U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO^sub 2^ policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study
We study the impact of fuel prices, technology innovation, and a CO2 emissions reduction policy on both the electric power and end-use sectors by comparing outputs from four U.S. energy-economic models through the year 2050. Achieving innovation goals decreases CO2 emissions in all models, regardles...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy economics 2018-06, Vol.73, p.352 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 352 |
container_title | Energy economics |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Hodson, Elke L Brown, Maxwell Cohen, Stuart Showalter, Sharon Wise, Marshall Wood, Frances Caron, Justin Feijoo, Felipe Iyer, Gokul Cleary, Kathryne |
description | We study the impact of fuel prices, technology innovation, and a CO2 emissions reduction policy on both the electric power and end-use sectors by comparing outputs from four U.S. energy-economic models through the year 2050. Achieving innovation goals decreases CO2 emissions in all models, regardless of natural gas price, due to increased energy efficiency and low-carbon generation becoming more cost competitive. For the models that include domestic natural gas markets, achieving innovation goals lowers wholesale electricity prices, but this effect diminishes as projected natural gas prices increase. Higher natural gas prices lead to higher wholesale electricity prices but fewer coal capacity retirements. A CO2 electric power sector emissions cap influences electric sector evolution under reference technology assumptions but has little to no incremental influence when added to innovation goals. Long-term, meeting innovation goals achieves a generation mix with similar CO2 emissions compared to the CO2 policy but with smaller increases to wholesale electricity prices. In the short-term, the relative effect on wholesale prices differs by model. Finally, higher natural gas prices, achieving innovation goals, and the combination of the two, increases the amount of renewable generation that is cost-effective to build and operate while slowing the growth of natural-gas fired generation, which is the predominant generation type in 2050 under reference conditions. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2097655381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2097655381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20976553813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjc1OwzAQhC0EEqHwDitxbSo7JqnLtWrFBVUCem0VnA115XiDf5DyKjwtPsCd02g0M99csEKopSwbocQlK7h44OVKKXnNbkI4c87rplYF-94vXheADv3HBAF1JA9mGFsdA1APEfXJkaUcGufoq42G3Bz6hBZGbzTOoXUdoM3LbP8I690hpHeoDjCSNXp6hBcMyWZm72mAeELYPG9BVjBQl1HGRfSa8q83gRyEmLrpll31rQ1496szdr_dvK2fytHTZ8IQj2dK3uXoWPHVsqlrqYT8X-sHFBdacA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2097655381</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO^sub 2^ policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hodson, Elke L ; Brown, Maxwell ; Cohen, Stuart ; Showalter, Sharon ; Wise, Marshall ; Wood, Frances ; Caron, Justin ; Feijoo, Felipe ; Iyer, Gokul ; Cleary, Kathryne</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodson, Elke L ; Brown, Maxwell ; Cohen, Stuart ; Showalter, Sharon ; Wise, Marshall ; Wood, Frances ; Caron, Justin ; Feijoo, Felipe ; Iyer, Gokul ; Cleary, Kathryne</creatorcontrib><description>We study the impact of fuel prices, technology innovation, and a CO2 emissions reduction policy on both the electric power and end-use sectors by comparing outputs from four U.S. energy-economic models through the year 2050. Achieving innovation goals decreases CO2 emissions in all models, regardless of natural gas price, due to increased energy efficiency and low-carbon generation becoming more cost competitive. For the models that include domestic natural gas markets, achieving innovation goals lowers wholesale electricity prices, but this effect diminishes as projected natural gas prices increase. Higher natural gas prices lead to higher wholesale electricity prices but fewer coal capacity retirements. A CO2 electric power sector emissions cap influences electric sector evolution under reference technology assumptions but has little to no incremental influence when added to innovation goals. Long-term, meeting innovation goals achieves a generation mix with similar CO2 emissions compared to the CO2 policy but with smaller increases to wholesale electricity prices. In the short-term, the relative effect on wholesale prices differs by model. Finally, higher natural gas prices, achieving innovation goals, and the combination of the two, increases the amount of renewable generation that is cost-effective to build and operate while slowing the growth of natural-gas fired generation, which is the predominant generation type in 2050 under reference conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-9883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Coal ; Construction costs ; Cost analysis ; Economic analysis ; Economic models ; Electric power ; Electric power generation ; Electricity ; Electricity distribution ; Electricity pricing ; Electromagnetic fields ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Energy consumption ; Energy economics ; Energy efficiency ; Energy industry ; Gasoline prices ; Innovations ; Markets ; Natural gas ; Natural gas prices ; Objectives ; Power ; Prices ; Producer prices ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Energy economics, 2018-06, Vol.73, p.352</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodson, Elke L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Maxwell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Showalter, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Marshall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caron, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feijoo, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iyer, Gokul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Kathryne</creatorcontrib><title>U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO^sub 2^ policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study</title><title>Energy economics</title><description>We study the impact of fuel prices, technology innovation, and a CO2 emissions reduction policy on both the electric power and end-use sectors by comparing outputs from four U.S. energy-economic models through the year 2050. Achieving innovation goals decreases CO2 emissions in all models, regardless of natural gas price, due to increased energy efficiency and low-carbon generation becoming more cost competitive. For the models that include domestic natural gas markets, achieving innovation goals lowers wholesale electricity prices, but this effect diminishes as projected natural gas prices increase. Higher natural gas prices lead to higher wholesale electricity prices but fewer coal capacity retirements. A CO2 electric power sector emissions cap influences electric sector evolution under reference technology assumptions but has little to no incremental influence when added to innovation goals. Long-term, meeting innovation goals achieves a generation mix with similar CO2 emissions compared to the CO2 policy but with smaller increases to wholesale electricity prices. In the short-term, the relative effect on wholesale prices differs by model. Finally, higher natural gas prices, achieving innovation goals, and the combination of the two, increases the amount of renewable generation that is cost-effective to build and operate while slowing the growth of natural-gas fired generation, which is the predominant generation type in 2050 under reference conditions.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Electromagnetic fields</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Gasoline prices</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Natural gas prices</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Producer prices</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0140-9883</issn><issn>1873-6181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjc1OwzAQhC0EEqHwDitxbSo7JqnLtWrFBVUCem0VnA115XiDf5DyKjwtPsCd02g0M99csEKopSwbocQlK7h44OVKKXnNbkI4c87rplYF-94vXheADv3HBAF1JA9mGFsdA1APEfXJkaUcGufoq42G3Bz6hBZGbzTOoXUdoM3LbP8I690hpHeoDjCSNXp6hBcMyWZm72mAeELYPG9BVjBQl1HGRfSa8q83gRyEmLrpll31rQ1496szdr_dvK2fytHTZ8IQj2dK3uXoWPHVsqlrqYT8X-sHFBdacA</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Hodson, Elke L</creator><creator>Brown, Maxwell</creator><creator>Cohen, Stuart</creator><creator>Showalter, Sharon</creator><creator>Wise, Marshall</creator><creator>Wood, Frances</creator><creator>Caron, Justin</creator><creator>Feijoo, Felipe</creator><creator>Iyer, Gokul</creator><creator>Cleary, Kathryne</creator><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO^sub 2^ policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study</title><author>Hodson, Elke L ; Brown, Maxwell ; Cohen, Stuart ; Showalter, Sharon ; Wise, Marshall ; Wood, Frances ; Caron, Justin ; Feijoo, Felipe ; Iyer, Gokul ; Cleary, Kathryne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20976553813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Electromagnetic fields</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Gasoline prices</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Natural gas prices</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Producer prices</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodson, Elke L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Maxwell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Showalter, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Marshall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caron, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feijoo, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iyer, Gokul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Kathryne</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodson, Elke L</au><au>Brown, Maxwell</au><au>Cohen, Stuart</au><au>Showalter, Sharon</au><au>Wise, Marshall</au><au>Wood, Frances</au><au>Caron, Justin</au><au>Feijoo, Felipe</au><au>Iyer, Gokul</au><au>Cleary, Kathryne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO^sub 2^ policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study</atitle><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>73</volume><spage>352</spage><pages>352-</pages><issn>0140-9883</issn><eissn>1873-6181</eissn><abstract>We study the impact of fuel prices, technology innovation, and a CO2 emissions reduction policy on both the electric power and end-use sectors by comparing outputs from four U.S. energy-economic models through the year 2050. Achieving innovation goals decreases CO2 emissions in all models, regardless of natural gas price, due to increased energy efficiency and low-carbon generation becoming more cost competitive. For the models that include domestic natural gas markets, achieving innovation goals lowers wholesale electricity prices, but this effect diminishes as projected natural gas prices increase. Higher natural gas prices lead to higher wholesale electricity prices but fewer coal capacity retirements. A CO2 electric power sector emissions cap influences electric sector evolution under reference technology assumptions but has little to no incremental influence when added to innovation goals. Long-term, meeting innovation goals achieves a generation mix with similar CO2 emissions compared to the CO2 policy but with smaller increases to wholesale electricity prices. In the short-term, the relative effect on wholesale prices differs by model. Finally, higher natural gas prices, achieving innovation goals, and the combination of the two, increases the amount of renewable generation that is cost-effective to build and operate while slowing the growth of natural-gas fired generation, which is the predominant generation type in 2050 under reference conditions.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Science Ltd</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-9883 |
ispartof | Energy economics, 2018-06, Vol.73, p.352 |
issn | 0140-9883 1873-6181 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2097655381 |
source | PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Coal Construction costs Cost analysis Economic analysis Economic models Electric power Electric power generation Electricity Electricity distribution Electricity pricing Electromagnetic fields Emissions Emissions control Energy consumption Energy economics Energy efficiency Energy industry Gasoline prices Innovations Markets Natural gas Natural gas prices Objectives Power Prices Producer prices Technology |
title | U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO^sub 2^ policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T20%3A39%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=U.S.%20energy%20sector%20impacts%20of%20technology%20innovation,%20fuel%20price,%20and%20electric%20sector%20CO%5Esub%202%5E%20policy:%20Results%20from%20the%20EMF%2032%20model%20intercomparison%20study&rft.jtitle=Energy%20economics&rft.au=Hodson,%20Elke%20L&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=73&rft.spage=352&rft.pages=352-&rft.issn=0140-9883&rft.eissn=1873-6181&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2097655381%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2097655381&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |