Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits

Research has established that low self-control is significantly related to harmful police behavior, but no study, of which we are aware, has investigated the relationship between self-control and adherence to the police code of silence. Structural equation modeling is used to test the theoretical ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of criminal justice 2018-05, Vol.56, p.11-19
Hauptverfasser: Donner, Christopher M., Maskaly, Jon, Thompson, Kanani N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 19
container_issue
container_start_page 11
container_title Journal of criminal justice
container_volume 56
creator Donner, Christopher M.
Maskaly, Jon
Thompson, Kanani N.
description Research has established that low self-control is significantly related to harmful police behavior, but no study, of which we are aware, has investigated the relationship between self-control and adherence to the police code of silence. Structural equation modeling is used to test the theoretical causal sequence linking self-control to the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of 1072 police recruits, while controlling for other factors associated with misconduct. Though our data specify some support for the general theory of crime, the results suggest that attempting to explain adherence to the code of silence is a complex and multifaceted endeavor. Impulsivity/temper was the only self-control variable, of three tested, to demonstrate a significant effect. Moreover, several other variables, including job satisfaction and cynicism, also significantly predicted the outcome of interest. Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct, and only the impulsivity/temper element was related to police recruits' unwillingness to report fellow officers' misconduct. Notably, though, other factors were also significant in predicting code adherence. This study offers insight into this important phenomenon and our findings yield important policy implications for police administrators. •Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct.•Only impulsivity/temper, of three self-control variables tested, was related to code adherence.•Code adherence was also partially explained by organizational factors, such as job satisfaction and cynicism.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.10.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2092892394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0047235217302428</els_id><sourcerecordid>2092892394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f1f930c74cb47cf8277622e9b428eb2dd7bfd40b0e56686964c9f83f901504a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1r3DAQFaWBbJP8hSDooSdvxrLWsntqCfkoBHpI7kKWR7sysuVK8qb5M_2t1Wa3556GGd4Hbx4h1yWsSyjrm2E96GDHYYlrBqXIxzUA-0BWZSOqomZQfSQrAC4KVm3YOfkU4wAZCEKsyJ9ndKbQfkrBO6qmnqYd0tk7q5Fq3yP1hkbrcNL4ld79VqOd7LR9Ry3Tq3UubxPGSJOnAWcfEjXonH_NRJNFQvxCRxs73Km99YGq0We6ouPiki3UNgu_0ajG2b1bnZwD6rDYFC_JmVEu4tVpXpCX-7uX28fi6efDj9vvT4WuOKTClKatQAuuOy60aZgQNWPYdpw12LG-F53pOXSAm7pu6rbmujVNZVooN8BVdUE-H2Xn4H8tGJMc_BKm7CgZtKxpWdXyjKqPKB18jAGNnPPfVXiTJchDFXKQ_6qQhyoO91xFJn47EjFH2FsMMmp7-Ghvc9Ake2__J_EXQIiZBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2092892394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Donner, Christopher M. ; Maskaly, Jon ; Thompson, Kanani N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Donner, Christopher M. ; Maskaly, Jon ; Thompson, Kanani N.</creatorcontrib><description>Research has established that low self-control is significantly related to harmful police behavior, but no study, of which we are aware, has investigated the relationship between self-control and adherence to the police code of silence. Structural equation modeling is used to test the theoretical causal sequence linking self-control to the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of 1072 police recruits, while controlling for other factors associated with misconduct. Though our data specify some support for the general theory of crime, the results suggest that attempting to explain adherence to the code of silence is a complex and multifaceted endeavor. Impulsivity/temper was the only self-control variable, of three tested, to demonstrate a significant effect. Moreover, several other variables, including job satisfaction and cynicism, also significantly predicted the outcome of interest. Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct, and only the impulsivity/temper element was related to police recruits' unwillingness to report fellow officers' misconduct. Notably, though, other factors were also significant in predicting code adherence. This study offers insight into this important phenomenon and our findings yield important policy implications for police administrators. •Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct.•Only impulsivity/temper, of three self-control variables tested, was related to code adherence.•Code adherence was also partially explained by organizational factors, such as job satisfaction and cynicism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.10.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adherence ; Behavior problems ; Crime ; Criminology ; Cynicism ; Impulsivity ; Job satisfaction ; Mathematical models ; Misconduct ; Police ; Police administration ; Police reports ; Professional ethics ; Professional misconduct ; Recruits ; Self control ; Silence ; Structural equation modeling</subject><ispartof>Journal of criminal justice, 2018-05, Vol.56, p.11-19</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. May/Jun 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f1f930c74cb47cf8277622e9b428eb2dd7bfd40b0e56686964c9f83f901504a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f1f930c74cb47cf8277622e9b428eb2dd7bfd40b0e56686964c9f83f901504a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.10.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,30997,33772,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donner, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maskaly, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Kanani N.</creatorcontrib><title>Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits</title><title>Journal of criminal justice</title><description>Research has established that low self-control is significantly related to harmful police behavior, but no study, of which we are aware, has investigated the relationship between self-control and adherence to the police code of silence. Structural equation modeling is used to test the theoretical causal sequence linking self-control to the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of 1072 police recruits, while controlling for other factors associated with misconduct. Though our data specify some support for the general theory of crime, the results suggest that attempting to explain adherence to the code of silence is a complex and multifaceted endeavor. Impulsivity/temper was the only self-control variable, of three tested, to demonstrate a significant effect. Moreover, several other variables, including job satisfaction and cynicism, also significantly predicted the outcome of interest. Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct, and only the impulsivity/temper element was related to police recruits' unwillingness to report fellow officers' misconduct. Notably, though, other factors were also significant in predicting code adherence. This study offers insight into this important phenomenon and our findings yield important policy implications for police administrators. •Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct.•Only impulsivity/temper, of three self-control variables tested, was related to code adherence.•Code adherence was also partially explained by organizational factors, such as job satisfaction and cynicism.</description><subject>Adherence</subject><subject>Behavior problems</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Cynicism</subject><subject>Impulsivity</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Misconduct</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Police administration</subject><subject>Police reports</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Professional misconduct</subject><subject>Recruits</subject><subject>Self control</subject><subject>Silence</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><issn>0047-2352</issn><issn>1873-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1r3DAQFaWBbJP8hSDooSdvxrLWsntqCfkoBHpI7kKWR7sysuVK8qb5M_2t1Wa3556GGd4Hbx4h1yWsSyjrm2E96GDHYYlrBqXIxzUA-0BWZSOqomZQfSQrAC4KVm3YOfkU4wAZCEKsyJ9ndKbQfkrBO6qmnqYd0tk7q5Fq3yP1hkbrcNL4ld79VqOd7LR9Ry3Tq3UubxPGSJOnAWcfEjXonH_NRJNFQvxCRxs73Km99YGq0We6ouPiki3UNgu_0ajG2b1bnZwD6rDYFC_JmVEu4tVpXpCX-7uX28fi6efDj9vvT4WuOKTClKatQAuuOy60aZgQNWPYdpw12LG-F53pOXSAm7pu6rbmujVNZVooN8BVdUE-H2Xn4H8tGJMc_BKm7CgZtKxpWdXyjKqPKB18jAGNnPPfVXiTJchDFXKQ_6qQhyoO91xFJn47EjFH2FsMMmp7-Ghvc9Ake2__J_EXQIiZBA</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Donner, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Maskaly, Jon</creator><creator>Thompson, Kanani N.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits</title><author>Donner, Christopher M. ; Maskaly, Jon ; Thompson, Kanani N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f1f930c74cb47cf8277622e9b428eb2dd7bfd40b0e56686964c9f83f901504a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adherence</topic><topic>Behavior problems</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Cynicism</topic><topic>Impulsivity</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Misconduct</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Police administration</topic><topic>Police reports</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Professional misconduct</topic><topic>Recruits</topic><topic>Self control</topic><topic>Silence</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donner, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maskaly, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Kanani N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of criminal justice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donner, Christopher M.</au><au>Maskaly, Jon</au><au>Thompson, Kanani N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits</atitle><jtitle>Journal of criminal justice</jtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><spage>11</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>11-19</pages><issn>0047-2352</issn><eissn>1873-6203</eissn><abstract>Research has established that low self-control is significantly related to harmful police behavior, but no study, of which we are aware, has investigated the relationship between self-control and adherence to the police code of silence. Structural equation modeling is used to test the theoretical causal sequence linking self-control to the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of 1072 police recruits, while controlling for other factors associated with misconduct. Though our data specify some support for the general theory of crime, the results suggest that attempting to explain adherence to the code of silence is a complex and multifaceted endeavor. Impulsivity/temper was the only self-control variable, of three tested, to demonstrate a significant effect. Moreover, several other variables, including job satisfaction and cynicism, also significantly predicted the outcome of interest. Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct, and only the impulsivity/temper element was related to police recruits' unwillingness to report fellow officers' misconduct. Notably, though, other factors were also significant in predicting code adherence. This study offers insight into this important phenomenon and our findings yield important policy implications for police administrators. •Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct.•Only impulsivity/temper, of three self-control variables tested, was related to code adherence.•Code adherence was also partially explained by organizational factors, such as job satisfaction and cynicism.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.10.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2352
ispartof Journal of criminal justice, 2018-05, Vol.56, p.11-19
issn 0047-2352
1873-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2092892394
source Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adherence
Behavior problems
Crime
Criminology
Cynicism
Impulsivity
Job satisfaction
Mathematical models
Misconduct
Police
Police administration
Police reports
Professional ethics
Professional misconduct
Recruits
Self control
Silence
Structural equation modeling
title Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A30%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-control%20and%20the%20police%20code%20of%20silence:%20Examining%20the%20unwillingness%20to%20report%20fellow%20officers'%20misbehavior%20among%20a%20multi-agency%20sample%20of%20police%20recruits&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20criminal%20justice&rft.au=Donner,%20Christopher%20M.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=56&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=11-19&rft.issn=0047-2352&rft.eissn=1873-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.10.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2092892394%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2092892394&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0047235217302428&rfr_iscdi=true