Change in the Status of the Crimean Tatars: from National Minority to Indigenous People?

Starting from the 1950s the term "indigenous peoples" has gained a tenacious worldwide popularity thanks to growing academic focus on the rights of Indian and Inuit peoples. Contiguous normative efforts of some influential international organizations such as International Labour Organizati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bilig (Ankara) 2018-04, Vol.85, p.299-332
1. Verfasser: Yapıcı, Utku
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 332
container_issue
container_start_page 299
container_title Bilig (Ankara)
container_volume 85
creator Yapıcı, Utku
description Starting from the 1950s the term "indigenous peoples" has gained a tenacious worldwide popularity thanks to growing academic focus on the rights of Indian and Inuit peoples. Contiguous normative efforts of some influential international organizations such as International Labour Organization, World Bank, and United Nations also encouraged the instrumentalization of the term by some right-seeking disadvantaged groups. Since the 1990s, the Crimean Tatars have also strived to be recognized as "indigenous people of Crimea". They eventually seemed to have reached their goals. Ukrainian parliament gave the status of indigenous people to Crimean Tatars after Russian Federation's seizure of Crimea in March 2014. However, the seizure itself prevented the implementation of the parliament act. This article mainly focuses on the reasons behind Tatar claims for gaining the indigenous people status as well as Ukraine's and Russian Federation's reactions to those claims. The main objective of the article is to identify historical changes in the status of the Crimean Tatars.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2087293105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2087293105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-bc9609090bab8fc886862c953efa054e787469142924fa98093f20a8371837083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjktLAzEUhbNQaKn9DwHXA3nMI3EjMvgotCo4i-7KnfGmTZkmY5JZ-O8N6jkcDmdxL98VWXLJeMGqUi_IOsYzy6rKWtdiSfbtCdwRqXU0nZB-JEhzpN78rjbYC4KjHSQI8Y6a4C_0FZL1Dka6s84Hm75p8nTjPu0Rnc-37-inEe9vyLWBMeL6v1eke3rs2pdi-_a8aR-2xaRVKvpB10xn99ArMyhVq1oMupJoIDNio5oMykuhRWlAK6alEQyUbHgOU3JFbv_eTsF_zRjT4eznkPHiQTDVCC05q-QPjtdLWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2087293105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Change in the Status of the Crimean Tatars: from National Minority to Indigenous People?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Yapıcı, Utku</creator><creatorcontrib>Yapıcı, Utku</creatorcontrib><description>Starting from the 1950s the term "indigenous peoples" has gained a tenacious worldwide popularity thanks to growing academic focus on the rights of Indian and Inuit peoples. Contiguous normative efforts of some influential international organizations such as International Labour Organization, World Bank, and United Nations also encouraged the instrumentalization of the term by some right-seeking disadvantaged groups. Since the 1990s, the Crimean Tatars have also strived to be recognized as "indigenous people of Crimea". They eventually seemed to have reached their goals. Ukrainian parliament gave the status of indigenous people to Crimean Tatars after Russian Federation's seizure of Crimea in March 2014. However, the seizure itself prevented the implementation of the parliament act. This article mainly focuses on the reasons behind Tatar claims for gaining the indigenous people status as well as Ukraine's and Russian Federation's reactions to those claims. The main objective of the article is to identify historical changes in the status of the Crimean Tatars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1301-0549</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ankara: Ahmet Yesesvi Universitesi, Management Center</publisher><subject>At risk populations ; Change agents ; Changes ; Demonstrations &amp; protests ; Disadvantaged ; Federations ; History ; Indigenous peoples ; International economic organizations ; International organizations ; Inuit ; Labor movements ; Legislatures ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Minority groups ; Native peoples ; Parliaments ; Popularity ; Turkic languages ; Ukrainian language ; Williams, Brian</subject><ispartof>Bilig (Ankara), 2018-04, Vol.85, p.299-332</ispartof><rights>Copyright Ahmet Yesesvi Universitesi, Management Center Spring 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,12832</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yapıcı, Utku</creatorcontrib><title>Change in the Status of the Crimean Tatars: from National Minority to Indigenous People?</title><title>Bilig (Ankara)</title><description>Starting from the 1950s the term "indigenous peoples" has gained a tenacious worldwide popularity thanks to growing academic focus on the rights of Indian and Inuit peoples. Contiguous normative efforts of some influential international organizations such as International Labour Organization, World Bank, and United Nations also encouraged the instrumentalization of the term by some right-seeking disadvantaged groups. Since the 1990s, the Crimean Tatars have also strived to be recognized as "indigenous people of Crimea". They eventually seemed to have reached their goals. Ukrainian parliament gave the status of indigenous people to Crimean Tatars after Russian Federation's seizure of Crimea in March 2014. However, the seizure itself prevented the implementation of the parliament act. This article mainly focuses on the reasons behind Tatar claims for gaining the indigenous people status as well as Ukraine's and Russian Federation's reactions to those claims. The main objective of the article is to identify historical changes in the status of the Crimean Tatars.</description><subject>At risk populations</subject><subject>Change agents</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Demonstrations &amp; protests</subject><subject>Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Federations</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>International economic organizations</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>Inuit</subject><subject>Labor movements</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Turkic languages</subject><subject>Ukrainian language</subject><subject>Williams, Brian</subject><issn>1301-0549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotjktLAzEUhbNQaKn9DwHXA3nMI3EjMvgotCo4i-7KnfGmTZkmY5JZ-O8N6jkcDmdxL98VWXLJeMGqUi_IOsYzy6rKWtdiSfbtCdwRqXU0nZB-JEhzpN78rjbYC4KjHSQI8Y6a4C_0FZL1Dka6s84Hm75p8nTjPu0Rnc-37-inEe9vyLWBMeL6v1eke3rs2pdi-_a8aR-2xaRVKvpB10xn99ArMyhVq1oMupJoIDNio5oMykuhRWlAK6alEQyUbHgOU3JFbv_eTsF_zRjT4eznkPHiQTDVCC05q-QPjtdLWg</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Yapıcı, Utku</creator><general>Ahmet Yesesvi Universitesi, Management Center</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Change in the Status of the Crimean Tatars: from National Minority to Indigenous People?</title><author>Yapıcı, Utku</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-bc9609090bab8fc886862c953efa054e787469142924fa98093f20a8371837083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>At risk populations</topic><topic>Change agents</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Demonstrations &amp; protests</topic><topic>Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Federations</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>International economic organizations</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>Inuit</topic><topic>Labor movements</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Turkic languages</topic><topic>Ukrainian language</topic><topic>Williams, Brian</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yapıcı, Utku</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Bilig (Ankara)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yapıcı, Utku</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Change in the Status of the Crimean Tatars: from National Minority to Indigenous People?</atitle><jtitle>Bilig (Ankara)</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>85</volume><spage>299</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>299-332</pages><issn>1301-0549</issn><abstract>Starting from the 1950s the term "indigenous peoples" has gained a tenacious worldwide popularity thanks to growing academic focus on the rights of Indian and Inuit peoples. Contiguous normative efforts of some influential international organizations such as International Labour Organization, World Bank, and United Nations also encouraged the instrumentalization of the term by some right-seeking disadvantaged groups. Since the 1990s, the Crimean Tatars have also strived to be recognized as "indigenous people of Crimea". They eventually seemed to have reached their goals. Ukrainian parliament gave the status of indigenous people to Crimean Tatars after Russian Federation's seizure of Crimea in March 2014. However, the seizure itself prevented the implementation of the parliament act. This article mainly focuses on the reasons behind Tatar claims for gaining the indigenous people status as well as Ukraine's and Russian Federation's reactions to those claims. The main objective of the article is to identify historical changes in the status of the Crimean Tatars.</abstract><cop>Ankara</cop><pub>Ahmet Yesesvi Universitesi, Management Center</pub><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1301-0549
ispartof Bilig (Ankara), 2018-04, Vol.85, p.299-332
issn 1301-0549
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2087293105
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects At risk populations
Change agents
Changes
Demonstrations & protests
Disadvantaged
Federations
History
Indigenous peoples
International economic organizations
International organizations
Inuit
Labor movements
Legislatures
Minority & ethnic groups
Minority groups
Native peoples
Parliaments
Popularity
Turkic languages
Ukrainian language
Williams, Brian
title Change in the Status of the Crimean Tatars: from National Minority to Indigenous People?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T12%3A47%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Change%20in%20the%20Status%20of%20the%20Crimean%20Tatars:%20from%20National%20Minority%20to%20Indigenous%20People?&rft.jtitle=Bilig%20(Ankara)&rft.au=Yap%C4%B1c%C4%B1,%20Utku&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=85&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=299-332&rft.issn=1301-0549&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2087293105%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2087293105&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true