Self‐Compassion as a Facet of Neuroticism? A Reply to the Comments of Neff, Tóth‐Király, and Colosimo (2018)
In this paper, we respond to comments by Neff et al. (2018) made about our finding that the negative dimensions of self‐compassion were redundant with facets of neuroticism (rs ≥ 0.85; Pfattheicher et al., 2017) and not incrementally valid. We first provide epistemological guidance for establishing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of personality 2018-07, Vol.32 (4), p.393-404 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 404 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 393 |
container_title | European journal of personality |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Geiger, Mattis Pfattheicher, Stefan Hartung, Johanna Weiss, Selina Schindler, Simon Wilhelm, Oliver Kandler, Christian |
description | In this paper, we respond to comments by Neff et al. (2018) made about our finding that the negative dimensions of self‐compassion were redundant with facets of neuroticism (rs ≥ 0.85; Pfattheicher et al., 2017) and not incrementally valid. We first provide epistemological guidance for establishing psychological constructs, namely, three hurdles that new constructs must pass: theoretically and empirically sound measurement, discriminant validity, and incremental validity—and then apply these guidelines to the self‐compassion scale. We then outline that the critique of Neff et al. (2018) is contestable. We question their decisions concerning data‐analytic methods that help them to circumvent instead of passing the outlined hurdles. In a reanalysis of the data provided by Neff et al. (2018), we point to several conceptual and psychometric problems and conclude that self‐compassion does not overcome the outlined hurdles. Instead, we show that our initial critique of the self‐compassion scale holds and that its dimensions are best considered facets of neuroticism. © 2018 European Association of Personality Psychology |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/per.2168 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2088168882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2088168882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-80eb740de81d08802fe98afa48b07bccfa194d1fa6ba2b9460ab971c9c0245073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FFKwzAcx_EgCs4peISALxPW-U9W2-RJZGwqDpU5n0PaJqyjbWrSIX3zCF7BM3iE3cSTmFlffcrLJ78_fBE6JTAiAPSiVnZEScT2UI8A5wFwFu6jHjAOAYUYDtGRc2sA4FFEe8g-q0J_v39MTFlL53JTYemwxDOZqgYbjR_UxpomT3NXXuFrvFB10eLG4GalsP9UqqpxndN6iJfbr2bl5-5zu_0s2iGWVeZZYVxeGjygQNj5MTrQsnDq5O_to5fZdDm5DeaPN3eT63mQjmnMAgYqiUPIFCMZMAZUK86kliFLIE7SVEvCw4xoGSWSJjyMQCY8JilPgYaXEI_76Kzbra153SjXiLXZ2MqfFNQP-kaMUa8GnUqtcc4qLWqbl9K2goDYFRW-qNgV9TTo6FteqPZfJ56mi1__A-PweIM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2088168882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self‐Compassion as a Facet of Neuroticism? A Reply to the Comments of Neff, Tóth‐Király, and Colosimo (2018)</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Geiger, Mattis ; Pfattheicher, Stefan ; Hartung, Johanna ; Weiss, Selina ; Schindler, Simon ; Wilhelm, Oliver ; Kandler, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Geiger, Mattis ; Pfattheicher, Stefan ; Hartung, Johanna ; Weiss, Selina ; Schindler, Simon ; Wilhelm, Oliver ; Kandler, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we respond to comments by Neff et al. (2018) made about our finding that the negative dimensions of self‐compassion were redundant with facets of neuroticism (rs ≥ 0.85; Pfattheicher et al., 2017) and not incrementally valid. We first provide epistemological guidance for establishing psychological constructs, namely, three hurdles that new constructs must pass: theoretically and empirically sound measurement, discriminant validity, and incremental validity—and then apply these guidelines to the self‐compassion scale. We then outline that the critique of Neff et al. (2018) is contestable. We question their decisions concerning data‐analytic methods that help them to circumvent instead of passing the outlined hurdles. In a reanalysis of the data provided by Neff et al. (2018), we point to several conceptual and psychometric problems and conclude that self‐compassion does not overcome the outlined hurdles. Instead, we show that our initial critique of the self‐compassion scale holds and that its dimensions are best considered facets of neuroticism. © 2018 European Association of Personality Psychology</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-2070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/per.2168</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Data processing ; Discriminant validity ; jangle fallacy ; Measurement ; Neurosis ; Neuroticism ; Personality psychology ; rebuttal ; Self ; Self compassion ; Sympathy ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>European journal of personality, 2018-07, Vol.32 (4), p.393-404</ispartof><rights>2018 European Association of Personality Psychology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-80eb740de81d08802fe98afa48b07bccfa194d1fa6ba2b9460ab971c9c0245073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-80eb740de81d08802fe98afa48b07bccfa194d1fa6ba2b9460ab971c9c0245073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fper.2168$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fper.2168$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30978,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geiger, Mattis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfattheicher, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartung, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Selina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindler, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilhelm, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandler, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Self‐Compassion as a Facet of Neuroticism? A Reply to the Comments of Neff, Tóth‐Király, and Colosimo (2018)</title><title>European journal of personality</title><description>In this paper, we respond to comments by Neff et al. (2018) made about our finding that the negative dimensions of self‐compassion were redundant with facets of neuroticism (rs ≥ 0.85; Pfattheicher et al., 2017) and not incrementally valid. We first provide epistemological guidance for establishing psychological constructs, namely, three hurdles that new constructs must pass: theoretically and empirically sound measurement, discriminant validity, and incremental validity—and then apply these guidelines to the self‐compassion scale. We then outline that the critique of Neff et al. (2018) is contestable. We question their decisions concerning data‐analytic methods that help them to circumvent instead of passing the outlined hurdles. In a reanalysis of the data provided by Neff et al. (2018), we point to several conceptual and psychometric problems and conclude that self‐compassion does not overcome the outlined hurdles. Instead, we show that our initial critique of the self‐compassion scale holds and that its dimensions are best considered facets of neuroticism. © 2018 European Association of Personality Psychology</description><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Discriminant validity</subject><subject>jangle fallacy</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Neurosis</subject><subject>Neuroticism</subject><subject>Personality psychology</subject><subject>rebuttal</subject><subject>Self</subject><subject>Self compassion</subject><subject>Sympathy</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>0890-2070</issn><issn>1099-0984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10FFKwzAcx_EgCs4peISALxPW-U9W2-RJZGwqDpU5n0PaJqyjbWrSIX3zCF7BM3iE3cSTmFlffcrLJ78_fBE6JTAiAPSiVnZEScT2UI8A5wFwFu6jHjAOAYUYDtGRc2sA4FFEe8g-q0J_v39MTFlL53JTYemwxDOZqgYbjR_UxpomT3NXXuFrvFB10eLG4GalsP9UqqpxndN6iJfbr2bl5-5zu_0s2iGWVeZZYVxeGjygQNj5MTrQsnDq5O_to5fZdDm5DeaPN3eT63mQjmnMAgYqiUPIFCMZMAZUK86kliFLIE7SVEvCw4xoGSWSJjyMQCY8JilPgYaXEI_76Kzbra153SjXiLXZ2MqfFNQP-kaMUa8GnUqtcc4qLWqbl9K2goDYFRW-qNgV9TTo6FteqPZfJ56mi1__A-PweIM</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Geiger, Mattis</creator><creator>Pfattheicher, Stefan</creator><creator>Hartung, Johanna</creator><creator>Weiss, Selina</creator><creator>Schindler, Simon</creator><creator>Wilhelm, Oliver</creator><creator>Kandler, Christian</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Self‐Compassion as a Facet of Neuroticism? A Reply to the Comments of Neff, Tóth‐Király, and Colosimo (2018)</title><author>Geiger, Mattis ; Pfattheicher, Stefan ; Hartung, Johanna ; Weiss, Selina ; Schindler, Simon ; Wilhelm, Oliver ; Kandler, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-80eb740de81d08802fe98afa48b07bccfa194d1fa6ba2b9460ab971c9c0245073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Discriminant validity</topic><topic>jangle fallacy</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Neurosis</topic><topic>Neuroticism</topic><topic>Personality psychology</topic><topic>rebuttal</topic><topic>Self</topic><topic>Self compassion</topic><topic>Sympathy</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geiger, Mattis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfattheicher, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartung, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Selina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindler, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilhelm, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandler, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>European journal of personality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geiger, Mattis</au><au>Pfattheicher, Stefan</au><au>Hartung, Johanna</au><au>Weiss, Selina</au><au>Schindler, Simon</au><au>Wilhelm, Oliver</au><au>Kandler, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self‐Compassion as a Facet of Neuroticism? A Reply to the Comments of Neff, Tóth‐Király, and Colosimo (2018)</atitle><jtitle>European journal of personality</jtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>393</spage><epage>404</epage><pages>393-404</pages><issn>0890-2070</issn><eissn>1099-0984</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we respond to comments by Neff et al. (2018) made about our finding that the negative dimensions of self‐compassion were redundant with facets of neuroticism (rs ≥ 0.85; Pfattheicher et al., 2017) and not incrementally valid. We first provide epistemological guidance for establishing psychological constructs, namely, three hurdles that new constructs must pass: theoretically and empirically sound measurement, discriminant validity, and incremental validity—and then apply these guidelines to the self‐compassion scale. We then outline that the critique of Neff et al. (2018) is contestable. We question their decisions concerning data‐analytic methods that help them to circumvent instead of passing the outlined hurdles. In a reanalysis of the data provided by Neff et al. (2018), we point to several conceptual and psychometric problems and conclude that self‐compassion does not overcome the outlined hurdles. Instead, we show that our initial critique of the self‐compassion scale holds and that its dimensions are best considered facets of neuroticism. © 2018 European Association of Personality Psychology</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub><doi>10.1002/per.2168</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-2070 |
ispartof | European journal of personality, 2018-07, Vol.32 (4), p.393-404 |
issn | 0890-2070 1099-0984 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2088168882 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Data processing Discriminant validity jangle fallacy Measurement Neurosis Neuroticism Personality psychology rebuttal Self Self compassion Sympathy Validation studies |
title | Self‐Compassion as a Facet of Neuroticism? A Reply to the Comments of Neff, Tóth‐Király, and Colosimo (2018) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T07%3A22%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self%E2%80%90Compassion%20as%20a%20Facet%20of%20Neuroticism?%20A%20Reply%20to%20the%20Comments%20of%20Neff,%20T%C3%B3th%E2%80%90Kir%C3%A1ly,%20and%20Colosimo%20(2018)&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20personality&rft.au=Geiger,%20Mattis&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=393&rft.epage=404&rft.pages=393-404&rft.issn=0890-2070&rft.eissn=1099-0984&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/per.2168&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2088168882%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2088168882&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |