The Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale: Development and Initial Validation
Research exploring nonbelievers' reasons for not believing in the existence of god(s) has focused on theory development. Such efforts are valuable, but may not capture the lived experiences of nonbelievers. The current two studies quantitatively examined nonbelievers' self-reported reasons...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychology of religion and spirituality 2018-08, Vol.10 (3), p.263-275 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 275 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 263 |
container_title | Psychology of religion and spirituality |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Bradley, David F Exline, Julie J Uzdavines, Alex Stauner, Nick Grubbs, Joshua B |
description | Research exploring nonbelievers' reasons for not believing in the existence of god(s) has focused on theory development. Such efforts are valuable, but may not capture the lived experiences of nonbelievers. The current two studies quantitatively examined nonbelievers' self-reported reasons for nonbelief through developing the Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale (RANGES). We developed an initial pool of 64 items using prior published research, revised by a panel of experts including researchers and thought leaders in nonbelief communities. Both studies included participants from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (Study 1 & 2 Ns = 520 & 369), all of whom reported not believing in god(s). In Study 1, our exploratory factor analysis suggested nine factors across 35 items. In Study 2, we confirmed the nine-factor structure using 38 items (35 from Study 1 plus three new items for better coverage of factors with few items) with adequate fit. Across both studies, the RANGES subscales showed good reliability, convergent validity (e.g., positive correlations with previous lists of reasons for religious doubt), predictive validity (e.g., positive and negative feelings toward God and religion), and discriminant validity (e.g., subscales were not unexpectedly associated with other measures). Our 1-year follow-up with a subset of Study 2 participants (N = 132) found different levels of stability among the RANGES subscales. This measure can promote further understanding the motivations, identities, and experiences of nonbelievers across cultures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/rel0000199 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2097655767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2097655767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a359t-5766b08c50f380941c5780fe82ed2ae1c84e3a3297b7dbfc9d4cbb2aa0d630273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctKBDEQRYMPUEc3fkHAhaC0Jql-xd0wjqMgCr5w16TT1U6kTdqkR_TvzTiCS2tTizp1b3GLkH3OTjiD4tRjx2JxKdfINpcpJDzLxTrZ4SlAKbmE542fAU84E2KL7ITwylgeIdgm_cMc6R2q4GygrqXjYY4mDIEq29Dxi3VhMDrQ1nl642yNncGWGktnrjkMdPoZWbQa6b1WHZ7Rc_zAzvVvaIcfhStrBqM6-qQ606jBOLtLNlvVBdz77SPyeDF9mFwm17ezq8n4OlGQySHJijyvWakz1kLJ4vE6K0rWYimwEQq5LlMEBUIWddHUrZZNqutaKMWaHJgoYEQOVrq9d-8LDEP16hbeRstKMFnkWXT4hyoBpJSpiNTRitLeheCxrXpv3pT_qjirlk-o_p4Q4eMVrHpV9eFLKx8j7DDohfcxlyW73INK5ADffP2GlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2083399942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale: Development and Initial Validation</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Bradley, David F ; Exline, Julie J ; Uzdavines, Alex ; Stauner, Nick ; Grubbs, Joshua B</creator><contributor>Park, Crystal L ; Hood, Ralph W ; Streib, Heinz ; Coleman, Thomas J ; Piedmont, Ralph L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bradley, David F ; Exline, Julie J ; Uzdavines, Alex ; Stauner, Nick ; Grubbs, Joshua B ; Park, Crystal L ; Hood, Ralph W ; Streib, Heinz ; Coleman, Thomas J ; Piedmont, Ralph L</creatorcontrib><description>Research exploring nonbelievers' reasons for not believing in the existence of god(s) has focused on theory development. Such efforts are valuable, but may not capture the lived experiences of nonbelievers. The current two studies quantitatively examined nonbelievers' self-reported reasons for nonbelief through developing the Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale (RANGES). We developed an initial pool of 64 items using prior published research, revised by a panel of experts including researchers and thought leaders in nonbelief communities. Both studies included participants from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (Study 1 & 2 Ns = 520 & 369), all of whom reported not believing in god(s). In Study 1, our exploratory factor analysis suggested nine factors across 35 items. In Study 2, we confirmed the nine-factor structure using 38 items (35 from Study 1 plus three new items for better coverage of factors with few items) with adequate fit. Across both studies, the RANGES subscales showed good reliability, convergent validity (e.g., positive correlations with previous lists of reasons for religious doubt), predictive validity (e.g., positive and negative feelings toward God and religion), and discriminant validity (e.g., subscales were not unexpectedly associated with other measures). Our 1-year follow-up with a subset of Study 2 participants (N = 132) found different levels of stability among the RANGES subscales. This measure can promote further understanding the motivations, identities, and experiences of nonbelievers across cultures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-1022</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 143389193X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433891939</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-1562</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/rel0000199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Agnosticism ; Atheism ; Convergent validity ; Discriminant validity ; Experts ; Exploratory factor analysis ; Factor Structure ; Female ; God ; God Concepts ; Human ; Male ; Personality ; Predictive validity ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Religion ; Religious Beliefs ; Statistical Validity ; Test Construction ; Test Validity ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Psychology of religion and spirituality, 2018-08, Vol.10 (3), p.263-275</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a359t-5766b08c50f380941c5780fe82ed2ae1c84e3a3297b7dbfc9d4cbb2aa0d630273</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Park, Crystal L</contributor><contributor>Hood, Ralph W</contributor><contributor>Streib, Heinz</contributor><contributor>Coleman, Thomas J</contributor><contributor>Piedmont, Ralph L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bradley, David F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Exline, Julie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzdavines, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stauner, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grubbs, Joshua B</creatorcontrib><title>The Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale: Development and Initial Validation</title><title>Psychology of religion and spirituality</title><description>Research exploring nonbelievers' reasons for not believing in the existence of god(s) has focused on theory development. Such efforts are valuable, but may not capture the lived experiences of nonbelievers. The current two studies quantitatively examined nonbelievers' self-reported reasons for nonbelief through developing the Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale (RANGES). We developed an initial pool of 64 items using prior published research, revised by a panel of experts including researchers and thought leaders in nonbelief communities. Both studies included participants from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (Study 1 & 2 Ns = 520 & 369), all of whom reported not believing in god(s). In Study 1, our exploratory factor analysis suggested nine factors across 35 items. In Study 2, we confirmed the nine-factor structure using 38 items (35 from Study 1 plus three new items for better coverage of factors with few items) with adequate fit. Across both studies, the RANGES subscales showed good reliability, convergent validity (e.g., positive correlations with previous lists of reasons for religious doubt), predictive validity (e.g., positive and negative feelings toward God and religion), and discriminant validity (e.g., subscales were not unexpectedly associated with other measures). Our 1-year follow-up with a subset of Study 2 participants (N = 132) found different levels of stability among the RANGES subscales. This measure can promote further understanding the motivations, identities, and experiences of nonbelievers across cultures.</description><subject>Agnosticism</subject><subject>Atheism</subject><subject>Convergent validity</subject><subject>Discriminant validity</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Exploratory factor analysis</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>God</subject><subject>God Concepts</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Predictive validity</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious Beliefs</subject><subject>Statistical Validity</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1941-1022</issn><issn>1943-1562</issn><isbn>143389193X</isbn><isbn>9781433891939</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctKBDEQRYMPUEc3fkHAhaC0Jql-xd0wjqMgCr5w16TT1U6kTdqkR_TvzTiCS2tTizp1b3GLkH3OTjiD4tRjx2JxKdfINpcpJDzLxTrZ4SlAKbmE542fAU84E2KL7ITwylgeIdgm_cMc6R2q4GygrqXjYY4mDIEq29Dxi3VhMDrQ1nl642yNncGWGktnrjkMdPoZWbQa6b1WHZ7Rc_zAzvVvaIcfhStrBqM6-qQ606jBOLtLNlvVBdz77SPyeDF9mFwm17ezq8n4OlGQySHJijyvWakz1kLJ4vE6K0rWYimwEQq5LlMEBUIWddHUrZZNqutaKMWaHJgoYEQOVrq9d-8LDEP16hbeRstKMFnkWXT4hyoBpJSpiNTRitLeheCxrXpv3pT_qjirlk-o_p4Q4eMVrHpV9eFLKx8j7DDohfcxlyW73INK5ADffP2GlA</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Bradley, David F</creator><creator>Exline, Julie J</creator><creator>Uzdavines, Alex</creator><creator>Stauner, Nick</creator><creator>Grubbs, Joshua B</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>The Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale: Development and Initial Validation</title><author>Bradley, David F ; Exline, Julie J ; Uzdavines, Alex ; Stauner, Nick ; Grubbs, Joshua B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a359t-5766b08c50f380941c5780fe82ed2ae1c84e3a3297b7dbfc9d4cbb2aa0d630273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agnosticism</topic><topic>Atheism</topic><topic>Convergent validity</topic><topic>Discriminant validity</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Exploratory factor analysis</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>God</topic><topic>God Concepts</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Predictive validity</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious Beliefs</topic><topic>Statistical Validity</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, David F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Exline, Julie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzdavines, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stauner, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grubbs, Joshua B</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Psychology of religion and spirituality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, David F</au><au>Exline, Julie J</au><au>Uzdavines, Alex</au><au>Stauner, Nick</au><au>Grubbs, Joshua B</au><au>Park, Crystal L</au><au>Hood, Ralph W</au><au>Streib, Heinz</au><au>Coleman, Thomas J</au><au>Piedmont, Ralph L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale: Development and Initial Validation</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of religion and spirituality</jtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>263-275</pages><issn>1941-1022</issn><eissn>1943-1562</eissn><isbn>143389193X</isbn><isbn>9781433891939</isbn><abstract>Research exploring nonbelievers' reasons for not believing in the existence of god(s) has focused on theory development. Such efforts are valuable, but may not capture the lived experiences of nonbelievers. The current two studies quantitatively examined nonbelievers' self-reported reasons for nonbelief through developing the Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale (RANGES). We developed an initial pool of 64 items using prior published research, revised by a panel of experts including researchers and thought leaders in nonbelief communities. Both studies included participants from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (Study 1 & 2 Ns = 520 & 369), all of whom reported not believing in god(s). In Study 1, our exploratory factor analysis suggested nine factors across 35 items. In Study 2, we confirmed the nine-factor structure using 38 items (35 from Study 1 plus three new items for better coverage of factors with few items) with adequate fit. Across both studies, the RANGES subscales showed good reliability, convergent validity (e.g., positive correlations with previous lists of reasons for religious doubt), predictive validity (e.g., positive and negative feelings toward God and religion), and discriminant validity (e.g., subscales were not unexpectedly associated with other measures). Our 1-year follow-up with a subset of Study 2 participants (N = 132) found different levels of stability among the RANGES subscales. This measure can promote further understanding the motivations, identities, and experiences of nonbelievers across cultures.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/rel0000199</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1941-1022 |
ispartof | Psychology of religion and spirituality, 2018-08, Vol.10 (3), p.263-275 |
issn | 1941-1022 1943-1562 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2097655767 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Agnosticism Atheism Convergent validity Discriminant validity Experts Exploratory factor analysis Factor Structure Female God God Concepts Human Male Personality Predictive validity Questionnaires Reliability Religion Religious Beliefs Statistical Validity Test Construction Test Validity Validity |
title | The Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale: Development and Initial Validation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T20%3A36%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Reasons%20of%20Atheists%20and%20Agnostics%20for%20Nonbelief%20in%20God's%20Existence%20Scale:%20Development%20and%20Initial%20Validation&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20religion%20and%20spirituality&rft.au=Bradley,%20David%20F&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=263-275&rft.issn=1941-1022&rft.eissn=1943-1562&rft.isbn=143389193X&rft.isbn_list=9781433891939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/rel0000199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2097655767%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2083399942&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |