Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education

This study analyses four American multicultural teacher education textbooks for instances of inclusive and exclusive representations through the use of first person plural pronouns (i.e. we, us, our, ours). Positioning theory is used as a theoretical framework to examine the textbook authors’ uses o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language teaching research : LTR 2018-09, Vol.22 (5), p.625-647
Hauptverfasser: Uzum, Baburhan, Yazan, Bedrettin, Selvi, Ali Fuad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 647
container_issue 5
container_start_page 625
container_title Language teaching research : LTR
container_volume 22
creator Uzum, Baburhan
Yazan, Bedrettin
Selvi, Ali Fuad
description This study analyses four American multicultural teacher education textbooks for instances of inclusive and exclusive representations through the use of first person plural pronouns (i.e. we, us, our, ours). Positioning theory is used as a theoretical framework to examine the textbook authors’ uses of first person plural pronouns and to understand how these pronouns perform reflexive and interactive positioning and fluidly (re)negotiate and (re)delineate the borders between ‘self’ and ‘other.’ The findings suggest that first person plural pronouns are used extensively in the focal textbooks to refer to such groups as authors, Americans, humans, teachers, and teacher educators. Expressing differing levels of ambiguity in interpretation, these pronouns play significant roles in the discursive representations of inclusivity and exclusivity across topics of multicultural education. This study implicates that language teachers should use criticality and reflexivity when approaching exclusionary discourses and representations that neglect the particularities of individuals from different cultures.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1362168817718576
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2096259395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1189769</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1362168817718576</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2096259395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-c335f0e0be29f71f9d185f7dd7add2291c910c6058b661b3bb36449143dfadc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw54IUiXMhbtqkOU7TGEOTuMC5SvMBHV07kgbGvydV-ZCQuNiOn9d2bITOgVwBcH4NlKXAiiLGUOScHaAJZJwnROTZYYwjTgZ-jE683xBCaE7oBMlVq5rg6zeDZaux2X-_gjcedxa_G1y32HbB4dnWuFrJFvdm31dd9-Jj3uFtaPpaRROcbCKT6tk4bHRQsq-79hQdWdl4c_blp-jxZvEwv03W98vVfLZOFKXQDza3xJDKpMJysELHNSzXmkut01SAEkAUI3lRMQYVrSrKskxARrWVWuV0ii7HvjvXvQbj-3ITP93GkWVKBEtzQcWgIqNKuc57Z2y5c_VWuo8SSDkcsvx7yFhyMZYM2__IF3cAheBMRJ6M3Msn8zv0336fhvR9Eg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2096259395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Uzum, Baburhan ; Yazan, Bedrettin ; Selvi, Ali Fuad</creator><creatorcontrib>Uzum, Baburhan ; Yazan, Bedrettin ; Selvi, Ali Fuad</creatorcontrib><description>This study analyses four American multicultural teacher education textbooks for instances of inclusive and exclusive representations through the use of first person plural pronouns (i.e. we, us, our, ours). Positioning theory is used as a theoretical framework to examine the textbook authors’ uses of first person plural pronouns and to understand how these pronouns perform reflexive and interactive positioning and fluidly (re)negotiate and (re)delineate the borders between ‘self’ and ‘other.’ The findings suggest that first person plural pronouns are used extensively in the focal textbooks to refer to such groups as authors, Americans, humans, teachers, and teacher educators. Expressing differing levels of ambiguity in interpretation, these pronouns play significant roles in the discursive representations of inclusivity and exclusivity across topics of multicultural education. This study implicates that language teachers should use criticality and reflexivity when approaching exclusionary discourses and representations that neglect the particularities of individuals from different cultures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1362-1688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1362168817718576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Ambiguity (Semantics) ; Communicative Competence (Languages) ; Critical discourse analysis ; Cultural Awareness ; Cultural Pluralism ; Form Classes (Languages) ; Inclusion ; Intercultural Communication ; Language Teachers ; Language Usage ; Multicultural Education ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; Negotiation ; Pronouns ; Reflexivity ; Teacher Education ; Textbook Content ; Textbooks</subject><ispartof>Language teaching research : LTR, 2018-09, Vol.22 (5), p.625-647</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-c335f0e0be29f71f9d185f7dd7add2291c910c6058b661b3bb36449143dfadc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-c335f0e0be29f71f9d185f7dd7add2291c910c6058b661b3bb36449143dfadc53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1362168817718576$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1362168817718576$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1189769$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uzum, Baburhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazan, Bedrettin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvi, Ali Fuad</creatorcontrib><title>Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education</title><title>Language teaching research : LTR</title><description>This study analyses four American multicultural teacher education textbooks for instances of inclusive and exclusive representations through the use of first person plural pronouns (i.e. we, us, our, ours). Positioning theory is used as a theoretical framework to examine the textbook authors’ uses of first person plural pronouns and to understand how these pronouns perform reflexive and interactive positioning and fluidly (re)negotiate and (re)delineate the borders between ‘self’ and ‘other.’ The findings suggest that first person plural pronouns are used extensively in the focal textbooks to refer to such groups as authors, Americans, humans, teachers, and teacher educators. Expressing differing levels of ambiguity in interpretation, these pronouns play significant roles in the discursive representations of inclusivity and exclusivity across topics of multicultural education. This study implicates that language teachers should use criticality and reflexivity when approaching exclusionary discourses and representations that neglect the particularities of individuals from different cultures.</description><subject>Ambiguity (Semantics)</subject><subject>Communicative Competence (Languages)</subject><subject>Critical discourse analysis</subject><subject>Cultural Awareness</subject><subject>Cultural Pluralism</subject><subject>Form Classes (Languages)</subject><subject>Inclusion</subject><subject>Intercultural Communication</subject><subject>Language Teachers</subject><subject>Language Usage</subject><subject>Multicultural Education</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Pronouns</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Textbook Content</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><issn>1362-1688</issn><issn>1477-0954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw54IUiXMhbtqkOU7TGEOTuMC5SvMBHV07kgbGvydV-ZCQuNiOn9d2bITOgVwBcH4NlKXAiiLGUOScHaAJZJwnROTZYYwjTgZ-jE683xBCaE7oBMlVq5rg6zeDZaux2X-_gjcedxa_G1y32HbB4dnWuFrJFvdm31dd9-Jj3uFtaPpaRROcbCKT6tk4bHRQsq-79hQdWdl4c_blp-jxZvEwv03W98vVfLZOFKXQDza3xJDKpMJysELHNSzXmkut01SAEkAUI3lRMQYVrSrKskxARrWVWuV0ii7HvjvXvQbj-3ITP93GkWVKBEtzQcWgIqNKuc57Z2y5c_VWuo8SSDkcsvx7yFhyMZYM2__IF3cAheBMRJ6M3Msn8zv0336fhvR9Eg</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Uzum, Baburhan</creator><creator>Yazan, Bedrettin</creator><creator>Selvi, Ali Fuad</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education</title><author>Uzum, Baburhan ; Yazan, Bedrettin ; Selvi, Ali Fuad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-c335f0e0be29f71f9d185f7dd7add2291c910c6058b661b3bb36449143dfadc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity (Semantics)</topic><topic>Communicative Competence (Languages)</topic><topic>Critical discourse analysis</topic><topic>Cultural Awareness</topic><topic>Cultural Pluralism</topic><topic>Form Classes (Languages)</topic><topic>Inclusion</topic><topic>Intercultural Communication</topic><topic>Language Teachers</topic><topic>Language Usage</topic><topic>Multicultural Education</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Pronouns</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Textbook Content</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uzum, Baburhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazan, Bedrettin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvi, Ali Fuad</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language teaching research : LTR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uzum, Baburhan</au><au>Yazan, Bedrettin</au><au>Selvi, Ali Fuad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1189769</ericid><atitle>Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education</atitle><jtitle>Language teaching research : LTR</jtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>647</epage><pages>625-647</pages><issn>1362-1688</issn><eissn>1477-0954</eissn><abstract>This study analyses four American multicultural teacher education textbooks for instances of inclusive and exclusive representations through the use of first person plural pronouns (i.e. we, us, our, ours). Positioning theory is used as a theoretical framework to examine the textbook authors’ uses of first person plural pronouns and to understand how these pronouns perform reflexive and interactive positioning and fluidly (re)negotiate and (re)delineate the borders between ‘self’ and ‘other.’ The findings suggest that first person plural pronouns are used extensively in the focal textbooks to refer to such groups as authors, Americans, humans, teachers, and teacher educators. Expressing differing levels of ambiguity in interpretation, these pronouns play significant roles in the discursive representations of inclusivity and exclusivity across topics of multicultural education. This study implicates that language teachers should use criticality and reflexivity when approaching exclusionary discourses and representations that neglect the particularities of individuals from different cultures.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1362168817718576</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1362-1688
ispartof Language teaching research : LTR, 2018-09, Vol.22 (5), p.625-647
issn 1362-1688
1477-0954
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2096259395
source SAGE Complete
subjects Ambiguity (Semantics)
Communicative Competence (Languages)
Critical discourse analysis
Cultural Awareness
Cultural Pluralism
Form Classes (Languages)
Inclusion
Intercultural Communication
Language Teachers
Language Usage
Multicultural Education
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Negotiation
Pronouns
Reflexivity
Teacher Education
Textbook Content
Textbooks
title Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T17%3A04%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inclusive%20and%20exclusive%20uses%20of%20we%20in%20four%20American%20textbooks%20for%20multicultural%20teacher%20education&rft.jtitle=Language%20teaching%20research%20:%20LTR&rft.au=Uzum,%20Baburhan&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=647&rft.pages=625-647&rft.issn=1362-1688&rft.eissn=1477-0954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1362168817718576&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2096259395%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2096259395&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1189769&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1362168817718576&rfr_iscdi=true