Revenue sharing contracts for horizontal capacity sharing under competition

The capacity-sharing strategy is a widely used strategy to alleviate the mismatch between supply and demand. To investigate the performance of the capacity-sharing strategy, we consider two firms competing for business in a single market in this paper. Both firms can choose to join the horizontal ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of operations research 2020-08, Vol.291 (1-2), p.731-760
Hauptverfasser: Qin, Juanjuan, Wang, Kun, Wang, Ziping, Xia, Liangjie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 760
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 731
container_title Annals of operations research
container_volume 291
creator Qin, Juanjuan
Wang, Kun
Wang, Ziping
Xia, Liangjie
description The capacity-sharing strategy is a widely used strategy to alleviate the mismatch between supply and demand. To investigate the performance of the capacity-sharing strategy, we consider two firms competing for business in a single market in this paper. Both firms can choose to join the horizontal capacity-sharing strategy with a revenue-sharing contract. By comparing the equilibrium solutions of analytical models where firms share capacities and firms don’t share capacities respectively, we find that both firms raise their prices with a low revenue sharing rate when the total desired demand can be satisfied by the total capacities; But the change of prices depends on the combined effect of competition intensity and the revenue sharing rate if the capacity sharing can’t satisfy the total desired demand. In addition, we find that the profit of the firm with insufficient capacity increases if capacity sharing is present. However, the profit of the firm with underutilized capacity increases in the revenue sharing rate when it is small, but decreases in it when it becomes relatively large. Thus, capacity sharing is not always better for the firm with underutilized capacity.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10479-018-3005-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2089010480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A630101124</galeid><sourcerecordid>A630101124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-c744c040b94a7d67c6d4c0aade5d8ed42949f5f0a2ea88c5cd89594c4bec882a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9LwzAUxYMoOKcfwLeCr1Zv0mRNH8fwHw4E0eeQpbdbxtbW3FbUT2_GxCkogRvu5XcS7jmMnXK44AD5JXGQeZEC12kGoNK3PTbgKhdpkWV6nw1AKJmqLINDdkS0BADOtRqw-0d8xbrHhBY2-HqeuKbugnUdJVUTkkUT_Eec2FXibGud796_yb4uMUR-3WLnO9_Ux-ygsivCk697yJ6vr54mt-n04eZuMp6mTgroUpdL6UDCrJA2L0e5G5Wxt7ZEVWospShkUakKrECrtVOu1IUqpJMzdFoLmw3Z2fbdNjQvPVJnlk0f6vilEaALiFZo2FFzu0Lj66rZ7LX25Mx4lEWIcyEjdfEHFU-Jax-9wMrH-S_B-Q_BrCdfI8VCfr7oaG57ot843-IuNEQBK9MGv7bh3XAwm-TMNjkTkzOb5Mxb1IithtqN0Rh2-_0v-gRj9Zth</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2089010480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revenue sharing contracts for horizontal capacity sharing under competition</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Qin, Juanjuan ; Wang, Kun ; Wang, Ziping ; Xia, Liangjie</creator><creatorcontrib>Qin, Juanjuan ; Wang, Kun ; Wang, Ziping ; Xia, Liangjie</creatorcontrib><description>The capacity-sharing strategy is a widely used strategy to alleviate the mismatch between supply and demand. To investigate the performance of the capacity-sharing strategy, we consider two firms competing for business in a single market in this paper. Both firms can choose to join the horizontal capacity-sharing strategy with a revenue-sharing contract. By comparing the equilibrium solutions of analytical models where firms share capacities and firms don’t share capacities respectively, we find that both firms raise their prices with a low revenue sharing rate when the total desired demand can be satisfied by the total capacities; But the change of prices depends on the combined effect of competition intensity and the revenue sharing rate if the capacity sharing can’t satisfy the total desired demand. In addition, we find that the profit of the firm with insufficient capacity increases if capacity sharing is present. However, the profit of the firm with underutilized capacity increases in the revenue sharing rate when it is small, but decreases in it when it becomes relatively large. Thus, capacity sharing is not always better for the firm with underutilized capacity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-5330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-3005-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Business and Management ; Capacity ; Combinatorics ; Competition ; Competition (Economics) ; Contracts ; Demand ; Industrial capacity ; Markets ; Mathematical models ; Operations research ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Pricing policies ; Revenue ; Revenue sharing ; S.I.: RealCaseOR ; Strategy ; Studies ; Supply &amp; demand ; Theory of Computation</subject><ispartof>Annals of operations research, 2020-08, Vol.291 (1-2), p.731-760</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-c744c040b94a7d67c6d4c0aade5d8ed42949f5f0a2ea88c5cd89594c4bec882a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-c744c040b94a7d67c6d4c0aade5d8ed42949f5f0a2ea88c5cd89594c4bec882a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0228-3342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10479-018-3005-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-018-3005-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qin, Juanjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ziping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Liangjie</creatorcontrib><title>Revenue sharing contracts for horizontal capacity sharing under competition</title><title>Annals of operations research</title><addtitle>Ann Oper Res</addtitle><description>The capacity-sharing strategy is a widely used strategy to alleviate the mismatch between supply and demand. To investigate the performance of the capacity-sharing strategy, we consider two firms competing for business in a single market in this paper. Both firms can choose to join the horizontal capacity-sharing strategy with a revenue-sharing contract. By comparing the equilibrium solutions of analytical models where firms share capacities and firms don’t share capacities respectively, we find that both firms raise their prices with a low revenue sharing rate when the total desired demand can be satisfied by the total capacities; But the change of prices depends on the combined effect of competition intensity and the revenue sharing rate if the capacity sharing can’t satisfy the total desired demand. In addition, we find that the profit of the firm with insufficient capacity increases if capacity sharing is present. However, the profit of the firm with underutilized capacity increases in the revenue sharing rate when it is small, but decreases in it when it becomes relatively large. Thus, capacity sharing is not always better for the firm with underutilized capacity.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Capacity</subject><subject>Combinatorics</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competition (Economics)</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Industrial capacity</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Revenue sharing</subject><subject>S.I.: RealCaseOR</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply &amp; demand</subject><subject>Theory of Computation</subject><issn>0254-5330</issn><issn>1572-9338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9LwzAUxYMoOKcfwLeCr1Zv0mRNH8fwHw4E0eeQpbdbxtbW3FbUT2_GxCkogRvu5XcS7jmMnXK44AD5JXGQeZEC12kGoNK3PTbgKhdpkWV6nw1AKJmqLINDdkS0BADOtRqw-0d8xbrHhBY2-HqeuKbugnUdJVUTkkUT_Eec2FXibGud796_yb4uMUR-3WLnO9_Ux-ygsivCk697yJ6vr54mt-n04eZuMp6mTgroUpdL6UDCrJA2L0e5G5Wxt7ZEVWospShkUakKrECrtVOu1IUqpJMzdFoLmw3Z2fbdNjQvPVJnlk0f6vilEaALiFZo2FFzu0Lj66rZ7LX25Mx4lEWIcyEjdfEHFU-Jax-9wMrH-S_B-Q_BrCdfI8VCfr7oaG57ot843-IuNEQBK9MGv7bh3XAwm-TMNjkTkzOb5Mxb1IithtqN0Rh2-_0v-gRj9Zth</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Qin, Juanjuan</creator><creator>Wang, Kun</creator><creator>Wang, Ziping</creator><creator>Xia, Liangjie</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0228-3342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Revenue sharing contracts for horizontal capacity sharing under competition</title><author>Qin, Juanjuan ; Wang, Kun ; Wang, Ziping ; Xia, Liangjie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-c744c040b94a7d67c6d4c0aade5d8ed42949f5f0a2ea88c5cd89594c4bec882a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Capacity</topic><topic>Combinatorics</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competition (Economics)</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Industrial capacity</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Revenue sharing</topic><topic>S.I.: RealCaseOR</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply &amp; demand</topic><topic>Theory of Computation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qin, Juanjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ziping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Liangjie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qin, Juanjuan</au><au>Wang, Kun</au><au>Wang, Ziping</au><au>Xia, Liangjie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revenue sharing contracts for horizontal capacity sharing under competition</atitle><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle><stitle>Ann Oper Res</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>291</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>731</spage><epage>760</epage><pages>731-760</pages><issn>0254-5330</issn><eissn>1572-9338</eissn><abstract>The capacity-sharing strategy is a widely used strategy to alleviate the mismatch between supply and demand. To investigate the performance of the capacity-sharing strategy, we consider two firms competing for business in a single market in this paper. Both firms can choose to join the horizontal capacity-sharing strategy with a revenue-sharing contract. By comparing the equilibrium solutions of analytical models where firms share capacities and firms don’t share capacities respectively, we find that both firms raise their prices with a low revenue sharing rate when the total desired demand can be satisfied by the total capacities; But the change of prices depends on the combined effect of competition intensity and the revenue sharing rate if the capacity sharing can’t satisfy the total desired demand. In addition, we find that the profit of the firm with insufficient capacity increases if capacity sharing is present. However, the profit of the firm with underutilized capacity increases in the revenue sharing rate when it is small, but decreases in it when it becomes relatively large. Thus, capacity sharing is not always better for the firm with underutilized capacity.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10479-018-3005-x</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0228-3342</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0254-5330
ispartof Annals of operations research, 2020-08, Vol.291 (1-2), p.731-760
issn 0254-5330
1572-9338
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2089010480
source Business Source Complete; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Analysis
Business and Management
Capacity
Combinatorics
Competition
Competition (Economics)
Contracts
Demand
Industrial capacity
Markets
Mathematical models
Operations research
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Pricing policies
Revenue
Revenue sharing
S.I.: RealCaseOR
Strategy
Studies
Supply & demand
Theory of Computation
title Revenue sharing contracts for horizontal capacity sharing under competition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A57%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revenue%20sharing%20contracts%20for%20horizontal%20capacity%20sharing%20under%20competition&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20operations%20research&rft.au=Qin,%20Juanjuan&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=291&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=760&rft.pages=731-760&rft.issn=0254-5330&rft.eissn=1572-9338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10479-018-3005-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA630101124%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2089010480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A630101124&rfr_iscdi=true