U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO^sub 2^ policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study

We study the impact of fuel prices, technology innovation, and a CO2 emissions reduction policy on both the electric power and end-use sectors by comparing outputs from four U.S. energy-economic models through the year 2050. Achieving innovation goals decreases CO2 emissions in all models, regardles...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy economics 2018-06, Vol.73, p.352
Hauptverfasser: Hodson, Elke L, Brown, Maxwell, Cohen, Stuart, Showalter, Sharon, Wise, Marshall, Wood, Frances, Caron, Justin, Feijoo, Felipe, Iyer, Gokul, Cleary, Kathryne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 352
container_title Energy economics
container_volume 73
creator Hodson, Elke L
Brown, Maxwell
Cohen, Stuart
Showalter, Sharon
Wise, Marshall
Wood, Frances
Caron, Justin
Feijoo, Felipe
Iyer, Gokul
Cleary, Kathryne
description We study the impact of fuel prices, technology innovation, and a CO2 emissions reduction policy on both the electric power and end-use sectors by comparing outputs from four U.S. energy-economic models through the year 2050. Achieving innovation goals decreases CO2 emissions in all models, regardless of natural gas price, due to increased energy efficiency and low-carbon generation becoming more cost competitive. For the models that include domestic natural gas markets, achieving innovation goals lowers wholesale electricity prices, but this effect diminishes as projected natural gas prices increase. Higher natural gas prices lead to higher wholesale electricity prices but fewer coal capacity retirements. A CO2 electric power sector emissions cap influences electric sector evolution under reference technology assumptions but has little to no incremental influence when added to innovation goals. Long-term, meeting innovation goals achieves a generation mix with similar CO2 emissions compared to the CO2 policy but with smaller increases to wholesale electricity prices. In the short-term, the relative effect on wholesale prices differs by model. Finally, higher natural gas prices, achieving innovation goals, and the combination of the two, increases the amount of renewable generation that is cost-effective to build and operate while slowing the growth of natural-gas fired generation, which is the predominant generation type in 2050 under reference conditions.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2097655381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2097655381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20976553813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjc1OwzAQhC0EEqHwDitxbSo7JqnLtWrFBVUCem0VnA115XiDf5DyKjwtPsCd02g0M99csEKopSwbocQlK7h44OVKKXnNbkI4c87rplYF-94vXheADv3HBAF1JA9mGFsdA1APEfXJkaUcGufoq42G3Bz6hBZGbzTOoXUdoM3LbP8I690hpHeoDjCSNXp6hBcMyWZm72mAeELYPG9BVjBQl1HGRfSa8q83gRyEmLrpll31rQ1496szdr_dvK2fytHTZ8IQj2dK3uXoWPHVsqlrqYT8X-sHFBdacA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2097655381</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO^sub 2^ policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hodson, Elke L ; Brown, Maxwell ; Cohen, Stuart ; Showalter, Sharon ; Wise, Marshall ; Wood, Frances ; Caron, Justin ; Feijoo, Felipe ; Iyer, Gokul ; Cleary, Kathryne</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodson, Elke L ; Brown, Maxwell ; Cohen, Stuart ; Showalter, Sharon ; Wise, Marshall ; Wood, Frances ; Caron, Justin ; Feijoo, Felipe ; Iyer, Gokul ; Cleary, Kathryne</creatorcontrib><description>We study the impact of fuel prices, technology innovation, and a CO2 emissions reduction policy on both the electric power and end-use sectors by comparing outputs from four U.S. energy-economic models through the year 2050. Achieving innovation goals decreases CO2 emissions in all models, regardless of natural gas price, due to increased energy efficiency and low-carbon generation becoming more cost competitive. For the models that include domestic natural gas markets, achieving innovation goals lowers wholesale electricity prices, but this effect diminishes as projected natural gas prices increase. Higher natural gas prices lead to higher wholesale electricity prices but fewer coal capacity retirements. A CO2 electric power sector emissions cap influences electric sector evolution under reference technology assumptions but has little to no incremental influence when added to innovation goals. Long-term, meeting innovation goals achieves a generation mix with similar CO2 emissions compared to the CO2 policy but with smaller increases to wholesale electricity prices. In the short-term, the relative effect on wholesale prices differs by model. Finally, higher natural gas prices, achieving innovation goals, and the combination of the two, increases the amount of renewable generation that is cost-effective to build and operate while slowing the growth of natural-gas fired generation, which is the predominant generation type in 2050 under reference conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-9883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Coal ; Construction costs ; Cost analysis ; Economic analysis ; Economic models ; Electric power ; Electric power generation ; Electricity ; Electricity distribution ; Electricity pricing ; Electromagnetic fields ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Energy consumption ; Energy economics ; Energy efficiency ; Energy industry ; Gasoline prices ; Innovations ; Markets ; Natural gas ; Natural gas prices ; Objectives ; Power ; Prices ; Producer prices ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Energy economics, 2018-06, Vol.73, p.352</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodson, Elke L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Maxwell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Showalter, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Marshall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caron, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feijoo, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iyer, Gokul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Kathryne</creatorcontrib><title>U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO^sub 2^ policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study</title><title>Energy economics</title><description>We study the impact of fuel prices, technology innovation, and a CO2 emissions reduction policy on both the electric power and end-use sectors by comparing outputs from four U.S. energy-economic models through the year 2050. Achieving innovation goals decreases CO2 emissions in all models, regardless of natural gas price, due to increased energy efficiency and low-carbon generation becoming more cost competitive. For the models that include domestic natural gas markets, achieving innovation goals lowers wholesale electricity prices, but this effect diminishes as projected natural gas prices increase. Higher natural gas prices lead to higher wholesale electricity prices but fewer coal capacity retirements. A CO2 electric power sector emissions cap influences electric sector evolution under reference technology assumptions but has little to no incremental influence when added to innovation goals. Long-term, meeting innovation goals achieves a generation mix with similar CO2 emissions compared to the CO2 policy but with smaller increases to wholesale electricity prices. In the short-term, the relative effect on wholesale prices differs by model. Finally, higher natural gas prices, achieving innovation goals, and the combination of the two, increases the amount of renewable generation that is cost-effective to build and operate while slowing the growth of natural-gas fired generation, which is the predominant generation type in 2050 under reference conditions.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Electromagnetic fields</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Gasoline prices</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Natural gas prices</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Producer prices</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0140-9883</issn><issn>1873-6181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjc1OwzAQhC0EEqHwDitxbSo7JqnLtWrFBVUCem0VnA115XiDf5DyKjwtPsCd02g0M99csEKopSwbocQlK7h44OVKKXnNbkI4c87rplYF-94vXheADv3HBAF1JA9mGFsdA1APEfXJkaUcGufoq42G3Bz6hBZGbzTOoXUdoM3LbP8I690hpHeoDjCSNXp6hBcMyWZm72mAeELYPG9BVjBQl1HGRfSa8q83gRyEmLrpll31rQ1496szdr_dvK2fytHTZ8IQj2dK3uXoWPHVsqlrqYT8X-sHFBdacA</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Hodson, Elke L</creator><creator>Brown, Maxwell</creator><creator>Cohen, Stuart</creator><creator>Showalter, Sharon</creator><creator>Wise, Marshall</creator><creator>Wood, Frances</creator><creator>Caron, Justin</creator><creator>Feijoo, Felipe</creator><creator>Iyer, Gokul</creator><creator>Cleary, Kathryne</creator><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO^sub 2^ policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study</title><author>Hodson, Elke L ; Brown, Maxwell ; Cohen, Stuart ; Showalter, Sharon ; Wise, Marshall ; Wood, Frances ; Caron, Justin ; Feijoo, Felipe ; Iyer, Gokul ; Cleary, Kathryne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20976553813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Electromagnetic fields</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Gasoline prices</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Natural gas prices</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Producer prices</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodson, Elke L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Maxwell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Showalter, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Marshall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caron, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feijoo, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iyer, Gokul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Kathryne</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodson, Elke L</au><au>Brown, Maxwell</au><au>Cohen, Stuart</au><au>Showalter, Sharon</au><au>Wise, Marshall</au><au>Wood, Frances</au><au>Caron, Justin</au><au>Feijoo, Felipe</au><au>Iyer, Gokul</au><au>Cleary, Kathryne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO^sub 2^ policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study</atitle><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>73</volume><spage>352</spage><pages>352-</pages><issn>0140-9883</issn><eissn>1873-6181</eissn><abstract>We study the impact of fuel prices, technology innovation, and a CO2 emissions reduction policy on both the electric power and end-use sectors by comparing outputs from four U.S. energy-economic models through the year 2050. Achieving innovation goals decreases CO2 emissions in all models, regardless of natural gas price, due to increased energy efficiency and low-carbon generation becoming more cost competitive. For the models that include domestic natural gas markets, achieving innovation goals lowers wholesale electricity prices, but this effect diminishes as projected natural gas prices increase. Higher natural gas prices lead to higher wholesale electricity prices but fewer coal capacity retirements. A CO2 electric power sector emissions cap influences electric sector evolution under reference technology assumptions but has little to no incremental influence when added to innovation goals. Long-term, meeting innovation goals achieves a generation mix with similar CO2 emissions compared to the CO2 policy but with smaller increases to wholesale electricity prices. In the short-term, the relative effect on wholesale prices differs by model. Finally, higher natural gas prices, achieving innovation goals, and the combination of the two, increases the amount of renewable generation that is cost-effective to build and operate while slowing the growth of natural-gas fired generation, which is the predominant generation type in 2050 under reference conditions.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Science Ltd</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-9883
ispartof Energy economics, 2018-06, Vol.73, p.352
issn 0140-9883
1873-6181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2097655381
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emissions
Coal
Construction costs
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
Economic models
Electric power
Electric power generation
Electricity
Electricity distribution
Electricity pricing
Electromagnetic fields
Emissions
Emissions control
Energy consumption
Energy economics
Energy efficiency
Energy industry
Gasoline prices
Innovations
Markets
Natural gas
Natural gas prices
Objectives
Power
Prices
Producer prices
Technology
title U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO^sub 2^ policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T20%3A39%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=U.S.%20energy%20sector%20impacts%20of%20technology%20innovation,%20fuel%20price,%20and%20electric%20sector%20CO%5Esub%202%5E%20policy:%20Results%20from%20the%20EMF%2032%20model%20intercomparison%20study&rft.jtitle=Energy%20economics&rft.au=Hodson,%20Elke%20L&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=73&rft.spage=352&rft.pages=352-&rft.issn=0140-9883&rft.eissn=1873-6181&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2097655381%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2097655381&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true