Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education
This study analyses four American multicultural teacher education textbooks for instances of inclusive and exclusive representations through the use of first person plural pronouns (i.e. we, us, our, ours). Positioning theory is used as a theoretical framework to examine the textbook authors’ uses o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Language teaching research : LTR 2018-09, Vol.22 (5), p.625-647 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 647 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 625 |
container_title | Language teaching research : LTR |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Uzum, Baburhan Yazan, Bedrettin Selvi, Ali Fuad |
description | This study analyses four American multicultural teacher education textbooks for instances of inclusive and exclusive representations through the use of first person plural pronouns (i.e. we, us, our, ours). Positioning theory is used as a theoretical framework to examine the textbook authors’ uses of first person plural pronouns and to understand how these pronouns perform reflexive and interactive positioning and fluidly (re)negotiate and (re)delineate the borders between ‘self’ and ‘other.’ The findings suggest that first person plural pronouns are used extensively in the focal textbooks to refer to such groups as authors, Americans, humans, teachers, and teacher educators. Expressing differing levels of ambiguity in interpretation, these pronouns play significant roles in the discursive representations of inclusivity and exclusivity across topics of multicultural education. This study implicates that language teachers should use criticality and reflexivity when approaching exclusionary discourses and representations that neglect the particularities of individuals from different cultures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1362168817718576 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2096259395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1189769</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1362168817718576</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2096259395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-c335f0e0be29f71f9d185f7dd7add2291c910c6058b661b3bb36449143dfadc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw54IUiXMhbtqkOU7TGEOTuMC5SvMBHV07kgbGvydV-ZCQuNiOn9d2bITOgVwBcH4NlKXAiiLGUOScHaAJZJwnROTZYYwjTgZ-jE683xBCaE7oBMlVq5rg6zeDZaux2X-_gjcedxa_G1y32HbB4dnWuFrJFvdm31dd9-Jj3uFtaPpaRROcbCKT6tk4bHRQsq-79hQdWdl4c_blp-jxZvEwv03W98vVfLZOFKXQDza3xJDKpMJysELHNSzXmkut01SAEkAUI3lRMQYVrSrKskxARrWVWuV0ii7HvjvXvQbj-3ITP93GkWVKBEtzQcWgIqNKuc57Z2y5c_VWuo8SSDkcsvx7yFhyMZYM2__IF3cAheBMRJ6M3Msn8zv0336fhvR9Eg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2096259395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Uzum, Baburhan ; Yazan, Bedrettin ; Selvi, Ali Fuad</creator><creatorcontrib>Uzum, Baburhan ; Yazan, Bedrettin ; Selvi, Ali Fuad</creatorcontrib><description>This study analyses four American multicultural teacher education textbooks for instances of inclusive and exclusive representations through the use of first person plural pronouns (i.e. we, us, our, ours). Positioning theory is used as a theoretical framework to examine the textbook authors’ uses of first person plural pronouns and to understand how these pronouns perform reflexive and interactive positioning and fluidly (re)negotiate and (re)delineate the borders between ‘self’ and ‘other.’ The findings suggest that first person plural pronouns are used extensively in the focal textbooks to refer to such groups as authors, Americans, humans, teachers, and teacher educators. Expressing differing levels of ambiguity in interpretation, these pronouns play significant roles in the discursive representations of inclusivity and exclusivity across topics of multicultural education. This study implicates that language teachers should use criticality and reflexivity when approaching exclusionary discourses and representations that neglect the particularities of individuals from different cultures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1362-1688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1362168817718576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Ambiguity (Semantics) ; Communicative Competence (Languages) ; Critical discourse analysis ; Cultural Awareness ; Cultural Pluralism ; Form Classes (Languages) ; Inclusion ; Intercultural Communication ; Language Teachers ; Language Usage ; Multicultural Education ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Negotiation ; Pronouns ; Reflexivity ; Teacher Education ; Textbook Content ; Textbooks</subject><ispartof>Language teaching research : LTR, 2018-09, Vol.22 (5), p.625-647</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-c335f0e0be29f71f9d185f7dd7add2291c910c6058b661b3bb36449143dfadc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-c335f0e0be29f71f9d185f7dd7add2291c910c6058b661b3bb36449143dfadc53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1362168817718576$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1362168817718576$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1189769$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uzum, Baburhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazan, Bedrettin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvi, Ali Fuad</creatorcontrib><title>Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education</title><title>Language teaching research : LTR</title><description>This study analyses four American multicultural teacher education textbooks for instances of inclusive and exclusive representations through the use of first person plural pronouns (i.e. we, us, our, ours). Positioning theory is used as a theoretical framework to examine the textbook authors’ uses of first person plural pronouns and to understand how these pronouns perform reflexive and interactive positioning and fluidly (re)negotiate and (re)delineate the borders between ‘self’ and ‘other.’ The findings suggest that first person plural pronouns are used extensively in the focal textbooks to refer to such groups as authors, Americans, humans, teachers, and teacher educators. Expressing differing levels of ambiguity in interpretation, these pronouns play significant roles in the discursive representations of inclusivity and exclusivity across topics of multicultural education. This study implicates that language teachers should use criticality and reflexivity when approaching exclusionary discourses and representations that neglect the particularities of individuals from different cultures.</description><subject>Ambiguity (Semantics)</subject><subject>Communicative Competence (Languages)</subject><subject>Critical discourse analysis</subject><subject>Cultural Awareness</subject><subject>Cultural Pluralism</subject><subject>Form Classes (Languages)</subject><subject>Inclusion</subject><subject>Intercultural Communication</subject><subject>Language Teachers</subject><subject>Language Usage</subject><subject>Multicultural Education</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Pronouns</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Textbook Content</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><issn>1362-1688</issn><issn>1477-0954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw54IUiXMhbtqkOU7TGEOTuMC5SvMBHV07kgbGvydV-ZCQuNiOn9d2bITOgVwBcH4NlKXAiiLGUOScHaAJZJwnROTZYYwjTgZ-jE683xBCaE7oBMlVq5rg6zeDZaux2X-_gjcedxa_G1y32HbB4dnWuFrJFvdm31dd9-Jj3uFtaPpaRROcbCKT6tk4bHRQsq-79hQdWdl4c_blp-jxZvEwv03W98vVfLZOFKXQDza3xJDKpMJysELHNSzXmkut01SAEkAUI3lRMQYVrSrKskxARrWVWuV0ii7HvjvXvQbj-3ITP93GkWVKBEtzQcWgIqNKuc57Z2y5c_VWuo8SSDkcsvx7yFhyMZYM2__IF3cAheBMRJ6M3Msn8zv0336fhvR9Eg</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Uzum, Baburhan</creator><creator>Yazan, Bedrettin</creator><creator>Selvi, Ali Fuad</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education</title><author>Uzum, Baburhan ; Yazan, Bedrettin ; Selvi, Ali Fuad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-c335f0e0be29f71f9d185f7dd7add2291c910c6058b661b3bb36449143dfadc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity (Semantics)</topic><topic>Communicative Competence (Languages)</topic><topic>Critical discourse analysis</topic><topic>Cultural Awareness</topic><topic>Cultural Pluralism</topic><topic>Form Classes (Languages)</topic><topic>Inclusion</topic><topic>Intercultural Communication</topic><topic>Language Teachers</topic><topic>Language Usage</topic><topic>Multicultural Education</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Pronouns</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Textbook Content</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uzum, Baburhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazan, Bedrettin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvi, Ali Fuad</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language teaching research : LTR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uzum, Baburhan</au><au>Yazan, Bedrettin</au><au>Selvi, Ali Fuad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1189769</ericid><atitle>Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education</atitle><jtitle>Language teaching research : LTR</jtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>647</epage><pages>625-647</pages><issn>1362-1688</issn><eissn>1477-0954</eissn><abstract>This study analyses four American multicultural teacher education textbooks for instances of inclusive and exclusive representations through the use of first person plural pronouns (i.e. we, us, our, ours). Positioning theory is used as a theoretical framework to examine the textbook authors’ uses of first person plural pronouns and to understand how these pronouns perform reflexive and interactive positioning and fluidly (re)negotiate and (re)delineate the borders between ‘self’ and ‘other.’ The findings suggest that first person plural pronouns are used extensively in the focal textbooks to refer to such groups as authors, Americans, humans, teachers, and teacher educators. Expressing differing levels of ambiguity in interpretation, these pronouns play significant roles in the discursive representations of inclusivity and exclusivity across topics of multicultural education. This study implicates that language teachers should use criticality and reflexivity when approaching exclusionary discourses and representations that neglect the particularities of individuals from different cultures.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1362168817718576</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1362-1688 |
ispartof | Language teaching research : LTR, 2018-09, Vol.22 (5), p.625-647 |
issn | 1362-1688 1477-0954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2096259395 |
source | SAGE Complete |
subjects | Ambiguity (Semantics) Communicative Competence (Languages) Critical discourse analysis Cultural Awareness Cultural Pluralism Form Classes (Languages) Inclusion Intercultural Communication Language Teachers Language Usage Multicultural Education Multiculturalism & pluralism Negotiation Pronouns Reflexivity Teacher Education Textbook Content Textbooks |
title | Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T17%3A04%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inclusive%20and%20exclusive%20uses%20of%20we%20in%20four%20American%20textbooks%20for%20multicultural%20teacher%20education&rft.jtitle=Language%20teaching%20research%20:%20LTR&rft.au=Uzum,%20Baburhan&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=647&rft.pages=625-647&rft.issn=1362-1688&rft.eissn=1477-0954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1362168817718576&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2096259395%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2096259395&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1189769&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1362168817718576&rfr_iscdi=true |