Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?

Marx’s concept of metabolic rift has emerged as an important category in ecological Marxism, but has received relatively little attention in political ecology. This appears to reflect a combination of confusion regarding the conceptual basis of metabolic rift and theoretical antagonisms between its...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geoforum 2018-06, Vol.92, p.92-95
Hauptverfasser: Napoletano, Brian M., Urquijo, Pedro S., Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime, Clark, Brett, York, Richard, Franch-Pardo, Iván, Méndez-Lemus, Yadira, Vieyra, Antonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 95
container_issue
container_start_page 92
container_title Geoforum
container_volume 92
creator Napoletano, Brian M.
Urquijo, Pedro S.
Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime
Clark, Brett
York, Richard
Franch-Pardo, Iván
Méndez-Lemus, Yadira
Vieyra, Antonio
description Marx’s concept of metabolic rift has emerged as an important category in ecological Marxism, but has received relatively little attention in political ecology. This appears to reflect a combination of confusion regarding the conceptual basis of metabolic rift and theoretical antagonisms between its materialist dialectic and dominant post-humanist approaches in hybridist political ecology. In this essay, we argue that stronger engagement with metabolic-rift scholarship in political ecology could strengthen work in both areas. We briefly outline the possibilities for such engagement by first clarifying some of the conceptual confusion regarding the metabolic rift and its material-dialectical approach to human alienation and the socio-ecological contradictions and crises of capital accumulation and human development within capitalism. We then briefly discuss some of the key points of contention between this approach and dominant hybridist paradigms in political ecology. We conclude that, despite these conflicts, the concept of metabolic rift could provide essential critical contributions to political ecology's explanatory and emancipatory efforts.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2086828981</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016718518301179</els_id><sourcerecordid>2086828981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f874a40ca7c2f0688c77b55ce9da1adb880c7cfe92651f7db82d8cf2f1065dfb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QQJe9LDrZL-SPakUv7DiRc8hm53ULNtNTdJi_71bqmdPA8PzvsM8hJwzSBmw6rpLF-iM8-tlmgETKRQpgDggEyZ4ltR5LQ7JBEYy4UyUx-QkhA4AeC7qCXl5UoFe4gYH-qr8tw3xiq5cb6PVqqeoXe8WW-pR9f2WRq-GoHFosaXxE-kSo2pGWFNvTbw5JUdG9QHPfueUfDzcv8-ekvnb4_Psbp7ovICYGMELVYBWXGcGKiE0501ZaqxbxVTbCAGaa4N1VpXM8HGRtUKbzDCoytY0-ZRc7HtX3n2tMUTZubUfxpMyA1GJTNSCjVS1p7R3IXg0cuXtUvmtZCB34mQn_8TJnTgJhRzFjcHbfRDHHzYWvQza4qCxtR51lK2z_1X8ADC3e0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2086828981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Napoletano, Brian M. ; Urquijo, Pedro S. ; Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime ; Clark, Brett ; York, Richard ; Franch-Pardo, Iván ; Méndez-Lemus, Yadira ; Vieyra, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Napoletano, Brian M. ; Urquijo, Pedro S. ; Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime ; Clark, Brett ; York, Richard ; Franch-Pardo, Iván ; Méndez-Lemus, Yadira ; Vieyra, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>Marx’s concept of metabolic rift has emerged as an important category in ecological Marxism, but has received relatively little attention in political ecology. This appears to reflect a combination of confusion regarding the conceptual basis of metabolic rift and theoretical antagonisms between its materialist dialectic and dominant post-humanist approaches in hybridist political ecology. In this essay, we argue that stronger engagement with metabolic-rift scholarship in political ecology could strengthen work in both areas. We briefly outline the possibilities for such engagement by first clarifying some of the conceptual confusion regarding the metabolic rift and its material-dialectical approach to human alienation and the socio-ecological contradictions and crises of capital accumulation and human development within capitalism. We then briefly discuss some of the key points of contention between this approach and dominant hybridist paradigms in political ecology. We conclude that, despite these conflicts, the concept of metabolic rift could provide essential critical contributions to political ecology's explanatory and emancipatory efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9398</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Bioaccumulation ; Capital formation ; Capitalism ; Confusion ; Ecological Marxism ; Ecology ; Human development ; Marxism ; Marxist analysis ; Metabolic disorders ; Metabolic rift ; Nature-society dialectic ; Paradigms ; Political ecology ; Politics ; Post-humanism ; Posthumanism ; Production of nature</subject><ispartof>Geoforum, 2018-06, Vol.92, p.92-95</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f874a40ca7c2f0688c77b55ce9da1adb880c7cfe92651f7db82d8cf2f1065dfb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f874a40ca7c2f0688c77b55ce9da1adb880c7cfe92651f7db82d8cf2f1065dfb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Napoletano, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquijo, Pedro S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franch-Pardo, Iván</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez-Lemus, Yadira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieyra, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?</title><title>Geoforum</title><description>Marx’s concept of metabolic rift has emerged as an important category in ecological Marxism, but has received relatively little attention in political ecology. This appears to reflect a combination of confusion regarding the conceptual basis of metabolic rift and theoretical antagonisms between its materialist dialectic and dominant post-humanist approaches in hybridist political ecology. In this essay, we argue that stronger engagement with metabolic-rift scholarship in political ecology could strengthen work in both areas. We briefly outline the possibilities for such engagement by first clarifying some of the conceptual confusion regarding the metabolic rift and its material-dialectical approach to human alienation and the socio-ecological contradictions and crises of capital accumulation and human development within capitalism. We then briefly discuss some of the key points of contention between this approach and dominant hybridist paradigms in political ecology. We conclude that, despite these conflicts, the concept of metabolic rift could provide essential critical contributions to political ecology's explanatory and emancipatory efforts.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Bioaccumulation</subject><subject>Capital formation</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Confusion</subject><subject>Ecological Marxism</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Human development</subject><subject>Marxism</subject><subject>Marxist analysis</subject><subject>Metabolic disorders</subject><subject>Metabolic rift</subject><subject>Nature-society dialectic</subject><subject>Paradigms</subject><subject>Political ecology</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Post-humanism</subject><subject>Posthumanism</subject><subject>Production of nature</subject><issn>0016-7185</issn><issn>1872-9398</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QQJe9LDrZL-SPakUv7DiRc8hm53ULNtNTdJi_71bqmdPA8PzvsM8hJwzSBmw6rpLF-iM8-tlmgETKRQpgDggEyZ4ltR5LQ7JBEYy4UyUx-QkhA4AeC7qCXl5UoFe4gYH-qr8tw3xiq5cb6PVqqeoXe8WW-pR9f2WRq-GoHFosaXxE-kSo2pGWFNvTbw5JUdG9QHPfueUfDzcv8-ekvnb4_Psbp7ovICYGMELVYBWXGcGKiE0501ZaqxbxVTbCAGaa4N1VpXM8HGRtUKbzDCoytY0-ZRc7HtX3n2tMUTZubUfxpMyA1GJTNSCjVS1p7R3IXg0cuXtUvmtZCB34mQn_8TJnTgJhRzFjcHbfRDHHzYWvQza4qCxtR51lK2z_1X8ADC3e0w</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Napoletano, Brian M.</creator><creator>Urquijo, Pedro S.</creator><creator>Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime</creator><creator>Clark, Brett</creator><creator>York, Richard</creator><creator>Franch-Pardo, Iván</creator><creator>Méndez-Lemus, Yadira</creator><creator>Vieyra, Antonio</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?</title><author>Napoletano, Brian M. ; Urquijo, Pedro S. ; Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime ; Clark, Brett ; York, Richard ; Franch-Pardo, Iván ; Méndez-Lemus, Yadira ; Vieyra, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f874a40ca7c2f0688c77b55ce9da1adb880c7cfe92651f7db82d8cf2f1065dfb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Bioaccumulation</topic><topic>Capital formation</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Confusion</topic><topic>Ecological Marxism</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Human development</topic><topic>Marxism</topic><topic>Marxist analysis</topic><topic>Metabolic disorders</topic><topic>Metabolic rift</topic><topic>Nature-society dialectic</topic><topic>Paradigms</topic><topic>Political ecology</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Post-humanism</topic><topic>Posthumanism</topic><topic>Production of nature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Napoletano, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquijo, Pedro S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franch-Pardo, Iván</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez-Lemus, Yadira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieyra, Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Napoletano, Brian M.</au><au>Urquijo, Pedro S.</au><au>Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime</au><au>Clark, Brett</au><au>York, Richard</au><au>Franch-Pardo, Iván</au><au>Méndez-Lemus, Yadira</au><au>Vieyra, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?</atitle><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>92</volume><spage>92</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>92-95</pages><issn>0016-7185</issn><eissn>1872-9398</eissn><abstract>Marx’s concept of metabolic rift has emerged as an important category in ecological Marxism, but has received relatively little attention in political ecology. This appears to reflect a combination of confusion regarding the conceptual basis of metabolic rift and theoretical antagonisms between its materialist dialectic and dominant post-humanist approaches in hybridist political ecology. In this essay, we argue that stronger engagement with metabolic-rift scholarship in political ecology could strengthen work in both areas. We briefly outline the possibilities for such engagement by first clarifying some of the conceptual confusion regarding the metabolic rift and its material-dialectical approach to human alienation and the socio-ecological contradictions and crises of capital accumulation and human development within capitalism. We then briefly discuss some of the key points of contention between this approach and dominant hybridist paradigms in political ecology. We conclude that, despite these conflicts, the concept of metabolic rift could provide essential critical contributions to political ecology's explanatory and emancipatory efforts.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.008</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7185
ispartof Geoforum, 2018-06, Vol.92, p.92-95
issn 0016-7185
1872-9398
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2086828981
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accumulation
Bioaccumulation
Capital formation
Capitalism
Confusion
Ecological Marxism
Ecology
Human development
Marxism
Marxist analysis
Metabolic disorders
Metabolic rift
Nature-society dialectic
Paradigms
Political ecology
Politics
Post-humanism
Posthumanism
Production of nature
title Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A16%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Has%20(even%20Marxist)%20political%20ecology%20really%20transcended%20the%20metabolic%20rift?&rft.jtitle=Geoforum&rft.au=Napoletano,%20Brian%20M.&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=92&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=92-95&rft.issn=0016-7185&rft.eissn=1872-9398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2086828981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2086828981&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016718518301179&rfr_iscdi=true