rates of algae removal, carbonate erosion, and sediment production. Recognizing that different species of parrotfishes interact with the benthos in fundamentally different ways will enable scientists and managers to better predict how changes in the structure of parrotfish assemblages may affect benthic communities and ecosystem processes.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Benthic communities</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Corals</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Endolithic algae</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Excavators</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Functional groups</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Keys (islands)</subject><subject>Labroidei</subject><subject>Marine invertebrates</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Sanctuaries</subject><subject>Scrapers</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsHf4AQ8ORhNR-7SXOUxS8oeNHzMskmbUp3U5O02Iu_3Uilpzm8D8_MvAhdU3LPeVM_DHaTKBOEnKAJFVRUtFHqFE0IlbSaCU7O0UVKK0KoqKWYoJ82DBuIkP3OYhhhvU8-4eCwCxEWflxgbZew8yGWtMfaZ4sHa5YwepNwtDsL64RNkaztN3bb0WQfigb3RRiTz3sMQyiaFqLX2sKIy7oYsvNpadMlOnNFYK_-5xR9Pj99tK_V_P3lrX2cV4ZJlSsphSQg5KyxjtaKK264NoQq2bNGCdYDlbXWwBkzvLwvLDNOm5rJuqSg-RTdHrybGL62NuVuFbax3Jk6RpSqBVWCFuruQJkYUorWdZvoB4j7jpLur97uWG9hbw7sKuUQjyATDeFEEv4Lz355bw</recordid><startdate>20180611</startdate><enddate>20180611</enddate><creator>Adam, Thomas C.</creator><creator>Duran, Alain</creator><creator>Fuchs, Corinne E.</creator><creator>Roycroft, Madelyn V.</creator><creator>Rojas, Maria C.</creator><creator>Ruttenberg, Benjamin I.</creator><creator>Burkepile, Deron E.</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><general>Inter-Research Science Center</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180611</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of foraging behavior and bite mechanics reveals complex functional diversity among Caribbean parrotfishes</title><author>Adam, Thomas C. ; Duran, Alain ; Fuchs, Corinne E. ; Roycroft, Madelyn V. ; Rojas, Maria C. ; Ruttenberg, Benjamin I. ; Burkepile, Deron E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-77670a6785ef149393c3bc0197d25962da174bba322c31266e2cfbc4274962ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Benthic communities</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Corals</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Endolithic algae</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Excavators</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Functional groups</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Keys (islands)</topic><topic>Labroidei</topic><topic>Marine invertebrates</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Sanctuaries</topic><topic>Scrapers</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adam, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duran, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Corinne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roycroft, Madelyn V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojas, Maria C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruttenberg, Benjamin I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkepile, Deron E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adam, Thomas C.</au><au>Duran, Alain</au><au>Fuchs, Corinne E.</au><au>Roycroft, Madelyn V.</au><au>Rojas, Maria C.</au><au>Ruttenberg, Benjamin I.</au><au>Burkepile, Deron E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of foraging behavior and bite mechanics reveals complex functional diversity among Caribbean parrotfishes</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>2018-06-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>597</volume><spage>207</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>207-220</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>Parrotfishes are a diverse group of herbivores that can influence benthic community dynamics and ecosystem function on coral reefs. Different species and size classes of parrotfishes vary in their feeding ecology and can impact reef ecosystems in distinct ways. We documented differences in the feeding ecology of 9 species of parrotfishes in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS). Many of the key differences can be summarized by assigning species to functional groups (e.g. scrapers, excavators, croppers, macroalgae browsers), which are differentially responsible for carrying out specific ecological processes. For example, we found that Sparisoma viride, Scarus coelestinus, Sc. guacamaia, Sc. taeniopterus, and Sc. vetula feed on short turfs with few sediments, while Sp. aurofrenatum, Sp. chrysopterum, and Sp. rubripinne feed on longer sediment-laden turfs in addition to macroalgae. Further, parrotfishes use distinct bite types that indicate contrasting impacts on the benthos. Species that feed on short turfs scrape and excavate epilithic and endolithic algae, while species that feed on longer turfs and macroalgae tend to tear or crop algae from the reef. These distinct feeding behaviors result in different rates of algae removal, carbonate erosion, and sediment production. Recognizing that different species of parrotfishes interact with the benthos in fundamentally different ways will enable scientists and managers to better predict how changes in the structure of parrotfish assemblages may affect benthic communities and ecosystem processes.</abstract><cop>Oldendorf</cop><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps12600</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-8630
ispartof Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2018-06, Vol.597, p.207-220
issn 0171-8630
1616-1599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2099461961
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Inter-Research; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Algae
Benthic communities
Benthos
Carbonates
Comparative analysis
Coral reefs
Corals
Dynamics
Ecology
Ecosystems
Endolithic algae
Environmental changes
Environmental impact
Erosion
Excavators
Feeding
Feeds
Foraging
Foraging behavior
Functional groups
Herbivores
Keys (islands)
Labroidei
Marine invertebrates
Mechanics
Nature conservation
Removal
Sanctuaries
Scrapers
Seaweeds
Sediment
Sediments
Species
title Comparative analysis of foraging behavior and bite mechanics reveals complex functional diversity among Caribbean parrotfishes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A26%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20foraging%20behavior%20and%20bite%20mechanics%20reveals%20complex%20functional%20diversity%20among%20Caribbean%20parrotfishes&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Adam,%20Thomas%20C.&rft.date=2018-06-11&rft.volume=597&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=207-220&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps12600&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26503070%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2099461961&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26503070&rfr_iscdi=true