Recent Developments in Public Education Law: Postsecondary Education

[...] a conservative student group challenged the State University of New York Student Association's use of advisory referenda to assist it in making funding allocation decisions for registered student organizations.3 The Second Circuit Court of Appeals first held that the student activity fees...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Urban lawyer 2009-06, Vol.41 (3), p.455-487
Hauptverfasser: Jorgensen, James D., Helms, Lelia B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 487
container_issue 3
container_start_page 455
container_title The Urban lawyer
container_volume 41
creator Jorgensen, James D.
Helms, Lelia B.
description [...] a conservative student group challenged the State University of New York Student Association's use of advisory referenda to assist it in making funding allocation decisions for registered student organizations.3 The Second Circuit Court of Appeals first held that the student activity fees were a limited public forum requiring viewpoint neutrality in their distribution.4 The court then rejected the use of the advisory referenda, holding that voting on the propriety of funding for student organizations was inherently laden with viewpoint-based judgments and that the defendant's attempts to mitigate the influence of the referenda by applying objective standards to its funding decisions did not preserve the necessary protections of the First Amendment.5 In Beta Upsilon Chi v. Machen,6 the defendant university declined to recognize a Christian fraternity as a Registered Student Organization on its campus because the fraternity refused to accept non-Christian members.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_208559249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A211061258</galeid><jstor_id>27895719</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A211061258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g309t-e639fddc61aeeb6111c496e78c818a547bfb2abad2d21ae9f9939b93f76351bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkFtLw0AQhYMoWKs_QQj6HNlLNsn4Vtp6gYBF9DlsdidlS7JbsxvFf-9CBRHKPMxh5jtnYE6SGYWcZYUAfprMCImaABHnyYX3O0I4oSyfJatXVGhDusJP7N1-iNqnxqabqe2NStd6UjIYZ9Naft2nG-eDR-WsluP33_IyOetk7_Hqt8-T94f12_Ipq18en5eLOttyAiHDgkOntSqoRGwLSqnKocCyUhWtpMjLtmuZbKVmmkUEOgAOLfCuLLigrebz5OaQux_dx4Q-NDs3jTaebBiphACWQ4RuD9BW9tgY27kwSjUYr5oFo5QUlIkqUtkRaosWR9k7i52J43_83RE-lsbBqKOG64Nh54Mbm_1ohvizhpUViJIC_wFOWnxd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208559249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recent Developments in Public Education Law: Postsecondary Education</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Jorgensen, James D. ; Helms, Lelia B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jorgensen, James D. ; Helms, Lelia B.</creatorcontrib><description>[...] a conservative student group challenged the State University of New York Student Association's use of advisory referenda to assist it in making funding allocation decisions for registered student organizations.3 The Second Circuit Court of Appeals first held that the student activity fees were a limited public forum requiring viewpoint neutrality in their distribution.4 The court then rejected the use of the advisory referenda, holding that voting on the propriety of funding for student organizations was inherently laden with viewpoint-based judgments and that the defendant's attempts to mitigate the influence of the referenda by applying objective standards to its funding decisions did not preserve the necessary protections of the First Amendment.5 In Beta Upsilon Chi v. Machen,6 the defendant university declined to recognize a Christian fraternity as a Registered Student Organization on its campus because the fraternity refused to accept non-Christian members.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-0905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-6593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Section of State and Local Government Law, American Bar Association. University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Amendments ; ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE LAW ; Appellate courts ; Athletic recruitment ; College campuses ; College students ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Defendants ; Education law ; Employment ; Federal circuit courts ; Federal court decisions ; Federal district courts ; First Amendment ; Higher education ; Injunctions ; Plaintiffs ; Religion ; Religious studies ; Sanctions ; State universities ; Surveys ; Universities ; Violations</subject><ispartof>The Urban lawyer, 2009-06, Vol.41 (3), p.455-487</ispartof><rights>2009 American Bar Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Summer 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27895719$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27895719$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jorgensen, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helms, Lelia B.</creatorcontrib><title>Recent Developments in Public Education Law: Postsecondary Education</title><title>The Urban lawyer</title><description>[...] a conservative student group challenged the State University of New York Student Association's use of advisory referenda to assist it in making funding allocation decisions for registered student organizations.3 The Second Circuit Court of Appeals first held that the student activity fees were a limited public forum requiring viewpoint neutrality in their distribution.4 The court then rejected the use of the advisory referenda, holding that voting on the propriety of funding for student organizations was inherently laden with viewpoint-based judgments and that the defendant's attempts to mitigate the influence of the referenda by applying objective standards to its funding decisions did not preserve the necessary protections of the First Amendment.5 In Beta Upsilon Chi v. Machen,6 the defendant university declined to recognize a Christian fraternity as a Registered Student Organization on its campus because the fraternity refused to accept non-Christian members.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Amendments</subject><subject>ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE LAW</subject><subject>Appellate courts</subject><subject>Athletic recruitment</subject><subject>College campuses</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Education law</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Federal circuit courts</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Federal district courts</subject><subject>First Amendment</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Injunctions</subject><subject>Plaintiffs</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious studies</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>State universities</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Violations</subject><issn>0042-0905</issn><issn>1942-6593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkFtLw0AQhYMoWKs_QQj6HNlLNsn4Vtp6gYBF9DlsdidlS7JbsxvFf-9CBRHKPMxh5jtnYE6SGYWcZYUAfprMCImaABHnyYX3O0I4oSyfJatXVGhDusJP7N1-iNqnxqabqe2NStd6UjIYZ9Naft2nG-eDR-WsluP33_IyOetk7_Hqt8-T94f12_Ipq18en5eLOttyAiHDgkOntSqoRGwLSqnKocCyUhWtpMjLtmuZbKVmmkUEOgAOLfCuLLigrebz5OaQux_dx4Q-NDs3jTaebBiphACWQ4RuD9BW9tgY27kwSjUYr5oFo5QUlIkqUtkRaosWR9k7i52J43_83RE-lsbBqKOG64Nh54Mbm_1ohvizhpUViJIC_wFOWnxd</recordid><startdate>20090622</startdate><enddate>20090622</enddate><creator>Jorgensen, James D.</creator><creator>Helms, Lelia B.</creator><general>Section of State and Local Government Law, American Bar Association. University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090622</creationdate><title>Recent Developments in Public Education Law: Postsecondary Education</title><author>Jorgensen, James D. ; Helms, Lelia B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g309t-e639fddc61aeeb6111c496e78c818a547bfb2abad2d21ae9f9939b93f76351bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Amendments</topic><topic>ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE LAW</topic><topic>Appellate courts</topic><topic>Athletic recruitment</topic><topic>College campuses</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Education law</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Federal circuit courts</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Federal district courts</topic><topic>First Amendment</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Injunctions</topic><topic>Plaintiffs</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious studies</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>State universities</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Violations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jorgensen, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helms, Lelia B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Urban lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jorgensen, James D.</au><au>Helms, Lelia B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recent Developments in Public Education Law: Postsecondary Education</atitle><jtitle>The Urban lawyer</jtitle><date>2009-06-22</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>455</spage><epage>487</epage><pages>455-487</pages><issn>0042-0905</issn><eissn>1942-6593</eissn><abstract>[...] a conservative student group challenged the State University of New York Student Association's use of advisory referenda to assist it in making funding allocation decisions for registered student organizations.3 The Second Circuit Court of Appeals first held that the student activity fees were a limited public forum requiring viewpoint neutrality in their distribution.4 The court then rejected the use of the advisory referenda, holding that voting on the propriety of funding for student organizations was inherently laden with viewpoint-based judgments and that the defendant's attempts to mitigate the influence of the referenda by applying objective standards to its funding decisions did not preserve the necessary protections of the First Amendment.5 In Beta Upsilon Chi v. Machen,6 the defendant university declined to recognize a Christian fraternity as a Registered Student Organization on its campus because the fraternity refused to accept non-Christian members.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Section of State and Local Government Law, American Bar Association. University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law</pub><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-0905
ispartof The Urban lawyer, 2009-06, Vol.41 (3), p.455-487
issn 0042-0905
1942-6593
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_208559249
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Accreditation
Amendments
ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE LAW
Appellate courts
Athletic recruitment
College campuses
College students
Colleges & universities
Defendants
Education law
Employment
Federal circuit courts
Federal court decisions
Federal district courts
First Amendment
Higher education
Injunctions
Plaintiffs
Religion
Religious studies
Sanctions
State universities
Surveys
Universities
Violations
title Recent Developments in Public Education Law: Postsecondary Education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A31%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recent%20Developments%20in%20Public%20Education%20Law:%20Postsecondary%20Education&rft.jtitle=The%20Urban%20lawyer&rft.au=Jorgensen,%20James%20D.&rft.date=2009-06-22&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=487&rft.pages=455-487&rft.issn=0042-0905&rft.eissn=1942-6593&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA211061258%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208559249&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A211061258&rft_jstor_id=27895719&rfr_iscdi=true