Friends in the Boardroom: Attendance, voting, and turnover

We analyze a unique data set on board activities of individual outside directors contingent on social ties to the CEO. We find that outside directors’ dissents are rare and this is even more so from those with social connections with the CEO. Dissenting outside directors, especially those without co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economics letters 2018-08, Vol.169, p.11-14
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Jaehoon, Lee, Hwa Ryung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue
container_start_page 11
container_title Economics letters
container_volume 169
creator Kim, Jaehoon
Lee, Hwa Ryung
description We analyze a unique data set on board activities of individual outside directors contingent on social ties to the CEO. We find that outside directors’ dissents are rare and this is even more so from those with social connections with the CEO. Dissenting outside directors, especially those without connections to the CEO face a significantly higher chance of being replaced. Besides, outside directors with social ties to the CEO tend to participate in board decision less often than independent ones. •Dissent in board is rare and more so from outside directors with social ties to CEO.•Attendance rate of outside directors with social ties is lower than those without.•Absence is to let inside directors have power to make decisions.•Outside directors who have opposed CEO face high turnover risk next year.•CEOs tactically steer composition of boards by retaining only those with social ties.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.04.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2098781696</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165176518301691</els_id><sourcerecordid>2098781696</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-1de2d6d9902d1ba7a03e30d23fd604757e940ca9504f98298d074166e21c14483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QVjw2l0n2Wyy6UVqsSoUvOg5xGRWt7SbmqQF_70p7d3THOa9N_M-Qm4pVBSouF9VaP2wxlQxoG0FvIKanZERbWVdylryczLKuqakUjSX5CrGFQBlSjYjMl2EHgcXi34o0jcWj94EF7zfTItZSnljBouTYu9TP3xNCjO4Iu3C4PcYrslFZ9YRb05zTD4WT-_zl3L59vw6ny1Ly4GlkjpkTjilgDn6aaSBGmtwrO6cAC4biYqDNaoB3qmWqdaB5FQIZNRSztt6TO6Oudvgf3YYk175_EI-qRmoVrZUKJFVzVFlg48xYKe3od-Y8Ksp6AMmvdInTPqASQPXGVP2PRx9mCvseww62kzEousD2qSd7_9J-AOLE3E7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2098781696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Friends in the Boardroom: Attendance, voting, and turnover</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Kim, Jaehoon ; Lee, Hwa Ryung</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jaehoon ; Lee, Hwa Ryung</creatorcontrib><description>We analyze a unique data set on board activities of individual outside directors contingent on social ties to the CEO. We find that outside directors’ dissents are rare and this is even more so from those with social connections with the CEO. Dissenting outside directors, especially those without connections to the CEO face a significantly higher chance of being replaced. Besides, outside directors with social ties to the CEO tend to participate in board decision less often than independent ones. •Dissent in board is rare and more so from outside directors with social ties to CEO.•Attendance rate of outside directors with social ties is lower than those without.•Absence is to let inside directors have power to make decisions.•Outside directors who have opposed CEO face high turnover risk next year.•CEOs tactically steer composition of boards by retaining only those with social ties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.04.032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Attendance ; Board independence ; Connectedness ; Directors ; Friendship ; Hierarchies ; Outside director ; Outside directors ; Social ties ; Studies ; Turnover ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Economics letters, 2018-08, Vol.169, p.11-14</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-1de2d6d9902d1ba7a03e30d23fd604757e940ca9504f98298d074166e21c14483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-1de2d6d9902d1ba7a03e30d23fd604757e940ca9504f98298d074166e21c14483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176518301691$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jaehoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hwa Ryung</creatorcontrib><title>Friends in the Boardroom: Attendance, voting, and turnover</title><title>Economics letters</title><description>We analyze a unique data set on board activities of individual outside directors contingent on social ties to the CEO. We find that outside directors’ dissents are rare and this is even more so from those with social connections with the CEO. Dissenting outside directors, especially those without connections to the CEO face a significantly higher chance of being replaced. Besides, outside directors with social ties to the CEO tend to participate in board decision less often than independent ones. •Dissent in board is rare and more so from outside directors with social ties to CEO.•Attendance rate of outside directors with social ties is lower than those without.•Absence is to let inside directors have power to make decisions.•Outside directors who have opposed CEO face high turnover risk next year.•CEOs tactically steer composition of boards by retaining only those with social ties.</description><subject>Attendance</subject><subject>Board independence</subject><subject>Connectedness</subject><subject>Directors</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Outside director</subject><subject>Outside directors</subject><subject>Social ties</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Turnover</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0165-1765</issn><issn>1873-7374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QVjw2l0n2Wyy6UVqsSoUvOg5xGRWt7SbmqQF_70p7d3THOa9N_M-Qm4pVBSouF9VaP2wxlQxoG0FvIKanZERbWVdylryczLKuqakUjSX5CrGFQBlSjYjMl2EHgcXi34o0jcWj94EF7zfTItZSnljBouTYu9TP3xNCjO4Iu3C4PcYrslFZ9YRb05zTD4WT-_zl3L59vw6ny1Ly4GlkjpkTjilgDn6aaSBGmtwrO6cAC4biYqDNaoB3qmWqdaB5FQIZNRSztt6TO6Oudvgf3YYk175_EI-qRmoVrZUKJFVzVFlg48xYKe3od-Y8Ksp6AMmvdInTPqASQPXGVP2PRx9mCvseww62kzEousD2qSd7_9J-AOLE3E7</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Kim, Jaehoon</creator><creator>Lee, Hwa Ryung</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Friends in the Boardroom: Attendance, voting, and turnover</title><author>Kim, Jaehoon ; Lee, Hwa Ryung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-1de2d6d9902d1ba7a03e30d23fd604757e940ca9504f98298d074166e21c14483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Attendance</topic><topic>Board independence</topic><topic>Connectedness</topic><topic>Directors</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Outside director</topic><topic>Outside directors</topic><topic>Social ties</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Turnover</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jaehoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hwa Ryung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Jaehoon</au><au>Lee, Hwa Ryung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Friends in the Boardroom: Attendance, voting, and turnover</atitle><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>169</volume><spage>11</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>11-14</pages><issn>0165-1765</issn><eissn>1873-7374</eissn><abstract>We analyze a unique data set on board activities of individual outside directors contingent on social ties to the CEO. We find that outside directors’ dissents are rare and this is even more so from those with social connections with the CEO. Dissenting outside directors, especially those without connections to the CEO face a significantly higher chance of being replaced. Besides, outside directors with social ties to the CEO tend to participate in board decision less often than independent ones. •Dissent in board is rare and more so from outside directors with social ties to CEO.•Attendance rate of outside directors with social ties is lower than those without.•Absence is to let inside directors have power to make decisions.•Outside directors who have opposed CEO face high turnover risk next year.•CEOs tactically steer composition of boards by retaining only those with social ties.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.econlet.2018.04.032</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-1765
ispartof Economics letters, 2018-08, Vol.169, p.11-14
issn 0165-1765
1873-7374
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2098781696
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Attendance
Board independence
Connectedness
Directors
Friendship
Hierarchies
Outside director
Outside directors
Social ties
Studies
Turnover
Voting
title Friends in the Boardroom: Attendance, voting, and turnover
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T03%3A16%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Friends%20in%20the%20Boardroom:%20Attendance,%20voting,%20and%20turnover&rft.jtitle=Economics%20letters&rft.au=Kim,%20Jaehoon&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=169&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=11-14&rft.issn=0165-1765&rft.eissn=1873-7374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.04.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2098781696%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2098781696&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0165176518301691&rfr_iscdi=true