IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL AND DISCHARGE OUTCOMES FOR LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO BUPIVACAINE
OBJECTIVES: While more than 300,000 total hip arthroplasties (THA) are performed annually in the United States, there is no gold standard for an effective postoperative THA pain strategy. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare clinical, and discharge outcomes for patients ut...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | A216 |
container_title | |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Asche, CV Maurer, BT Ren, J Kim, M Gordon, K Kirkness, CS |
description | OBJECTIVES: While more than 300,000 total hip arthroplasties (THA) are performed annually in the United States, there is no gold standard for an effective postoperative THA pain strategy. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare clinical, and discharge outcomes for patients utilizing an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to a control cohort utilizing bupivacaine. METHODS: The LB cohort included 64 consecutive THA patients from one surgeon at a single institution between August 2013 and July 2015 and 66 consecutive THA procedures performed by the same surgeon between June 2011 and July 2013 were selected as the control cohort. Clinical (pain [VAS], distance walked, opioid use, falls) and discharge (discharge destination, length of stay[LOS], readmission rates) outcomes were compared on post-operation day (POD) 0, 1 and 2 using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The LB cohort showed significantly lower AUC VAS pain scores on POD 0, 1 and 2. Significantly fewer LB patients used rescue opioids on POD1 and POD2. LOS decreased significantly from 2.7 to 2.0 days and 30% more LB patients were discharged at POD1. After adjusting for covariates, LB patients were more likely to walk farther than controls after surgery. LB cohort had significantly fewer 30-day readmissions than the control cohort. For patients with available financial data, adjusted mean hospital charge costs were lower in the LB patients. Categorically, the LB cohort had lower costs than the control cohort for room, medical and surgical supplies, diagnostic test (including labs and operation), and physical therapy. There were no differences in falls or discharge location. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study comparing LB to bupivacaine demonstrated improved perioperative pain management, less opioid use, decreased length of stay, lower costs, earlier discharge and increased physical function. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2097664260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2097664260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g540-d66ec9b9204d6d5fab5226495d58fce48bf39dddd94dfcfb5e1abcb02f3648583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNTUtLw0AYXETBWv0DnhY8J377TPa4pmm7kHRDmuZa8lolFKuN7e93RQ_OZYZhHgg9EggJEPk8huOlOYQUSBSCCAHEFZoRQXnAI8auvQYVBwyIuEV30zQCgGRUzNCbyYvS1ukCF3Zb2SItdWXqFCeZ2ZhEZ1hvFnhhtslal6sU212V2Dzd4qUtcWZ8x-Y-9LIrTK0TbTa-afNCl36wsv_9e3TjmsM0PPzxHFXLtErWQWZXP0fBq-AQ9FIOnWoVBd7LXrimFZRKrkQvYtcNPG4dU72H4r3rXCsG0rRdC9QxyWMRszl6-p39OB0_z8P0tR-P59O7f9xTUJGUnEpg36xLUc8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2097664260</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL AND DISCHARGE OUTCOMES FOR LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO BUPIVACAINE</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Asche, CV ; Maurer, BT ; Ren, J ; Kim, M ; Gordon, K ; Kirkness, CS</creator><creatorcontrib>Asche, CV ; Maurer, BT ; Ren, J ; Kim, M ; Gordon, K ; Kirkness, CS</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES: While more than 300,000 total hip arthroplasties (THA) are performed annually in the United States, there is no gold standard for an effective postoperative THA pain strategy. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare clinical, and discharge outcomes for patients utilizing an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to a control cohort utilizing bupivacaine. METHODS: The LB cohort included 64 consecutive THA patients from one surgeon at a single institution between August 2013 and July 2015 and 66 consecutive THA procedures performed by the same surgeon between June 2011 and July 2013 were selected as the control cohort. Clinical (pain [VAS], distance walked, opioid use, falls) and discharge (discharge destination, length of stay[LOS], readmission rates) outcomes were compared on post-operation day (POD) 0, 1 and 2 using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The LB cohort showed significantly lower AUC VAS pain scores on POD 0, 1 and 2. Significantly fewer LB patients used rescue opioids on POD1 and POD2. LOS decreased significantly from 2.7 to 2.0 days and 30% more LB patients were discharged at POD1. After adjusting for covariates, LB patients were more likely to walk farther than controls after surgery. LB cohort had significantly fewer 30-day readmissions than the control cohort. For patients with available financial data, adjusted mean hospital charge costs were lower in the LB patients. Categorically, the LB cohort had lower costs than the control cohort for room, medical and surgical supplies, diagnostic test (including labs and operation), and physical therapy. There were no differences in falls or discharge location. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study comparing LB to bupivacaine demonstrated improved perioperative pain management, less opioid use, decreased length of stay, lower costs, earlier discharge and increased physical function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrenceville: Elsevier Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Bupivacaine ; Cohort analysis ; Comparative analysis ; Diagnostic tests ; Drug use ; Falls ; Hip ; Joint surgery ; Length of stay ; Opioids ; Pain ; Physical ability ; Physiotherapy ; Readmission ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2017, Vol.20 (5), p.A216</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asche, CV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, BT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkness, CS</creatorcontrib><title>IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL AND DISCHARGE OUTCOMES FOR LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO BUPIVACAINE</title><title>Value in health</title><description>OBJECTIVES: While more than 300,000 total hip arthroplasties (THA) are performed annually in the United States, there is no gold standard for an effective postoperative THA pain strategy. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare clinical, and discharge outcomes for patients utilizing an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to a control cohort utilizing bupivacaine. METHODS: The LB cohort included 64 consecutive THA patients from one surgeon at a single institution between August 2013 and July 2015 and 66 consecutive THA procedures performed by the same surgeon between June 2011 and July 2013 were selected as the control cohort. Clinical (pain [VAS], distance walked, opioid use, falls) and discharge (discharge destination, length of stay[LOS], readmission rates) outcomes were compared on post-operation day (POD) 0, 1 and 2 using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The LB cohort showed significantly lower AUC VAS pain scores on POD 0, 1 and 2. Significantly fewer LB patients used rescue opioids on POD1 and POD2. LOS decreased significantly from 2.7 to 2.0 days and 30% more LB patients were discharged at POD1. After adjusting for covariates, LB patients were more likely to walk farther than controls after surgery. LB cohort had significantly fewer 30-day readmissions than the control cohort. For patients with available financial data, adjusted mean hospital charge costs were lower in the LB patients. Categorically, the LB cohort had lower costs than the control cohort for room, medical and surgical supplies, diagnostic test (including labs and operation), and physical therapy. There were no differences in falls or discharge location. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study comparing LB to bupivacaine demonstrated improved perioperative pain management, less opioid use, decreased length of stay, lower costs, earlier discharge and increased physical function.</description><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Physical ability</subject><subject>Physiotherapy</subject><subject>Readmission</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNTUtLw0AYXETBWv0DnhY8J377TPa4pmm7kHRDmuZa8lolFKuN7e93RQ_OZYZhHgg9EggJEPk8huOlOYQUSBSCCAHEFZoRQXnAI8auvQYVBwyIuEV30zQCgGRUzNCbyYvS1ukCF3Zb2SItdWXqFCeZ2ZhEZ1hvFnhhtslal6sU212V2Dzd4qUtcWZ8x-Y-9LIrTK0TbTa-afNCl36wsv_9e3TjmsM0PPzxHFXLtErWQWZXP0fBq-AQ9FIOnWoVBd7LXrimFZRKrkQvYtcNPG4dU72H4r3rXCsG0rRdC9QxyWMRszl6-p39OB0_z8P0tR-P59O7f9xTUJGUnEpg36xLUc8</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Asche, CV</creator><creator>Maurer, BT</creator><creator>Ren, J</creator><creator>Kim, M</creator><creator>Gordon, K</creator><creator>Kirkness, CS</creator><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL AND DISCHARGE OUTCOMES FOR LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO BUPIVACAINE</title><author>Asche, CV ; Maurer, BT ; Ren, J ; Kim, M ; Gordon, K ; Kirkness, CS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g540-d66ec9b9204d6d5fab5226495d58fce48bf39dddd94dfcfb5e1abcb02f3648583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Physical ability</topic><topic>Physiotherapy</topic><topic>Readmission</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asche, CV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, BT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkness, CS</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asche, CV</au><au>Maurer, BT</au><au>Ren, J</au><au>Kim, M</au><au>Gordon, K</au><au>Kirkness, CS</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL AND DISCHARGE OUTCOMES FOR LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO BUPIVACAINE</atitle><btitle>Value in health</btitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>A216</spage><pages>A216-</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES: While more than 300,000 total hip arthroplasties (THA) are performed annually in the United States, there is no gold standard for an effective postoperative THA pain strategy. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare clinical, and discharge outcomes for patients utilizing an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to a control cohort utilizing bupivacaine. METHODS: The LB cohort included 64 consecutive THA patients from one surgeon at a single institution between August 2013 and July 2015 and 66 consecutive THA procedures performed by the same surgeon between June 2011 and July 2013 were selected as the control cohort. Clinical (pain [VAS], distance walked, opioid use, falls) and discharge (discharge destination, length of stay[LOS], readmission rates) outcomes were compared on post-operation day (POD) 0, 1 and 2 using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The LB cohort showed significantly lower AUC VAS pain scores on POD 0, 1 and 2. Significantly fewer LB patients used rescue opioids on POD1 and POD2. LOS decreased significantly from 2.7 to 2.0 days and 30% more LB patients were discharged at POD1. After adjusting for covariates, LB patients were more likely to walk farther than controls after surgery. LB cohort had significantly fewer 30-day readmissions than the control cohort. For patients with available financial data, adjusted mean hospital charge costs were lower in the LB patients. Categorically, the LB cohort had lower costs than the control cohort for room, medical and surgical supplies, diagnostic test (including labs and operation), and physical therapy. There were no differences in falls or discharge location. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study comparing LB to bupivacaine demonstrated improved perioperative pain management, less opioid use, decreased length of stay, lower costs, earlier discharge and increased physical function.</abstract><cop>Lawrenceville</cop><pub>Elsevier Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-3015 |
ispartof | Value in health, 2017, Vol.20 (5), p.A216 |
issn | 1098-3015 1524-4733 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2097664260 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Bupivacaine Cohort analysis Comparative analysis Diagnostic tests Drug use Falls Hip Joint surgery Length of stay Opioids Pain Physical ability Physiotherapy Readmission Surgery |
title | IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL AND DISCHARGE OUTCOMES FOR LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO BUPIVACAINE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=IMPROVED%20POSTOPERATIVE%20CLINICAL%20AND%20DISCHARGE%20OUTCOMES%20FOR%20LIPOSOMAL%20BUPIVACAINE%20COMPARED%20TO%20BUPIVACAINE&rft.btitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=Asche,%20CV&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=A216&rft.pages=A216-&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2097664260%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2097664260&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |