DO BETTER INFORMED INVESTORS ALWAYS DO BETTER? A BUYBACK PUZZLE
We explore the value of private investment information using data from a singular source: auctions of yearling racehorses. Horse breeders possess superior information about their own horses and have strong financial incentives to buy the best of these back at auction. However, those they repurchase...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economic inquiry 2018-10, Vol.56 (4), p.2137-2157 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2157 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2137 |
container_title | Economic inquiry |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Boyle, Glenn Ward, Gerald |
description | We explore the value of private investment information using data from a singular source: auctions of yearling racehorses. Horse breeders possess superior information about their own horses and have strong financial incentives to buy the best of these back at auction. However, those they repurchase subsequently perform significantly worse on average, earning 30% less at the racetrack than horses purchased by outsiders. Moreover, this underperformance is concentrated in male horses, despite these being purchased exclusively for racing purposes. These puzzling findings cannot be explained by differences in horse risk or breeder abilities, or by nonfinancial objectives, or by behavioral or selection biases. (JEL G02, G11, G14, L83, D44) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ecin.12688 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2095424418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A557301212</galeid><sourcerecordid>A557301212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-bbfb86aa8c02927d2e9798bbbbd8a2f2aab615fc9b93d0bafe84ce573d2d4eb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90t1OwjAUAODGaCKiNz7BEq80DttuHd2VGTCQiGD40eBN03YdjsCG64jy9hZnVBLiadI2zXdO2-QAcI5gDZm4UTJJawh7lB6ACnI9YtexTw5BBUKf2JhQ5xicaD2HEDoeIRVw2xpYjXA8DodWt98eDB_Cltk8haPxYDiygt5zMB1ZP-bWCqzGZNoImvfW4-TlpReegqOYL7Q6-16rYNIOx807uzfodJtBz5YEEmoLEQvqcU4lxD6uR1j5dZ8KExHlOMacCw-RWPrCdyIoeKyoKxWpOxGOXCU8pwouyrqrPHtbK12webbOU3Mlw-ZrLnZdRH_VjC8US9I4K3Iul4mWLCCmGkQYYaPsPWqmUpXzRZaqODHHO762x5sRqWUi9yZc7iQYU6iPYsbXWrNuo7Nrr_9YsdZJqrSZdDJ7LXSZssOvSi7zTOtcxWyVJ0uebxiCbNsCbNsC7KsFDEYlfjcP3PwjWdjs9sucT6STqis</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2095424418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DO BETTER INFORMED INVESTORS ALWAYS DO BETTER? A BUYBACK PUZZLE</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Boyle, Glenn ; Ward, Gerald</creator><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Glenn ; Ward, Gerald</creatorcontrib><description>We explore the value of private investment information using data from a singular source: auctions of yearling racehorses. Horse breeders possess superior information about their own horses and have strong financial incentives to buy the best of these back at auction. However, those they repurchase subsequently perform significantly worse on average, earning 30% less at the racetrack than horses purchased by outsiders. Moreover, this underperformance is concentrated in male horses, despite these being purchased exclusively for racing purposes. These puzzling findings cannot be explained by differences in horse risk or breeder abilities, or by nonfinancial objectives, or by behavioral or selection biases. (JEL G02, G11, G14, L83, D44)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-2583</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Auctions ; Bias ; Economic aspects ; Financial incentives ; Horse breeders ; Horses ; Knowledge ; Marketing ; Planning ; Racing</subject><ispartof>Economic inquiry, 2018-10, Vol.56 (4), p.2137-2157</ispartof><rights>2018 Western Economic Association International</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-bbfb86aa8c02927d2e9798bbbbd8a2f2aab615fc9b93d0bafe84ce573d2d4eb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fecin.12688$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fecin.12688$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1413,27906,27907,45556,45557</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Gerald</creatorcontrib><title>DO BETTER INFORMED INVESTORS ALWAYS DO BETTER? A BUYBACK PUZZLE</title><title>Economic inquiry</title><description>We explore the value of private investment information using data from a singular source: auctions of yearling racehorses. Horse breeders possess superior information about their own horses and have strong financial incentives to buy the best of these back at auction. However, those they repurchase subsequently perform significantly worse on average, earning 30% less at the racetrack than horses purchased by outsiders. Moreover, this underperformance is concentrated in male horses, despite these being purchased exclusively for racing purposes. These puzzling findings cannot be explained by differences in horse risk or breeder abilities, or by nonfinancial objectives, or by behavioral or selection biases. (JEL G02, G11, G14, L83, D44)</description><subject>Auctions</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Financial incentives</subject><subject>Horse breeders</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Racing</subject><issn>0095-2583</issn><issn>1465-7295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNp90t1OwjAUAODGaCKiNz7BEq80DttuHd2VGTCQiGD40eBN03YdjsCG64jy9hZnVBLiadI2zXdO2-QAcI5gDZm4UTJJawh7lB6ACnI9YtexTw5BBUKf2JhQ5xicaD2HEDoeIRVw2xpYjXA8DodWt98eDB_Cltk8haPxYDiygt5zMB1ZP-bWCqzGZNoImvfW4-TlpReegqOYL7Q6-16rYNIOx807uzfodJtBz5YEEmoLEQvqcU4lxD6uR1j5dZ8KExHlOMacCw-RWPrCdyIoeKyoKxWpOxGOXCU8pwouyrqrPHtbK12webbOU3Mlw-ZrLnZdRH_VjC8US9I4K3Iul4mWLCCmGkQYYaPsPWqmUpXzRZaqODHHO762x5sRqWUi9yZc7iQYU6iPYsbXWrNuo7Nrr_9YsdZJqrSZdDJ7LXSZssOvSi7zTOtcxWyVJ0uebxiCbNsCbNsC7KsFDEYlfjcP3PwjWdjs9sucT6STqis</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Boyle, Glenn</creator><creator>Ward, Gerald</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</general><general>Western Economic Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>DO BETTER INFORMED INVESTORS ALWAYS DO BETTER? A BUYBACK PUZZLE</title><author>Boyle, Glenn ; Ward, Gerald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-bbfb86aa8c02927d2e9798bbbbd8a2f2aab615fc9b93d0bafe84ce573d2d4eb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Auctions</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Financial incentives</topic><topic>Horse breeders</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Racing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Gerald</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Economic inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boyle, Glenn</au><au>Ward, Gerald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DO BETTER INFORMED INVESTORS ALWAYS DO BETTER? A BUYBACK PUZZLE</atitle><jtitle>Economic inquiry</jtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2137</spage><epage>2157</epage><pages>2137-2157</pages><issn>0095-2583</issn><eissn>1465-7295</eissn><abstract>We explore the value of private investment information using data from a singular source: auctions of yearling racehorses. Horse breeders possess superior information about their own horses and have strong financial incentives to buy the best of these back at auction. However, those they repurchase subsequently perform significantly worse on average, earning 30% less at the racetrack than horses purchased by outsiders. Moreover, this underperformance is concentrated in male horses, despite these being purchased exclusively for racing purposes. These puzzling findings cannot be explained by differences in horse risk or breeder abilities, or by nonfinancial objectives, or by behavioral or selection biases. (JEL G02, G11, G14, L83, D44)</abstract><cop>Boston, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ecin.12688</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-2583 |
ispartof | Economic inquiry, 2018-10, Vol.56 (4), p.2137-2157 |
issn | 0095-2583 1465-7295 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2095424418 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Auctions Bias Economic aspects Financial incentives Horse breeders Horses Knowledge Marketing Planning Racing |
title | DO BETTER INFORMED INVESTORS ALWAYS DO BETTER? A BUYBACK PUZZLE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A02%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DO%20BETTER%20INFORMED%20INVESTORS%20ALWAYS%20DO%20BETTER?%20A%20BUYBACK%20PUZZLE&rft.jtitle=Economic%20inquiry&rft.au=Boyle,%20Glenn&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2137&rft.epage=2157&rft.pages=2137-2157&rft.issn=0095-2583&rft.eissn=1465-7295&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecin.12688&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA557301212%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2095424418&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A557301212&rfr_iscdi=true |