THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF STATINS FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE: OBSERVATIONAL STUDY USING DATA FROM ROUTINE ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of statins for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in routine practice from the perspective of the English NHS. METHODS: Electronic English NHS health records of 6,078 previously untreated patients of age 60+ receiving statins following the o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health 2017-05, Vol.20 (5), p.A259
Hauptverfasser: Mujica-Mota, RE, Hughes, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page A259
container_title Value in health
container_volume 20
creator Mujica-Mota, RE
Hughes, P
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of statins for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in routine practice from the perspective of the English NHS. METHODS: Electronic English NHS health records of 6,078 previously untreated patients of age 60+ receiving statins following the occurrence of a myocardial infarction (MI) and a one-to-one propensity score matched control of untreated patients after a MI, resulted in n=12,156 patients. Costs of primary care service use and referrals were calculated from CPRD data and inpatient hospitalisations from HES and HRG codes. QALYs were calculated from ONS mortality records and utilities from the literature applied to MI or ischemic stroke events recorded in HES. Inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW) were used to estimate counterfactual outcomes in the absence of treatment cross-over in the control arm. RESULTS: The distribution of baseline characteristics was balanced across the two treatment groups, and 43% initially untreated patients crossed-over to statins treatment. For 60-74 year olds, we found an increase in QALY with statins of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.44-0.87) and, in the 75+ group, a gain of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72-0.88) per patient. Excluding the CV-unrelated costs of inpatient hospitalisations, the total incremental costs were respectively £1,616 (95% CI: 1347-2095) and £2,644 (95% CI: 2034-2963) per patient. Statins had an ICER of £2456 (95% CI: 1814, 2759) in the younger patient group and of £3250 (95% CI: 2843, 3531) in the older group. In contrast, when inpatient hospitalisation costs ICD-10 codes for non-CV events were included, statins resulted in cost savings (95% CI: -1165, 2782), and was consequently dominant, in the younger group, and had incremental costs of £5562 (95% CI: 4356, 6436) for an ICER of £7200 (6221, 8587) in patients aged 75+. CONCLUSIONS: Quasi-experimental evaluation using data from electronic medical records of patients treated in routine practice is feasible. CEA based on decision models may underestimate the cost-effectiveness of statins, due to their omission of hospitalisation costs associated with non-CVD outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2097658233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2097658233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20976582333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjU1OwzAUhC0EEuXnAqyexDrBjuukZWfsZ2optZHtROqq6qIsoopCQzkNh60rcQBWM9J8M0PIA6Mlo6x-GsrhZ7MrK8qakoqSUnFBJkxU02LacH6ZPZ3PCk6ZuCY34zhQSmteiQn5TQsE5WMq0BhUyfboMEbwBmKSyboIxgeIqLzTMqzgLWBGkvXuzCgZtPW9jKprZQBtI8qIz-BfIoZenjHZ5qVOr6CL1r2ClkmCCX4JwXd5HwHb_Bu8swqWqK3KhZDvgo535Op9sxu39396Sx4NJrUoPg_7r-N2_F4P--PhI0fris6bWswqzvn_qBMif1PA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2097658233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF STATINS FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE: OBSERVATIONAL STUDY USING DATA FROM ROUTINE ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Mujica-Mota, RE ; Hughes, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Mujica-Mota, RE ; Hughes, P</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of statins for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in routine practice from the perspective of the English NHS. METHODS: Electronic English NHS health records of 6,078 previously untreated patients of age 60+ receiving statins following the occurrence of a myocardial infarction (MI) and a one-to-one propensity score matched control of untreated patients after a MI, resulted in n=12,156 patients. Costs of primary care service use and referrals were calculated from CPRD data and inpatient hospitalisations from HES and HRG codes. QALYs were calculated from ONS mortality records and utilities from the literature applied to MI or ischemic stroke events recorded in HES. Inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW) were used to estimate counterfactual outcomes in the absence of treatment cross-over in the control arm. RESULTS: The distribution of baseline characteristics was balanced across the two treatment groups, and 43% initially untreated patients crossed-over to statins treatment. For 60-74 year olds, we found an increase in QALY with statins of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.44-0.87) and, in the 75+ group, a gain of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72-0.88) per patient. Excluding the CV-unrelated costs of inpatient hospitalisations, the total incremental costs were respectively £1,616 (95% CI: 1347-2095) and £2,644 (95% CI: 2034-2963) per patient. Statins had an ICER of £2456 (95% CI: 1814, 2759) in the younger patient group and of £3250 (95% CI: 2843, 3531) in the older group. In contrast, when inpatient hospitalisation costs ICD-10 codes for non-CV events were included, statins resulted in cost savings (95% CI: -1165, 2782), and was consequently dominant, in the younger group, and had incremental costs of £5562 (95% CI: 4356, 6436) for an ICER of £7200 (6221, 8587) in patients aged 75+. CONCLUSIONS: Quasi-experimental evaluation using data from electronic medical records of patients treated in routine practice is feasible. CEA based on decision models may underestimate the cost-effectiveness of statins, due to their omission of hospitalisation costs associated with non-CVD outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrenceville: Elsevier Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Cerebral infarction ; Computerized medical records ; Cost analysis ; Cost control ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Health care expenditures ; Health records ; Health services ; Heart attacks ; Hospitalization ; Inpatient care ; Ischemia ; Medical records ; Medical referrals ; Medical treatment ; Mortality ; Myocardial infarction ; Observational studies ; Patients ; Primary care ; Propensity ; Quality adjusted life years ; Quasi-experimental methods ; Savings ; Secondary prevention ; Statins</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2017-05, Vol.20 (5), p.A259</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mujica-Mota, RE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, P</creatorcontrib><title>THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF STATINS FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE: OBSERVATIONAL STUDY USING DATA FROM ROUTINE ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS</title><title>Value in health</title><description>OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of statins for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in routine practice from the perspective of the English NHS. METHODS: Electronic English NHS health records of 6,078 previously untreated patients of age 60+ receiving statins following the occurrence of a myocardial infarction (MI) and a one-to-one propensity score matched control of untreated patients after a MI, resulted in n=12,156 patients. Costs of primary care service use and referrals were calculated from CPRD data and inpatient hospitalisations from HES and HRG codes. QALYs were calculated from ONS mortality records and utilities from the literature applied to MI or ischemic stroke events recorded in HES. Inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW) were used to estimate counterfactual outcomes in the absence of treatment cross-over in the control arm. RESULTS: The distribution of baseline characteristics was balanced across the two treatment groups, and 43% initially untreated patients crossed-over to statins treatment. For 60-74 year olds, we found an increase in QALY with statins of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.44-0.87) and, in the 75+ group, a gain of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72-0.88) per patient. Excluding the CV-unrelated costs of inpatient hospitalisations, the total incremental costs were respectively £1,616 (95% CI: 1347-2095) and £2,644 (95% CI: 2034-2963) per patient. Statins had an ICER of £2456 (95% CI: 1814, 2759) in the younger patient group and of £3250 (95% CI: 2843, 3531) in the older group. In contrast, when inpatient hospitalisation costs ICD-10 codes for non-CV events were included, statins resulted in cost savings (95% CI: -1165, 2782), and was consequently dominant, in the younger group, and had incremental costs of £5562 (95% CI: 4356, 6436) for an ICER of £7200 (6221, 8587) in patients aged 75+. CONCLUSIONS: Quasi-experimental evaluation using data from electronic medical records of patients treated in routine practice is feasible. CEA based on decision models may underestimate the cost-effectiveness of statins, due to their omission of hospitalisation costs associated with non-CVD outcomes.</description><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Cerebral infarction</subject><subject>Computerized medical records</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health records</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medical referrals</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Propensity</subject><subject>Quality adjusted life years</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>Savings</subject><subject>Secondary prevention</subject><subject>Statins</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjU1OwzAUhC0EEuXnAqyexDrBjuukZWfsZ2optZHtROqq6qIsoopCQzkNh60rcQBWM9J8M0PIA6Mlo6x-GsrhZ7MrK8qakoqSUnFBJkxU02LacH6ZPZ3PCk6ZuCY34zhQSmteiQn5TQsE5WMq0BhUyfboMEbwBmKSyboIxgeIqLzTMqzgLWBGkvXuzCgZtPW9jKprZQBtI8qIz-BfIoZenjHZ5qVOr6CL1r2ClkmCCX4JwXd5HwHb_Bu8swqWqK3KhZDvgo535Op9sxu39396Sx4NJrUoPg_7r-N2_F4P--PhI0fris6bWswqzvn_qBMif1PA</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Mujica-Mota, RE</creator><creator>Hughes, P</creator><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF STATINS FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE: OBSERVATIONAL STUDY USING DATA FROM ROUTINE ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS</title><author>Mujica-Mota, RE ; Hughes, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20976582333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Cerebral infarction</topic><topic>Computerized medical records</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health records</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medical referrals</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Propensity</topic><topic>Quality adjusted life years</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>Savings</topic><topic>Secondary prevention</topic><topic>Statins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mujica-Mota, RE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mujica-Mota, RE</au><au>Hughes, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF STATINS FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE: OBSERVATIONAL STUDY USING DATA FROM ROUTINE ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS</atitle><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>A259</spage><pages>A259-</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of statins for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in routine practice from the perspective of the English NHS. METHODS: Electronic English NHS health records of 6,078 previously untreated patients of age 60+ receiving statins following the occurrence of a myocardial infarction (MI) and a one-to-one propensity score matched control of untreated patients after a MI, resulted in n=12,156 patients. Costs of primary care service use and referrals were calculated from CPRD data and inpatient hospitalisations from HES and HRG codes. QALYs were calculated from ONS mortality records and utilities from the literature applied to MI or ischemic stroke events recorded in HES. Inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW) were used to estimate counterfactual outcomes in the absence of treatment cross-over in the control arm. RESULTS: The distribution of baseline characteristics was balanced across the two treatment groups, and 43% initially untreated patients crossed-over to statins treatment. For 60-74 year olds, we found an increase in QALY with statins of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.44-0.87) and, in the 75+ group, a gain of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72-0.88) per patient. Excluding the CV-unrelated costs of inpatient hospitalisations, the total incremental costs were respectively £1,616 (95% CI: 1347-2095) and £2,644 (95% CI: 2034-2963) per patient. Statins had an ICER of £2456 (95% CI: 1814, 2759) in the younger patient group and of £3250 (95% CI: 2843, 3531) in the older group. In contrast, when inpatient hospitalisation costs ICD-10 codes for non-CV events were included, statins resulted in cost savings (95% CI: -1165, 2782), and was consequently dominant, in the younger group, and had incremental costs of £5562 (95% CI: 4356, 6436) for an ICER of £7200 (6221, 8587) in patients aged 75+. CONCLUSIONS: Quasi-experimental evaluation using data from electronic medical records of patients treated in routine practice is feasible. CEA based on decision models may underestimate the cost-effectiveness of statins, due to their omission of hospitalisation costs associated with non-CVD outcomes.</abstract><cop>Lawrenceville</cop><pub>Elsevier Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3015
ispartof Value in health, 2017-05, Vol.20 (5), p.A259
issn 1098-3015
1524-4733
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2097658233
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular diseases
Cerebral infarction
Computerized medical records
Cost analysis
Cost control
Electronic health records
Electronic medical records
Health care expenditures
Health records
Health services
Heart attacks
Hospitalization
Inpatient care
Ischemia
Medical records
Medical referrals
Medical treatment
Mortality
Myocardial infarction
Observational studies
Patients
Primary care
Propensity
Quality adjusted life years
Quasi-experimental methods
Savings
Secondary prevention
Statins
title THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF STATINS FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE: OBSERVATIONAL STUDY USING DATA FROM ROUTINE ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A04%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20COST-EFFECTIVENESS%20OF%20STATINS%20FOR%20SECONDARY%20PREVENTION%20OF%20CARDIOVASCULAR%20DISEASE:%20OBSERVATIONAL%20STUDY%20USING%20DATA%20FROM%20ROUTINE%20ELECTRONIC%20MEDICAL%20RECORDS&rft.jtitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=Mujica-Mota,%20RE&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=A259&rft.pages=A259-&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2097658233%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2097658233&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true