Effects of biodiesel-ethanol and biodiesel-butanol blends on the combustion, performance and emissions of a diesel engine
The present study is aimed to investigate and compare effects of biodiesel-ethanol (BE) and biodiesel-n-butanol (BBu) blends on combustion, performance and emissions of a direct-injection diesel engine. Experiments were conducted on BE5 (5% ethanol and 95% biodiesel, v/v), BE10, BE15, BBu5, BBu10 an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy (Oxford) 2018-07, Vol.155, p.957-970 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 970 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 957 |
container_title | Energy (Oxford) |
container_volume | 155 |
creator | Wei, L. Cheung, C.S. Ning, Z. |
description | The present study is aimed to investigate and compare effects of biodiesel-ethanol (BE) and biodiesel-n-butanol (BBu) blends on combustion, performance and emissions of a direct-injection diesel engine. Experiments were conducted on BE5 (5% ethanol and 95% biodiesel, v/v), BE10, BE15, BBu5, BBu10 and BBu15, at five engine loads and at 1800 rpm. In regard to combustion characteristics, effects on maximum heat release rate, maximum in-cylinder pressure, start of combustion, combustion duration and coefficients of variations (COVs) of IMEP and maximum increase rate of in-cylinder pressure were investigated. In regard to engine performance, effects on BSFC and BTE were investigated. The blended fuels have adverse effects on engine performance especially at low load, with the BE blends having more adverse effects than the BBu blends. Moreover, on average of the five engine loads, the BBu and BE blends increase CO emission by 13.7% and 22.8% and HC emission by 5.6% and 29.2%, respectively; but reduce NOx emission by 6.5% and 28.0%, particle mass concentration by 20.7% and 20.6% and particle number concentration by 22% and 21%, respectively. Overall, the BE blends are more effective in reducing particulate and NOx emissions but the BBu blends would lead to less increase in CO and HC emissions.
•BBu blends have less adverse influence on BSFC and BTE than BE blends.•BE/BBu blends have adverse effects on combustion noise and stability of power output.•BE blends are better than BBu blends in reducing NOX and PM emissions.•BE blends lead to higher CO and HC emissions than BBu blends. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.049 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2087381476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544218308697</els_id><sourcerecordid>2087381476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-451d571dbc67a43b5bfaec8ad04e5b41d0a26249c93024afff1cb210ce4d94973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB__wMWAW2e8mUnmsRGk-IKCG12HPG5sSpvUZCr03xs7Lly5unDuOedyP0KuKFQUaHu7qtBj_NhXNdC-Al4BG47IjPZdU7Zdz4_JDJoWSs5YfUrOUloBAO-HYUb2D9aiHlMRbKFcMA4Trkscl9KHdSG9-aOq3XhQ1Rq9yQlfjEssdNioXRpd8DfFFqMNcSO9xkMWNy6lvDnUy2LqKdB_OI8X5MTKdcLL33lO3h8f3ubP5eL16WV-vyh10zVjyTg1vKNG6baTrFFcWYm6lwYYcsWoAVm3NRv00EDNpLWWalVT0MjMwIauOSfXU-82hs8dplGswi76fFLUkAn1lHVtdrHJpWNIKaIV2-g2Mu4FBfEDWazEBFn8QBbARYacY3dTDPMHXw6jSNphft-4mLEKE9z_Bd-a8Ymm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2087381476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of biodiesel-ethanol and biodiesel-butanol blends on the combustion, performance and emissions of a diesel engine</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wei, L. ; Cheung, C.S. ; Ning, Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, L. ; Cheung, C.S. ; Ning, Z.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study is aimed to investigate and compare effects of biodiesel-ethanol (BE) and biodiesel-n-butanol (BBu) blends on combustion, performance and emissions of a direct-injection diesel engine. Experiments were conducted on BE5 (5% ethanol and 95% biodiesel, v/v), BE10, BE15, BBu5, BBu10 and BBu15, at five engine loads and at 1800 rpm. In regard to combustion characteristics, effects on maximum heat release rate, maximum in-cylinder pressure, start of combustion, combustion duration and coefficients of variations (COVs) of IMEP and maximum increase rate of in-cylinder pressure were investigated. In regard to engine performance, effects on BSFC and BTE were investigated. The blended fuels have adverse effects on engine performance especially at low load, with the BE blends having more adverse effects than the BBu blends. Moreover, on average of the five engine loads, the BBu and BE blends increase CO emission by 13.7% and 22.8% and HC emission by 5.6% and 29.2%, respectively; but reduce NOx emission by 6.5% and 28.0%, particle mass concentration by 20.7% and 20.6% and particle number concentration by 22% and 21%, respectively. Overall, the BE blends are more effective in reducing particulate and NOx emissions but the BBu blends would lead to less increase in CO and HC emissions.
•BBu blends have less adverse influence on BSFC and BTE than BE blends.•BE/BBu blends have adverse effects on combustion noise and stability of power output.•BE blends are better than BBu blends in reducing NOX and PM emissions.•BE blends lead to higher CO and HC emissions than BBu blends.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biodiesel ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biofuels ; Butanol ; Combustion ; Cylinders ; Diesel ; Diesel engine ; Diesel engines ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Ethanol ; Heat release rate ; Heat transfer ; Mixtures ; Nitrogen oxides ; Particle mass ; Pressure ; Side effects</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2018-07, Vol.155, p.957-970</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jul 15, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-451d571dbc67a43b5bfaec8ad04e5b41d0a26249c93024afff1cb210ce4d94973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-451d571dbc67a43b5bfaec8ad04e5b41d0a26249c93024afff1cb210ce4d94973</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6671-416X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218308697$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Z.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of biodiesel-ethanol and biodiesel-butanol blends on the combustion, performance and emissions of a diesel engine</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>The present study is aimed to investigate and compare effects of biodiesel-ethanol (BE) and biodiesel-n-butanol (BBu) blends on combustion, performance and emissions of a direct-injection diesel engine. Experiments were conducted on BE5 (5% ethanol and 95% biodiesel, v/v), BE10, BE15, BBu5, BBu10 and BBu15, at five engine loads and at 1800 rpm. In regard to combustion characteristics, effects on maximum heat release rate, maximum in-cylinder pressure, start of combustion, combustion duration and coefficients of variations (COVs) of IMEP and maximum increase rate of in-cylinder pressure were investigated. In regard to engine performance, effects on BSFC and BTE were investigated. The blended fuels have adverse effects on engine performance especially at low load, with the BE blends having more adverse effects than the BBu blends. Moreover, on average of the five engine loads, the BBu and BE blends increase CO emission by 13.7% and 22.8% and HC emission by 5.6% and 29.2%, respectively; but reduce NOx emission by 6.5% and 28.0%, particle mass concentration by 20.7% and 20.6% and particle number concentration by 22% and 21%, respectively. Overall, the BE blends are more effective in reducing particulate and NOx emissions but the BBu blends would lead to less increase in CO and HC emissions.
•BBu blends have less adverse influence on BSFC and BTE than BE blends.•BE/BBu blends have adverse effects on combustion noise and stability of power output.•BE blends are better than BBu blends in reducing NOX and PM emissions.•BE blends lead to higher CO and HC emissions than BBu blends.</description><subject>Biodiesel</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Butanol</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Cylinders</subject><subject>Diesel</subject><subject>Diesel engine</subject><subject>Diesel engines</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Heat release rate</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Mixtures</subject><subject>Nitrogen oxides</subject><subject>Particle mass</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><issn>1873-6785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB__wMWAW2e8mUnmsRGk-IKCG12HPG5sSpvUZCr03xs7Lly5unDuOedyP0KuKFQUaHu7qtBj_NhXNdC-Al4BG47IjPZdU7Zdz4_JDJoWSs5YfUrOUloBAO-HYUb2D9aiHlMRbKFcMA4Trkscl9KHdSG9-aOq3XhQ1Rq9yQlfjEssdNioXRpd8DfFFqMNcSO9xkMWNy6lvDnUy2LqKdB_OI8X5MTKdcLL33lO3h8f3ubP5eL16WV-vyh10zVjyTg1vKNG6baTrFFcWYm6lwYYcsWoAVm3NRv00EDNpLWWalVT0MjMwIauOSfXU-82hs8dplGswi76fFLUkAn1lHVtdrHJpWNIKaIV2-g2Mu4FBfEDWazEBFn8QBbARYacY3dTDPMHXw6jSNphft-4mLEKE9z_Bd-a8Ymm</recordid><startdate>20180715</startdate><enddate>20180715</enddate><creator>Wei, L.</creator><creator>Cheung, C.S.</creator><creator>Ning, Z.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6671-416X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180715</creationdate><title>Effects of biodiesel-ethanol and biodiesel-butanol blends on the combustion, performance and emissions of a diesel engine</title><author>Wei, L. ; Cheung, C.S. ; Ning, Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-451d571dbc67a43b5bfaec8ad04e5b41d0a26249c93024afff1cb210ce4d94973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biodiesel</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Butanol</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Cylinders</topic><topic>Diesel</topic><topic>Diesel engine</topic><topic>Diesel engines</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Heat release rate</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Mixtures</topic><topic>Nitrogen oxides</topic><topic>Particle mass</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, L.</au><au>Cheung, C.S.</au><au>Ning, Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of biodiesel-ethanol and biodiesel-butanol blends on the combustion, performance and emissions of a diesel engine</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2018-07-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>155</volume><spage>957</spage><epage>970</epage><pages>957-970</pages><issn>0360-5442</issn><eissn>1873-6785</eissn><abstract>The present study is aimed to investigate and compare effects of biodiesel-ethanol (BE) and biodiesel-n-butanol (BBu) blends on combustion, performance and emissions of a direct-injection diesel engine. Experiments were conducted on BE5 (5% ethanol and 95% biodiesel, v/v), BE10, BE15, BBu5, BBu10 and BBu15, at five engine loads and at 1800 rpm. In regard to combustion characteristics, effects on maximum heat release rate, maximum in-cylinder pressure, start of combustion, combustion duration and coefficients of variations (COVs) of IMEP and maximum increase rate of in-cylinder pressure were investigated. In regard to engine performance, effects on BSFC and BTE were investigated. The blended fuels have adverse effects on engine performance especially at low load, with the BE blends having more adverse effects than the BBu blends. Moreover, on average of the five engine loads, the BBu and BE blends increase CO emission by 13.7% and 22.8% and HC emission by 5.6% and 29.2%, respectively; but reduce NOx emission by 6.5% and 28.0%, particle mass concentration by 20.7% and 20.6% and particle number concentration by 22% and 21%, respectively. Overall, the BE blends are more effective in reducing particulate and NOx emissions but the BBu blends would lead to less increase in CO and HC emissions.
•BBu blends have less adverse influence on BSFC and BTE than BE blends.•BE/BBu blends have adverse effects on combustion noise and stability of power output.•BE blends are better than BBu blends in reducing NOX and PM emissions.•BE blends lead to higher CO and HC emissions than BBu blends.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.049</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6671-416X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-5442 |
ispartof | Energy (Oxford), 2018-07, Vol.155, p.957-970 |
issn | 0360-5442 1873-6785 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2087381476 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biodiesel Biodiesel fuels Biofuels Butanol Combustion Cylinders Diesel Diesel engine Diesel engines Emissions Emissions control Ethanol Heat release rate Heat transfer Mixtures Nitrogen oxides Particle mass Pressure Side effects |
title | Effects of biodiesel-ethanol and biodiesel-butanol blends on the combustion, performance and emissions of a diesel engine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A56%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20biodiesel-ethanol%20and%20biodiesel-butanol%20blends%20on%20the%20combustion,%20performance%20and%20emissions%20of%20a%20diesel%20engine&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Wei,%20L.&rft.date=2018-07-15&rft.volume=155&rft.spage=957&rft.epage=970&rft.pages=957-970&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.eissn=1873-6785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2087381476%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2087381476&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360544218308697&rfr_iscdi=true |