DO BETTER INFORMED INVESTORS ALWAYS DO BETTER? A BUYBACK PUZZLE

We explore the value of private investment information using data from a singular source: auctions of yearling racehorses. Horse breeders possess superior information about their own horses and have strong financial incentives to buy the best of these back at auction. However, those they repurchase...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economic inquiry 2018-10, Vol.56 (4), p.2137-2157
Hauptverfasser: Boyle, Glenn, Ward, Gerald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2157
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2137
container_title Economic inquiry
container_volume 56
creator Boyle, Glenn
Ward, Gerald
description We explore the value of private investment information using data from a singular source: auctions of yearling racehorses. Horse breeders possess superior information about their own horses and have strong financial incentives to buy the best of these back at auction. However, those they repurchase subsequently perform significantly worse on average, earning 30% less at the racetrack than horses purchased by outsiders. Moreover, this underperformance is concentrated in male horses, despite these being purchased exclusively for racing purposes. These puzzling findings cannot be explained by differences in horse risk or breeder abilities, or by nonfinancial objectives, or by behavioral or selection biases. (JEL G02, G11, G14, L83, D44)
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ecin.12688
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2095424418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A557301212</galeid><sourcerecordid>A557301212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-bbfb86aa8c02927d2e9798bbbbd8a2f2aab615fc9b93d0bafe84ce573d2d4eb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90t1OwjAUAODGaCKiNz7BEq80DttuHd2VGTCQiGD40eBN03YdjsCG64jy9hZnVBLiadI2zXdO2-QAcI5gDZm4UTJJawh7lB6ACnI9YtexTw5BBUKf2JhQ5xicaD2HEDoeIRVw2xpYjXA8DodWt98eDB_Cltk8haPxYDiygt5zMB1ZP-bWCqzGZNoImvfW4-TlpReegqOYL7Q6-16rYNIOx807uzfodJtBz5YEEmoLEQvqcU4lxD6uR1j5dZ8KExHlOMacCw-RWPrCdyIoeKyoKxWpOxGOXCU8pwouyrqrPHtbK12webbOU3Mlw-ZrLnZdRH_VjC8US9I4K3Iul4mWLCCmGkQYYaPsPWqmUpXzRZaqODHHO762x5sRqWUi9yZc7iQYU6iPYsbXWrNuo7Nrr_9YsdZJqrSZdDJ7LXSZssOvSi7zTOtcxWyVJ0uebxiCbNsCbNsC7KsFDEYlfjcP3PwjWdjs9sucT6STqis</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2095424418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DO BETTER INFORMED INVESTORS ALWAYS DO BETTER? A BUYBACK PUZZLE</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Boyle, Glenn ; Ward, Gerald</creator><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Glenn ; Ward, Gerald</creatorcontrib><description>We explore the value of private investment information using data from a singular source: auctions of yearling racehorses. Horse breeders possess superior information about their own horses and have strong financial incentives to buy the best of these back at auction. However, those they repurchase subsequently perform significantly worse on average, earning 30% less at the racetrack than horses purchased by outsiders. Moreover, this underperformance is concentrated in male horses, despite these being purchased exclusively for racing purposes. These puzzling findings cannot be explained by differences in horse risk or breeder abilities, or by nonfinancial objectives, or by behavioral or selection biases. (JEL G02, G11, G14, L83, D44)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-2583</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Auctions ; Bias ; Economic aspects ; Financial incentives ; Horse breeders ; Horses ; Knowledge ; Marketing ; Planning ; Racing</subject><ispartof>Economic inquiry, 2018-10, Vol.56 (4), p.2137-2157</ispartof><rights>2018 Western Economic Association International</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-bbfb86aa8c02927d2e9798bbbbd8a2f2aab615fc9b93d0bafe84ce573d2d4eb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fecin.12688$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fecin.12688$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1413,27906,27907,45556,45557</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Gerald</creatorcontrib><title>DO BETTER INFORMED INVESTORS ALWAYS DO BETTER? A BUYBACK PUZZLE</title><title>Economic inquiry</title><description>We explore the value of private investment information using data from a singular source: auctions of yearling racehorses. Horse breeders possess superior information about their own horses and have strong financial incentives to buy the best of these back at auction. However, those they repurchase subsequently perform significantly worse on average, earning 30% less at the racetrack than horses purchased by outsiders. Moreover, this underperformance is concentrated in male horses, despite these being purchased exclusively for racing purposes. These puzzling findings cannot be explained by differences in horse risk or breeder abilities, or by nonfinancial objectives, or by behavioral or selection biases. (JEL G02, G11, G14, L83, D44)</description><subject>Auctions</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Financial incentives</subject><subject>Horse breeders</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Racing</subject><issn>0095-2583</issn><issn>1465-7295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNp90t1OwjAUAODGaCKiNz7BEq80DttuHd2VGTCQiGD40eBN03YdjsCG64jy9hZnVBLiadI2zXdO2-QAcI5gDZm4UTJJawh7lB6ACnI9YtexTw5BBUKf2JhQ5xicaD2HEDoeIRVw2xpYjXA8DodWt98eDB_Cltk8haPxYDiygt5zMB1ZP-bWCqzGZNoImvfW4-TlpReegqOYL7Q6-16rYNIOx807uzfodJtBz5YEEmoLEQvqcU4lxD6uR1j5dZ8KExHlOMacCw-RWPrCdyIoeKyoKxWpOxGOXCU8pwouyrqrPHtbK12webbOU3Mlw-ZrLnZdRH_VjC8US9I4K3Iul4mWLCCmGkQYYaPsPWqmUpXzRZaqODHHO762x5sRqWUi9yZc7iQYU6iPYsbXWrNuo7Nrr_9YsdZJqrSZdDJ7LXSZssOvSi7zTOtcxWyVJ0uebxiCbNsCbNsC7KsFDEYlfjcP3PwjWdjs9sucT6STqis</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Boyle, Glenn</creator><creator>Ward, Gerald</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</general><general>Western Economic Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>DO BETTER INFORMED INVESTORS ALWAYS DO BETTER? A BUYBACK PUZZLE</title><author>Boyle, Glenn ; Ward, Gerald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-bbfb86aa8c02927d2e9798bbbbd8a2f2aab615fc9b93d0bafe84ce573d2d4eb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Auctions</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Financial incentives</topic><topic>Horse breeders</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Racing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Gerald</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Economic inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boyle, Glenn</au><au>Ward, Gerald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DO BETTER INFORMED INVESTORS ALWAYS DO BETTER? A BUYBACK PUZZLE</atitle><jtitle>Economic inquiry</jtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2137</spage><epage>2157</epage><pages>2137-2157</pages><issn>0095-2583</issn><eissn>1465-7295</eissn><abstract>We explore the value of private investment information using data from a singular source: auctions of yearling racehorses. Horse breeders possess superior information about their own horses and have strong financial incentives to buy the best of these back at auction. However, those they repurchase subsequently perform significantly worse on average, earning 30% less at the racetrack than horses purchased by outsiders. Moreover, this underperformance is concentrated in male horses, despite these being purchased exclusively for racing purposes. These puzzling findings cannot be explained by differences in horse risk or breeder abilities, or by nonfinancial objectives, or by behavioral or selection biases. (JEL G02, G11, G14, L83, D44)</abstract><cop>Boston, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ecin.12688</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-2583
ispartof Economic inquiry, 2018-10, Vol.56 (4), p.2137-2157
issn 0095-2583
1465-7295
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2095424418
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Auctions
Bias
Economic aspects
Financial incentives
Horse breeders
Horses
Knowledge
Marketing
Planning
Racing
title DO BETTER INFORMED INVESTORS ALWAYS DO BETTER? A BUYBACK PUZZLE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A02%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DO%20BETTER%20INFORMED%20INVESTORS%20ALWAYS%20DO%20BETTER?%20A%20BUYBACK%20PUZZLE&rft.jtitle=Economic%20inquiry&rft.au=Boyle,%20Glenn&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2137&rft.epage=2157&rft.pages=2137-2157&rft.issn=0095-2583&rft.eissn=1465-7295&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecin.12688&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA557301212%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2095424418&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A557301212&rfr_iscdi=true