Resilience of willows (Salix spp.) differs between families during and after flooding according to floodwater depth
Key message Willows differ in their post-flooding responses according to floodwater depth and genotype. Although the morphological and physiological responses of willows to flooding have already been characterized, less is known about their responses during the post-flooding period. After the end of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Trees (Berlin, West) West), 2018-12, Vol.32 (6), p.1779-1788 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1788 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1779 |
| container_title | Trees (Berlin, West) |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Doffo, Guillermo N. Rodríguez, María E. Olguín, Flavia Y. Cerrillo, Teresa Luquez, Virginia M. C. |
| description | Key message
Willows differ in their post-flooding responses according to floodwater depth and genotype.
Although the morphological and physiological responses of willows to flooding have already been characterized, less is known about their responses during the post-flooding period. After the end of the stress episode, plants may modify some leaf and plant traits to compensate for biomass loss. The aim of this work was to analyze the post-flooding responses of different willow genotypes under two different depths of floodwater. The hypothesis was that the growth recovery in the post-flooding period would be different according to the genotype and the floodwater depth. We analyzed three genotypes of five willow families (four interspecific hybrids and one open-pollinated family). The treatments were: (1) Control: plants watered to field capacity; (2) T10: water covering 10 cm above soil level; (3) T65: water covering 65 cm above soil level. Both flooding treatments were followed by a period of recovery (without flooding). Growth was reduced by flooding in T65 but not in T10, while root-to-shoot ratio was reduced in both flooding treatments. The relative growth rate in height, leaf nitrogen concentration, stomatal conductance and electron transport rate changed in a different manner during the post-flooding period, depending on the treatment and genetic background. These results emphasize the need for evaluating a post-flooding recovery period for the breeding of willow genotypes destined for areas under risk of flooding. According to our results,
Salix matsudana
could be a source of flooding tolerance for willow breeding programs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00468-018-1751-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2088799732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2088799732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-2494b69d9df91d0b3924040c95ee985e9c89418676e2ace88b8fa83172e810b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8BL3rIOkm6bXKUxS9YEPw4h7SdaJduU5Mu1X9vuxU8eZpheJ934CHknMOCA2TXESBJFQOuGM-WnGUHZMYTKZgQanlIZqAlZ1xpOCYnMW4AQKZczEh8xljVFTYFUu9oX9W17yO9fLF19UVj2y6uaFk5hyHSHLsesaHObkck0nIXquad2qak1nUYqKu9L_enovBhv3V-uvZ2DJTYdh-n5MjZOuLZ75yTt7vb19UDWz_dP65u1qyQPO2YSHSSp7rUpdO8hFxqkUAChV4iarVEXSidcJVmKQpboFK5clZJnglUHHKQc3Ix9bbBf-4wdmbjd6EZXhoBSmVaZ1IMKT6liuBjDOhMG6qtDd-GgxndmsmtGdya0a3JBkZMTGxHAxj-mv-HfgBa0XyX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2088799732</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resilience of willows (Salix spp.) differs between families during and after flooding according to floodwater depth</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Doffo, Guillermo N. ; Rodríguez, María E. ; Olguín, Flavia Y. ; Cerrillo, Teresa ; Luquez, Virginia M. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Doffo, Guillermo N. ; Rodríguez, María E. ; Olguín, Flavia Y. ; Cerrillo, Teresa ; Luquez, Virginia M. C.</creatorcontrib><description>Key message
Willows differ in their post-flooding responses according to floodwater depth and genotype.
Although the morphological and physiological responses of willows to flooding have already been characterized, less is known about their responses during the post-flooding period. After the end of the stress episode, plants may modify some leaf and plant traits to compensate for biomass loss. The aim of this work was to analyze the post-flooding responses of different willow genotypes under two different depths of floodwater. The hypothesis was that the growth recovery in the post-flooding period would be different according to the genotype and the floodwater depth. We analyzed three genotypes of five willow families (four interspecific hybrids and one open-pollinated family). The treatments were: (1) Control: plants watered to field capacity; (2) T10: water covering 10 cm above soil level; (3) T65: water covering 65 cm above soil level. Both flooding treatments were followed by a period of recovery (without flooding). Growth was reduced by flooding in T65 but not in T10, while root-to-shoot ratio was reduced in both flooding treatments. The relative growth rate in height, leaf nitrogen concentration, stomatal conductance and electron transport rate changed in a different manner during the post-flooding period, depending on the treatment and genetic background. These results emphasize the need for evaluating a post-flooding recovery period for the breeding of willow genotypes destined for areas under risk of flooding. According to our results,
Salix matsudana
could be a source of flooding tolerance for willow breeding programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-1890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00468-018-1751-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Breeding ; Conductance ; Electron transport ; Environmental risk ; Field capacity ; Flooding ; Floods ; Floodwater ; Forestry ; Genotypes ; Growth rate ; Hybrids ; Interspecific ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Original Article ; Physiological responses ; Plant Anatomy/Development ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Plants (botany) ; Recovery ; Resistance ; Soil water ; Stomata ; Stomatal conductance ; Willow</subject><ispartof>Trees (Berlin, West), 2018-12, Vol.32 (6), p.1779-1788</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Trees is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-2494b69d9df91d0b3924040c95ee985e9c89418676e2ace88b8fa83172e810b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-2494b69d9df91d0b3924040c95ee985e9c89418676e2ace88b8fa83172e810b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8433-909X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00468-018-1751-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00468-018-1751-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doffo, Guillermo N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, María E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olguín, Flavia Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerrillo, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luquez, Virginia M. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Resilience of willows (Salix spp.) differs between families during and after flooding according to floodwater depth</title><title>Trees (Berlin, West)</title><addtitle>Trees</addtitle><description>Key message
Willows differ in their post-flooding responses according to floodwater depth and genotype.
Although the morphological and physiological responses of willows to flooding have already been characterized, less is known about their responses during the post-flooding period. After the end of the stress episode, plants may modify some leaf and plant traits to compensate for biomass loss. The aim of this work was to analyze the post-flooding responses of different willow genotypes under two different depths of floodwater. The hypothesis was that the growth recovery in the post-flooding period would be different according to the genotype and the floodwater depth. We analyzed three genotypes of five willow families (four interspecific hybrids and one open-pollinated family). The treatments were: (1) Control: plants watered to field capacity; (2) T10: water covering 10 cm above soil level; (3) T65: water covering 65 cm above soil level. Both flooding treatments were followed by a period of recovery (without flooding). Growth was reduced by flooding in T65 but not in T10, while root-to-shoot ratio was reduced in both flooding treatments. The relative growth rate in height, leaf nitrogen concentration, stomatal conductance and electron transport rate changed in a different manner during the post-flooding period, depending on the treatment and genetic background. These results emphasize the need for evaluating a post-flooding recovery period for the breeding of willow genotypes destined for areas under risk of flooding. According to our results,
Salix matsudana
could be a source of flooding tolerance for willow breeding programs.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Conductance</subject><subject>Electron transport</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Field capacity</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Floodwater</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Physiological responses</subject><subject>Plant Anatomy/Development</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Stomatal conductance</subject><subject>Willow</subject><issn>0931-1890</issn><issn>1432-2285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8BL3rIOkm6bXKUxS9YEPw4h7SdaJduU5Mu1X9vuxU8eZpheJ934CHknMOCA2TXESBJFQOuGM-WnGUHZMYTKZgQanlIZqAlZ1xpOCYnMW4AQKZczEh8xljVFTYFUu9oX9W17yO9fLF19UVj2y6uaFk5hyHSHLsesaHObkck0nIXquad2qak1nUYqKu9L_enovBhv3V-uvZ2DJTYdh-n5MjZOuLZ75yTt7vb19UDWz_dP65u1qyQPO2YSHSSp7rUpdO8hFxqkUAChV4iarVEXSidcJVmKQpboFK5clZJnglUHHKQc3Ix9bbBf-4wdmbjd6EZXhoBSmVaZ1IMKT6liuBjDOhMG6qtDd-GgxndmsmtGdya0a3JBkZMTGxHAxj-mv-HfgBa0XyX</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Doffo, Guillermo N.</creator><creator>Rodríguez, María E.</creator><creator>Olguín, Flavia Y.</creator><creator>Cerrillo, Teresa</creator><creator>Luquez, Virginia M. C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8433-909X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Resilience of willows (Salix spp.) differs between families during and after flooding according to floodwater depth</title><author>Doffo, Guillermo N. ; Rodríguez, María E. ; Olguín, Flavia Y. ; Cerrillo, Teresa ; Luquez, Virginia M. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-2494b69d9df91d0b3924040c95ee985e9c89418676e2ace88b8fa83172e810b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Conductance</topic><topic>Electron transport</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Field capacity</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Floodwater</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Physiological responses</topic><topic>Plant Anatomy/Development</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Stomatal conductance</topic><topic>Willow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doffo, Guillermo N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, María E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olguín, Flavia Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerrillo, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luquez, Virginia M. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Trees (Berlin, West)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doffo, Guillermo N.</au><au>Rodríguez, María E.</au><au>Olguín, Flavia Y.</au><au>Cerrillo, Teresa</au><au>Luquez, Virginia M. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resilience of willows (Salix spp.) differs between families during and after flooding according to floodwater depth</atitle><jtitle>Trees (Berlin, West)</jtitle><stitle>Trees</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1779</spage><epage>1788</epage><pages>1779-1788</pages><issn>0931-1890</issn><eissn>1432-2285</eissn><abstract>Key message
Willows differ in their post-flooding responses according to floodwater depth and genotype.
Although the morphological and physiological responses of willows to flooding have already been characterized, less is known about their responses during the post-flooding period. After the end of the stress episode, plants may modify some leaf and plant traits to compensate for biomass loss. The aim of this work was to analyze the post-flooding responses of different willow genotypes under two different depths of floodwater. The hypothesis was that the growth recovery in the post-flooding period would be different according to the genotype and the floodwater depth. We analyzed three genotypes of five willow families (four interspecific hybrids and one open-pollinated family). The treatments were: (1) Control: plants watered to field capacity; (2) T10: water covering 10 cm above soil level; (3) T65: water covering 65 cm above soil level. Both flooding treatments were followed by a period of recovery (without flooding). Growth was reduced by flooding in T65 but not in T10, while root-to-shoot ratio was reduced in both flooding treatments. The relative growth rate in height, leaf nitrogen concentration, stomatal conductance and electron transport rate changed in a different manner during the post-flooding period, depending on the treatment and genetic background. These results emphasize the need for evaluating a post-flooding recovery period for the breeding of willow genotypes destined for areas under risk of flooding. According to our results,
Salix matsudana
could be a source of flooding tolerance for willow breeding programs.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00468-018-1751-7</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8433-909X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0931-1890 |
| ispartof | Trees (Berlin, West), 2018-12, Vol.32 (6), p.1779-1788 |
| issn | 0931-1890 1432-2285 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2088799732 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Agriculture Biomedical and Life Sciences Breeding Conductance Electron transport Environmental risk Field capacity Flooding Floods Floodwater Forestry Genotypes Growth rate Hybrids Interspecific Leaves Life Sciences Original Article Physiological responses Plant Anatomy/Development Plant Pathology Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Plants (botany) Recovery Resistance Soil water Stomata Stomatal conductance Willow |
| title | Resilience of willows (Salix spp.) differs between families during and after flooding according to floodwater depth |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A38%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resilience%20of%20willows%20(Salix%20spp.)%20differs%20between%20families%20during%20and%20after%20flooding%20according%20to%20floodwater%20depth&rft.jtitle=Trees%20(Berlin,%20West)&rft.au=Doffo,%20Guillermo%20N.&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1779&rft.epage=1788&rft.pages=1779-1788&rft.issn=0931-1890&rft.eissn=1432-2285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00468-018-1751-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2088799732%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2088799732&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |