Whose (Meta)modernism?: Metamodernism, Race, and the Politics of Failure

Contemporary American poetry by black women writers challenges a theory of metamodernism that would identify the acceptance of “failure” as a central attitude of metamodern art and literature. Metadmodernist poetry by Harryette Mullen and Evie Shockley explicitly engages the politics of form that ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of modern literature 2018-03, Vol.41 (3), p.60-76
1. Verfasser: Brunton, James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue 3
container_start_page 60
container_title Journal of modern literature
container_volume 41
creator Brunton, James
description Contemporary American poetry by black women writers challenges a theory of metamodernism that would identify the acceptance of “failure” as a central attitude of metamodern art and literature. Metadmodernist poetry by Harryette Mullen and Evie Shockley explicitly engages the politics of form that characterizes avant-garde modernism; rather than figure political and aesthetic failure as inevitable or even desirable, these writers revitalize formal techniques of modernism (often modernism's avant-garde strands in particular) in order to offer critiques of state-sanctioned racism and heterosexism. These critiques do not redeem failure by aestheticizing it but rather lay bare the ways in which American society has failed people of color. The varying degrees of attention afforded to such contemporary political concerns by theories of metamodernism prompts the question “Whose metamodernism are we theorizing?”
doi_str_mv 10.2979/jmodelite.41.3.05
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2086241408</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A554494024</galeid><jstor_id>10.2979/jmodelite.41.3.05</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A554494024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-4b2ad364f7ccf50ec0b0961eaa911b751fd447a58dbeb8f878ac962cecca143f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl-L1DAUxYsoOK5-AJ8sCOLCtibpbZv6Isvg_oHRFVfRt5CmN7MtbbMmKei3N7XLLIODmDyEXH733AvnRNFzSlJWldWbbjAN9q3HFGiapSR_EK1ozqqEQgEPoxUhjCWM0--PoyfOdSQcXhar6OLbjXEYv_6AXh7PGnZs3fDubTwXdv-T-LNUeBLLsYn9DcafTBjVKhcbHZ_Jtp8sPo0eadk7fHb3HkVfz95_WV8km6vzy_XpJlE5B59AzWSTFaBLpXROUJGaVAVFKStK6zKnugEoZc6bGmuuecmlqgqmUClJIdPZUfRy0b215seEzovOTHYMIwUjvGBAgfBAvViorexR9FZt5eScOM1zgAoIg3udP0Q7auOtVEPr1D6VHKC2OKKVvRlRt6G8x6cH-HAbHFp1sOF4ryEwHn_6Zd3L64__zfLzzb8Wv2OV6XvcogiWrK_2ebrwyhrnLGpxa9tB2l-CEjEnTOwSJoCKTJA89MDOig6VHyaH926UhFTAxfWcwjmElGchdDB782pp65w3djfnb_3fiYrdeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2086241408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Whose (Meta)modernism?: Metamodernism, Race, and the Politics of Failure</title><source>JSTOR Complete Journals</source><creator>Brunton, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Brunton, James</creatorcontrib><description>Contemporary American poetry by black women writers challenges a theory of metamodernism that would identify the acceptance of “failure” as a central attitude of metamodern art and literature. Metadmodernist poetry by Harryette Mullen and Evie Shockley explicitly engages the politics of form that characterizes avant-garde modernism; rather than figure political and aesthetic failure as inevitable or even desirable, these writers revitalize formal techniques of modernism (often modernism's avant-garde strands in particular) in order to offer critiques of state-sanctioned racism and heterosexism. These critiques do not redeem failure by aestheticizing it but rather lay bare the ways in which American society has failed people of color. The varying degrees of attention afforded to such contemporary political concerns by theories of metamodernism prompts the question “Whose metamodernism are we theorizing?”</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-281X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2979/jmodelite.41.3.05</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bloomington: Indiana University Press</publisher><subject>Absurdism ; Aesthetics ; African American literature ; African Americans ; Allusion ; Attitudes ; Authorship ; Avant-garde ; Contemporary literature ; Contemporary problems ; Dictionaries ; Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics ; Failure ; Gender ; Ideology ; Literary devices ; Literature ; Logic ; Misogyny ; Modern literature ; Modernism ; Mullen, Harryette Romell ; Narrative techniques ; Other-Late-Meta-Modernisms ; Poetry ; Poets ; Political aspects ; Politics ; Racism ; Shockley, Evie ; Stein, Gertrude ; Stein, Gertrude (1874-1946) ; Utopias ; Websites ; Writers</subject><ispartof>Journal of modern literature, 2018-03, Vol.41 (3), p.60-76</ispartof><rights>2018 Indiana University Press</rights><rights>Copyright © Indiana University Press.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Indiana University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Indiana University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Indiana University Press Spring 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-4b2ad364f7ccf50ec0b0961eaa911b751fd447a58dbeb8f878ac962cecca143f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brunton, James</creatorcontrib><title>Whose (Meta)modernism?: Metamodernism, Race, and the Politics of Failure</title><title>Journal of modern literature</title><addtitle>Journal of Modern Literature</addtitle><description>Contemporary American poetry by black women writers challenges a theory of metamodernism that would identify the acceptance of “failure” as a central attitude of metamodern art and literature. Metadmodernist poetry by Harryette Mullen and Evie Shockley explicitly engages the politics of form that characterizes avant-garde modernism; rather than figure political and aesthetic failure as inevitable or even desirable, these writers revitalize formal techniques of modernism (often modernism's avant-garde strands in particular) in order to offer critiques of state-sanctioned racism and heterosexism. These critiques do not redeem failure by aestheticizing it but rather lay bare the ways in which American society has failed people of color. The varying degrees of attention afforded to such contemporary political concerns by theories of metamodernism prompts the question “Whose metamodernism are we theorizing?”</description><subject>Absurdism</subject><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>African American literature</subject><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Allusion</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Avant-garde</subject><subject>Contemporary literature</subject><subject>Contemporary problems</subject><subject>Dictionaries</subject><subject>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Literary devices</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Misogyny</subject><subject>Modern literature</subject><subject>Modernism</subject><subject>Mullen, Harryette Romell</subject><subject>Narrative techniques</subject><subject>Other-Late-Meta-Modernisms</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Poets</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Shockley, Evie</subject><subject>Stein, Gertrude</subject><subject>Stein, Gertrude (1874-1946)</subject><subject>Utopias</subject><subject>Websites</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>0022-281X</issn><issn>1529-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl-L1DAUxYsoOK5-AJ8sCOLCtibpbZv6Isvg_oHRFVfRt5CmN7MtbbMmKei3N7XLLIODmDyEXH733AvnRNFzSlJWldWbbjAN9q3HFGiapSR_EK1ozqqEQgEPoxUhjCWM0--PoyfOdSQcXhar6OLbjXEYv_6AXh7PGnZs3fDubTwXdv-T-LNUeBLLsYn9DcafTBjVKhcbHZ_Jtp8sPo0eadk7fHb3HkVfz95_WV8km6vzy_XpJlE5B59AzWSTFaBLpXROUJGaVAVFKStK6zKnugEoZc6bGmuuecmlqgqmUClJIdPZUfRy0b215seEzovOTHYMIwUjvGBAgfBAvViorexR9FZt5eScOM1zgAoIg3udP0Q7auOtVEPr1D6VHKC2OKKVvRlRt6G8x6cH-HAbHFp1sOF4ryEwHn_6Zd3L64__zfLzzb8Wv2OV6XvcogiWrK_2ebrwyhrnLGpxa9tB2l-CEjEnTOwSJoCKTJA89MDOig6VHyaH926UhFTAxfWcwjmElGchdDB782pp65w3djfnb_3fiYrdeA</recordid><startdate>20180322</startdate><enddate>20180322</enddate><creator>Brunton, James</creator><general>Indiana University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ILR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180322</creationdate><title>Whose (Meta)modernism?: Metamodernism, Race, and the Politics of Failure</title><author>Brunton, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-4b2ad364f7ccf50ec0b0961eaa911b751fd447a58dbeb8f878ac962cecca143f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Absurdism</topic><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>African American literature</topic><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Allusion</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Avant-garde</topic><topic>Contemporary literature</topic><topic>Contemporary problems</topic><topic>Dictionaries</topic><topic>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Literary devices</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Misogyny</topic><topic>Modern literature</topic><topic>Modernism</topic><topic>Mullen, Harryette Romell</topic><topic>Narrative techniques</topic><topic>Other-Late-Meta-Modernisms</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Poets</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Shockley, Evie</topic><topic>Stein, Gertrude</topic><topic>Stein, Gertrude (1874-1946)</topic><topic>Utopias</topic><topic>Websites</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brunton, James</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Literature Resource Center</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) – US</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of modern literature</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brunton, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Whose (Meta)modernism?: Metamodernism, Race, and the Politics of Failure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of modern literature</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Modern Literature</addtitle><date>2018-03-22</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>60-76</pages><issn>0022-281X</issn><eissn>1529-1464</eissn><abstract>Contemporary American poetry by black women writers challenges a theory of metamodernism that would identify the acceptance of “failure” as a central attitude of metamodern art and literature. Metadmodernist poetry by Harryette Mullen and Evie Shockley explicitly engages the politics of form that characterizes avant-garde modernism; rather than figure political and aesthetic failure as inevitable or even desirable, these writers revitalize formal techniques of modernism (often modernism's avant-garde strands in particular) in order to offer critiques of state-sanctioned racism and heterosexism. These critiques do not redeem failure by aestheticizing it but rather lay bare the ways in which American society has failed people of color. The varying degrees of attention afforded to such contemporary political concerns by theories of metamodernism prompts the question “Whose metamodernism are we theorizing?”</abstract><cop>Bloomington</cop><pub>Indiana University Press</pub><doi>10.2979/jmodelite.41.3.05</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-281X
ispartof Journal of modern literature, 2018-03, Vol.41 (3), p.60-76
issn 0022-281X
1529-1464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2086241408
source JSTOR Complete Journals
subjects Absurdism
Aesthetics
African American literature
African Americans
Allusion
Attitudes
Authorship
Avant-garde
Contemporary literature
Contemporary problems
Dictionaries
Exegesis & hermeneutics
Failure
Gender
Ideology
Literary devices
Literature
Logic
Misogyny
Modern literature
Modernism
Mullen, Harryette Romell
Narrative techniques
Other-Late-Meta-Modernisms
Poetry
Poets
Political aspects
Politics
Racism
Shockley, Evie
Stein, Gertrude
Stein, Gertrude (1874-1946)
Utopias
Websites
Writers
title Whose (Meta)modernism?: Metamodernism, Race, and the Politics of Failure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A36%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Whose%20(Meta)modernism?:%20Metamodernism,%20Race,%20and%20the%20Politics%20of%20Failure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20modern%20literature&rft.au=Brunton,%20James&rft.date=2018-03-22&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=60-76&rft.issn=0022-281X&rft.eissn=1529-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.2979/jmodelite.41.3.05&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA554494024%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2086241408&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A554494024&rft_jstor_id=10.2979/jmodelite.41.3.05&rfr_iscdi=true