Debates over dam removal in Japan
Japan is facing a severe problem with the aging of its infrastructure, including dams. We studied eight controversial cases (the Ararse, Okusawa, Setoishi, Tamayodo, Minochi, Yasuoka, Tsuga and Nibutani Dam) involving dam removal in Japan and elucidated the triggers and suggested reasons for the deb...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water and environment journal : WEJ 2018-08, Vol.32 (3), p.446-452 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 452 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 446 |
| container_title | Water and environment journal : WEJ |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Noda, Keigo Hamada, Junya Kimura, Masaomi Oki, Kazuo |
| description | Japan is facing a severe problem with the aging of its infrastructure, including dams. We studied eight controversial cases (the Ararse, Okusawa, Setoishi, Tamayodo, Minochi, Yasuoka, Tsuga and Nibutani Dam) involving dam removal in Japan and elucidated the triggers and suggested reasons for the debate. Renewal of water rights was a major trigger in three of the eight cases. Environmental reasons in five cases were not relevant to the demolition decision regarding dams conferring public benefit, even if restoration of the river environment was a recognized benefit. Compared with single‐purpose dams, the removal debate for a multi‐purpose dam, based on economic reasons regarding a single function, did not gain traction. Among the eight cases, there has been no case triggered by the renewal of water right by reason of economics, which should be highlighted options for stock management purposes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/wej.12344 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2096360548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2096360548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4114-74e8de9ad027570035fe5e631597c8f85a49125c8d1b62a3c51a934f618fb17f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOw0AQRVcIJEKg4A-MqCic7HjfJQrhEUWiAVGu1vasZCt-sJuH8vcYjOiYZqY4c690CLkGOoNh5gesZ5Axzk_IBBRXqRSGnf7dWpyTixhrSrkyUk7IzQPmbosx6fYYktI1ScCm27tNUrXJyvWuvSRn3m0iXv3uKXl_XL4tntP169PL4n6dFhyAp4qjLtG4kmZKKEqZ8ChQMhBGFdpr4biBTBS6hFxmjhUCnGHcS9A-B-XZlNyOuX3oPncYt7budqEdKm1GjWSSCq4H6m6kitDFGNDbPlSNC0cL1H4bsIMB-2NgYOcje6g2ePwftB_L1fjxBV2GWco</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2096360548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Debates over dam removal in Japan</title><source>Wiley Blackwell Single Titles</source><creator>Noda, Keigo ; Hamada, Junya ; Kimura, Masaomi ; Oki, Kazuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Noda, Keigo ; Hamada, Junya ; Kimura, Masaomi ; Oki, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><description>Japan is facing a severe problem with the aging of its infrastructure, including dams. We studied eight controversial cases (the Ararse, Okusawa, Setoishi, Tamayodo, Minochi, Yasuoka, Tsuga and Nibutani Dam) involving dam removal in Japan and elucidated the triggers and suggested reasons for the debate. Renewal of water rights was a major trigger in three of the eight cases. Environmental reasons in five cases were not relevant to the demolition decision regarding dams conferring public benefit, even if restoration of the river environment was a recognized benefit. Compared with single‐purpose dams, the removal debate for a multi‐purpose dam, based on economic reasons regarding a single function, did not gain traction. Among the eight cases, there has been no case triggered by the renewal of water right by reason of economics, which should be highlighted options for stock management purposes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-6585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-6593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/wej.12344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ageing ; dam ; Dam effects ; Dams ; Demolition ; Economics ; environmental management ; Environmental restoration ; flood ; Removal ; Renewal ; Restoration ; river basin management ; Rivers ; Traction ; water resources ; Water rights</subject><ispartof>Water and environment journal : WEJ, 2018-08, Vol.32 (3), p.446-452</ispartof><rights>2018 CIWEM</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4114-74e8de9ad027570035fe5e631597c8f85a49125c8d1b62a3c51a934f618fb17f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4114-74e8de9ad027570035fe5e631597c8f85a49125c8d1b62a3c51a934f618fb17f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0952-5044</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fwej.12344$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fwej.12344$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Noda, Keigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamada, Junya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Masaomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oki, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><title>Debates over dam removal in Japan</title><title>Water and environment journal : WEJ</title><description>Japan is facing a severe problem with the aging of its infrastructure, including dams. We studied eight controversial cases (the Ararse, Okusawa, Setoishi, Tamayodo, Minochi, Yasuoka, Tsuga and Nibutani Dam) involving dam removal in Japan and elucidated the triggers and suggested reasons for the debate. Renewal of water rights was a major trigger in three of the eight cases. Environmental reasons in five cases were not relevant to the demolition decision regarding dams conferring public benefit, even if restoration of the river environment was a recognized benefit. Compared with single‐purpose dams, the removal debate for a multi‐purpose dam, based on economic reasons regarding a single function, did not gain traction. Among the eight cases, there has been no case triggered by the renewal of water right by reason of economics, which should be highlighted options for stock management purposes.</description><subject>Ageing</subject><subject>dam</subject><subject>Dam effects</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Demolition</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>flood</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Renewal</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>river basin management</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Traction</subject><subject>water resources</subject><subject>Water rights</subject><issn>1747-6585</issn><issn>1747-6593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLtOw0AQRVcIJEKg4A-MqCic7HjfJQrhEUWiAVGu1vasZCt-sJuH8vcYjOiYZqY4c690CLkGOoNh5gesZ5Axzk_IBBRXqRSGnf7dWpyTixhrSrkyUk7IzQPmbosx6fYYktI1ScCm27tNUrXJyvWuvSRn3m0iXv3uKXl_XL4tntP169PL4n6dFhyAp4qjLtG4kmZKKEqZ8ChQMhBGFdpr4biBTBS6hFxmjhUCnGHcS9A-B-XZlNyOuX3oPncYt7budqEdKm1GjWSSCq4H6m6kitDFGNDbPlSNC0cL1H4bsIMB-2NgYOcje6g2ePwftB_L1fjxBV2GWco</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Noda, Keigo</creator><creator>Hamada, Junya</creator><creator>Kimura, Masaomi</creator><creator>Oki, Kazuo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0952-5044</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Debates over dam removal in Japan</title><author>Noda, Keigo ; Hamada, Junya ; Kimura, Masaomi ; Oki, Kazuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4114-74e8de9ad027570035fe5e631597c8f85a49125c8d1b62a3c51a934f618fb17f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ageing</topic><topic>dam</topic><topic>Dam effects</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Demolition</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>flood</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Renewal</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>river basin management</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Traction</topic><topic>water resources</topic><topic>Water rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Noda, Keigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamada, Junya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Masaomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oki, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water and environment journal : WEJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Noda, Keigo</au><au>Hamada, Junya</au><au>Kimura, Masaomi</au><au>Oki, Kazuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Debates over dam removal in Japan</atitle><jtitle>Water and environment journal : WEJ</jtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>446</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>446-452</pages><issn>1747-6585</issn><eissn>1747-6593</eissn><abstract>Japan is facing a severe problem with the aging of its infrastructure, including dams. We studied eight controversial cases (the Ararse, Okusawa, Setoishi, Tamayodo, Minochi, Yasuoka, Tsuga and Nibutani Dam) involving dam removal in Japan and elucidated the triggers and suggested reasons for the debate. Renewal of water rights was a major trigger in three of the eight cases. Environmental reasons in five cases were not relevant to the demolition decision regarding dams conferring public benefit, even if restoration of the river environment was a recognized benefit. Compared with single‐purpose dams, the removal debate for a multi‐purpose dam, based on economic reasons regarding a single function, did not gain traction. Among the eight cases, there has been no case triggered by the renewal of water right by reason of economics, which should be highlighted options for stock management purposes.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/wej.12344</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0952-5044</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1747-6585 |
| ispartof | Water and environment journal : WEJ, 2018-08, Vol.32 (3), p.446-452 |
| issn | 1747-6585 1747-6593 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2096360548 |
| source | Wiley Blackwell Single Titles |
| subjects | Ageing dam Dam effects Dams Demolition Economics environmental management Environmental restoration flood Removal Renewal Restoration river basin management Rivers Traction water resources Water rights |
| title | Debates over dam removal in Japan |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T19%3A58%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Debates%20over%20dam%20removal%20in%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Water%20and%20environment%20journal%20:%20WEJ&rft.au=Noda,%20Keigo&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=446&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=446-452&rft.issn=1747-6585&rft.eissn=1747-6593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/wej.12344&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2096360548%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2096360548&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |