Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?
Marx’s concept of metabolic rift has emerged as an important category in ecological Marxism, but has received relatively little attention in political ecology. This appears to reflect a combination of confusion regarding the conceptual basis of metabolic rift and theoretical antagonisms between its...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geoforum 2018-06, Vol.92, p.92-95 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 95 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | Geoforum |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Napoletano, Brian M. Urquijo, Pedro S. Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime Clark, Brett York, Richard Franch-Pardo, Iván Méndez-Lemus, Yadira Vieyra, Antonio |
description | Marx’s concept of metabolic rift has emerged as an important category in ecological Marxism, but has received relatively little attention in political ecology. This appears to reflect a combination of confusion regarding the conceptual basis of metabolic rift and theoretical antagonisms between its materialist dialectic and dominant post-humanist approaches in hybridist political ecology. In this essay, we argue that stronger engagement with metabolic-rift scholarship in political ecology could strengthen work in both areas. We briefly outline the possibilities for such engagement by first clarifying some of the conceptual confusion regarding the metabolic rift and its material-dialectical approach to human alienation and the socio-ecological contradictions and crises of capital accumulation and human development within capitalism. We then briefly discuss some of the key points of contention between this approach and dominant hybridist paradigms in political ecology. We conclude that, despite these conflicts, the concept of metabolic rift could provide essential critical contributions to political ecology's explanatory and emancipatory efforts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2086828981</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016718518301179</els_id><sourcerecordid>2086828981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f874a40ca7c2f0688c77b55ce9da1adb880c7cfe92651f7db82d8cf2f1065dfb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QQJe9LDrZL-SPakUv7DiRc8hm53ULNtNTdJi_71bqmdPA8PzvsM8hJwzSBmw6rpLF-iM8-tlmgETKRQpgDggEyZ4ltR5LQ7JBEYy4UyUx-QkhA4AeC7qCXl5UoFe4gYH-qr8tw3xiq5cb6PVqqeoXe8WW-pR9f2WRq-GoHFosaXxE-kSo2pGWFNvTbw5JUdG9QHPfueUfDzcv8-ekvnb4_Psbp7ovICYGMELVYBWXGcGKiE0501ZaqxbxVTbCAGaa4N1VpXM8HGRtUKbzDCoytY0-ZRc7HtX3n2tMUTZubUfxpMyA1GJTNSCjVS1p7R3IXg0cuXtUvmtZCB34mQn_8TJnTgJhRzFjcHbfRDHHzYWvQza4qCxtR51lK2z_1X8ADC3e0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2086828981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Napoletano, Brian M. ; Urquijo, Pedro S. ; Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime ; Clark, Brett ; York, Richard ; Franch-Pardo, Iván ; Méndez-Lemus, Yadira ; Vieyra, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Napoletano, Brian M. ; Urquijo, Pedro S. ; Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime ; Clark, Brett ; York, Richard ; Franch-Pardo, Iván ; Méndez-Lemus, Yadira ; Vieyra, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>Marx’s concept of metabolic rift has emerged as an important category in ecological Marxism, but has received relatively little attention in political ecology. This appears to reflect a combination of confusion regarding the conceptual basis of metabolic rift and theoretical antagonisms between its materialist dialectic and dominant post-humanist approaches in hybridist political ecology. In this essay, we argue that stronger engagement with metabolic-rift scholarship in political ecology could strengthen work in both areas. We briefly outline the possibilities for such engagement by first clarifying some of the conceptual confusion regarding the metabolic rift and its material-dialectical approach to human alienation and the socio-ecological contradictions and crises of capital accumulation and human development within capitalism. We then briefly discuss some of the key points of contention between this approach and dominant hybridist paradigms in political ecology. We conclude that, despite these conflicts, the concept of metabolic rift could provide essential critical contributions to political ecology's explanatory and emancipatory efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9398</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Bioaccumulation ; Capital formation ; Capitalism ; Confusion ; Ecological Marxism ; Ecology ; Human development ; Marxism ; Marxist analysis ; Metabolic disorders ; Metabolic rift ; Nature-society dialectic ; Paradigms ; Political ecology ; Politics ; Post-humanism ; Posthumanism ; Production of nature</subject><ispartof>Geoforum, 2018-06, Vol.92, p.92-95</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f874a40ca7c2f0688c77b55ce9da1adb880c7cfe92651f7db82d8cf2f1065dfb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f874a40ca7c2f0688c77b55ce9da1adb880c7cfe92651f7db82d8cf2f1065dfb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Napoletano, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquijo, Pedro S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franch-Pardo, Iván</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez-Lemus, Yadira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieyra, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?</title><title>Geoforum</title><description>Marx’s concept of metabolic rift has emerged as an important category in ecological Marxism, but has received relatively little attention in political ecology. This appears to reflect a combination of confusion regarding the conceptual basis of metabolic rift and theoretical antagonisms between its materialist dialectic and dominant post-humanist approaches in hybridist political ecology. In this essay, we argue that stronger engagement with metabolic-rift scholarship in political ecology could strengthen work in both areas. We briefly outline the possibilities for such engagement by first clarifying some of the conceptual confusion regarding the metabolic rift and its material-dialectical approach to human alienation and the socio-ecological contradictions and crises of capital accumulation and human development within capitalism. We then briefly discuss some of the key points of contention between this approach and dominant hybridist paradigms in political ecology. We conclude that, despite these conflicts, the concept of metabolic rift could provide essential critical contributions to political ecology's explanatory and emancipatory efforts.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Bioaccumulation</subject><subject>Capital formation</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Confusion</subject><subject>Ecological Marxism</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Human development</subject><subject>Marxism</subject><subject>Marxist analysis</subject><subject>Metabolic disorders</subject><subject>Metabolic rift</subject><subject>Nature-society dialectic</subject><subject>Paradigms</subject><subject>Political ecology</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Post-humanism</subject><subject>Posthumanism</subject><subject>Production of nature</subject><issn>0016-7185</issn><issn>1872-9398</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QQJe9LDrZL-SPakUv7DiRc8hm53ULNtNTdJi_71bqmdPA8PzvsM8hJwzSBmw6rpLF-iM8-tlmgETKRQpgDggEyZ4ltR5LQ7JBEYy4UyUx-QkhA4AeC7qCXl5UoFe4gYH-qr8tw3xiq5cb6PVqqeoXe8WW-pR9f2WRq-GoHFosaXxE-kSo2pGWFNvTbw5JUdG9QHPfueUfDzcv8-ekvnb4_Psbp7ovICYGMELVYBWXGcGKiE0501ZaqxbxVTbCAGaa4N1VpXM8HGRtUKbzDCoytY0-ZRc7HtX3n2tMUTZubUfxpMyA1GJTNSCjVS1p7R3IXg0cuXtUvmtZCB34mQn_8TJnTgJhRzFjcHbfRDHHzYWvQza4qCxtR51lK2z_1X8ADC3e0w</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Napoletano, Brian M.</creator><creator>Urquijo, Pedro S.</creator><creator>Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime</creator><creator>Clark, Brett</creator><creator>York, Richard</creator><creator>Franch-Pardo, Iván</creator><creator>Méndez-Lemus, Yadira</creator><creator>Vieyra, Antonio</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?</title><author>Napoletano, Brian M. ; Urquijo, Pedro S. ; Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime ; Clark, Brett ; York, Richard ; Franch-Pardo, Iván ; Méndez-Lemus, Yadira ; Vieyra, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f874a40ca7c2f0688c77b55ce9da1adb880c7cfe92651f7db82d8cf2f1065dfb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Bioaccumulation</topic><topic>Capital formation</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Confusion</topic><topic>Ecological Marxism</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Human development</topic><topic>Marxism</topic><topic>Marxist analysis</topic><topic>Metabolic disorders</topic><topic>Metabolic rift</topic><topic>Nature-society dialectic</topic><topic>Paradigms</topic><topic>Political ecology</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Post-humanism</topic><topic>Posthumanism</topic><topic>Production of nature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Napoletano, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquijo, Pedro S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franch-Pardo, Iván</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez-Lemus, Yadira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieyra, Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Napoletano, Brian M.</au><au>Urquijo, Pedro S.</au><au>Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime</au><au>Clark, Brett</au><au>York, Richard</au><au>Franch-Pardo, Iván</au><au>Méndez-Lemus, Yadira</au><au>Vieyra, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?</atitle><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>92</volume><spage>92</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>92-95</pages><issn>0016-7185</issn><eissn>1872-9398</eissn><abstract>Marx’s concept of metabolic rift has emerged as an important category in ecological Marxism, but has received relatively little attention in political ecology. This appears to reflect a combination of confusion regarding the conceptual basis of metabolic rift and theoretical antagonisms between its materialist dialectic and dominant post-humanist approaches in hybridist political ecology. In this essay, we argue that stronger engagement with metabolic-rift scholarship in political ecology could strengthen work in both areas. We briefly outline the possibilities for such engagement by first clarifying some of the conceptual confusion regarding the metabolic rift and its material-dialectical approach to human alienation and the socio-ecological contradictions and crises of capital accumulation and human development within capitalism. We then briefly discuss some of the key points of contention between this approach and dominant hybridist paradigms in political ecology. We conclude that, despite these conflicts, the concept of metabolic rift could provide essential critical contributions to political ecology's explanatory and emancipatory efforts.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.008</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-7185 |
ispartof | Geoforum, 2018-06, Vol.92, p.92-95 |
issn | 0016-7185 1872-9398 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2086828981 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Accumulation Bioaccumulation Capital formation Capitalism Confusion Ecological Marxism Ecology Human development Marxism Marxist analysis Metabolic disorders Metabolic rift Nature-society dialectic Paradigms Political ecology Politics Post-humanism Posthumanism Production of nature |
title | Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A16%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Has%20(even%20Marxist)%20political%20ecology%20really%20transcended%20the%20metabolic%20rift?&rft.jtitle=Geoforum&rft.au=Napoletano,%20Brian%20M.&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=92&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=92-95&rft.issn=0016-7185&rft.eissn=1872-9398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2086828981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2086828981&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016718518301179&rfr_iscdi=true |