Recent Developments in Public Education Law: Postsecondary Education
[...] a conservative student group challenged the State University of New York Student Association's use of advisory referenda to assist it in making funding allocation decisions for registered student organizations.3 The Second Circuit Court of Appeals first held that the student activity fees...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Urban lawyer 2009-06, Vol.41 (3), p.455-487 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 487 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 455 |
container_title | The Urban lawyer |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Jorgensen, James D. Helms, Lelia B. |
description | [...] a conservative student group challenged the State University of New York Student Association's use of advisory referenda to assist it in making funding allocation decisions for registered student organizations.3 The Second Circuit Court of Appeals first held that the student activity fees were a limited public forum requiring viewpoint neutrality in their distribution.4 The court then rejected the use of the advisory referenda, holding that voting on the propriety of funding for student organizations was inherently laden with viewpoint-based judgments and that the defendant's attempts to mitigate the influence of the referenda by applying objective standards to its funding decisions did not preserve the necessary protections of the First Amendment.5 In Beta Upsilon Chi v. Machen,6 the defendant university declined to recognize a Christian fraternity as a Registered Student Organization on its campus because the fraternity refused to accept non-Christian members. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_208559249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A211061258</galeid><jstor_id>27895719</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A211061258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g309t-e639fddc61aeeb6111c496e78c818a547bfb2abad2d21ae9f9939b93f76351bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkFtLw0AQhYMoWKs_QQj6HNlLNsn4Vtp6gYBF9DlsdidlS7JbsxvFf-9CBRHKPMxh5jtnYE6SGYWcZYUAfprMCImaABHnyYX3O0I4oSyfJatXVGhDusJP7N1-iNqnxqabqe2NStd6UjIYZ9Naft2nG-eDR-WsluP33_IyOetk7_Hqt8-T94f12_Ipq18en5eLOttyAiHDgkOntSqoRGwLSqnKocCyUhWtpMjLtmuZbKVmmkUEOgAOLfCuLLigrebz5OaQux_dx4Q-NDs3jTaebBiphACWQ4RuD9BW9tgY27kwSjUYr5oFo5QUlIkqUtkRaosWR9k7i52J43_83RE-lsbBqKOG64Nh54Mbm_1ohvizhpUViJIC_wFOWnxd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208559249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recent Developments in Public Education Law: Postsecondary Education</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Jorgensen, James D. ; Helms, Lelia B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jorgensen, James D. ; Helms, Lelia B.</creatorcontrib><description>[...] a conservative student group challenged the State University of New York Student Association's use of advisory referenda to assist it in making funding allocation decisions for registered student organizations.3 The Second Circuit Court of Appeals first held that the student activity fees were a limited public forum requiring viewpoint neutrality in their distribution.4 The court then rejected the use of the advisory referenda, holding that voting on the propriety of funding for student organizations was inherently laden with viewpoint-based judgments and that the defendant's attempts to mitigate the influence of the referenda by applying objective standards to its funding decisions did not preserve the necessary protections of the First Amendment.5 In Beta Upsilon Chi v. Machen,6 the defendant university declined to recognize a Christian fraternity as a Registered Student Organization on its campus because the fraternity refused to accept non-Christian members.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-0905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-6593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Section of State and Local Government Law, American Bar Association. University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Amendments ; ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE LAW ; Appellate courts ; Athletic recruitment ; College campuses ; College students ; Colleges & universities ; Defendants ; Education law ; Employment ; Federal circuit courts ; Federal court decisions ; Federal district courts ; First Amendment ; Higher education ; Injunctions ; Plaintiffs ; Religion ; Religious studies ; Sanctions ; State universities ; Surveys ; Universities ; Violations</subject><ispartof>The Urban lawyer, 2009-06, Vol.41 (3), p.455-487</ispartof><rights>2009 American Bar Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Summer 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27895719$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27895719$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jorgensen, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helms, Lelia B.</creatorcontrib><title>Recent Developments in Public Education Law: Postsecondary Education</title><title>The Urban lawyer</title><description>[...] a conservative student group challenged the State University of New York Student Association's use of advisory referenda to assist it in making funding allocation decisions for registered student organizations.3 The Second Circuit Court of Appeals first held that the student activity fees were a limited public forum requiring viewpoint neutrality in their distribution.4 The court then rejected the use of the advisory referenda, holding that voting on the propriety of funding for student organizations was inherently laden with viewpoint-based judgments and that the defendant's attempts to mitigate the influence of the referenda by applying objective standards to its funding decisions did not preserve the necessary protections of the First Amendment.5 In Beta Upsilon Chi v. Machen,6 the defendant university declined to recognize a Christian fraternity as a Registered Student Organization on its campus because the fraternity refused to accept non-Christian members.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Amendments</subject><subject>ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE LAW</subject><subject>Appellate courts</subject><subject>Athletic recruitment</subject><subject>College campuses</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Education law</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Federal circuit courts</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Federal district courts</subject><subject>First Amendment</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Injunctions</subject><subject>Plaintiffs</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious studies</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>State universities</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Violations</subject><issn>0042-0905</issn><issn>1942-6593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkFtLw0AQhYMoWKs_QQj6HNlLNsn4Vtp6gYBF9DlsdidlS7JbsxvFf-9CBRHKPMxh5jtnYE6SGYWcZYUAfprMCImaABHnyYX3O0I4oSyfJatXVGhDusJP7N1-iNqnxqabqe2NStd6UjIYZ9Naft2nG-eDR-WsluP33_IyOetk7_Hqt8-T94f12_Ipq18en5eLOttyAiHDgkOntSqoRGwLSqnKocCyUhWtpMjLtmuZbKVmmkUEOgAOLfCuLLigrebz5OaQux_dx4Q-NDs3jTaebBiphACWQ4RuD9BW9tgY27kwSjUYr5oFo5QUlIkqUtkRaosWR9k7i52J43_83RE-lsbBqKOG64Nh54Mbm_1ohvizhpUViJIC_wFOWnxd</recordid><startdate>20090622</startdate><enddate>20090622</enddate><creator>Jorgensen, James D.</creator><creator>Helms, Lelia B.</creator><general>Section of State and Local Government Law, American Bar Association. University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090622</creationdate><title>Recent Developments in Public Education Law: Postsecondary Education</title><author>Jorgensen, James D. ; Helms, Lelia B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g309t-e639fddc61aeeb6111c496e78c818a547bfb2abad2d21ae9f9939b93f76351bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Amendments</topic><topic>ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE LAW</topic><topic>Appellate courts</topic><topic>Athletic recruitment</topic><topic>College campuses</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Education law</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Federal circuit courts</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Federal district courts</topic><topic>First Amendment</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Injunctions</topic><topic>Plaintiffs</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious studies</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>State universities</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Violations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jorgensen, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helms, Lelia B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Urban lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jorgensen, James D.</au><au>Helms, Lelia B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recent Developments in Public Education Law: Postsecondary Education</atitle><jtitle>The Urban lawyer</jtitle><date>2009-06-22</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>455</spage><epage>487</epage><pages>455-487</pages><issn>0042-0905</issn><eissn>1942-6593</eissn><abstract>[...] a conservative student group challenged the State University of New York Student Association's use of advisory referenda to assist it in making funding allocation decisions for registered student organizations.3 The Second Circuit Court of Appeals first held that the student activity fees were a limited public forum requiring viewpoint neutrality in their distribution.4 The court then rejected the use of the advisory referenda, holding that voting on the propriety of funding for student organizations was inherently laden with viewpoint-based judgments and that the defendant's attempts to mitigate the influence of the referenda by applying objective standards to its funding decisions did not preserve the necessary protections of the First Amendment.5 In Beta Upsilon Chi v. Machen,6 the defendant university declined to recognize a Christian fraternity as a Registered Student Organization on its campus because the fraternity refused to accept non-Christian members.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Section of State and Local Government Law, American Bar Association. University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law</pub><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-0905 |
ispartof | The Urban lawyer, 2009-06, Vol.41 (3), p.455-487 |
issn | 0042-0905 1942-6593 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_208559249 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Accreditation Amendments ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE LAW Appellate courts Athletic recruitment College campuses College students Colleges & universities Defendants Education law Employment Federal circuit courts Federal court decisions Federal district courts First Amendment Higher education Injunctions Plaintiffs Religion Religious studies Sanctions State universities Surveys Universities Violations |
title | Recent Developments in Public Education Law: Postsecondary Education |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A31%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recent%20Developments%20in%20Public%20Education%20Law:%20Postsecondary%20Education&rft.jtitle=The%20Urban%20lawyer&rft.au=Jorgensen,%20James%20D.&rft.date=2009-06-22&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=487&rft.pages=455-487&rft.issn=0042-0905&rft.eissn=1942-6593&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA211061258%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208559249&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A211061258&rft_jstor_id=27895719&rfr_iscdi=true |