Impact of ruxolitinib pretreatment on outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis

Introduction Ruxolitinib is the first approved drug for treatment of myelofibrosis, but its impact of outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is unknown. Patients and methods We reported on 159 myelofibrosis patients (pts) with a median age of 59 years (r: 28‐74) who received reduc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of haematology 2018-09, Vol.101 (3), p.305-317
Hauptverfasser: Shahnaz Syed Abd Kadir, Sharifah, Christopeit, Maximilian, Wulf, Gerald, Wagner, Eva, Bornhauser, Martin, Schroeder, Thomas, Crysandt, Martina, Mayer, Karin, Jonas, Julia, Stelljes, Matthias, Badbaran, Anita, Ayuketang Ayuk, Francis, Triviai, Ioanna, Wolf, Dominik, Wolschke, Christine, Kröger, Nicolaus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Ruxolitinib is the first approved drug for treatment of myelofibrosis, but its impact of outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is unknown. Patients and methods We reported on 159 myelofibrosis patients (pts) with a median age of 59 years (r: 28‐74) who received reduced intensity ASCT between 2000 and 2015 in eight German centers from related (n = 23), matched (n = 86) or mismatched (n = 50) unrelated donors. Forty‐six (29%) patients received ruxolitinib at any time point prior to ASCT. The median daily dose of ruxolitinib was 30 mg (range 10‐40 mg) and the median duration of treatment was 4.9 months (range 0.4‐39.1 months). Results Primary graft failure was seen in 2 pts (4%) in the ruxolitinib and 3 (2%) in the non‐ruxolitinib group. Engraftment and incidence of acute GVHD grade II to IV and III/IV did not differ between groups (37% vs 39% and 19% vs 28%, respectively), nor did the non‐relapse mortality at 2 years (23% vs 23%). A trend for lower risk of relapse was seen in the ruxolitinib group (9% vs 17%, P = .2), resulting in a similar 2 year DFS and OS (68% vs 60% and 73% vs 70%, respectively). No difference in any outcome variable could be seen between ruxolitinib responders and those who failed or lost response to ruxolitinib. Conclusions These results suggest that ruxolitinib pretreatment in myelofibrosis patient does not negatively influence outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
ISSN:0902-4441
1600-0609
DOI:10.1111/ejh.13099