The role of human-at-work systems in business sustainability: perspectives based on expert and qualified production workers in a manufacturing enterprise

A community of highly qualified employees is desirable for the workforce to become a competitive business advantage, improving and sustaining corporate health. Currently, the scientific literature is limited on information comparing the assessment of expert and qualified workers for the employee-wor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ergonomics 2010-04, Vol.53 (4), p.559-585
Hauptverfasser: Genaidy, Ash M., Rinder, Maria M., Sequeira, Reynold, A-Rehim, Amal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 585
container_issue 4
container_start_page 559
container_title Ergonomics
container_volume 53
creator Genaidy, Ash M.
Rinder, Maria M.
Sequeira, Reynold
A-Rehim, Amal
description A community of highly qualified employees is desirable for the workforce to become a competitive business advantage, improving and sustaining corporate health. Currently, the scientific literature is limited on information comparing the assessment of expert and qualified workers for the employee-work environment interface. Such information would be valuable for industrial managers to obtain and act on the different perspectives of its workers for business improvement and survivability. A primary objective of this study is to explore the perspectives of expert and qualified workers on the quality of the employee-work environment interface in a manufacturing enterprise. This investigation was performed in a production department in a small manufacturing enterprise. Two expert workers participated in the study, with each being in the company for 30 years and having performed all jobs in the production department as well as supervisory and line management responsibilities. A total of 13 qualified workers from day and night shifts were used in the study, with the great majority of workers possessing 10 or more years of on-the-job experience but not acquiring the same specialised knowledge required for operating the technological resources in the department. The work compatibility methodology was used to assess the quality of employee-work environment interface for both expert and qualified workers. Both expert and qualified workers provided similar trends in terms of their compatibility assessment of experienced and acting work domains. In general, the compatibility levels for the day shift were poorer than those obtained for the night shift for acting work domains. The similarities in assessment between the expert and qualified workers were much closer for factors impacting job performance at the task and immediate surrounding levels (i.e. physical and mental task content, physical environment). There were greater differences at the macro level, that is, at the process and enterprise levels, in terms of organisational/social/technological environment. This is particularly noted for the organisational environment. The compatibility values obtained for the experienced domains mirror those obtained for acting domains. The overall workload was assessed as requiring major redesign during the day shift and needing added responsibilities for the night shift according to both expert and qualified workers. The assessment of qualified workers is comparable with that of
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00140130903528558
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_208920525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>753658320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-907753dd170603ef364e52c81e59653a6c630236fc78cbf871fc1d35b1766b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd2KFDEQhYMo7rj6AN5IEMSr1qQz-WnxRhb_YMGbuW_S6YqbtTs9m0p051F8WzPOrIIL7lVI1XdOqnIIecrZK84Me80YXzMuWMeEbI2U5h5ZcaFUI81a3yerfb-pQHdCHiFe1qvgXfuQnLSsirTkK_JzcwE0LRPQxdOLMtvY2Nz8WNI3ijvMMCMNkQ4FQwREigWzDdEOYQp594ZuIeEWXA7fAelgEUa6RArXtZ6pjSO9KnYKPtT6Ni1jqWTt7-2rcO9saX2yeOtySSF-pRAzpG0KCI_JA28nhCfH85RsPrzfnH1qzr98_Hz27rxx647lpmNaSzGOXDPFBHih1iBbZzjITklhlVOCtUJ5p40bvNHcOz4KOXCt1MDFKXl5sK3zXRXA3M8BHUyTjbAU7Ku5kkbUH7uTFKLthPlNPv-HvFxKinWLvmWma5lsZYX4AXJpQUzg-7r2bNOu56zfx9vfirdqnh2NyzDD-Edxk2cFXhwBi85OPtnoAv7lWqmVVnvu7YEL0S9ptjWRaeyz3U1LuhGJ_82h75TfUvX5OotfNYjTnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208920525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of human-at-work systems in business sustainability: perspectives based on expert and qualified production workers in a manufacturing enterprise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>Genaidy, Ash M. ; Rinder, Maria M. ; Sequeira, Reynold ; A-Rehim, Amal</creator><creatorcontrib>Genaidy, Ash M. ; Rinder, Maria M. ; Sequeira, Reynold ; A-Rehim, Amal</creatorcontrib><description>A community of highly qualified employees is desirable for the workforce to become a competitive business advantage, improving and sustaining corporate health. Currently, the scientific literature is limited on information comparing the assessment of expert and qualified workers for the employee-work environment interface. Such information would be valuable for industrial managers to obtain and act on the different perspectives of its workers for business improvement and survivability. A primary objective of this study is to explore the perspectives of expert and qualified workers on the quality of the employee-work environment interface in a manufacturing enterprise. This investigation was performed in a production department in a small manufacturing enterprise. Two expert workers participated in the study, with each being in the company for 30 years and having performed all jobs in the production department as well as supervisory and line management responsibilities. A total of 13 qualified workers from day and night shifts were used in the study, with the great majority of workers possessing 10 or more years of on-the-job experience but not acquiring the same specialised knowledge required for operating the technological resources in the department. The work compatibility methodology was used to assess the quality of employee-work environment interface for both expert and qualified workers. Both expert and qualified workers provided similar trends in terms of their compatibility assessment of experienced and acting work domains. In general, the compatibility levels for the day shift were poorer than those obtained for the night shift for acting work domains. The similarities in assessment between the expert and qualified workers were much closer for factors impacting job performance at the task and immediate surrounding levels (i.e. physical and mental task content, physical environment). There were greater differences at the macro level, that is, at the process and enterprise levels, in terms of organisational/social/technological environment. This is particularly noted for the organisational environment. The compatibility values obtained for the experienced domains mirror those obtained for acting domains. The overall workload was assessed as requiring major redesign during the day shift and needing added responsibilities for the night shift according to both expert and qualified workers. The assessment of qualified workers is comparable with that of expert workers for the job content and immediate surroundings. Differences are more observed for process- and enterprise-based factors; thereby, providing company management different perspectives in order to devise organisational strategies conducive for optimum human and corporate health and pointing to the probable interactions of the different systems impacting individual and enterprise performance. Statement of Relevance: This research examines similarities and differences between qualified and expert workers in their assessment of the worker-work environment interface. The contribution to improved understanding of the complex interactions of human-at-work and enterprise systems should be beneficial to organisations in their quest to remain competitive in a global economy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140130903528558</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20309751</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERGOAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Employment - organization &amp; administration ; Employment - psychology ; Employment - standards ; Ergonomics ; Ergonomics. Human factors ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; human-at-work ; Humans ; Industry - manpower ; Industry - standards ; Male ; Manufacturing ; manufacturing/service enterprise ; Middle Aged ; Occupational psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Space life sciences ; Staff Development ; sustainability ; Work environment ; Workers ; Workloads ; Workplace - organization &amp; administration ; Workplace - standards ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 2010-04, Vol.53 (4), p.559-585</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-907753dd170603ef364e52c81e59653a6c630236fc78cbf871fc1d35b1766b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-907753dd170603ef364e52c81e59653a6c630236fc78cbf871fc1d35b1766b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00140130903528558$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00140130903528558$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22576761$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20309751$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Genaidy, Ash M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinder, Maria M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sequeira, Reynold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A-Rehim, Amal</creatorcontrib><title>The role of human-at-work systems in business sustainability: perspectives based on expert and qualified production workers in a manufacturing enterprise</title><title>Ergonomics</title><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><description>A community of highly qualified employees is desirable for the workforce to become a competitive business advantage, improving and sustaining corporate health. Currently, the scientific literature is limited on information comparing the assessment of expert and qualified workers for the employee-work environment interface. Such information would be valuable for industrial managers to obtain and act on the different perspectives of its workers for business improvement and survivability. A primary objective of this study is to explore the perspectives of expert and qualified workers on the quality of the employee-work environment interface in a manufacturing enterprise. This investigation was performed in a production department in a small manufacturing enterprise. Two expert workers participated in the study, with each being in the company for 30 years and having performed all jobs in the production department as well as supervisory and line management responsibilities. A total of 13 qualified workers from day and night shifts were used in the study, with the great majority of workers possessing 10 or more years of on-the-job experience but not acquiring the same specialised knowledge required for operating the technological resources in the department. The work compatibility methodology was used to assess the quality of employee-work environment interface for both expert and qualified workers. Both expert and qualified workers provided similar trends in terms of their compatibility assessment of experienced and acting work domains. In general, the compatibility levels for the day shift were poorer than those obtained for the night shift for acting work domains. The similarities in assessment between the expert and qualified workers were much closer for factors impacting job performance at the task and immediate surrounding levels (i.e. physical and mental task content, physical environment). There were greater differences at the macro level, that is, at the process and enterprise levels, in terms of organisational/social/technological environment. This is particularly noted for the organisational environment. The compatibility values obtained for the experienced domains mirror those obtained for acting domains. The overall workload was assessed as requiring major redesign during the day shift and needing added responsibilities for the night shift according to both expert and qualified workers. The assessment of qualified workers is comparable with that of expert workers for the job content and immediate surroundings. Differences are more observed for process- and enterprise-based factors; thereby, providing company management different perspectives in order to devise organisational strategies conducive for optimum human and corporate health and pointing to the probable interactions of the different systems impacting individual and enterprise performance. Statement of Relevance: This research examines similarities and differences between qualified and expert workers in their assessment of the worker-work environment interface. The contribution to improved understanding of the complex interactions of human-at-work and enterprise systems should be beneficial to organisations in their quest to remain competitive in a global economy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Employment - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Employment - psychology</subject><subject>Employment - standards</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Human factors</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>human-at-work</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industry - manpower</subject><subject>Industry - standards</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>manufacturing/service enterprise</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Staff Development</subject><subject>sustainability</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><subject>Workplace - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Workplace - standards</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd2KFDEQhYMo7rj6AN5IEMSr1qQz-WnxRhb_YMGbuW_S6YqbtTs9m0p051F8WzPOrIIL7lVI1XdOqnIIecrZK84Me80YXzMuWMeEbI2U5h5ZcaFUI81a3yerfb-pQHdCHiFe1qvgXfuQnLSsirTkK_JzcwE0LRPQxdOLMtvY2Nz8WNI3ijvMMCMNkQ4FQwREigWzDdEOYQp594ZuIeEWXA7fAelgEUa6RArXtZ6pjSO9KnYKPtT6Ni1jqWTt7-2rcO9saX2yeOtySSF-pRAzpG0KCI_JA28nhCfH85RsPrzfnH1qzr98_Hz27rxx647lpmNaSzGOXDPFBHih1iBbZzjITklhlVOCtUJ5p40bvNHcOz4KOXCt1MDFKXl5sK3zXRXA3M8BHUyTjbAU7Ku5kkbUH7uTFKLthPlNPv-HvFxKinWLvmWma5lsZYX4AXJpQUzg-7r2bNOu56zfx9vfirdqnh2NyzDD-Edxk2cFXhwBi85OPtnoAv7lWqmVVnvu7YEL0S9ptjWRaeyz3U1LuhGJ_82h75TfUvX5OotfNYjTnQ</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Genaidy, Ash M.</creator><creator>Rinder, Maria M.</creator><creator>Sequeira, Reynold</creator><creator>A-Rehim, Amal</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>The role of human-at-work systems in business sustainability: perspectives based on expert and qualified production workers in a manufacturing enterprise</title><author>Genaidy, Ash M. ; Rinder, Maria M. ; Sequeira, Reynold ; A-Rehim, Amal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-907753dd170603ef364e52c81e59653a6c630236fc78cbf871fc1d35b1766b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Employment - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Employment - psychology</topic><topic>Employment - standards</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Human factors</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>human-at-work</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industry - manpower</topic><topic>Industry - standards</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>manufacturing/service enterprise</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Staff Development</topic><topic>sustainability</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><topic>Workplace - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Workplace - standards</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Genaidy, Ash M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinder, Maria M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sequeira, Reynold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A-Rehim, Amal</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Genaidy, Ash M.</au><au>Rinder, Maria M.</au><au>Sequeira, Reynold</au><au>A-Rehim, Amal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of human-at-work systems in business sustainability: perspectives based on expert and qualified production workers in a manufacturing enterprise</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>559</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>559-585</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><coden>ERGOAX</coden><abstract>A community of highly qualified employees is desirable for the workforce to become a competitive business advantage, improving and sustaining corporate health. Currently, the scientific literature is limited on information comparing the assessment of expert and qualified workers for the employee-work environment interface. Such information would be valuable for industrial managers to obtain and act on the different perspectives of its workers for business improvement and survivability. A primary objective of this study is to explore the perspectives of expert and qualified workers on the quality of the employee-work environment interface in a manufacturing enterprise. This investigation was performed in a production department in a small manufacturing enterprise. Two expert workers participated in the study, with each being in the company for 30 years and having performed all jobs in the production department as well as supervisory and line management responsibilities. A total of 13 qualified workers from day and night shifts were used in the study, with the great majority of workers possessing 10 or more years of on-the-job experience but not acquiring the same specialised knowledge required for operating the technological resources in the department. The work compatibility methodology was used to assess the quality of employee-work environment interface for both expert and qualified workers. Both expert and qualified workers provided similar trends in terms of their compatibility assessment of experienced and acting work domains. In general, the compatibility levels for the day shift were poorer than those obtained for the night shift for acting work domains. The similarities in assessment between the expert and qualified workers were much closer for factors impacting job performance at the task and immediate surrounding levels (i.e. physical and mental task content, physical environment). There were greater differences at the macro level, that is, at the process and enterprise levels, in terms of organisational/social/technological environment. This is particularly noted for the organisational environment. The compatibility values obtained for the experienced domains mirror those obtained for acting domains. The overall workload was assessed as requiring major redesign during the day shift and needing added responsibilities for the night shift according to both expert and qualified workers. The assessment of qualified workers is comparable with that of expert workers for the job content and immediate surroundings. Differences are more observed for process- and enterprise-based factors; thereby, providing company management different perspectives in order to devise organisational strategies conducive for optimum human and corporate health and pointing to the probable interactions of the different systems impacting individual and enterprise performance. Statement of Relevance: This research examines similarities and differences between qualified and expert workers in their assessment of the worker-work environment interface. The contribution to improved understanding of the complex interactions of human-at-work and enterprise systems should be beneficial to organisations in their quest to remain competitive in a global economy.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>20309751</pmid><doi>10.1080/00140130903528558</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-0139
ispartof Ergonomics, 2010-04, Vol.53 (4), p.559-585
issn 0014-0139
1366-5847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_208920525
source MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Employment - organization & administration
Employment - psychology
Employment - standards
Ergonomics
Ergonomics. Human factors
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
human-at-work
Humans
Industry - manpower
Industry - standards
Male
Manufacturing
manufacturing/service enterprise
Middle Aged
Occupational psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Space life sciences
Staff Development
sustainability
Work environment
Workers
Workloads
Workplace - organization & administration
Workplace - standards
Young Adult
title The role of human-at-work systems in business sustainability: perspectives based on expert and qualified production workers in a manufacturing enterprise
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T12%3A40%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20human-at-work%20systems%20in%20business%20sustainability:%20perspectives%20based%20on%20expert%20and%20qualified%20production%20workers%20in%20a%20manufacturing%20enterprise&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=Genaidy,%20Ash%20M.&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=559&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=559-585&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft.coden=ERGOAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140130903528558&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E753658320%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208920525&rft_id=info:pmid/20309751&rfr_iscdi=true