The Problem of the Height Dependence of Magnetic Fields in Sunspots

To understand the physics of sunspots, it is important to know the properties of their magnetic field, and especially its height stratification plays a substantial role. There are mainly two methods to assess this stratification, but they yield different magnetic gradients in the photospheric layers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar physics 2018-08, Vol.293 (8), p.1-27, Article 120
1. Verfasser: Balthasar, Horst
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1
container_title Solar physics
container_volume 293
creator Balthasar, Horst
description To understand the physics of sunspots, it is important to know the properties of their magnetic field, and especially its height stratification plays a substantial role. There are mainly two methods to assess this stratification, but they yield different magnetic gradients in the photospheric layers. Determinations based on the several spectral lines of different formation heights and the slope of their profiles result in gradients of −2 to −3 G km −1 , or even steeper. This is similar for the total magnetic field strength and for the vertical component of the magnetic field. The other option is to determine the horizontal partial derivatives of the magnetic field, and with the condition div B = 0 also the vertical derivative is known. With this method, gradients of −0.5 G km −1 and even shallower are obtained. Obviously, these results do not agree. If chromospheric spectral lines are included, only shallow gradients around −0.5 G km −1 are obtained. Shallow gradients are also found from gyro-resonance measurements in the radio wave range 300 – 2000 GHz. Some indirect methods are also considered, but they cannot clarify the total picture. An analysis of a numerical simulation of a sunspot indicates a shallow gradient over a wide height range, but with slightly steeper gradients in deep layers. Several ideas to explain the discrepancy are also discussed. With no doubts cast on Maxwell’s equations, the first one is to look at the uncertainties of the formation heights of spectral lines, but a wider range of these heights would require an extension of the solar photosphere that is incompatible with observations and the theory of stellar atmospheres. Submerging and rising magnetic flux might play a role in the outer penumbra, if the resolution is too low to separate them, but it is not likely that this effect acts also in the umbra. A quick investigation assuming a spatial small scale structure of sunspots together with twist and writhe of individual flux tubes shows a reduction of the measured magnetic field strength for spectral lines sensitive to a larger height range. However, sophisticated investigations are required to prove that the explanation for the discrepancy lies here, and the problem of the height gradient of the magnetic field in sunspots is still not solved.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11207-018-1338-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2091029799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2091029799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-97a37c698f9d2fe847f5f04907b5f2e6b37a0ebf8fadd25adecc63327c42488b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuA19WTpG2SS5nOCRMFJ3gX2vRk69jamnQw_70pFbzy6ny9zzmcl5BrBrcMQN4FxjjIBJhKmBAqOZ6QCcukSECLz1MyAYjNmKtzchHCFmCgsgmZrTZI33xb7nBPW0f7WC6wXm96-oAdNhU2FofBS7FusK8tnde4qwKtG_p-aELX9uGSnLliF_DqN07Jx_xxNVsky9en59n9MrFC8T7RshDS5lo5XXGHKpUuc5BqkGXmOOalkAVg6ZQrqopnRYXW5kJwaVOeKlWKKbkZ93a-_Tpg6M22PfgmnjQcNAOupdZRxUaV9W0IHp3pfL0v_LdhYIavzeiViV6ZwStzjAwfmRC1zRr93-b_oR8CSmwB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2091029799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Problem of the Height Dependence of Magnetic Fields in Sunspots</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Balthasar, Horst</creator><creatorcontrib>Balthasar, Horst</creatorcontrib><description>To understand the physics of sunspots, it is important to know the properties of their magnetic field, and especially its height stratification plays a substantial role. There are mainly two methods to assess this stratification, but they yield different magnetic gradients in the photospheric layers. Determinations based on the several spectral lines of different formation heights and the slope of their profiles result in gradients of −2 to −3 G km −1 , or even steeper. This is similar for the total magnetic field strength and for the vertical component of the magnetic field. The other option is to determine the horizontal partial derivatives of the magnetic field, and with the condition div B = 0 also the vertical derivative is known. With this method, gradients of −0.5 G km −1 and even shallower are obtained. Obviously, these results do not agree. If chromospheric spectral lines are included, only shallow gradients around −0.5 G km −1 are obtained. Shallow gradients are also found from gyro-resonance measurements in the radio wave range 300 – 2000 GHz. Some indirect methods are also considered, but they cannot clarify the total picture. An analysis of a numerical simulation of a sunspot indicates a shallow gradient over a wide height range, but with slightly steeper gradients in deep layers. Several ideas to explain the discrepancy are also discussed. With no doubts cast on Maxwell’s equations, the first one is to look at the uncertainties of the formation heights of spectral lines, but a wider range of these heights would require an extension of the solar photosphere that is incompatible with observations and the theory of stellar atmospheres. Submerging and rising magnetic flux might play a role in the outer penumbra, if the resolution is too low to separate them, but it is not likely that this effect acts also in the umbra. A quick investigation assuming a spatial small scale structure of sunspots together with twist and writhe of individual flux tubes shows a reduction of the measured magnetic field strength for spectral lines sensitive to a larger height range. However, sophisticated investigations are required to prove that the explanation for the discrepancy lies here, and the problem of the height gradient of the magnetic field in sunspots is still not solved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0938</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-093X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11207-018-1338-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Astrophysics and Astroparticles ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Computer simulation ; Dependence ; Field strength ; Invited Review ; Line spectra ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic flux ; Magnetic properties ; Magnetic resonance ; Numerical simulations ; Photosphere ; Physics ; Physics and Astronomy ; Radio waves ; Solar physics ; Space Exploration and Astronautics ; Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics ; Stellar atmospheres ; Stratification ; Submerging ; Sunspots ; Tubes</subject><ispartof>Solar physics, 2018-08, Vol.293 (8), p.1-27, Article 120</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>Solar Physics is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-97a37c698f9d2fe847f5f04907b5f2e6b37a0ebf8fadd25adecc63327c42488b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-97a37c698f9d2fe847f5f04907b5f2e6b37a0ebf8fadd25adecc63327c42488b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4739-1710</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11207-018-1338-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11207-018-1338-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balthasar, Horst</creatorcontrib><title>The Problem of the Height Dependence of Magnetic Fields in Sunspots</title><title>Solar physics</title><addtitle>Sol Phys</addtitle><description>To understand the physics of sunspots, it is important to know the properties of their magnetic field, and especially its height stratification plays a substantial role. There are mainly two methods to assess this stratification, but they yield different magnetic gradients in the photospheric layers. Determinations based on the several spectral lines of different formation heights and the slope of their profiles result in gradients of −2 to −3 G km −1 , or even steeper. This is similar for the total magnetic field strength and for the vertical component of the magnetic field. The other option is to determine the horizontal partial derivatives of the magnetic field, and with the condition div B = 0 also the vertical derivative is known. With this method, gradients of −0.5 G km −1 and even shallower are obtained. Obviously, these results do not agree. If chromospheric spectral lines are included, only shallow gradients around −0.5 G km −1 are obtained. Shallow gradients are also found from gyro-resonance measurements in the radio wave range 300 – 2000 GHz. Some indirect methods are also considered, but they cannot clarify the total picture. An analysis of a numerical simulation of a sunspot indicates a shallow gradient over a wide height range, but with slightly steeper gradients in deep layers. Several ideas to explain the discrepancy are also discussed. With no doubts cast on Maxwell’s equations, the first one is to look at the uncertainties of the formation heights of spectral lines, but a wider range of these heights would require an extension of the solar photosphere that is incompatible with observations and the theory of stellar atmospheres. Submerging and rising magnetic flux might play a role in the outer penumbra, if the resolution is too low to separate them, but it is not likely that this effect acts also in the umbra. A quick investigation assuming a spatial small scale structure of sunspots together with twist and writhe of individual flux tubes shows a reduction of the measured magnetic field strength for spectral lines sensitive to a larger height range. However, sophisticated investigations are required to prove that the explanation for the discrepancy lies here, and the problem of the height gradient of the magnetic field in sunspots is still not solved.</description><subject>Astrophysics and Astroparticles</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Field strength</subject><subject>Invited Review</subject><subject>Line spectra</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic flux</subject><subject>Magnetic properties</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Numerical simulations</subject><subject>Photosphere</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics and Astronomy</subject><subject>Radio waves</subject><subject>Solar physics</subject><subject>Space Exploration and Astronautics</subject><subject>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</subject><subject>Stellar atmospheres</subject><subject>Stratification</subject><subject>Submerging</subject><subject>Sunspots</subject><subject>Tubes</subject><issn>0038-0938</issn><issn>1573-093X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuA19WTpG2SS5nOCRMFJ3gX2vRk69jamnQw_70pFbzy6ny9zzmcl5BrBrcMQN4FxjjIBJhKmBAqOZ6QCcukSECLz1MyAYjNmKtzchHCFmCgsgmZrTZI33xb7nBPW0f7WC6wXm96-oAdNhU2FofBS7FusK8tnde4qwKtG_p-aELX9uGSnLliF_DqN07Jx_xxNVsky9en59n9MrFC8T7RshDS5lo5XXGHKpUuc5BqkGXmOOalkAVg6ZQrqopnRYXW5kJwaVOeKlWKKbkZ93a-_Tpg6M22PfgmnjQcNAOupdZRxUaV9W0IHp3pfL0v_LdhYIavzeiViV6ZwStzjAwfmRC1zRr93-b_oR8CSmwB</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Balthasar, Horst</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4739-1710</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>The Problem of the Height Dependence of Magnetic Fields in Sunspots</title><author>Balthasar, Horst</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-97a37c698f9d2fe847f5f04907b5f2e6b37a0ebf8fadd25adecc63327c42488b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Astrophysics and Astroparticles</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Field strength</topic><topic>Invited Review</topic><topic>Line spectra</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic flux</topic><topic>Magnetic properties</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Numerical simulations</topic><topic>Photosphere</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics and Astronomy</topic><topic>Radio waves</topic><topic>Solar physics</topic><topic>Space Exploration and Astronautics</topic><topic>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</topic><topic>Stellar atmospheres</topic><topic>Stratification</topic><topic>Submerging</topic><topic>Sunspots</topic><topic>Tubes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balthasar, Horst</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Solar physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balthasar, Horst</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Problem of the Height Dependence of Magnetic Fields in Sunspots</atitle><jtitle>Solar physics</jtitle><stitle>Sol Phys</stitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>293</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>1-27</pages><artnum>120</artnum><issn>0038-0938</issn><eissn>1573-093X</eissn><abstract>To understand the physics of sunspots, it is important to know the properties of their magnetic field, and especially its height stratification plays a substantial role. There are mainly two methods to assess this stratification, but they yield different magnetic gradients in the photospheric layers. Determinations based on the several spectral lines of different formation heights and the slope of their profiles result in gradients of −2 to −3 G km −1 , or even steeper. This is similar for the total magnetic field strength and for the vertical component of the magnetic field. The other option is to determine the horizontal partial derivatives of the magnetic field, and with the condition div B = 0 also the vertical derivative is known. With this method, gradients of −0.5 G km −1 and even shallower are obtained. Obviously, these results do not agree. If chromospheric spectral lines are included, only shallow gradients around −0.5 G km −1 are obtained. Shallow gradients are also found from gyro-resonance measurements in the radio wave range 300 – 2000 GHz. Some indirect methods are also considered, but they cannot clarify the total picture. An analysis of a numerical simulation of a sunspot indicates a shallow gradient over a wide height range, but with slightly steeper gradients in deep layers. Several ideas to explain the discrepancy are also discussed. With no doubts cast on Maxwell’s equations, the first one is to look at the uncertainties of the formation heights of spectral lines, but a wider range of these heights would require an extension of the solar photosphere that is incompatible with observations and the theory of stellar atmospheres. Submerging and rising magnetic flux might play a role in the outer penumbra, if the resolution is too low to separate them, but it is not likely that this effect acts also in the umbra. A quick investigation assuming a spatial small scale structure of sunspots together with twist and writhe of individual flux tubes shows a reduction of the measured magnetic field strength for spectral lines sensitive to a larger height range. However, sophisticated investigations are required to prove that the explanation for the discrepancy lies here, and the problem of the height gradient of the magnetic field in sunspots is still not solved.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11207-018-1338-x</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4739-1710</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0938
ispartof Solar physics, 2018-08, Vol.293 (8), p.1-27, Article 120
issn 0038-0938
1573-093X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2091029799
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Astrophysics and Astroparticles
Atmospheric Sciences
Computer simulation
Dependence
Field strength
Invited Review
Line spectra
Magnetic fields
Magnetic flux
Magnetic properties
Magnetic resonance
Numerical simulations
Photosphere
Physics
Physics and Astronomy
Radio waves
Solar physics
Space Exploration and Astronautics
Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics
Stellar atmospheres
Stratification
Submerging
Sunspots
Tubes
title The Problem of the Height Dependence of Magnetic Fields in Sunspots
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T04%3A19%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Problem%20of%20the%20Height%20Dependence%20of%20Magnetic%20Fields%20in%20Sunspots&rft.jtitle=Solar%20physics&rft.au=Balthasar,%20Horst&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=293&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=1-27&rft.artnum=120&rft.issn=0038-0938&rft.eissn=1573-093X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11207-018-1338-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2091029799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2091029799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true