Why Do Analysts Issue Sales Forecasts? Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption

This study uses mandatory adoption of IFRS as a setting to investigate why financial analysts issue supplementary sales forecasts. The demand explanation proposes that analysts issue supplementary forecasts if earnings are not informative and thus investors demand additional accounting information....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Accounting horizons 2018-03, Vol.32 (1), p.121-141
Hauptverfasser: He, Wen, Lu, Chien-Ju
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue 1
container_start_page 121
container_title Accounting horizons
container_volume 32
creator He, Wen
Lu, Chien-Ju
description This study uses mandatory adoption of IFRS as a setting to investigate why financial analysts issue supplementary sales forecasts. The demand explanation proposes that analysts issue supplementary forecasts if earnings are not informative and thus investors demand additional accounting information. The reputation explanation posits that analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts if these forecasts are more accurate and will not cause reputation damage. Using mandatory IFRS adoption as an exogenous shock to analysts' information environment, we find that after firms mandatorily adopt IFRS, analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts and analysts' sales forecasts become more accurate and less dispersed. The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption is stronger in countries with strong law enforcement and a large difference between local GAAP and IFRS. Further analysis shows that the IFRS effect concentrates on analysts with prior experience with IAS. Overall, the results provide support to the reputation explanation. JEL Classifications: G15; G18; M41.
doi_str_mv 10.2308/acch-51941
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2089868837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2089868837</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4140c11aee3825fff6dc328cf91701c522cd62e417508afd30a87268e735e68f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFLAzEUhIMoWKsXf0HAm7D6kmw2b09StNVCRbCKxxCyL7Sl3dRkK-y_t7WeZhiGgfkYuxZwJxXgvfN-UWhRl-KEDYTWWJja6FM2AMSDr9U5u8h5BQAVKhiw2dei50-Rj1q37nOX-TTnHfG5W1Pmk5jIu336wMc_y4ZaTzykuOGvrm1cF1PPp5P3OR81cdstY3vJzoJbZ7r61yH7nIw_Hl-K2dvz9HE0K7zSpitKUYIXwhEplDqEUDVeSfShFgaE11L6ppJUCqMBXWgUODSyQjJKU4VBDdnNcXeb4veOcmdXcZf2D7KVgDVWiMrsW7fHlk8x50TBbtNy41JvBdgDLXugZf9oqV-soVvD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2089868837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Do Analysts Issue Sales Forecasts? Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>He, Wen ; Lu, Chien-Ju</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Wen ; Lu, Chien-Ju</creatorcontrib><description>This study uses mandatory adoption of IFRS as a setting to investigate why financial analysts issue supplementary sales forecasts. The demand explanation proposes that analysts issue supplementary forecasts if earnings are not informative and thus investors demand additional accounting information. The reputation explanation posits that analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts if these forecasts are more accurate and will not cause reputation damage. Using mandatory IFRS adoption as an exogenous shock to analysts' information environment, we find that after firms mandatorily adopt IFRS, analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts and analysts' sales forecasts become more accurate and less dispersed. The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption is stronger in countries with strong law enforcement and a large difference between local GAAP and IFRS. Further analysis shows that the IFRS effect concentrates on analysts with prior experience with IAS. Overall, the results provide support to the reputation explanation. JEL Classifications: G15; G18; M41.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-7993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-7975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2308/acch-51941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sarasota: American Accounting Association</publisher><subject>Analysts ; Earnings ; Financial reporting ; International Financial Reporting Standards ; International markets ; Law enforcement ; Reputations ; Sales ; Sales forecasting ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Accounting horizons, 2018-03, Vol.32 (1), p.121-141</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Accounting Association Mar 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4140c11aee3825fff6dc328cf91701c522cd62e417508afd30a87268e735e68f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4140c11aee3825fff6dc328cf91701c522cd62e417508afd30a87268e735e68f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7421-6208</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chien-Ju</creatorcontrib><title>Why Do Analysts Issue Sales Forecasts? Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption</title><title>Accounting horizons</title><description>This study uses mandatory adoption of IFRS as a setting to investigate why financial analysts issue supplementary sales forecasts. The demand explanation proposes that analysts issue supplementary forecasts if earnings are not informative and thus investors demand additional accounting information. The reputation explanation posits that analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts if these forecasts are more accurate and will not cause reputation damage. Using mandatory IFRS adoption as an exogenous shock to analysts' information environment, we find that after firms mandatorily adopt IFRS, analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts and analysts' sales forecasts become more accurate and less dispersed. The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption is stronger in countries with strong law enforcement and a large difference between local GAAP and IFRS. Further analysis shows that the IFRS effect concentrates on analysts with prior experience with IAS. Overall, the results provide support to the reputation explanation. JEL Classifications: G15; G18; M41.</description><subject>Analysts</subject><subject>Earnings</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>International Financial Reporting Standards</subject><subject>International markets</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Sales forecasting</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0888-7993</issn><issn>1558-7975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEFLAzEUhIMoWKsXf0HAm7D6kmw2b09StNVCRbCKxxCyL7Sl3dRkK-y_t7WeZhiGgfkYuxZwJxXgvfN-UWhRl-KEDYTWWJja6FM2AMSDr9U5u8h5BQAVKhiw2dei50-Rj1q37nOX-TTnHfG5W1Pmk5jIu336wMc_y4ZaTzykuOGvrm1cF1PPp5P3OR81cdstY3vJzoJbZ7r61yH7nIw_Hl-K2dvz9HE0K7zSpitKUYIXwhEplDqEUDVeSfShFgaE11L6ppJUCqMBXWgUODSyQjJKU4VBDdnNcXeb4veOcmdXcZf2D7KVgDVWiMrsW7fHlk8x50TBbtNy41JvBdgDLXugZf9oqV-soVvD</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>He, Wen</creator><creator>Lu, Chien-Ju</creator><general>American Accounting Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>U9A</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7421-6208</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Why Do Analysts Issue Sales Forecasts? Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption</title><author>He, Wen ; Lu, Chien-Ju</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4140c11aee3825fff6dc328cf91701c522cd62e417508afd30a87268e735e68f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysts</topic><topic>Earnings</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>International Financial Reporting Standards</topic><topic>International markets</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Sales forecasting</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chien-Ju</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Accounting horizons</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Wen</au><au>Lu, Chien-Ju</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Do Analysts Issue Sales Forecasts? Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption</atitle><jtitle>Accounting horizons</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>121-141</pages><issn>0888-7993</issn><eissn>1558-7975</eissn><abstract>This study uses mandatory adoption of IFRS as a setting to investigate why financial analysts issue supplementary sales forecasts. The demand explanation proposes that analysts issue supplementary forecasts if earnings are not informative and thus investors demand additional accounting information. The reputation explanation posits that analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts if these forecasts are more accurate and will not cause reputation damage. Using mandatory IFRS adoption as an exogenous shock to analysts' information environment, we find that after firms mandatorily adopt IFRS, analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts and analysts' sales forecasts become more accurate and less dispersed. The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption is stronger in countries with strong law enforcement and a large difference between local GAAP and IFRS. Further analysis shows that the IFRS effect concentrates on analysts with prior experience with IAS. Overall, the results provide support to the reputation explanation. JEL Classifications: G15; G18; M41.</abstract><cop>Sarasota</cop><pub>American Accounting Association</pub><doi>10.2308/acch-51941</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7421-6208</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-7993
ispartof Accounting horizons, 2018-03, Vol.32 (1), p.121-141
issn 0888-7993
1558-7975
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2089868837
source Business Source Complete
subjects Analysts
Earnings
Financial reporting
International Financial Reporting Standards
International markets
Law enforcement
Reputations
Sales
Sales forecasting
Studies
title Why Do Analysts Issue Sales Forecasts? Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T15%3A02%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Do%20Analysts%20Issue%20Sales%20Forecasts?%20Evidence%20from%20Mandatory%20IFRS%20Adoption&rft.jtitle=Accounting%20horizons&rft.au=He,%20Wen&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=121-141&rft.issn=0888-7993&rft.eissn=1558-7975&rft_id=info:doi/10.2308/acch-51941&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2089868837%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2089868837&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true