Parenting interventions for incarcerated parents to improve parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, and quality of the parent–child relationship: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the evidence for the impact of parenting interventions for incarcerated parents on parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, and quality of the parent–child relationship. Methods A systematic search of 19 published and unpubl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental criminology 2018-09, Vol.14 (3), p.279-317
Hauptverfasser: Armstrong, Eleanor, Eggins, Elizabeth, Reid, Natasha, Harnett, Paul, Dawe, Sharon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 317
container_issue 3
container_start_page 279
container_title Journal of experimental criminology
container_volume 14
creator Armstrong, Eleanor
Eggins, Elizabeth
Reid, Natasha
Harnett, Paul
Dawe, Sharon
description Objectives To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the evidence for the impact of parenting interventions for incarcerated parents on parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, and quality of the parent–child relationship. Methods A systematic search of 19 published and unpublished literature sources was conducted between June and July 2015 (with no date, language, document type, or geographical restrictions). Studies were included if they: (a) utilized a sample of parents who completed a parenting intervention in an incarceration setting; (b) measured parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, or quality of the parent–child relationship as outcome measures; and (c) employed a randomized controlled trial or quasi-experimental design with no treatment, waitlist control, or treatment-as-usual as the comparison condition. Two review authors independently determined study eligibility and extracted data from eligible studies, which included rating the risk of bias for each eligible study. Meta-analysis was used to synthesize standardized effect sizes, and subgroup analyses were used to examine the moderating effect of parent gender, level of child involvement, and research design. Results Twenty-two studies were eligible for inclusion in the review; however, only 16 studies ( N  = 2292) reported sufficient data for inclusion in the meta-analyses. Parenting interventions were more effective at post-intervention for improving parenting knowledge and skills than no treatment, waitlist control, or treatment-as-usual [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28, 1.06] and quality of the parent–child relationship (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI 0.02, 0.51), but not for improving parent well-being (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI −0.03, 0.30). There was significant heterogeneity across effect sizes for both parenting knowledge and skills and quality of the parent–child relationship outcome domains. There were no statistically significant differences between subgroups, and the effectiveness of parenting interventions was not maintained at follow-up time-points. Conclusions Existing evidence suggests small to moderate effectiveness for parenting interventions during incarceration at close to intervention completion. Further methodologically robust research is required to more confidently establish the effectiveness of parenting programs both in the short-term and in the post-release period.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11292-017-9290-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2091560349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2091560349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-865f4a049dffbea2044c1e633edafdf21d91da0bff02b0e13118ed890121128a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1uEzEUHiGQKIUDsLPEtgY_e37ZVRWlSJXaRVlbzvg5cevMpH5Oouy4A1fqSXqSOpMgVl3Z_v70nr-i-AziKwjRfCMA2UkuoOGd7ASv3xQnUDWStwqqt9NdcdVU4n3xgeheiFKWjTopnm5NxCH5Yc78kDBu9o9xIObGmJHexB6jSWjZahISSyPzy1UcN3iE9t6HYdwGtHNkZrCMHnwIdHbk2RZD4DPMurOJflyb4NOOjY6lxb-U5z9_-4UPlkUMZhph4Vff2TmjHSVcZqjP1MbjdspYYjLcDCbsyNPH4p0zgfDT8Twtfl_-uLu44tc3P39dnF_zXpUq8bauXGlE2VnnZmikKMsesFYKrXHWSbAdWCNmzgk5EwgKoEXbdgJk_t3WqNPiyyE3r_-4Rkr6flzHPARpKTqoaqHKLqvgoOrjSBTR6VX0SxN3GoTel6UPZelclt6XpevskQcPZe0wx_g_-XXTCwzznis</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2091560349</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parenting interventions for incarcerated parents to improve parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, and quality of the parent–child relationship: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Armstrong, Eleanor ; Eggins, Elizabeth ; Reid, Natasha ; Harnett, Paul ; Dawe, Sharon</creator><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Eleanor ; Eggins, Elizabeth ; Reid, Natasha ; Harnett, Paul ; Dawe, Sharon</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the evidence for the impact of parenting interventions for incarcerated parents on parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, and quality of the parent–child relationship. Methods A systematic search of 19 published and unpublished literature sources was conducted between June and July 2015 (with no date, language, document type, or geographical restrictions). Studies were included if they: (a) utilized a sample of parents who completed a parenting intervention in an incarceration setting; (b) measured parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, or quality of the parent–child relationship as outcome measures; and (c) employed a randomized controlled trial or quasi-experimental design with no treatment, waitlist control, or treatment-as-usual as the comparison condition. Two review authors independently determined study eligibility and extracted data from eligible studies, which included rating the risk of bias for each eligible study. Meta-analysis was used to synthesize standardized effect sizes, and subgroup analyses were used to examine the moderating effect of parent gender, level of child involvement, and research design. Results Twenty-two studies were eligible for inclusion in the review; however, only 16 studies ( N  = 2292) reported sufficient data for inclusion in the meta-analyses. Parenting interventions were more effective at post-intervention for improving parenting knowledge and skills than no treatment, waitlist control, or treatment-as-usual [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28, 1.06] and quality of the parent–child relationship (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI 0.02, 0.51), but not for improving parent well-being (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI −0.03, 0.30). There was significant heterogeneity across effect sizes for both parenting knowledge and skills and quality of the parent–child relationship outcome domains. There were no statistically significant differences between subgroups, and the effectiveness of parenting interventions was not maintained at follow-up time-points. Conclusions Existing evidence suggests small to moderate effectiveness for parenting interventions during incarceration at close to intervention completion. Further methodologically robust research is required to more confidently establish the effectiveness of parenting programs both in the short-term and in the post-release period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-3750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11292-017-9290-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Imprisonment ; Intervention ; Law and Criminology ; Meta-analysis ; Parent-child relations ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Political Science ; Prisoners ; Social Sciences ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental criminology, 2018-09, Vol.14 (3), p.279-317</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017</rights><rights>Journal of Experimental Criminology is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-865f4a049dffbea2044c1e633edafdf21d91da0bff02b0e13118ed890121128a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-865f4a049dffbea2044c1e633edafdf21d91da0bff02b0e13118ed890121128a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11292-017-9290-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11292-017-9290-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eggins, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harnett, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawe, Sharon</creatorcontrib><title>Parenting interventions for incarcerated parents to improve parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, and quality of the parent–child relationship: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of experimental criminology</title><addtitle>J Exp Criminol</addtitle><description>Objectives To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the evidence for the impact of parenting interventions for incarcerated parents on parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, and quality of the parent–child relationship. Methods A systematic search of 19 published and unpublished literature sources was conducted between June and July 2015 (with no date, language, document type, or geographical restrictions). Studies were included if they: (a) utilized a sample of parents who completed a parenting intervention in an incarceration setting; (b) measured parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, or quality of the parent–child relationship as outcome measures; and (c) employed a randomized controlled trial or quasi-experimental design with no treatment, waitlist control, or treatment-as-usual as the comparison condition. Two review authors independently determined study eligibility and extracted data from eligible studies, which included rating the risk of bias for each eligible study. Meta-analysis was used to synthesize standardized effect sizes, and subgroup analyses were used to examine the moderating effect of parent gender, level of child involvement, and research design. Results Twenty-two studies were eligible for inclusion in the review; however, only 16 studies ( N  = 2292) reported sufficient data for inclusion in the meta-analyses. Parenting interventions were more effective at post-intervention for improving parenting knowledge and skills than no treatment, waitlist control, or treatment-as-usual [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28, 1.06] and quality of the parent–child relationship (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI 0.02, 0.51), but not for improving parent well-being (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI −0.03, 0.30). There was significant heterogeneity across effect sizes for both parenting knowledge and skills and quality of the parent–child relationship outcome domains. There were no statistically significant differences between subgroups, and the effectiveness of parenting interventions was not maintained at follow-up time-points. Conclusions Existing evidence suggests small to moderate effectiveness for parenting interventions during incarceration at close to intervention completion. Further methodologically robust research is required to more confidently establish the effectiveness of parenting programs both in the short-term and in the post-release period.</description><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Law and Criminology</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Parent-child relations</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1573-3750</issn><issn>1572-8315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1uEzEUHiGQKIUDsLPEtgY_e37ZVRWlSJXaRVlbzvg5cevMpH5Oouy4A1fqSXqSOpMgVl3Z_v70nr-i-AziKwjRfCMA2UkuoOGd7ASv3xQnUDWStwqqt9NdcdVU4n3xgeheiFKWjTopnm5NxCH5Yc78kDBu9o9xIObGmJHexB6jSWjZahISSyPzy1UcN3iE9t6HYdwGtHNkZrCMHnwIdHbk2RZD4DPMurOJflyb4NOOjY6lxb-U5z9_-4UPlkUMZhph4Vff2TmjHSVcZqjP1MbjdspYYjLcDCbsyNPH4p0zgfDT8Twtfl_-uLu44tc3P39dnF_zXpUq8bauXGlE2VnnZmikKMsesFYKrXHWSbAdWCNmzgk5EwgKoEXbdgJk_t3WqNPiyyE3r_-4Rkr6flzHPARpKTqoaqHKLqvgoOrjSBTR6VX0SxN3GoTel6UPZelclt6XpevskQcPZe0wx_g_-XXTCwzznis</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Armstrong, Eleanor</creator><creator>Eggins, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Reid, Natasha</creator><creator>Harnett, Paul</creator><creator>Dawe, Sharon</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Parenting interventions for incarcerated parents to improve parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, and quality of the parent–child relationship: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Armstrong, Eleanor ; Eggins, Elizabeth ; Reid, Natasha ; Harnett, Paul ; Dawe, Sharon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-865f4a049dffbea2044c1e633edafdf21d91da0bff02b0e13118ed890121128a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Law and Criminology</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Parent-child relations</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eggins, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harnett, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawe, Sharon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Armstrong, Eleanor</au><au>Eggins, Elizabeth</au><au>Reid, Natasha</au><au>Harnett, Paul</au><au>Dawe, Sharon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parenting interventions for incarcerated parents to improve parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, and quality of the parent–child relationship: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental criminology</jtitle><stitle>J Exp Criminol</stitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>317</epage><pages>279-317</pages><issn>1573-3750</issn><eissn>1572-8315</eissn><abstract>Objectives To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the evidence for the impact of parenting interventions for incarcerated parents on parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, and quality of the parent–child relationship. Methods A systematic search of 19 published and unpublished literature sources was conducted between June and July 2015 (with no date, language, document type, or geographical restrictions). Studies were included if they: (a) utilized a sample of parents who completed a parenting intervention in an incarceration setting; (b) measured parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, or quality of the parent–child relationship as outcome measures; and (c) employed a randomized controlled trial or quasi-experimental design with no treatment, waitlist control, or treatment-as-usual as the comparison condition. Two review authors independently determined study eligibility and extracted data from eligible studies, which included rating the risk of bias for each eligible study. Meta-analysis was used to synthesize standardized effect sizes, and subgroup analyses were used to examine the moderating effect of parent gender, level of child involvement, and research design. Results Twenty-two studies were eligible for inclusion in the review; however, only 16 studies ( N  = 2292) reported sufficient data for inclusion in the meta-analyses. Parenting interventions were more effective at post-intervention for improving parenting knowledge and skills than no treatment, waitlist control, or treatment-as-usual [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28, 1.06] and quality of the parent–child relationship (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI 0.02, 0.51), but not for improving parent well-being (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI −0.03, 0.30). There was significant heterogeneity across effect sizes for both parenting knowledge and skills and quality of the parent–child relationship outcome domains. There were no statistically significant differences between subgroups, and the effectiveness of parenting interventions was not maintained at follow-up time-points. Conclusions Existing evidence suggests small to moderate effectiveness for parenting interventions during incarceration at close to intervention completion. Further methodologically robust research is required to more confidently establish the effectiveness of parenting programs both in the short-term and in the post-release period.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11292-017-9290-6</doi><tpages>39</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1573-3750
ispartof Journal of experimental criminology, 2018-09, Vol.14 (3), p.279-317
issn 1573-3750
1572-8315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2091560349
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Criminology and Criminal Justice
Imprisonment
Intervention
Law and Criminology
Meta-analysis
Parent-child relations
Parents & parenting
Political Science
Prisoners
Social Sciences
Systematic review
title Parenting interventions for incarcerated parents to improve parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, and quality of the parent–child relationship: A systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A10%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parenting%20interventions%20for%20incarcerated%20parents%20to%20improve%20parenting%20knowledge%20and%20skills,%20parent%20well-being,%20and%20quality%20of%20the%20parent%E2%80%93child%20relationship:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20criminology&rft.au=Armstrong,%20Eleanor&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=317&rft.pages=279-317&rft.issn=1573-3750&rft.eissn=1572-8315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11292-017-9290-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2091560349%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2091560349&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true