A comparison of the cognitive demands of navigating two-versus three-dimensional spatial database layouts
This paper reports an experimental investigation of target search performance in two- versus three-dimensional spatial database configurations. Although distance to targets was reduced in a three-dimensional condition there was no corresponding performance advantage in response times or implicit lea...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ergonomics 1998-02, Vol.41 (2), p.207-212 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 212 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 207 |
| container_title | Ergonomics |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | WESTERMAN, S. J. |
| description | This paper reports an experimental investigation of target search performance in two- versus three-dimensional spatial database configurations. Although distance to targets was reduced in a three-dimensional condition there was no corresponding performance advantage in response times or implicit learning, and navigational efficiency was reduced. Participants also reported expending greater effort when using a three-dimensional layout. Spatial ability was not predictive of navigational performance, and there was no interaction between spatial ability and database structure. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/001401398187251 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_208910735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>331053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-a88e495f2c26dc61b00daa1033c2a83d5076994455410c12a90cf10990a90ebc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v3CAQxVHVKN1se-6pktVGvTkZwNiQWxT1I1KkXtKzNYvxlsiGLeBN978v7m5zWCnKaYD3e08zDCHvKVxQkHAJQCugXEkqGyboK7KgvK5LIavmNVnMajnLb8hZjA_5yqlip-RUVaqqOFsQe11oP24w2Ohd4fsi_TL5Ze1ssltTdGZE18VZcLi1a0zWrYv06MutCXGKGQ_GlJ0djYvWOxyKuMlQrh0mXGE0xYA7P6X4lpz0OETz7lCX5OfXL_c338u7H99ub67vSi2ETCVKaSoleqZZ3emargA6RAqca4aSdwKaWuXmhagoaMpQge4pKAX5ZFaaL8nnfe4m-N-TiakdbdRmGNAZP8W2UQ3lIk__Esj-YfnLluTjEfjgp5BnzQxIRaHhIkOfnoNoI0ABV2qOutxTOvgYg-nbTbAjhl1LoZ0X2h4tNDs-HHKn1Wi6J_6wwayfH3SMGoc-oNM2PmGMVlKIub2rPWZd78OIjz4MXZtwN_jw38Of70G8aD7ytOlP4n8BNb3KnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1750903991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of the cognitive demands of navigating two-versus three-dimensional spatial database layouts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Taylor & Francis</source><creator>WESTERMAN, S. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>WESTERMAN, S. J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports an experimental investigation of target search performance in two- versus three-dimensional spatial database configurations. Although distance to targets was reduced in a three-dimensional condition there was no corresponding performance advantage in response times or implicit learning, and navigational efficiency was reduced. Participants also reported expending greater effort when using a three-dimensional layout. Spatial ability was not predictive of navigational performance, and there was no interaction between spatial ability and database structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/001401398187251</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9494432</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERGOAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Cognition & reasoning ; Cognition - physiology ; Cognitive aspects ; Cognitive systems ; Data structures ; Database systems ; Databases as Topic - standards ; Databases Spatial Ability Virtual Reality ; Ergonomics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Female ; Humans ; Information and communication sciences ; Information processing and retrieval ; Information retrieval. Man machine relationship ; Information science. Documentation ; Learning ; Male ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reaction Time ; Sciences and techniques of general use ; Space life sciences ; Spatial Behavior - physiology ; User-Computer Interface ; Virtual reality</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 1998-02, Vol.41 (2), p.207-212</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1998</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group Feb 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-a88e495f2c26dc61b00daa1033c2a83d5076994455410c12a90cf10990a90ebc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-a88e495f2c26dc61b00daa1033c2a83d5076994455410c12a90cf10990a90ebc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/001401398187251$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/001401398187251$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27848,27903,27904,59624,60413</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2148555$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9494432$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WESTERMAN, S. J.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of the cognitive demands of navigating two-versus three-dimensional spatial database layouts</title><title>Ergonomics</title><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><description>This paper reports an experimental investigation of target search performance in two- versus three-dimensional spatial database configurations. Although distance to targets was reduced in a three-dimensional condition there was no corresponding performance advantage in response times or implicit learning, and navigational efficiency was reduced. Participants also reported expending greater effort when using a three-dimensional layout. Spatial ability was not predictive of navigational performance, and there was no interaction between spatial ability and database structure.</description><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive aspects</subject><subject>Cognitive systems</subject><subject>Data structures</subject><subject>Database systems</subject><subject>Databases as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Databases Spatial Ability Virtual Reality</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information processing and retrieval</subject><subject>Information retrieval. Man machine relationship</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Spatial Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><subject>Virtual reality</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1v3CAQxVHVKN1se-6pktVGvTkZwNiQWxT1I1KkXtKzNYvxlsiGLeBN978v7m5zWCnKaYD3e08zDCHvKVxQkHAJQCugXEkqGyboK7KgvK5LIavmNVnMajnLb8hZjA_5yqlip-RUVaqqOFsQe11oP24w2Ohd4fsi_TL5Ze1ssltTdGZE18VZcLi1a0zWrYv06MutCXGKGQ_GlJ0djYvWOxyKuMlQrh0mXGE0xYA7P6X4lpz0OETz7lCX5OfXL_c338u7H99ub67vSi2ETCVKaSoleqZZ3emargA6RAqca4aSdwKaWuXmhagoaMpQge4pKAX5ZFaaL8nnfe4m-N-TiakdbdRmGNAZP8W2UQ3lIk__Esj-YfnLluTjEfjgp5BnzQxIRaHhIkOfnoNoI0ABV2qOutxTOvgYg-nbTbAjhl1LoZ0X2h4tNDs-HHKn1Wi6J_6wwayfH3SMGoc-oNM2PmGMVlKIub2rPWZd78OIjz4MXZtwN_jw38Of70G8aD7ytOlP4n8BNb3KnA</recordid><startdate>19980201</startdate><enddate>19980201</enddate><creator>WESTERMAN, S. J.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor and Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980201</creationdate><title>A comparison of the cognitive demands of navigating two-versus three-dimensional spatial database layouts</title><author>WESTERMAN, S. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-a88e495f2c26dc61b00daa1033c2a83d5076994455410c12a90cf10990a90ebc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive aspects</topic><topic>Cognitive systems</topic><topic>Data structures</topic><topic>Database systems</topic><topic>Databases as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Databases Spatial Ability Virtual Reality</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information processing and retrieval</topic><topic>Information retrieval. Man machine relationship</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Spatial Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><topic>Virtual reality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WESTERMAN, S. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WESTERMAN, S. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of the cognitive demands of navigating two-versus three-dimensional spatial database layouts</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><date>1998-02-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>207-212</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><coden>ERGOAX</coden><abstract>This paper reports an experimental investigation of target search performance in two- versus three-dimensional spatial database configurations. Although distance to targets was reduced in a three-dimensional condition there was no corresponding performance advantage in response times or implicit learning, and navigational efficiency was reduced. Participants also reported expending greater effort when using a three-dimensional layout. Spatial ability was not predictive of navigational performance, and there was no interaction between spatial ability and database structure.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>9494432</pmid><doi>10.1080/001401398187251</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0014-0139 |
| ispartof | Ergonomics, 1998-02, Vol.41 (2), p.207-212 |
| issn | 0014-0139 1366-5847 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_208910735 |
| source | MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; Taylor & Francis |
| subjects | Cognition & reasoning Cognition - physiology Cognitive aspects Cognitive systems Data structures Database systems Databases as Topic - standards Databases Spatial Ability Virtual Reality Ergonomics Exact sciences and technology Female Humans Information and communication sciences Information processing and retrieval Information retrieval. Man machine relationship Information science. Documentation Learning Male Predictive Value of Tests Reaction Time Sciences and techniques of general use Space life sciences Spatial Behavior - physiology User-Computer Interface Virtual reality |
| title | A comparison of the cognitive demands of navigating two-versus three-dimensional spatial database layouts |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T14%3A43%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20the%20cognitive%20demands%20of%20navigating%20two-versus%20three-dimensional%20spatial%20database%20layouts&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=WESTERMAN,%20S.%20J.&rft.date=1998-02-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=207-212&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft.coden=ERGOAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/001401398187251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E331053%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1750903991&rft_id=info:pmid/9494432&rfr_iscdi=true |