Why Do Analysts Issue Sales Forecasts? Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption
This study uses mandatory adoption of IFRS as a setting to investigate why financial analysts issue supplementary sales forecasts. The demand explanation proposes that analysts issue supplementary forecasts if earnings are not informative and thus investors demand additional accounting information....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Accounting horizons 2018-03, Vol.32 (1), p.121-141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | Accounting horizons |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | He, Wen Lu, Chien-Ju |
description | This study uses mandatory adoption of IFRS as a setting to investigate why financial analysts issue supplementary sales forecasts. The demand explanation proposes that analysts issue supplementary forecasts if earnings are not informative and thus investors demand additional accounting information. The reputation explanation posits that analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts if these forecasts are more accurate and will not cause reputation damage. Using mandatory IFRS adoption as an exogenous shock to analysts' information environment, we find that after firms mandatorily adopt IFRS, analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts and analysts' sales forecasts become more accurate and less dispersed. The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption is stronger in countries with strong law enforcement and a large difference between local GAAP and IFRS. Further analysis shows that the IFRS effect concentrates on analysts with prior experience with IAS. Overall, the results provide support to the reputation explanation.
JEL Classifications: G15; G18; M41. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2308/acch-51941 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2089868837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2089868837</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4140c11aee3825fff6dc328cf91701c522cd62e417508afd30a87268e735e68f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFLAzEUhIMoWKsXf0HAm7D6kmw2b09StNVCRbCKxxCyL7Sl3dRkK-y_t7WeZhiGgfkYuxZwJxXgvfN-UWhRl-KEDYTWWJja6FM2AMSDr9U5u8h5BQAVKhiw2dei50-Rj1q37nOX-TTnHfG5W1Pmk5jIu336wMc_y4ZaTzykuOGvrm1cF1PPp5P3OR81cdstY3vJzoJbZ7r61yH7nIw_Hl-K2dvz9HE0K7zSpitKUYIXwhEplDqEUDVeSfShFgaE11L6ppJUCqMBXWgUODSyQjJKU4VBDdnNcXeb4veOcmdXcZf2D7KVgDVWiMrsW7fHlk8x50TBbtNy41JvBdgDLXugZf9oqV-soVvD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2089868837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Do Analysts Issue Sales Forecasts? Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>He, Wen ; Lu, Chien-Ju</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Wen ; Lu, Chien-Ju</creatorcontrib><description>This study uses mandatory adoption of IFRS as a setting to investigate why financial analysts issue supplementary sales forecasts. The demand explanation proposes that analysts issue supplementary forecasts if earnings are not informative and thus investors demand additional accounting information. The reputation explanation posits that analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts if these forecasts are more accurate and will not cause reputation damage. Using mandatory IFRS adoption as an exogenous shock to analysts' information environment, we find that after firms mandatorily adopt IFRS, analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts and analysts' sales forecasts become more accurate and less dispersed. The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption is stronger in countries with strong law enforcement and a large difference between local GAAP and IFRS. Further analysis shows that the IFRS effect concentrates on analysts with prior experience with IAS. Overall, the results provide support to the reputation explanation.
JEL Classifications: G15; G18; M41.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-7993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-7975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2308/acch-51941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sarasota: American Accounting Association</publisher><subject>Analysts ; Earnings ; Financial reporting ; International Financial Reporting Standards ; International markets ; Law enforcement ; Reputations ; Sales ; Sales forecasting ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Accounting horizons, 2018-03, Vol.32 (1), p.121-141</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Accounting Association Mar 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4140c11aee3825fff6dc328cf91701c522cd62e417508afd30a87268e735e68f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4140c11aee3825fff6dc328cf91701c522cd62e417508afd30a87268e735e68f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7421-6208</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chien-Ju</creatorcontrib><title>Why Do Analysts Issue Sales Forecasts? Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption</title><title>Accounting horizons</title><description>This study uses mandatory adoption of IFRS as a setting to investigate why financial analysts issue supplementary sales forecasts. The demand explanation proposes that analysts issue supplementary forecasts if earnings are not informative and thus investors demand additional accounting information. The reputation explanation posits that analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts if these forecasts are more accurate and will not cause reputation damage. Using mandatory IFRS adoption as an exogenous shock to analysts' information environment, we find that after firms mandatorily adopt IFRS, analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts and analysts' sales forecasts become more accurate and less dispersed. The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption is stronger in countries with strong law enforcement and a large difference between local GAAP and IFRS. Further analysis shows that the IFRS effect concentrates on analysts with prior experience with IAS. Overall, the results provide support to the reputation explanation.
JEL Classifications: G15; G18; M41.</description><subject>Analysts</subject><subject>Earnings</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>International Financial Reporting Standards</subject><subject>International markets</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Sales forecasting</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0888-7993</issn><issn>1558-7975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEFLAzEUhIMoWKsXf0HAm7D6kmw2b09StNVCRbCKxxCyL7Sl3dRkK-y_t7WeZhiGgfkYuxZwJxXgvfN-UWhRl-KEDYTWWJja6FM2AMSDr9U5u8h5BQAVKhiw2dei50-Rj1q37nOX-TTnHfG5W1Pmk5jIu336wMc_y4ZaTzykuOGvrm1cF1PPp5P3OR81cdstY3vJzoJbZ7r61yH7nIw_Hl-K2dvz9HE0K7zSpitKUYIXwhEplDqEUDVeSfShFgaE11L6ppJUCqMBXWgUODSyQjJKU4VBDdnNcXeb4veOcmdXcZf2D7KVgDVWiMrsW7fHlk8x50TBbtNy41JvBdgDLXugZf9oqV-soVvD</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>He, Wen</creator><creator>Lu, Chien-Ju</creator><general>American Accounting Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>U9A</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7421-6208</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Why Do Analysts Issue Sales Forecasts? Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption</title><author>He, Wen ; Lu, Chien-Ju</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4140c11aee3825fff6dc328cf91701c522cd62e417508afd30a87268e735e68f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysts</topic><topic>Earnings</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>International Financial Reporting Standards</topic><topic>International markets</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Sales forecasting</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chien-Ju</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Accounting horizons</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Wen</au><au>Lu, Chien-Ju</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Do Analysts Issue Sales Forecasts? Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption</atitle><jtitle>Accounting horizons</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>121-141</pages><issn>0888-7993</issn><eissn>1558-7975</eissn><abstract>This study uses mandatory adoption of IFRS as a setting to investigate why financial analysts issue supplementary sales forecasts. The demand explanation proposes that analysts issue supplementary forecasts if earnings are not informative and thus investors demand additional accounting information. The reputation explanation posits that analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts if these forecasts are more accurate and will not cause reputation damage. Using mandatory IFRS adoption as an exogenous shock to analysts' information environment, we find that after firms mandatorily adopt IFRS, analysts are more likely to issue sales forecasts and analysts' sales forecasts become more accurate and less dispersed. The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption is stronger in countries with strong law enforcement and a large difference between local GAAP and IFRS. Further analysis shows that the IFRS effect concentrates on analysts with prior experience with IAS. Overall, the results provide support to the reputation explanation.
JEL Classifications: G15; G18; M41.</abstract><cop>Sarasota</cop><pub>American Accounting Association</pub><doi>10.2308/acch-51941</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7421-6208</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-7993 |
ispartof | Accounting horizons, 2018-03, Vol.32 (1), p.121-141 |
issn | 0888-7993 1558-7975 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2089868837 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Analysts Earnings Financial reporting International Financial Reporting Standards International markets Law enforcement Reputations Sales Sales forecasting Studies |
title | Why Do Analysts Issue Sales Forecasts? Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T15%3A02%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Do%20Analysts%20Issue%20Sales%20Forecasts?%20Evidence%20from%20Mandatory%20IFRS%20Adoption&rft.jtitle=Accounting%20horizons&rft.au=He,%20Wen&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=121-141&rft.issn=0888-7993&rft.eissn=1558-7975&rft_id=info:doi/10.2308/acch-51941&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2089868837%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2089868837&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |