Change in the Status of the Crimean Tatars: from National Minority to Indigenous People?
Starting from the 1950s the term "indigenous peoples" has gained a tenacious worldwide popularity thanks to growing academic focus on the rights of Indian and Inuit peoples. Contiguous normative efforts of some influential international organizations such as International Labour Organizati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bilig (Ankara) 2018-04, Vol.85, p.299-332 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 332 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 299 |
container_title | Bilig (Ankara) |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Yapıcı, Utku |
description | Starting from the 1950s the term "indigenous peoples" has gained a tenacious worldwide popularity thanks to growing academic focus on the rights of Indian and Inuit peoples. Contiguous normative efforts of some influential international organizations such as International Labour Organization, World Bank, and United Nations also encouraged the instrumentalization of the term by some right-seeking disadvantaged groups. Since the 1990s, the Crimean Tatars have also strived to be recognized as "indigenous people of Crimea". They eventually seemed to have reached their goals. Ukrainian parliament gave the status of indigenous people to Crimean Tatars after Russian Federation's seizure of Crimea in March 2014. However, the seizure itself prevented the implementation of the parliament act. This article mainly focuses on the reasons behind Tatar claims for gaining the indigenous people status as well as Ukraine's and Russian Federation's reactions to those claims. The main objective of the article is to identify historical changes in the status of the Crimean Tatars. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2087293105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2087293105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-bc9609090bab8fc886862c953efa054e787469142924fa98093f20a8371837083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjktLAzEUhbNQaKn9DwHXA3nMI3EjMvgotCo4i-7KnfGmTZkmY5JZ-O8N6jkcDmdxL98VWXLJeMGqUi_IOsYzy6rKWtdiSfbtCdwRqXU0nZB-JEhzpN78rjbYC4KjHSQI8Y6a4C_0FZL1Dka6s84Hm75p8nTjPu0Rnc-37-inEe9vyLWBMeL6v1eke3rs2pdi-_a8aR-2xaRVKvpB10xn99ArMyhVq1oMupJoIDNio5oMykuhRWlAK6alEQyUbHgOU3JFbv_eTsF_zRjT4eznkPHiQTDVCC05q-QPjtdLWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2087293105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Change in the Status of the Crimean Tatars: from National Minority to Indigenous People?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Yapıcı, Utku</creator><creatorcontrib>Yapıcı, Utku</creatorcontrib><description>Starting from the 1950s the term "indigenous peoples" has gained a tenacious worldwide popularity thanks to growing academic focus on the rights of Indian and Inuit peoples. Contiguous normative efforts of some influential international organizations such as International Labour Organization, World Bank, and United Nations also encouraged the instrumentalization of the term by some right-seeking disadvantaged groups. Since the 1990s, the Crimean Tatars have also strived to be recognized as "indigenous people of Crimea". They eventually seemed to have reached their goals. Ukrainian parliament gave the status of indigenous people to Crimean Tatars after Russian Federation's seizure of Crimea in March 2014. However, the seizure itself prevented the implementation of the parliament act. This article mainly focuses on the reasons behind Tatar claims for gaining the indigenous people status as well as Ukraine's and Russian Federation's reactions to those claims. The main objective of the article is to identify historical changes in the status of the Crimean Tatars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1301-0549</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ankara: Ahmet Yesesvi Universitesi, Management Center</publisher><subject>At risk populations ; Change agents ; Changes ; Demonstrations & protests ; Disadvantaged ; Federations ; History ; Indigenous peoples ; International economic organizations ; International organizations ; Inuit ; Labor movements ; Legislatures ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Minority groups ; Native peoples ; Parliaments ; Popularity ; Turkic languages ; Ukrainian language ; Williams, Brian</subject><ispartof>Bilig (Ankara), 2018-04, Vol.85, p.299-332</ispartof><rights>Copyright Ahmet Yesesvi Universitesi, Management Center Spring 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,12832</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yapıcı, Utku</creatorcontrib><title>Change in the Status of the Crimean Tatars: from National Minority to Indigenous People?</title><title>Bilig (Ankara)</title><description>Starting from the 1950s the term "indigenous peoples" has gained a tenacious worldwide popularity thanks to growing academic focus on the rights of Indian and Inuit peoples. Contiguous normative efforts of some influential international organizations such as International Labour Organization, World Bank, and United Nations also encouraged the instrumentalization of the term by some right-seeking disadvantaged groups. Since the 1990s, the Crimean Tatars have also strived to be recognized as "indigenous people of Crimea". They eventually seemed to have reached their goals. Ukrainian parliament gave the status of indigenous people to Crimean Tatars after Russian Federation's seizure of Crimea in March 2014. However, the seizure itself prevented the implementation of the parliament act. This article mainly focuses on the reasons behind Tatar claims for gaining the indigenous people status as well as Ukraine's and Russian Federation's reactions to those claims. The main objective of the article is to identify historical changes in the status of the Crimean Tatars.</description><subject>At risk populations</subject><subject>Change agents</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Demonstrations & protests</subject><subject>Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Federations</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>International economic organizations</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>Inuit</subject><subject>Labor movements</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Turkic languages</subject><subject>Ukrainian language</subject><subject>Williams, Brian</subject><issn>1301-0549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotjktLAzEUhbNQaKn9DwHXA3nMI3EjMvgotCo4i-7KnfGmTZkmY5JZ-O8N6jkcDmdxL98VWXLJeMGqUi_IOsYzy6rKWtdiSfbtCdwRqXU0nZB-JEhzpN78rjbYC4KjHSQI8Y6a4C_0FZL1Dka6s84Hm75p8nTjPu0Rnc-37-inEe9vyLWBMeL6v1eke3rs2pdi-_a8aR-2xaRVKvpB10xn99ArMyhVq1oMupJoIDNio5oMykuhRWlAK6alEQyUbHgOU3JFbv_eTsF_zRjT4eznkPHiQTDVCC05q-QPjtdLWg</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Yapıcı, Utku</creator><general>Ahmet Yesesvi Universitesi, Management Center</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Change in the Status of the Crimean Tatars: from National Minority to Indigenous People?</title><author>Yapıcı, Utku</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-bc9609090bab8fc886862c953efa054e787469142924fa98093f20a8371837083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>At risk populations</topic><topic>Change agents</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Demonstrations & protests</topic><topic>Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Federations</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>International economic organizations</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>Inuit</topic><topic>Labor movements</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Turkic languages</topic><topic>Ukrainian language</topic><topic>Williams, Brian</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yapıcı, Utku</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Bilig (Ankara)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yapıcı, Utku</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Change in the Status of the Crimean Tatars: from National Minority to Indigenous People?</atitle><jtitle>Bilig (Ankara)</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>85</volume><spage>299</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>299-332</pages><issn>1301-0549</issn><abstract>Starting from the 1950s the term "indigenous peoples" has gained a tenacious worldwide popularity thanks to growing academic focus on the rights of Indian and Inuit peoples. Contiguous normative efforts of some influential international organizations such as International Labour Organization, World Bank, and United Nations also encouraged the instrumentalization of the term by some right-seeking disadvantaged groups. Since the 1990s, the Crimean Tatars have also strived to be recognized as "indigenous people of Crimea". They eventually seemed to have reached their goals. Ukrainian parliament gave the status of indigenous people to Crimean Tatars after Russian Federation's seizure of Crimea in March 2014. However, the seizure itself prevented the implementation of the parliament act. This article mainly focuses on the reasons behind Tatar claims for gaining the indigenous people status as well as Ukraine's and Russian Federation's reactions to those claims. The main objective of the article is to identify historical changes in the status of the Crimean Tatars.</abstract><cop>Ankara</cop><pub>Ahmet Yesesvi Universitesi, Management Center</pub><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1301-0549 |
ispartof | Bilig (Ankara), 2018-04, Vol.85, p.299-332 |
issn | 1301-0549 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2087293105 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | At risk populations Change agents Changes Demonstrations & protests Disadvantaged Federations History Indigenous peoples International economic organizations International organizations Inuit Labor movements Legislatures Minority & ethnic groups Minority groups Native peoples Parliaments Popularity Turkic languages Ukrainian language Williams, Brian |
title | Change in the Status of the Crimean Tatars: from National Minority to Indigenous People? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T12%3A47%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Change%20in%20the%20Status%20of%20the%20Crimean%20Tatars:%20from%20National%20Minority%20to%20Indigenous%20People?&rft.jtitle=Bilig%20(Ankara)&rft.au=Yap%C4%B1c%C4%B1,%20Utku&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=85&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=299-332&rft.issn=1301-0549&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2087293105%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2087293105&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |