BAK1 Gene Variation: the doubts remain

Dr. Hatchwell [2010] has proposed that the BAK1 gene variants were likely due to sequencing of a processed gene on chromosome 20. However, in response, Dr. Gottlieb and co-authors [2010] have argued that "some but not all of the sequence changes present in the BAK1 sequence of our abdominal aor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2010-02
1. Verfasser: Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E
description Dr. Hatchwell [2010] has proposed that the BAK1 gene variants were likely due to sequencing of a processed gene on chromosome 20. However, in response, Dr. Gottlieb and co-authors [2010] have argued that "some but not all of the sequence changes present in the BAK1 sequence of our abdominal aorta samples are also present in the chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence. However, all the AAA and AA cDNA samples are identical to each other and different from chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence at amino acids 2 and 145". I have been following this discussion because I have independently reached almost the same conclusion as Dr. Hatchwell did [Yamagishi, 2009], and, unfortunately, the response from Dr. Gottlieb and his co-authors seems to me to be unsatisfactory for the reasons listed below
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2087616797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2087616797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20876167973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mRQc3L0NlRwT81LVQhLLMpMLMnMz7NSKMlIVUjJL00qKVYoSs1NzMzjYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMym6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4IwMLczNDM3NLc2PiVAEAtwEuaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2087616797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>BAK1 Gene Variation: the doubts remain</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</creator><creatorcontrib>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</creatorcontrib><description>Dr. Hatchwell [2010] has proposed that the BAK1 gene variants were likely due to sequencing of a processed gene on chromosome 20. However, in response, Dr. Gottlieb and co-authors [2010] have argued that "some but not all of the sequence changes present in the BAK1 sequence of our abdominal aorta samples are also present in the chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence. However, all the AAA and AA cDNA samples are identical to each other and different from chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence at amino acids 2 and 145". I have been following this discussion because I have independently reached almost the same conclusion as Dr. Hatchwell did [Yamagishi, 2009], and, unfortunately, the response from Dr. Gottlieb and his co-authors seems to me to be unsatisfactory for the reasons listed below</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Amino acids ; Aorta ; Chromosomes ; Direct reduction ; Gene sequencing</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2010-02</ispartof><rights>2010. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</creatorcontrib><title>BAK1 Gene Variation: the doubts remain</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Dr. Hatchwell [2010] has proposed that the BAK1 gene variants were likely due to sequencing of a processed gene on chromosome 20. However, in response, Dr. Gottlieb and co-authors [2010] have argued that "some but not all of the sequence changes present in the BAK1 sequence of our abdominal aorta samples are also present in the chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence. However, all the AAA and AA cDNA samples are identical to each other and different from chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence at amino acids 2 and 145". I have been following this discussion because I have independently reached almost the same conclusion as Dr. Hatchwell did [Yamagishi, 2009], and, unfortunately, the response from Dr. Gottlieb and his co-authors seems to me to be unsatisfactory for the reasons listed below</description><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Direct reduction</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mRQc3L0NlRwT81LVQhLLMpMLMnMz7NSKMlIVUjJL00qKVYoSs1NzMzjYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMym6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4IwMLczNDM3NLc2PiVAEAtwEuaA</recordid><startdate>20100212</startdate><enddate>20100212</enddate><creator>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100212</creationdate><title>BAK1 Gene Variation: the doubts remain</title><author>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20876167973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Direct reduction</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beleza Yamagishi, Michel E</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>BAK1 Gene Variation: the doubts remain</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2010-02-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Dr. Hatchwell [2010] has proposed that the BAK1 gene variants were likely due to sequencing of a processed gene on chromosome 20. However, in response, Dr. Gottlieb and co-authors [2010] have argued that "some but not all of the sequence changes present in the BAK1 sequence of our abdominal aorta samples are also present in the chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence. However, all the AAA and AA cDNA samples are identical to each other and different from chromosome 20 BAK1 sequence at amino acids 2 and 145". I have been following this discussion because I have independently reached almost the same conclusion as Dr. Hatchwell did [Yamagishi, 2009], and, unfortunately, the response from Dr. Gottlieb and his co-authors seems to me to be unsatisfactory for the reasons listed below</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2010-02
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2087616797
source Free E- Journals
subjects Amino acids
Aorta
Chromosomes
Direct reduction
Gene sequencing
title BAK1 Gene Variation: the doubts remain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T15%3A56%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=BAK1%20Gene%20Variation:%20the%20doubts%20remain&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Beleza%20Yamagishi,%20Michel%20E&rft.date=2010-02-12&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2087616797%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2087616797&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true