Protected employee concerted activity: hospitality-industry implications
Many fired employees now challenge their terminations by going to court. Employees can file charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) claiming a violation of the protected concerted activity provision of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRB's current interpretation of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly 1994-10, Vol.35 (5), p.12-15 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 15 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 12 |
| container_title | The Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Clay, J.M Stephens, E.C |
| description | Many fired employees now challenge their terminations by going to court. Employees can file charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) claiming a violation of the protected concerted activity provision of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRB's current interpretation of protected concerted activity is that an employee or employees must be acting on behalf of other employees in complaining about wages, hours, or working conditions, or trying to enforce a provision in the collective-bargaining agreement. Before a manager decides to discharge or discipline an employee, it is wise to determine whether the employee is engaged in protected concerted activity. If so, the employee is protected by Section 7 of the NLRA and, if discharged, may then have to be reinstated, most likely with full back pay. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/001088049403500510 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_209726999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A16401410</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_001088049403500510</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A16401410</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-e898300f2706d6df3fd49a5d7544894857fab9a0dcb95fe534bf9923230f88d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVooK6TP9BLTM7ZZvTllXoLIW0KgQaSnIUsjRyZ9cqR5IL_fWW20ENDNQcxw_NILwwhnyl8obTvrwEoKAVCC-ASQFI4ITMqJeu4kvwDmR2B7kh8JJ9K2UA7jLMZuX_MqaKr6Be43Q3pgLhwaXSYjyPravwV6-Hr4jWVXax2aE0XR78vNR8WsRnR2RrTWM7IabBDwfM_95y8fLt7vr3vHn5-_3F789A51uvaodKKAwTWw9IvfeDBC22l76UQSgsl-2BX2oJ3Ky0DSi5WQesWlUNQyis-J5fTu7uc3vZYqtmkfR7bl4aB7tlSa92gqwla2wFNHEOq2bo1jpjtkEYMsY1v6FIAFRQa3r2Dt_K4je49nk28y6mUjMHsctzafDAUzHEf5t99NOl6kopd49_Q_zUuJiPYZOw6x2JenhhQ3lJoBSD4bzIrk0M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>209726999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Protected employee concerted activity: hospitality-industry implications</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Clay, J.M ; Stephens, E.C</creator><creatorcontrib>Clay, J.M ; Stephens, E.C</creatorcontrib><description>Many fired employees now challenge their terminations by going to court. Employees can file charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) claiming a violation of the protected concerted activity provision of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRB's current interpretation of protected concerted activity is that an employee or employees must be acting on behalf of other employees in complaining about wages, hours, or working conditions, or trying to enforce a provision in the collective-bargaining agreement. Before a manager decides to discharge or discipline an employee, it is wise to determine whether the employee is engaged in protected concerted activity. If so, the employee is protected by Section 7 of the NLRA and, if discharged, may then have to be reinstated, most likely with full back pay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-8804</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-9655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-9663</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001088049403500510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Collective bargaining ; Complaints ; Court decisions ; Employee dismissals ; Employees ; Firings ; Hospitality industry ; Hotels & motels ; Hotels and motels ; human resources management ; Impacts ; Independent contractors ; Labor contracts ; Labor relations ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Litigation ; Management ; Restaurants ; Wagner Act 1935-US ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>The Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly, 1994-10, Vol.35 (5), p.12-15</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1994 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Cornell University. School of Hotel Administration Oct 1994</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001088049403500510$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001088049403500510$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clay, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, E.C</creatorcontrib><title>Protected employee concerted activity: hospitality-industry implications</title><title>The Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly</title><description>Many fired employees now challenge their terminations by going to court. Employees can file charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) claiming a violation of the protected concerted activity provision of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRB's current interpretation of protected concerted activity is that an employee or employees must be acting on behalf of other employees in complaining about wages, hours, or working conditions, or trying to enforce a provision in the collective-bargaining agreement. Before a manager decides to discharge or discipline an employee, it is wise to determine whether the employee is engaged in protected concerted activity. If so, the employee is protected by Section 7 of the NLRA and, if discharged, may then have to be reinstated, most likely with full back pay.</description><subject>Collective bargaining</subject><subject>Complaints</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Employee dismissals</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Firings</subject><subject>Hospitality industry</subject><subject>Hotels & motels</subject><subject>Hotels and motels</subject><subject>human resources management</subject><subject>Impacts</subject><subject>Independent contractors</subject><subject>Labor contracts</subject><subject>Labor relations</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Restaurants</subject><subject>Wagner Act 1935-US</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>0010-8804</issn><issn>1938-9655</issn><issn>1552-3853</issn><issn>1938-9663</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVooK6TP9BLTM7ZZvTllXoLIW0KgQaSnIUsjRyZ9cqR5IL_fWW20ENDNQcxw_NILwwhnyl8obTvrwEoKAVCC-ASQFI4ITMqJeu4kvwDmR2B7kh8JJ9K2UA7jLMZuX_MqaKr6Be43Q3pgLhwaXSYjyPravwV6-Hr4jWVXax2aE0XR78vNR8WsRnR2RrTWM7IabBDwfM_95y8fLt7vr3vHn5-_3F789A51uvaodKKAwTWw9IvfeDBC22l76UQSgsl-2BX2oJ3Ky0DSi5WQesWlUNQyis-J5fTu7uc3vZYqtmkfR7bl4aB7tlSa92gqwla2wFNHEOq2bo1jpjtkEYMsY1v6FIAFRQa3r2Dt_K4je49nk28y6mUjMHsctzafDAUzHEf5t99NOl6kopd49_Q_zUuJiPYZOw6x2JenhhQ3lJoBSD4bzIrk0M</recordid><startdate>199410</startdate><enddate>199410</enddate><creator>Clay, J.M</creator><creator>Stephens, E.C</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199410</creationdate><title>Protected employee concerted activity: hospitality-industry implications</title><author>Clay, J.M ; Stephens, E.C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-e898300f2706d6df3fd49a5d7544894857fab9a0dcb95fe534bf9923230f88d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Collective bargaining</topic><topic>Complaints</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Employee dismissals</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Firings</topic><topic>Hospitality industry</topic><topic>Hotels & motels</topic><topic>Hotels and motels</topic><topic>human resources management</topic><topic>Impacts</topic><topic>Independent contractors</topic><topic>Labor contracts</topic><topic>Labor relations</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Restaurants</topic><topic>Wagner Act 1935-US</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clay, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, E.C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clay, J.M</au><au>Stephens, E.C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Protected employee concerted activity: hospitality-industry implications</atitle><jtitle>The Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly</jtitle><date>1994-10</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>12-15</pages><issn>0010-8804</issn><issn>1938-9655</issn><eissn>1552-3853</eissn><eissn>1938-9663</eissn><abstract>Many fired employees now challenge their terminations by going to court. Employees can file charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) claiming a violation of the protected concerted activity provision of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRB's current interpretation of protected concerted activity is that an employee or employees must be acting on behalf of other employees in complaining about wages, hours, or working conditions, or trying to enforce a provision in the collective-bargaining agreement. Before a manager decides to discharge or discipline an employee, it is wise to determine whether the employee is engaged in protected concerted activity. If so, the employee is protected by Section 7 of the NLRA and, if discharged, may then have to be reinstated, most likely with full back pay.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/001088049403500510</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0010-8804 |
| ispartof | The Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly, 1994-10, Vol.35 (5), p.12-15 |
| issn | 0010-8804 1938-9655 1552-3853 1938-9663 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_209726999 |
| source | Access via SAGE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Collective bargaining Complaints Court decisions Employee dismissals Employees Firings Hospitality industry Hotels & motels Hotels and motels human resources management Impacts Independent contractors Labor contracts Labor relations Laws, regulations and rules Litigation Management Restaurants Wagner Act 1935-US Working conditions |
| title | Protected employee concerted activity: hospitality-industry implications |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A13%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Protected%20employee%20concerted%20activity:%20hospitality-industry%20implications&rft.jtitle=The%20Cornell%20hotel%20and%20restaurant%20administration%20quarterly&rft.au=Clay,%20J.M&rft.date=1994-10&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=12-15&rft.issn=0010-8804&rft.eissn=1552-3853&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001088049403500510&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA16401410%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=209726999&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A16401410&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001088049403500510&rfr_iscdi=true |