Pacific sea surface temperature related influences on North American monsoon precipitation within North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program models

Climate inter‐annual variability over the North American monsoon (NAM) region is associated with El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Pacific decadal variability (PDV), which drive a warm season atmospheric teleconnection response. Using the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Progr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of climatology 2018-09, Vol.38 (11), p.4189-4210
Hauptverfasser: Carrillo, Carlos M., Castro, Christopher L., Garfin, Gregg, Chang, Hsin‐I, Bukovsky, Melissa S., Mearns, Linda O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Climate inter‐annual variability over the North American monsoon (NAM) region is associated with El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Pacific decadal variability (PDV), which drive a warm season atmospheric teleconnection response. Using the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) simulations, previous studies have found that regional models forced with an atmospheric reanalysis (NARCCAP Phase I) represent the NAM reasonably well as a climatological feature. However, when these same regional models are forced with global climate model projections (NARCCAP Phase II), their ability to represent the NAM as a salient feature substantially degrades. The present study evaluates NAM inter‐annual climate variability through the continental‐scale patterns of summer precipitation within the NARCCAP simulations (Phases I and II), in relation to ENSO–PDV, and the presence of the driving atmospheric teleconnection response. Multivariate statistical analyses are applied to sea surface temperature and precipitation data sets to determine dominant variability at continental scale, with focus on the southwest. The analysis reveals that NARCCAP Phase I simulations are able to portray the spatial pattern of precipitation associated with ENSO–PDV in a similar way to observations. However, all NARCCAP Phase II simulations, with the exception of the HRM(Hadcm3) regional–global model pair, fail to reproduce this climate variability. Although including all possible NARCCAP model simulations to generate a multi‐model ensemble mean would increase the statistical degree of confidence in climate projections, this type of result would not increase confidence in the physical climatology of model representations of warm season climate variability. More physically based, process‐oriented metrics are needed to evaluate model quality in assessing the uncertainty of future climate change in multi‐model ensemble products used for climate change impacts assessments. (left top) Annual cycle of precipitation for a NAM region in Arizona for NOAA observed (in histogram), NARCCAP 20th century Phase II simulations (red thin lines), and NARCCAP ensemble mean (red thick line). (right top) Same as the left plot but for selected NARCCAP models that best represent the abrupt pre‐ and post‐monsoon transition in precipitation as distinguished in colours with the black case for the ensemble mean among these RCM–GCM pairs: CRCM(cgcm3), HRM3(hadcm3), RCM3(cgcm3), and WRFG(cgcm3
ISSN:0899-8418
1097-0088
DOI:10.1002/joc.5561