Kinetic parameter estimation and simulation of trickle-bed reactor for hydrodesulfurization of whole fraction low-temperature coal tar

With whole-fraction low temperature coal tar (LTCT) as raw material, which boiling point range is 209–514 °C. This paper conducts hydrotreatment (HDT) test for 1176 h on trickle-bed reactor (TBR) with commercial NiMo/Al2O3-SiO2 catalyst. The reaction conditions are as follows: reaction temperature 6...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fuel (Guildford) 2018-10, Vol.230, p.113-125
Hauptverfasser: Feng, Xian, Li, Dong, Chen, Junghui, Niu, Menglong, Liu, Xu, Chan, Lester Lik Teck, Li, Wenhong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 125
container_issue
container_start_page 113
container_title Fuel (Guildford)
container_volume 230
creator Feng, Xian
Li, Dong
Chen, Junghui
Niu, Menglong
Liu, Xu
Chan, Lester Lik Teck
Li, Wenhong
description With whole-fraction low temperature coal tar (LTCT) as raw material, which boiling point range is 209–514 °C. This paper conducts hydrotreatment (HDT) test for 1176 h on trickle-bed reactor (TBR) with commercial NiMo/Al2O3-SiO2 catalyst. The reaction conditions are as follows: reaction temperature 613–653 K, reaction pressure 10–14 MPa, liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) 0.2–0.4 h−1, and hydrogen-to-oil volume ratio 1000:1. Considering the short life of coal tar HDT catalyst, a kinetic model of whole-fraction LTCT hydrodesulfurization (HDS) including running time (t1) and catalyst half-life (tc) was established. The kinetic parameter estimation was conducted according to the experimental data, and the results are as follows: activation energy 94965 J/mol, reaction order 1.5, and the relative error of the model is less than 5%. Based on the premise of steady state operation, the HDS reaction happened in the three-phase trickle-bed reactor was simulated by combining the mass transfer, reaction kinetics model and physical property data of LTCT. The results show that the experimental and simulated values of sulphur content at the exit of the reactor are within the error range of 5%. By simulating the whole-fraction LTCT HDS reactor, the pattern of changes in the concentrations of hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen and sulfur in gas, liquid and solid phases according to the length of the reactor were obtained. Based on this, this paper discusses on the impacts of each process parameter and hydrogen sulfide partial pressure on LTCT HDS, and works out the reaction characteristics of whole-fraction LTCT HDS different from crude oil fraction. Finally, this paper analyzes the influence of different process conditions on internal gradients of catalyst, and concludes the influence of each parameter on effectiveness factor of particle. The increase of temperature, decrease of pressure or increase of LHSV can all cause the decrease of effectiveness factor, wherein the temperature has the most significant effect on the effectiveness factor, followed by LHSV, and pressure has the weakest effect. These findings contribute to a more in-depth understanding of the features and rules of LTCT HDS, and can also give us some guidance for industrial reactor simulation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2088758714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016236118308470</els_id><sourcerecordid>2088758714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-13dca68aea19fb19c07882393078fc144cbe3f612959c471d62c3111c9714a103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA866ZzX6CFxG_UPCi55BmJ5i63dRJVqk_wN9tSsWjhzAkPG9m5mHsFEQOAurzZW4nHPJCQJuLKheF3GMzaBuZNVDJfTYTicoKWcMhOwphKYRo2qqcse8HN2J0hq816RVGJI4hupWOzo9cjz0PbjUNu6u3PJIzbwNmC-w5oTbRE7fpvG568j2GabATua8__vPVD8gtJXL7MvjPLOJqjaTjRMiN1wOPmo7ZgdVDwJPfOmcvN9fPV3fZ49Pt_dXlY2ZkXcUMZG903WrU0NkFdCZt0Rayk6laA2VpFihtDUVXdaZsoK8LIwHAdA2UGoScs7Pdv2vy71PaVC39RGNqqQrRtk3VJjBRxY4y5EMgtGpNSQltFAi19a2WautbbX0rUankO4UudiFM8384JBWMw9Fg7whNVL13_8V_ALZai_k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2088758714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kinetic parameter estimation and simulation of trickle-bed reactor for hydrodesulfurization of whole fraction low-temperature coal tar</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Feng, Xian ; Li, Dong ; Chen, Junghui ; Niu, Menglong ; Liu, Xu ; Chan, Lester Lik Teck ; Li, Wenhong</creator><creatorcontrib>Feng, Xian ; Li, Dong ; Chen, Junghui ; Niu, Menglong ; Liu, Xu ; Chan, Lester Lik Teck ; Li, Wenhong</creatorcontrib><description>With whole-fraction low temperature coal tar (LTCT) as raw material, which boiling point range is 209–514 °C. This paper conducts hydrotreatment (HDT) test for 1176 h on trickle-bed reactor (TBR) with commercial NiMo/Al2O3-SiO2 catalyst. The reaction conditions are as follows: reaction temperature 613–653 K, reaction pressure 10–14 MPa, liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) 0.2–0.4 h−1, and hydrogen-to-oil volume ratio 1000:1. Considering the short life of coal tar HDT catalyst, a kinetic model of whole-fraction LTCT hydrodesulfurization (HDS) including running time (t1) and catalyst half-life (tc) was established. The kinetic parameter estimation was conducted according to the experimental data, and the results are as follows: activation energy 94965 J/mol, reaction order 1.5, and the relative error of the model is less than 5%. Based on the premise of steady state operation, the HDS reaction happened in the three-phase trickle-bed reactor was simulated by combining the mass transfer, reaction kinetics model and physical property data of LTCT. The results show that the experimental and simulated values of sulphur content at the exit of the reactor are within the error range of 5%. By simulating the whole-fraction LTCT HDS reactor, the pattern of changes in the concentrations of hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen and sulfur in gas, liquid and solid phases according to the length of the reactor were obtained. Based on this, this paper discusses on the impacts of each process parameter and hydrogen sulfide partial pressure on LTCT HDS, and works out the reaction characteristics of whole-fraction LTCT HDS different from crude oil fraction. Finally, this paper analyzes the influence of different process conditions on internal gradients of catalyst, and concludes the influence of each parameter on effectiveness factor of particle. The increase of temperature, decrease of pressure or increase of LHSV can all cause the decrease of effectiveness factor, wherein the temperature has the most significant effect on the effectiveness factor, followed by LHSV, and pressure has the weakest effect. These findings contribute to a more in-depth understanding of the features and rules of LTCT HDS, and can also give us some guidance for industrial reactor simulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aluminum oxide ; Boiling points ; Catalysis ; Catalysts ; Chemical reactors ; Coal ; Coal tar ; Computer simulation ; Crude oil ; Fluid mechanics ; gPROMS ; HDS kinetic model ; Hydrodesulfurization ; Hydrogen ; Hydrogen sulfide ; Kinetics ; Low temperature ; Low temperature coal tar ; Low temperature physics ; Mass transfer ; Mathematical models ; Oxidation ; Parameter estimation ; Partial pressure ; Pressure ; Pressure effects ; Process parameters ; Reaction kinetics ; Reactors ; Silicon dioxide ; Simulation ; Solid phases ; Sulfur ; Tar ; TBR ; Temperature effects</subject><ispartof>Fuel (Guildford), 2018-10, Vol.230, p.113-125</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Oct 15, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-13dca68aea19fb19c07882393078fc144cbe3f612959c471d62c3111c9714a103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-13dca68aea19fb19c07882393078fc144cbe3f612959c471d62c3111c9714a103</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4578-0595 ; 0000-0002-9994-839X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feng, Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Menglong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Lester Lik Teck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wenhong</creatorcontrib><title>Kinetic parameter estimation and simulation of trickle-bed reactor for hydrodesulfurization of whole fraction low-temperature coal tar</title><title>Fuel (Guildford)</title><description>With whole-fraction low temperature coal tar (LTCT) as raw material, which boiling point range is 209–514 °C. This paper conducts hydrotreatment (HDT) test for 1176 h on trickle-bed reactor (TBR) with commercial NiMo/Al2O3-SiO2 catalyst. The reaction conditions are as follows: reaction temperature 613–653 K, reaction pressure 10–14 MPa, liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) 0.2–0.4 h−1, and hydrogen-to-oil volume ratio 1000:1. Considering the short life of coal tar HDT catalyst, a kinetic model of whole-fraction LTCT hydrodesulfurization (HDS) including running time (t1) and catalyst half-life (tc) was established. The kinetic parameter estimation was conducted according to the experimental data, and the results are as follows: activation energy 94965 J/mol, reaction order 1.5, and the relative error of the model is less than 5%. Based on the premise of steady state operation, the HDS reaction happened in the three-phase trickle-bed reactor was simulated by combining the mass transfer, reaction kinetics model and physical property data of LTCT. The results show that the experimental and simulated values of sulphur content at the exit of the reactor are within the error range of 5%. By simulating the whole-fraction LTCT HDS reactor, the pattern of changes in the concentrations of hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen and sulfur in gas, liquid and solid phases according to the length of the reactor were obtained. Based on this, this paper discusses on the impacts of each process parameter and hydrogen sulfide partial pressure on LTCT HDS, and works out the reaction characteristics of whole-fraction LTCT HDS different from crude oil fraction. Finally, this paper analyzes the influence of different process conditions on internal gradients of catalyst, and concludes the influence of each parameter on effectiveness factor of particle. The increase of temperature, decrease of pressure or increase of LHSV can all cause the decrease of effectiveness factor, wherein the temperature has the most significant effect on the effectiveness factor, followed by LHSV, and pressure has the weakest effect. These findings contribute to a more in-depth understanding of the features and rules of LTCT HDS, and can also give us some guidance for industrial reactor simulation.</description><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Boiling points</subject><subject>Catalysis</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Chemical reactors</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coal tar</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Fluid mechanics</subject><subject>gPROMS</subject><subject>HDS kinetic model</subject><subject>Hydrodesulfurization</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>Hydrogen sulfide</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Low temperature</subject><subject>Low temperature coal tar</subject><subject>Low temperature physics</subject><subject>Mass transfer</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Partial pressure</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Pressure effects</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Reaction kinetics</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Solid phases</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Tar</subject><subject>TBR</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><issn>0016-2361</issn><issn>1873-7153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA866ZzX6CFxG_UPCi55BmJ5i63dRJVqk_wN9tSsWjhzAkPG9m5mHsFEQOAurzZW4nHPJCQJuLKheF3GMzaBuZNVDJfTYTicoKWcMhOwphKYRo2qqcse8HN2J0hq816RVGJI4hupWOzo9cjz0PbjUNu6u3PJIzbwNmC-w5oTbRE7fpvG568j2GabATua8__vPVD8gtJXL7MvjPLOJqjaTjRMiN1wOPmo7ZgdVDwJPfOmcvN9fPV3fZ49Pt_dXlY2ZkXcUMZG903WrU0NkFdCZt0Rayk6laA2VpFihtDUVXdaZsoK8LIwHAdA2UGoScs7Pdv2vy71PaVC39RGNqqQrRtk3VJjBRxY4y5EMgtGpNSQltFAi19a2WautbbX0rUankO4UudiFM8384JBWMw9Fg7whNVL13_8V_ALZai_k</recordid><startdate>20181015</startdate><enddate>20181015</enddate><creator>Feng, Xian</creator><creator>Li, Dong</creator><creator>Chen, Junghui</creator><creator>Niu, Menglong</creator><creator>Liu, Xu</creator><creator>Chan, Lester Lik Teck</creator><creator>Li, Wenhong</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4578-0595</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-839X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181015</creationdate><title>Kinetic parameter estimation and simulation of trickle-bed reactor for hydrodesulfurization of whole fraction low-temperature coal tar</title><author>Feng, Xian ; Li, Dong ; Chen, Junghui ; Niu, Menglong ; Liu, Xu ; Chan, Lester Lik Teck ; Li, Wenhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-13dca68aea19fb19c07882393078fc144cbe3f612959c471d62c3111c9714a103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Boiling points</topic><topic>Catalysis</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Chemical reactors</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coal tar</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Fluid mechanics</topic><topic>gPROMS</topic><topic>HDS kinetic model</topic><topic>Hydrodesulfurization</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>Hydrogen sulfide</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Low temperature</topic><topic>Low temperature coal tar</topic><topic>Low temperature physics</topic><topic>Mass transfer</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Partial pressure</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Pressure effects</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Reaction kinetics</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Solid phases</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Tar</topic><topic>TBR</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feng, Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Menglong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Lester Lik Teck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wenhong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feng, Xian</au><au>Li, Dong</au><au>Chen, Junghui</au><au>Niu, Menglong</au><au>Liu, Xu</au><au>Chan, Lester Lik Teck</au><au>Li, Wenhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kinetic parameter estimation and simulation of trickle-bed reactor for hydrodesulfurization of whole fraction low-temperature coal tar</atitle><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle><date>2018-10-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>230</volume><spage>113</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>113-125</pages><issn>0016-2361</issn><eissn>1873-7153</eissn><abstract>With whole-fraction low temperature coal tar (LTCT) as raw material, which boiling point range is 209–514 °C. This paper conducts hydrotreatment (HDT) test for 1176 h on trickle-bed reactor (TBR) with commercial NiMo/Al2O3-SiO2 catalyst. The reaction conditions are as follows: reaction temperature 613–653 K, reaction pressure 10–14 MPa, liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) 0.2–0.4 h−1, and hydrogen-to-oil volume ratio 1000:1. Considering the short life of coal tar HDT catalyst, a kinetic model of whole-fraction LTCT hydrodesulfurization (HDS) including running time (t1) and catalyst half-life (tc) was established. The kinetic parameter estimation was conducted according to the experimental data, and the results are as follows: activation energy 94965 J/mol, reaction order 1.5, and the relative error of the model is less than 5%. Based on the premise of steady state operation, the HDS reaction happened in the three-phase trickle-bed reactor was simulated by combining the mass transfer, reaction kinetics model and physical property data of LTCT. The results show that the experimental and simulated values of sulphur content at the exit of the reactor are within the error range of 5%. By simulating the whole-fraction LTCT HDS reactor, the pattern of changes in the concentrations of hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen and sulfur in gas, liquid and solid phases according to the length of the reactor were obtained. Based on this, this paper discusses on the impacts of each process parameter and hydrogen sulfide partial pressure on LTCT HDS, and works out the reaction characteristics of whole-fraction LTCT HDS different from crude oil fraction. Finally, this paper analyzes the influence of different process conditions on internal gradients of catalyst, and concludes the influence of each parameter on effectiveness factor of particle. The increase of temperature, decrease of pressure or increase of LHSV can all cause the decrease of effectiveness factor, wherein the temperature has the most significant effect on the effectiveness factor, followed by LHSV, and pressure has the weakest effect. These findings contribute to a more in-depth understanding of the features and rules of LTCT HDS, and can also give us some guidance for industrial reactor simulation.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.023</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4578-0595</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-839X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-2361
ispartof Fuel (Guildford), 2018-10, Vol.230, p.113-125
issn 0016-2361
1873-7153
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2088758714
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aluminum oxide
Boiling points
Catalysis
Catalysts
Chemical reactors
Coal
Coal tar
Computer simulation
Crude oil
Fluid mechanics
gPROMS
HDS kinetic model
Hydrodesulfurization
Hydrogen
Hydrogen sulfide
Kinetics
Low temperature
Low temperature coal tar
Low temperature physics
Mass transfer
Mathematical models
Oxidation
Parameter estimation
Partial pressure
Pressure
Pressure effects
Process parameters
Reaction kinetics
Reactors
Silicon dioxide
Simulation
Solid phases
Sulfur
Tar
TBR
Temperature effects
title Kinetic parameter estimation and simulation of trickle-bed reactor for hydrodesulfurization of whole fraction low-temperature coal tar
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A47%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kinetic%20parameter%20estimation%20and%20simulation%20of%20trickle-bed%20reactor%20for%20hydrodesulfurization%20of%20whole%20fraction%20low-temperature%20coal%20tar&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20(Guildford)&rft.au=Feng,%20Xian&rft.date=2018-10-15&rft.volume=230&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=113-125&rft.issn=0016-2361&rft.eissn=1873-7153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2088758714%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2088758714&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016236118308470&rfr_iscdi=true