BAK1 Gene Variation: the doubts remain
Dr. Hatchwell [2010] has proposed that the BAK1 gene variants were likely due to sequencing of a processed gene on chromosome 20. However, in response, Dr. Gottlieb and co-authors [2010] have argued that "some but not all of the sequence changes present in the BAK1 sequence of our abdominal aor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2010-02 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E |
description | Dr. Hatchwell [2010] has proposed that the BAK1 gene variants were likely due to sequencing of a processed gene on chromosome 20. However, in response, Dr. Gottlieb and co-authors [2010] have argued that "some but not all of the sequence changes present in the BAK1 sequence of our abdominal aorta samples are also present in the chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence. However, all the AAA and AA cDNA samples are identical to each other and different from chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence at amino acids 2 and 145". I have been following this discussion because I have independently reached almost the same conclusion as Dr. Hatchwell did [Yamagishi, 2009], and, unfortunately, the response from Dr. Gottlieb and his co-authors seems to me to be unsatisfactory for the reasons listed below |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2087616797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2087616797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20876167973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mRQc3L0NlRwT81LVQhLLMpMLMnMz7NSKMlIVUjJL00qKVYoSs1NzMzjYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMym6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4IwMLczNDM3NLc2PiVAEAtwEuaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2087616797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>BAK1 Gene Variation: the doubts remain</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</creator><creatorcontrib>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</creatorcontrib><description>Dr. Hatchwell [2010] has proposed that the BAK1 gene variants were likely due to sequencing of a processed gene on chromosome 20. However, in response, Dr. Gottlieb and co-authors [2010] have argued that "some but not all of the sequence changes present in the BAK1 sequence of our abdominal aorta samples are also present in the chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence. However, all the AAA and AA cDNA samples are identical to each other and different from chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence at amino acids 2 and 145". I have been following this discussion because I have independently reached almost the same conclusion as Dr. Hatchwell did [Yamagishi, 2009], and, unfortunately, the response from Dr. Gottlieb and his co-authors seems to me to be unsatisfactory for the reasons listed below</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Amino acids ; Aorta ; Chromosomes ; Direct reduction ; Gene sequencing</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2010-02</ispartof><rights>2010. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</creatorcontrib><title>BAK1 Gene Variation: the doubts remain</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Dr. Hatchwell [2010] has proposed that the BAK1 gene variants were likely due to sequencing of a processed gene on chromosome 20. However, in response, Dr. Gottlieb and co-authors [2010] have argued that "some but not all of the sequence changes present in the BAK1 sequence of our abdominal aorta samples are also present in the chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence. However, all the AAA and AA cDNA samples are identical to each other and different from chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence at amino acids 2 and 145". I have been following this discussion because I have independently reached almost the same conclusion as Dr. Hatchwell did [Yamagishi, 2009], and, unfortunately, the response from Dr. Gottlieb and his co-authors seems to me to be unsatisfactory for the reasons listed below</description><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Direct reduction</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mRQc3L0NlRwT81LVQhLLMpMLMnMz7NSKMlIVUjJL00qKVYoSs1NzMzjYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMym6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4IwMLczNDM3NLc2PiVAEAtwEuaA</recordid><startdate>20100212</startdate><enddate>20100212</enddate><creator>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100212</creationdate><title>BAK1 Gene Variation: the doubts remain</title><author>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20876167973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Direct reduction</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>BAK1 Gene Variation: the doubts remain</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2010-02-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Dr. Hatchwell [2010] has proposed that the BAK1 gene variants were likely due to sequencing of a processed gene on chromosome 20. However, in response, Dr. Gottlieb and co-authors [2010] have argued that "some but not all of the sequence changes present in the BAK1 sequence of our abdominal aorta samples are also present in the chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence. However, all the AAA and AA cDNA samples are identical to each other and different from chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence at amino acids 2 and 145". I have been following this discussion because I have independently reached almost the same conclusion as Dr. Hatchwell did [Yamagishi, 2009], and, unfortunately, the response from Dr. Gottlieb and his co-authors seems to me to be unsatisfactory for the reasons listed below</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2010-02 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2087616797 |
source | Free E- Journals |
subjects | Amino acids Aorta Chromosomes Direct reduction Gene sequencing |
title | BAK1 Gene Variation: the doubts remain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T15%3A56%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=BAK1%20Gene%20Variation:%20the%20doubts%20remain&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Beleza%20Yamagishi,%20Michel%20E&rft.date=2010-02-12&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2087616797%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2087616797&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |