IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL AND DISCHARGE OUTCOMES FOR LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO BUPIVACAINE

OBJECTIVES: While more than 300,000 total hip arthroplasties (THA) are performed annually in the United States, there is no gold standard for an effective postoperative THA pain strategy. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare clinical, and discharge outcomes for patients ut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Asche, CV, Maurer, BT, Ren, J, Kim, M, Gordon, K, Kirkness, CS
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page A216
container_title
container_volume 20
creator Asche, CV
Maurer, BT
Ren, J
Kim, M
Gordon, K
Kirkness, CS
description OBJECTIVES: While more than 300,000 total hip arthroplasties (THA) are performed annually in the United States, there is no gold standard for an effective postoperative THA pain strategy. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare clinical, and discharge outcomes for patients utilizing an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to a control cohort utilizing bupivacaine. METHODS: The LB cohort included 64 consecutive THA patients from one surgeon at a single institution between August 2013 and July 2015 and 66 consecutive THA procedures performed by the same surgeon between June 2011 and July 2013 were selected as the control cohort. Clinical (pain [VAS], distance walked, opioid use, falls) and discharge (discharge destination, length of stay[LOS], readmission rates) outcomes were compared on post-operation day (POD) 0, 1 and 2 using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The LB cohort showed significantly lower AUC VAS pain scores on POD 0, 1 and 2. Significantly fewer LB patients used rescue opioids on POD1 and POD2. LOS decreased significantly from 2.7 to 2.0 days and 30% more LB patients were discharged at POD1. After adjusting for covariates, LB patients were more likely to walk farther than controls after surgery. LB cohort had significantly fewer 30-day readmissions than the control cohort. For patients with available financial data, adjusted mean hospital charge costs were lower in the LB patients. Categorically, the LB cohort had lower costs than the control cohort for room, medical and surgical supplies, diagnostic test (including labs and operation), and physical therapy. There were no differences in falls or discharge location. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study comparing LB to bupivacaine demonstrated improved perioperative pain management, less opioid use, decreased length of stay, lower costs, earlier discharge and increased physical function.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2097664260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2097664260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g540-d66ec9b9204d6d5fab5226495d58fce48bf39dddd94dfcfb5e1abcb02f3648583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNTUtLw0AYXETBWv0DnhY8J377TPa4pmm7kHRDmuZa8lolFKuN7e93RQ_OZYZhHgg9EggJEPk8huOlOYQUSBSCCAHEFZoRQXnAI8auvQYVBwyIuEV30zQCgGRUzNCbyYvS1ukCF3Zb2SItdWXqFCeZ2ZhEZ1hvFnhhtslal6sU212V2Dzd4qUtcWZ8x-Y-9LIrTK0TbTa-afNCl36wsv_9e3TjmsM0PPzxHFXLtErWQWZXP0fBq-AQ9FIOnWoVBd7LXrimFZRKrkQvYtcNPG4dU72H4r3rXCsG0rRdC9QxyWMRszl6-p39OB0_z8P0tR-P59O7f9xTUJGUnEpg36xLUc8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2097664260</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL AND DISCHARGE OUTCOMES FOR LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO BUPIVACAINE</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Asche, CV ; Maurer, BT ; Ren, J ; Kim, M ; Gordon, K ; Kirkness, CS</creator><creatorcontrib>Asche, CV ; Maurer, BT ; Ren, J ; Kim, M ; Gordon, K ; Kirkness, CS</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES: While more than 300,000 total hip arthroplasties (THA) are performed annually in the United States, there is no gold standard for an effective postoperative THA pain strategy. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare clinical, and discharge outcomes for patients utilizing an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to a control cohort utilizing bupivacaine. METHODS: The LB cohort included 64 consecutive THA patients from one surgeon at a single institution between August 2013 and July 2015 and 66 consecutive THA procedures performed by the same surgeon between June 2011 and July 2013 were selected as the control cohort. Clinical (pain [VAS], distance walked, opioid use, falls) and discharge (discharge destination, length of stay[LOS], readmission rates) outcomes were compared on post-operation day (POD) 0, 1 and 2 using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The LB cohort showed significantly lower AUC VAS pain scores on POD 0, 1 and 2. Significantly fewer LB patients used rescue opioids on POD1 and POD2. LOS decreased significantly from 2.7 to 2.0 days and 30% more LB patients were discharged at POD1. After adjusting for covariates, LB patients were more likely to walk farther than controls after surgery. LB cohort had significantly fewer 30-day readmissions than the control cohort. For patients with available financial data, adjusted mean hospital charge costs were lower in the LB patients. Categorically, the LB cohort had lower costs than the control cohort for room, medical and surgical supplies, diagnostic test (including labs and operation), and physical therapy. There were no differences in falls or discharge location. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study comparing LB to bupivacaine demonstrated improved perioperative pain management, less opioid use, decreased length of stay, lower costs, earlier discharge and increased physical function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrenceville: Elsevier Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Bupivacaine ; Cohort analysis ; Comparative analysis ; Diagnostic tests ; Drug use ; Falls ; Hip ; Joint surgery ; Length of stay ; Opioids ; Pain ; Physical ability ; Physiotherapy ; Readmission ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2017, Vol.20 (5), p.A216</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asche, CV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, BT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkness, CS</creatorcontrib><title>IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL AND DISCHARGE OUTCOMES FOR LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO BUPIVACAINE</title><title>Value in health</title><description>OBJECTIVES: While more than 300,000 total hip arthroplasties (THA) are performed annually in the United States, there is no gold standard for an effective postoperative THA pain strategy. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare clinical, and discharge outcomes for patients utilizing an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to a control cohort utilizing bupivacaine. METHODS: The LB cohort included 64 consecutive THA patients from one surgeon at a single institution between August 2013 and July 2015 and 66 consecutive THA procedures performed by the same surgeon between June 2011 and July 2013 were selected as the control cohort. Clinical (pain [VAS], distance walked, opioid use, falls) and discharge (discharge destination, length of stay[LOS], readmission rates) outcomes were compared on post-operation day (POD) 0, 1 and 2 using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The LB cohort showed significantly lower AUC VAS pain scores on POD 0, 1 and 2. Significantly fewer LB patients used rescue opioids on POD1 and POD2. LOS decreased significantly from 2.7 to 2.0 days and 30% more LB patients were discharged at POD1. After adjusting for covariates, LB patients were more likely to walk farther than controls after surgery. LB cohort had significantly fewer 30-day readmissions than the control cohort. For patients with available financial data, adjusted mean hospital charge costs were lower in the LB patients. Categorically, the LB cohort had lower costs than the control cohort for room, medical and surgical supplies, diagnostic test (including labs and operation), and physical therapy. There were no differences in falls or discharge location. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study comparing LB to bupivacaine demonstrated improved perioperative pain management, less opioid use, decreased length of stay, lower costs, earlier discharge and increased physical function.</description><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Physical ability</subject><subject>Physiotherapy</subject><subject>Readmission</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNTUtLw0AYXETBWv0DnhY8J377TPa4pmm7kHRDmuZa8lolFKuN7e93RQ_OZYZhHgg9EggJEPk8huOlOYQUSBSCCAHEFZoRQXnAI8auvQYVBwyIuEV30zQCgGRUzNCbyYvS1ukCF3Zb2SItdWXqFCeZ2ZhEZ1hvFnhhtslal6sU212V2Dzd4qUtcWZ8x-Y-9LIrTK0TbTa-afNCl36wsv_9e3TjmsM0PPzxHFXLtErWQWZXP0fBq-AQ9FIOnWoVBd7LXrimFZRKrkQvYtcNPG4dU72H4r3rXCsG0rRdC9QxyWMRszl6-p39OB0_z8P0tR-P59O7f9xTUJGUnEpg36xLUc8</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Asche, CV</creator><creator>Maurer, BT</creator><creator>Ren, J</creator><creator>Kim, M</creator><creator>Gordon, K</creator><creator>Kirkness, CS</creator><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL AND DISCHARGE OUTCOMES FOR LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO BUPIVACAINE</title><author>Asche, CV ; Maurer, BT ; Ren, J ; Kim, M ; Gordon, K ; Kirkness, CS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g540-d66ec9b9204d6d5fab5226495d58fce48bf39dddd94dfcfb5e1abcb02f3648583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Physical ability</topic><topic>Physiotherapy</topic><topic>Readmission</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asche, CV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, BT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkness, CS</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asche, CV</au><au>Maurer, BT</au><au>Ren, J</au><au>Kim, M</au><au>Gordon, K</au><au>Kirkness, CS</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL AND DISCHARGE OUTCOMES FOR LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO BUPIVACAINE</atitle><btitle>Value in health</btitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>A216</spage><pages>A216-</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES: While more than 300,000 total hip arthroplasties (THA) are performed annually in the United States, there is no gold standard for an effective postoperative THA pain strategy. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare clinical, and discharge outcomes for patients utilizing an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to a control cohort utilizing bupivacaine. METHODS: The LB cohort included 64 consecutive THA patients from one surgeon at a single institution between August 2013 and July 2015 and 66 consecutive THA procedures performed by the same surgeon between June 2011 and July 2013 were selected as the control cohort. Clinical (pain [VAS], distance walked, opioid use, falls) and discharge (discharge destination, length of stay[LOS], readmission rates) outcomes were compared on post-operation day (POD) 0, 1 and 2 using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The LB cohort showed significantly lower AUC VAS pain scores on POD 0, 1 and 2. Significantly fewer LB patients used rescue opioids on POD1 and POD2. LOS decreased significantly from 2.7 to 2.0 days and 30% more LB patients were discharged at POD1. After adjusting for covariates, LB patients were more likely to walk farther than controls after surgery. LB cohort had significantly fewer 30-day readmissions than the control cohort. For patients with available financial data, adjusted mean hospital charge costs were lower in the LB patients. Categorically, the LB cohort had lower costs than the control cohort for room, medical and surgical supplies, diagnostic test (including labs and operation), and physical therapy. There were no differences in falls or discharge location. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study comparing LB to bupivacaine demonstrated improved perioperative pain management, less opioid use, decreased length of stay, lower costs, earlier discharge and increased physical function.</abstract><cop>Lawrenceville</cop><pub>Elsevier Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3015
ispartof Value in health, 2017, Vol.20 (5), p.A216
issn 1098-3015
1524-4733
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2097664260
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Bupivacaine
Cohort analysis
Comparative analysis
Diagnostic tests
Drug use
Falls
Hip
Joint surgery
Length of stay
Opioids
Pain
Physical ability
Physiotherapy
Readmission
Surgery
title IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL AND DISCHARGE OUTCOMES FOR LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO BUPIVACAINE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=IMPROVED%20POSTOPERATIVE%20CLINICAL%20AND%20DISCHARGE%20OUTCOMES%20FOR%20LIPOSOMAL%20BUPIVACAINE%20COMPARED%20TO%20BUPIVACAINE&rft.btitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=Asche,%20CV&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=A216&rft.pages=A216-&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2097664260%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2097664260&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true