Use of Created Snags by Cavity-Nesting Birds Across 25 Years

Snags are important habitat features for many forest-dwelling species, so reductions in the number of snags can lead to the loss of biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Intentional snag creation is often used in managed forests to mitigate the long-term declines of naturally created snags, yet informa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2018-09, Vol.82 (7), p.1376-1384
Hauptverfasser: BARRY, AMY M., HAGAR, JOAN C., RIVERS, JAMES W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1384
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1376
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 82
creator BARRY, AMY M.
HAGAR, JOAN C.
RIVERS, JAMES W.
description Snags are important habitat features for many forest-dwelling species, so reductions in the number of snags can lead to the loss of biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Intentional snag creation is often used in managed forests to mitigate the long-term declines of naturally created snags, yet information regarding the use of snags by wildlife across long timescales (>20 yr) is lacking and prevents a complete understanding of how the value of created snags change through time. We used a long-term experiment to assess how harvest treatment (i.e., small-patch group selection, 2-story, and clearcut) and snag configuration (i.e., scattered and clustered) influenced nesting in and foraging on 25–27-year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) snags by cavity-nesting birds. In addition, we compared our contemporary measures of bird use to estimates obtained from historical surveys conducted on the same group of snags to quantify how bird use changed over time. Despite observing created snags for >750 hours across 2 consecutive breeding seasons, we found limited evidence of nesting activity. Only 11% of created snags were used for breeding, with nesting attempts by 4 bird species (n = 36 nests); however, we detected 12 cavity-nesting species present on our study sites. Furthermore, nearly all nests (94%) belonged to the chestnut-backed chickadee (Poecile rufescens), a weak cavity-excavating species that requires well-decayed wood for creating nest cavities. Our surveys also recorded few observations of birds using created snags as foraging substrates, with only 1 foraging event recorded for every 20 hours of observation. We detected 82% fewer nests and recorded 7% fewer foraging observations during contemporary field work despite spending >7.5 times more effort observing created snags relative to historical surveys. We conclude that 25–27-year-old created Douglas-fir snags provided limited opportunities for nesting and foraging by most cavity-nesting birds, and that the period of greatest use by this group occurred within 5–15 years of creation.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.21489
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2091878098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26610348</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26610348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3239-358fa603c12849c6ca187f4b27b5aefd4b5fcd5edebb3153afeeab89c1c5f6653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFLwzAYxYMoWKcX70LAm9CZL2naFLzMolOZetChnkKaJqNlW2fSOfrf263q0dN3eL_3vsdD6BTIEAihl9VmMRtSiES6hwJIWRJSAck-CjqRhjyC90N05H1FCAMQcYCupt7g2uLMGdWYAr8s1czjvMWZ-iqbNnwyvimXM3xdusLjkXa195hy_GGU88fowKq5Nyc_d4Cmtzev2V04eR7fZ6NJqBllaci4sComTAMVUapjrUAkNsppknNlbBHl3OqCm8LkOQPOlDVG5SLVoLmNY84G6LzPXbn6c901klW9dsvupaQk7cIESUVHXfTUrqQzVq5cuVCulUDkdh25XUfu1ulg6OFNOTftP6R8eHsc_3rOek_lm9r9eWgcA2GRYN8CfG_7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2091878098</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Created Snags by Cavity-Nesting Birds Across 25 Years</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>BARRY, AMY M. ; HAGAR, JOAN C. ; RIVERS, JAMES W.</creator><creatorcontrib>BARRY, AMY M. ; HAGAR, JOAN C. ; RIVERS, JAMES W.</creatorcontrib><description>Snags are important habitat features for many forest-dwelling species, so reductions in the number of snags can lead to the loss of biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Intentional snag creation is often used in managed forests to mitigate the long-term declines of naturally created snags, yet information regarding the use of snags by wildlife across long timescales (&gt;20 yr) is lacking and prevents a complete understanding of how the value of created snags change through time. We used a long-term experiment to assess how harvest treatment (i.e., small-patch group selection, 2-story, and clearcut) and snag configuration (i.e., scattered and clustered) influenced nesting in and foraging on 25–27-year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) snags by cavity-nesting birds. In addition, we compared our contemporary measures of bird use to estimates obtained from historical surveys conducted on the same group of snags to quantify how bird use changed over time. Despite observing created snags for &gt;750 hours across 2 consecutive breeding seasons, we found limited evidence of nesting activity. Only 11% of created snags were used for breeding, with nesting attempts by 4 bird species (n = 36 nests); however, we detected 12 cavity-nesting species present on our study sites. Furthermore, nearly all nests (94%) belonged to the chestnut-backed chickadee (Poecile rufescens), a weak cavity-excavating species that requires well-decayed wood for creating nest cavities. Our surveys also recorded few observations of birds using created snags as foraging substrates, with only 1 foraging event recorded for every 20 hours of observation. We detected 82% fewer nests and recorded 7% fewer foraging observations during contemporary field work despite spending &gt;7.5 times more effort observing created snags relative to historical surveys. We conclude that 25–27-year-old created Douglas-fir snags provided limited opportunities for nesting and foraging by most cavity-nesting birds, and that the period of greatest use by this group occurred within 5–15 years of creation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Wiley</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biodiversity loss ; Birds ; Breeding ; Breeding seasons ; cavity‐nesting birds ; Chestnut ; Clearcutting ; created snags ; Douglas‐fir ; Foraging habitats ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Group selection ; Historical account ; Holes ; Management and Conservation ; Nesting ; Nests ; Oregon Coast Range ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Pseudotsuga menziesii ; Small mammals ; snag longevity ; Snags ; Species ; Substrates ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Wildlife ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management ; woodpeckers</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2018-09, Vol.82 (7), p.1376-1384</ispartof><rights>2018 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3239-358fa603c12849c6ca187f4b27b5aefd4b5fcd5edebb3153afeeab89c1c5f6653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3239-358fa603c12849c6ca187f4b27b5aefd4b5fcd5edebb3153afeeab89c1c5f6653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26610348$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26610348$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584,58026,58259</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BARRY, AMY M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAGAR, JOAN C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RIVERS, JAMES W.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Created Snags by Cavity-Nesting Birds Across 25 Years</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Snags are important habitat features for many forest-dwelling species, so reductions in the number of snags can lead to the loss of biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Intentional snag creation is often used in managed forests to mitigate the long-term declines of naturally created snags, yet information regarding the use of snags by wildlife across long timescales (&gt;20 yr) is lacking and prevents a complete understanding of how the value of created snags change through time. We used a long-term experiment to assess how harvest treatment (i.e., small-patch group selection, 2-story, and clearcut) and snag configuration (i.e., scattered and clustered) influenced nesting in and foraging on 25–27-year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) snags by cavity-nesting birds. In addition, we compared our contemporary measures of bird use to estimates obtained from historical surveys conducted on the same group of snags to quantify how bird use changed over time. Despite observing created snags for &gt;750 hours across 2 consecutive breeding seasons, we found limited evidence of nesting activity. Only 11% of created snags were used for breeding, with nesting attempts by 4 bird species (n = 36 nests); however, we detected 12 cavity-nesting species present on our study sites. Furthermore, nearly all nests (94%) belonged to the chestnut-backed chickadee (Poecile rufescens), a weak cavity-excavating species that requires well-decayed wood for creating nest cavities. Our surveys also recorded few observations of birds using created snags as foraging substrates, with only 1 foraging event recorded for every 20 hours of observation. We detected 82% fewer nests and recorded 7% fewer foraging observations during contemporary field work despite spending &gt;7.5 times more effort observing created snags relative to historical surveys. We conclude that 25–27-year-old created Douglas-fir snags provided limited opportunities for nesting and foraging by most cavity-nesting birds, and that the period of greatest use by this group occurred within 5–15 years of creation.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity loss</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>cavity‐nesting birds</subject><subject>Chestnut</subject><subject>Clearcutting</subject><subject>created snags</subject><subject>Douglas‐fir</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Group selection</subject><subject>Historical account</subject><subject>Holes</subject><subject>Management and Conservation</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Oregon Coast Range</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Pseudotsuga menziesii</subject><subject>Small mammals</subject><subject>snag longevity</subject><subject>Snags</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>woodpeckers</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFLwzAYxYMoWKcX70LAm9CZL2naFLzMolOZetChnkKaJqNlW2fSOfrf263q0dN3eL_3vsdD6BTIEAihl9VmMRtSiES6hwJIWRJSAck-CjqRhjyC90N05H1FCAMQcYCupt7g2uLMGdWYAr8s1czjvMWZ-iqbNnwyvimXM3xdusLjkXa195hy_GGU88fowKq5Nyc_d4Cmtzev2V04eR7fZ6NJqBllaci4sComTAMVUapjrUAkNsppknNlbBHl3OqCm8LkOQPOlDVG5SLVoLmNY84G6LzPXbn6c901klW9dsvupaQk7cIESUVHXfTUrqQzVq5cuVCulUDkdh25XUfu1ulg6OFNOTftP6R8eHsc_3rOek_lm9r9eWgcA2GRYN8CfG_7</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>BARRY, AMY M.</creator><creator>HAGAR, JOAN C.</creator><creator>RIVERS, JAMES W.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Use of Created Snags by Cavity-Nesting Birds Across 25 Years</title><author>BARRY, AMY M. ; HAGAR, JOAN C. ; RIVERS, JAMES W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3239-358fa603c12849c6ca187f4b27b5aefd4b5fcd5edebb3153afeeab89c1c5f6653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity loss</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>cavity‐nesting birds</topic><topic>Chestnut</topic><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>created snags</topic><topic>Douglas‐fir</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Group selection</topic><topic>Historical account</topic><topic>Holes</topic><topic>Management and Conservation</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Oregon Coast Range</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</topic><topic>Small mammals</topic><topic>snag longevity</topic><topic>Snags</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>woodpeckers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BARRY, AMY M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAGAR, JOAN C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RIVERS, JAMES W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BARRY, AMY M.</au><au>HAGAR, JOAN C.</au><au>RIVERS, JAMES W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Created Snags by Cavity-Nesting Birds Across 25 Years</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1376</spage><epage>1384</epage><pages>1376-1384</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Snags are important habitat features for many forest-dwelling species, so reductions in the number of snags can lead to the loss of biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Intentional snag creation is often used in managed forests to mitigate the long-term declines of naturally created snags, yet information regarding the use of snags by wildlife across long timescales (&gt;20 yr) is lacking and prevents a complete understanding of how the value of created snags change through time. We used a long-term experiment to assess how harvest treatment (i.e., small-patch group selection, 2-story, and clearcut) and snag configuration (i.e., scattered and clustered) influenced nesting in and foraging on 25–27-year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) snags by cavity-nesting birds. In addition, we compared our contemporary measures of bird use to estimates obtained from historical surveys conducted on the same group of snags to quantify how bird use changed over time. Despite observing created snags for &gt;750 hours across 2 consecutive breeding seasons, we found limited evidence of nesting activity. Only 11% of created snags were used for breeding, with nesting attempts by 4 bird species (n = 36 nests); however, we detected 12 cavity-nesting species present on our study sites. Furthermore, nearly all nests (94%) belonged to the chestnut-backed chickadee (Poecile rufescens), a weak cavity-excavating species that requires well-decayed wood for creating nest cavities. Our surveys also recorded few observations of birds using created snags as foraging substrates, with only 1 foraging event recorded for every 20 hours of observation. We detected 82% fewer nests and recorded 7% fewer foraging observations during contemporary field work despite spending &gt;7.5 times more effort observing created snags relative to historical surveys. We conclude that 25–27-year-old created Douglas-fir snags provided limited opportunities for nesting and foraging by most cavity-nesting birds, and that the period of greatest use by this group occurred within 5–15 years of creation.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.21489</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2018-09, Vol.82 (7), p.1376-1384
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2091878098
source Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR
subjects Biodiversity
Biodiversity loss
Birds
Breeding
Breeding seasons
cavity‐nesting birds
Chestnut
Clearcutting
created snags
Douglas‐fir
Foraging habitats
Forest ecosystems
Forest management
Group selection
Historical account
Holes
Management and Conservation
Nesting
Nests
Oregon Coast Range
Polls & surveys
Pseudotsuga menziesii
Small mammals
snag longevity
Snags
Species
Substrates
Terrestrial ecosystems
Wildlife
Wildlife habitats
Wildlife management
woodpeckers
title Use of Created Snags by Cavity-Nesting Birds Across 25 Years
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T09%3A45%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Created%20Snags%20by%20Cavity-Nesting%20Birds%20Across%2025%20Years&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=BARRY,%20AMY%20M.&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1376&rft.epage=1384&rft.pages=1376-1384&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.21489&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26610348%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2091878098&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26610348&rfr_iscdi=true