Joseph Sax and the Idea of the Public Trust

In the 1970s, Joseph Sax revived of the historical “public trust” doctrine and extended it from waterways to natural resources more generally. This essay argues that Sax’s doctrinal “rediscovery” was closely linked to his growing concern that governments may be too much influenced by partial interes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Issues in legal scholarship 2003-10, Vol.3 (1), p.1
1. Verfasser: Rose, Carol M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Issues in legal scholarship
container_volume 3
creator Rose, Carol M.
description In the 1970s, Joseph Sax revived of the historical “public trust” doctrine and extended it from waterways to natural resources more generally. This essay argues that Sax’s doctrinal “rediscovery” was closely linked to his growing concern that governments may be too much influenced by partial interest groups and hence unable to manage large and diffuse environmental resources. Sax turned to water law because water has traditionally been subject to community management. But his use of the language of “public trust,” though very arresting, was somewhat idiosyncratic. Traditionally, public trust doctrine focused on navigation and communication, and hence a revived public trust doctrine might have been more appropriate for new communications media than for environmental concerns. Many critics have pounced on the uncertainties of Sax’s public trust doctrine as applied to natural resources. In fact, a different area of water law–riparian law–was actually more consonant with Sax’s concerns for community management of environmental resources. But “riparianism” is a rather boring word by comparison to “public trust.” In sacrificing some historical precision and choosing the more dynamic language of “public trust,” Sax was able to dramatize important issues of environmental governance, in a way that has had great resonance to later scholarship.
doi_str_mv 10.2202/1539-8323.1050
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_209275391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>852957521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1890-a115561c31ed0ac64cb5cac590d53caa835bd29aea2e59b4b7a9daa69586c2043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMFKw0AQXUTBWr16Dl4ldXY3k2SPUrStFFSsuS6TzYam1qbuJlD_3sRI8TDMY3hvHu8xds1hIgSIO45ShakUcsIB4YSNjofTf_icXXi_AeDIEUbs9qn2dr8O3ugQ0K4ImrUNFoWloC5_8UubbysTrFzrm0t2VtLW26u_PWbvjw-r6TxcPs8W0_tlaHiqICTOEWNuJLcFkIkjk6MhgwoKlIYolZgXQpElYVHlUZ6QKohihWlsBERyzG6Gv3tXf7XWN3pTt27XWWoBSiRdFN6RJgPJuNp7Z0u9d9UnuW_NQfd96D6y7iPrvo9OEA6Cyjf2cGST-9BxIhPUr6uomzlmmcp0In8A3AdfBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>209275391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Joseph Sax and the Idea of the Public Trust</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Rose, Carol M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rose, Carol M.</creatorcontrib><description>In the 1970s, Joseph Sax revived of the historical “public trust” doctrine and extended it from waterways to natural resources more generally. This essay argues that Sax’s doctrinal “rediscovery” was closely linked to his growing concern that governments may be too much influenced by partial interest groups and hence unable to manage large and diffuse environmental resources. Sax turned to water law because water has traditionally been subject to community management. But his use of the language of “public trust,” though very arresting, was somewhat idiosyncratic. Traditionally, public trust doctrine focused on navigation and communication, and hence a revived public trust doctrine might have been more appropriate for new communications media than for environmental concerns. Many critics have pounced on the uncertainties of Sax’s public trust doctrine as applied to natural resources. In fact, a different area of water law–riparian law–was actually more consonant with Sax’s concerns for community management of environmental resources. But “riparianism” is a rather boring word by comparison to “public trust.” In sacrificing some historical precision and choosing the more dynamic language of “public trust,” Sax was able to dramatize important issues of environmental governance, in a way that has had great resonance to later scholarship.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-8323</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2194-5780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-8323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2202/1539-8323.1050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Conservation ; Interest groups ; Sax, Joseph L ; Water rights</subject><ispartof>Issues in legal scholarship, 2003-10, Vol.3 (1), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright BERKELEY ELECTRONIC PRESS 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1890-a115561c31ed0ac64cb5cac590d53caa835bd29aea2e59b4b7a9daa69586c2043</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rose, Carol M.</creatorcontrib><title>Joseph Sax and the Idea of the Public Trust</title><title>Issues in legal scholarship</title><description>In the 1970s, Joseph Sax revived of the historical “public trust” doctrine and extended it from waterways to natural resources more generally. This essay argues that Sax’s doctrinal “rediscovery” was closely linked to his growing concern that governments may be too much influenced by partial interest groups and hence unable to manage large and diffuse environmental resources. Sax turned to water law because water has traditionally been subject to community management. But his use of the language of “public trust,” though very arresting, was somewhat idiosyncratic. Traditionally, public trust doctrine focused on navigation and communication, and hence a revived public trust doctrine might have been more appropriate for new communications media than for environmental concerns. Many critics have pounced on the uncertainties of Sax’s public trust doctrine as applied to natural resources. In fact, a different area of water law–riparian law–was actually more consonant with Sax’s concerns for community management of environmental resources. But “riparianism” is a rather boring word by comparison to “public trust.” In sacrificing some historical precision and choosing the more dynamic language of “public trust,” Sax was able to dramatize important issues of environmental governance, in a way that has had great resonance to later scholarship.</description><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Sax, Joseph L</subject><subject>Water rights</subject><issn>1539-8323</issn><issn>2194-5780</issn><issn>1539-8323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUMFKw0AQXUTBWr16Dl4ldXY3k2SPUrStFFSsuS6TzYam1qbuJlD_3sRI8TDMY3hvHu8xds1hIgSIO45ShakUcsIB4YSNjofTf_icXXi_AeDIEUbs9qn2dr8O3ugQ0K4ImrUNFoWloC5_8UubbysTrFzrm0t2VtLW26u_PWbvjw-r6TxcPs8W0_tlaHiqICTOEWNuJLcFkIkjk6MhgwoKlIYolZgXQpElYVHlUZ6QKohihWlsBERyzG6Gv3tXf7XWN3pTt27XWWoBSiRdFN6RJgPJuNp7Z0u9d9UnuW_NQfd96D6y7iPrvo9OEA6Cyjf2cGST-9BxIhPUr6uomzlmmcp0In8A3AdfBg</recordid><startdate>20031008</startdate><enddate>20031008</enddate><creator>Rose, Carol M.</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter De Gruyter &amp; Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031008</creationdate><title>Joseph Sax and the Idea of the Public Trust</title><author>Rose, Carol M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1890-a115561c31ed0ac64cb5cac590d53caa835bd29aea2e59b4b7a9daa69586c2043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Sax, Joseph L</topic><topic>Water rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rose, Carol M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Issues in legal scholarship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rose, Carol M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Joseph Sax and the Idea of the Public Trust</atitle><jtitle>Issues in legal scholarship</jtitle><date>2003-10-08</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>1539-8323</issn><issn>2194-5780</issn><eissn>1539-8323</eissn><abstract>In the 1970s, Joseph Sax revived of the historical “public trust” doctrine and extended it from waterways to natural resources more generally. This essay argues that Sax’s doctrinal “rediscovery” was closely linked to his growing concern that governments may be too much influenced by partial interest groups and hence unable to manage large and diffuse environmental resources. Sax turned to water law because water has traditionally been subject to community management. But his use of the language of “public trust,” though very arresting, was somewhat idiosyncratic. Traditionally, public trust doctrine focused on navigation and communication, and hence a revived public trust doctrine might have been more appropriate for new communications media than for environmental concerns. Many critics have pounced on the uncertainties of Sax’s public trust doctrine as applied to natural resources. In fact, a different area of water law–riparian law–was actually more consonant with Sax’s concerns for community management of environmental resources. But “riparianism” is a rather boring word by comparison to “public trust.” In sacrificing some historical precision and choosing the more dynamic language of “public trust,” Sax was able to dramatize important issues of environmental governance, in a way that has had great resonance to later scholarship.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.2202/1539-8323.1050</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1539-8323
ispartof Issues in legal scholarship, 2003-10, Vol.3 (1), p.1
issn 1539-8323
2194-5780
1539-8323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_209275391
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; De Gruyter journals
subjects Conservation
Interest groups
Sax, Joseph L
Water rights
title Joseph Sax and the Idea of the Public Trust
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A30%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Joseph%20Sax%20and%20the%20Idea%20of%20the%20Public%20Trust&rft.jtitle=Issues%20in%20legal%20scholarship&rft.au=Rose,%20Carol%20M.&rft.date=2003-10-08&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=1539-8323&rft.eissn=1539-8323&rft_id=info:doi/10.2202/1539-8323.1050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E852957521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=209275391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true