Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits
Research has established that low self-control is significantly related to harmful police behavior, but no study, of which we are aware, has investigated the relationship between self-control and adherence to the police code of silence. Structural equation modeling is used to test the theoretical ca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of criminal justice 2018-05, Vol.56, p.11-19 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 19 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | Journal of criminal justice |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Donner, Christopher M. Maskaly, Jon Thompson, Kanani N. |
description | Research has established that low self-control is significantly related to harmful police behavior, but no study, of which we are aware, has investigated the relationship between self-control and adherence to the police code of silence.
Structural equation modeling is used to test the theoretical causal sequence linking self-control to the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of 1072 police recruits, while controlling for other factors associated with misconduct.
Though our data specify some support for the general theory of crime, the results suggest that attempting to explain adherence to the code of silence is a complex and multifaceted endeavor. Impulsivity/temper was the only self-control variable, of three tested, to demonstrate a significant effect. Moreover, several other variables, including job satisfaction and cynicism, also significantly predicted the outcome of interest.
Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct, and only the impulsivity/temper element was related to police recruits' unwillingness to report fellow officers' misconduct. Notably, though, other factors were also significant in predicting code adherence. This study offers insight into this important phenomenon and our findings yield important policy implications for police administrators.
•Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct.•Only impulsivity/temper, of three self-control variables tested, was related to code adherence.•Code adherence was also partially explained by organizational factors, such as job satisfaction and cynicism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.10.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2092892394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0047235217302428</els_id><sourcerecordid>2092892394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f1f930c74cb47cf8277622e9b428eb2dd7bfd40b0e56686964c9f83f901504a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1r3DAQFaWBbJP8hSDooSdvxrLWsntqCfkoBHpI7kKWR7sysuVK8qb5M_2t1Wa3556GGd4Hbx4h1yWsSyjrm2E96GDHYYlrBqXIxzUA-0BWZSOqomZQfSQrAC4KVm3YOfkU4wAZCEKsyJ9ndKbQfkrBO6qmnqYd0tk7q5Fq3yP1hkbrcNL4ld79VqOd7LR9Ry3Tq3UubxPGSJOnAWcfEjXonH_NRJNFQvxCRxs73Km99YGq0We6ouPiki3UNgu_0ajG2b1bnZwD6rDYFC_JmVEu4tVpXpCX-7uX28fi6efDj9vvT4WuOKTClKatQAuuOy60aZgQNWPYdpw12LG-F53pOXSAm7pu6rbmujVNZVooN8BVdUE-H2Xn4H8tGJMc_BKm7CgZtKxpWdXyjKqPKB18jAGNnPPfVXiTJchDFXKQ_6qQhyoO91xFJn47EjFH2FsMMmp7-Ghvc9Ake2__J_EXQIiZBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2092892394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Donner, Christopher M. ; Maskaly, Jon ; Thompson, Kanani N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Donner, Christopher M. ; Maskaly, Jon ; Thompson, Kanani N.</creatorcontrib><description>Research has established that low self-control is significantly related to harmful police behavior, but no study, of which we are aware, has investigated the relationship between self-control and adherence to the police code of silence.
Structural equation modeling is used to test the theoretical causal sequence linking self-control to the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of 1072 police recruits, while controlling for other factors associated with misconduct.
Though our data specify some support for the general theory of crime, the results suggest that attempting to explain adherence to the code of silence is a complex and multifaceted endeavor. Impulsivity/temper was the only self-control variable, of three tested, to demonstrate a significant effect. Moreover, several other variables, including job satisfaction and cynicism, also significantly predicted the outcome of interest.
Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct, and only the impulsivity/temper element was related to police recruits' unwillingness to report fellow officers' misconduct. Notably, though, other factors were also significant in predicting code adherence. This study offers insight into this important phenomenon and our findings yield important policy implications for police administrators.
•Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct.•Only impulsivity/temper, of three self-control variables tested, was related to code adherence.•Code adherence was also partially explained by organizational factors, such as job satisfaction and cynicism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.10.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adherence ; Behavior problems ; Crime ; Criminology ; Cynicism ; Impulsivity ; Job satisfaction ; Mathematical models ; Misconduct ; Police ; Police administration ; Police reports ; Professional ethics ; Professional misconduct ; Recruits ; Self control ; Silence ; Structural equation modeling</subject><ispartof>Journal of criminal justice, 2018-05, Vol.56, p.11-19</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. May/Jun 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f1f930c74cb47cf8277622e9b428eb2dd7bfd40b0e56686964c9f83f901504a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f1f930c74cb47cf8277622e9b428eb2dd7bfd40b0e56686964c9f83f901504a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.10.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,30997,33772,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donner, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maskaly, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Kanani N.</creatorcontrib><title>Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits</title><title>Journal of criminal justice</title><description>Research has established that low self-control is significantly related to harmful police behavior, but no study, of which we are aware, has investigated the relationship between self-control and adherence to the police code of silence.
Structural equation modeling is used to test the theoretical causal sequence linking self-control to the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of 1072 police recruits, while controlling for other factors associated with misconduct.
Though our data specify some support for the general theory of crime, the results suggest that attempting to explain adherence to the code of silence is a complex and multifaceted endeavor. Impulsivity/temper was the only self-control variable, of three tested, to demonstrate a significant effect. Moreover, several other variables, including job satisfaction and cynicism, also significantly predicted the outcome of interest.
Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct, and only the impulsivity/temper element was related to police recruits' unwillingness to report fellow officers' misconduct. Notably, though, other factors were also significant in predicting code adherence. This study offers insight into this important phenomenon and our findings yield important policy implications for police administrators.
•Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct.•Only impulsivity/temper, of three self-control variables tested, was related to code adherence.•Code adherence was also partially explained by organizational factors, such as job satisfaction and cynicism.</description><subject>Adherence</subject><subject>Behavior problems</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Cynicism</subject><subject>Impulsivity</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Misconduct</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Police administration</subject><subject>Police reports</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Professional misconduct</subject><subject>Recruits</subject><subject>Self control</subject><subject>Silence</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><issn>0047-2352</issn><issn>1873-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1r3DAQFaWBbJP8hSDooSdvxrLWsntqCfkoBHpI7kKWR7sysuVK8qb5M_2t1Wa3556GGd4Hbx4h1yWsSyjrm2E96GDHYYlrBqXIxzUA-0BWZSOqomZQfSQrAC4KVm3YOfkU4wAZCEKsyJ9ndKbQfkrBO6qmnqYd0tk7q5Fq3yP1hkbrcNL4ld79VqOd7LR9Ry3Tq3UubxPGSJOnAWcfEjXonH_NRJNFQvxCRxs73Km99YGq0We6ouPiki3UNgu_0ajG2b1bnZwD6rDYFC_JmVEu4tVpXpCX-7uX28fi6efDj9vvT4WuOKTClKatQAuuOy60aZgQNWPYdpw12LG-F53pOXSAm7pu6rbmujVNZVooN8BVdUE-H2Xn4H8tGJMc_BKm7CgZtKxpWdXyjKqPKB18jAGNnPPfVXiTJchDFXKQ_6qQhyoO91xFJn47EjFH2FsMMmp7-Ghvc9Ake2__J_EXQIiZBA</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Donner, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Maskaly, Jon</creator><creator>Thompson, Kanani N.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits</title><author>Donner, Christopher M. ; Maskaly, Jon ; Thompson, Kanani N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f1f930c74cb47cf8277622e9b428eb2dd7bfd40b0e56686964c9f83f901504a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adherence</topic><topic>Behavior problems</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Cynicism</topic><topic>Impulsivity</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Misconduct</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Police administration</topic><topic>Police reports</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Professional misconduct</topic><topic>Recruits</topic><topic>Self control</topic><topic>Silence</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donner, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maskaly, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Kanani N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of criminal justice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donner, Christopher M.</au><au>Maskaly, Jon</au><au>Thompson, Kanani N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits</atitle><jtitle>Journal of criminal justice</jtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><spage>11</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>11-19</pages><issn>0047-2352</issn><eissn>1873-6203</eissn><abstract>Research has established that low self-control is significantly related to harmful police behavior, but no study, of which we are aware, has investigated the relationship between self-control and adherence to the police code of silence.
Structural equation modeling is used to test the theoretical causal sequence linking self-control to the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of 1072 police recruits, while controlling for other factors associated with misconduct.
Though our data specify some support for the general theory of crime, the results suggest that attempting to explain adherence to the code of silence is a complex and multifaceted endeavor. Impulsivity/temper was the only self-control variable, of three tested, to demonstrate a significant effect. Moreover, several other variables, including job satisfaction and cynicism, also significantly predicted the outcome of interest.
Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct, and only the impulsivity/temper element was related to police recruits' unwillingness to report fellow officers' misconduct. Notably, though, other factors were also significant in predicting code adherence. This study offers insight into this important phenomenon and our findings yield important policy implications for police administrators.
•Self-control was found to be a multidimensional construct.•Only impulsivity/temper, of three self-control variables tested, was related to code adherence.•Code adherence was also partially explained by organizational factors, such as job satisfaction and cynicism.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.10.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-2352 |
ispartof | Journal of criminal justice, 2018-05, Vol.56, p.11-19 |
issn | 0047-2352 1873-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2092892394 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adherence Behavior problems Crime Criminology Cynicism Impulsivity Job satisfaction Mathematical models Misconduct Police Police administration Police reports Professional ethics Professional misconduct Recruits Self control Silence Structural equation modeling |
title | Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A30%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-control%20and%20the%20police%20code%20of%20silence:%20Examining%20the%20unwillingness%20to%20report%20fellow%20officers'%20misbehavior%20among%20a%20multi-agency%20sample%20of%20police%20recruits&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20criminal%20justice&rft.au=Donner,%20Christopher%20M.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=56&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=11-19&rft.issn=0047-2352&rft.eissn=1873-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.10.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2092892394%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2092892394&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0047235217302428&rfr_iscdi=true |