Application of Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode) and Danio rerio embryo (zebrafish) as model systems to screen for developmental and reproductive toxicity of Piperazine compounds

To enable selection of novel chemicals for new processes, there is a recognized need for alternative toxicity screening assays to assess potential risks to man and the environment. For human health hazard assessment these screening assays need to be translational to humans, have high throughput capa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicology in vitro 2017-10, Vol.44, p.11-16
Hauptverfasser: Racz, Peter I., Wildwater, Marjolein, Rooseboom, Martijn, Kerkhof, Engelien, Pieters, Raymond, Yebra-Pimentel, Elena Santidrian, Dirks, Ron P., Spaink, Herman P., Smulders, Chantal, Whale, Graham F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue
container_start_page 11
container_title Toxicology in vitro
container_volume 44
creator Racz, Peter I.
Wildwater, Marjolein
Rooseboom, Martijn
Kerkhof, Engelien
Pieters, Raymond
Yebra-Pimentel, Elena Santidrian
Dirks, Ron P.
Spaink, Herman P.
Smulders, Chantal
Whale, Graham F.
description To enable selection of novel chemicals for new processes, there is a recognized need for alternative toxicity screening assays to assess potential risks to man and the environment. For human health hazard assessment these screening assays need to be translational to humans, have high throughput capability, and from an animal welfare perspective be harmonized with the principles of the 3Rs (Reduction, Refinement, Replacement). In the area of toxicology a number of cell culture systems are available but while these have some predictive value, they are not ideally suited for the prediction of developmental and reproductive toxicology (DART). This is because they often lack biotransformation capacity, multicellular or multi- organ complexity, for example, the hypothalamus pituitary gonad (HPG) axis and the complete life cycle of whole organisms. To try to overcome some of these limitations in this study, we have used Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode) and Danio rerio embryos (zebrafish) as alternative assays for DART hazard assessment of some candidate chemicals being considered for a new commercial application. Nematodes exposed to Piperazine and one of the analogs tested showed a slight delay in development compared to untreated animals but only at high concentrations and with Piperazine as the most sensitive compound. Total brood size of the nematodes was also reduced primarily by Piperazine and one of the analogs. In zebrafish Piperazine and analogs showed developmental delays. Malformations and mortality in individual fish were also scored. Significant malformations were most sensitively identified with Piperazine, significant mortality was only observed in Piperazine and only at the higest dose. Thus, Piperazine seemed the most toxic compound for both nematodes and zebrafish. The results of the nematode and zebrafish studies were in alignment with data obtained from conventional mammalian toxicity studies indicating that these have potential as developmental toxicity screening systems. The results of these studies also provided reassurance that none of the Piperazines tested are likely to have any significant developmental and/or reproductive toxicity issues to humans when used in their commercial applications. •Nematodes and zebrafish embryos can be used to prioritize Piperazine analogs for DART.•Piperazine shows mild DART effects in mammals like in the 3R systems from this study.•Piperazine analogs are unlikely to have strong DART issues based on data f
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.06.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2085144326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0887233317301510</els_id><sourcerecordid>2085144326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-d60845b19ec8c9263d0a151c9d85d86feaf0fa7f155b1872c61e8fdc7c9868793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2OFCEURonROD2tD-DGkLgZF1UC9QMVV5PWUZNJdKFrQsHFoVMFJVAdex7LJ5S2R5duYHPu4X58CL2gpKaE9m_2dXaHmhHKa9LXhLBHaEMFH6qGcv4YbYgQvGJN01ygy5T2hJBOMPIUXTDRDZ1o-Ab9ul6WyWmVXfA4WLxT4EO8U6Nx2SUME3xXPuErD7PKwcBrrLzB75R3AUeI5YR5jMeAr-5hjMq6dFeQhOfCTjgdU4Y54Rxw0hHAYxsiNnCAKSwz-KymP74ISwxm1SUOFPin0y4fT-t8cQtEde88YB3mJazepGfoiVVTgucP9xZ9u3n_dfexuv384dPu-rbSLWtzZXoi2m6kA2ihB9Y3hijaUT0Y0RnRW1CWWMUt7QokONM9BWGN5noQffnEZotenb1ltx8rpCz3YY2-PCkZER1t26ZYt4ieKR1DShGsXKKbVTxKSuSpJbmXJZY8tSRJL0tLZeblg3kdZzD_Jv7WUoC3ZwBKvoODKJN24DUYF0FnaYL7j_43H_im6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2085144326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode) and Danio rerio embryo (zebrafish) as model systems to screen for developmental and reproductive toxicity of Piperazine compounds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Racz, Peter I. ; Wildwater, Marjolein ; Rooseboom, Martijn ; Kerkhof, Engelien ; Pieters, Raymond ; Yebra-Pimentel, Elena Santidrian ; Dirks, Ron P. ; Spaink, Herman P. ; Smulders, Chantal ; Whale, Graham F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Racz, Peter I. ; Wildwater, Marjolein ; Rooseboom, Martijn ; Kerkhof, Engelien ; Pieters, Raymond ; Yebra-Pimentel, Elena Santidrian ; Dirks, Ron P. ; Spaink, Herman P. ; Smulders, Chantal ; Whale, Graham F.</creatorcontrib><description>To enable selection of novel chemicals for new processes, there is a recognized need for alternative toxicity screening assays to assess potential risks to man and the environment. For human health hazard assessment these screening assays need to be translational to humans, have high throughput capability, and from an animal welfare perspective be harmonized with the principles of the 3Rs (Reduction, Refinement, Replacement). In the area of toxicology a number of cell culture systems are available but while these have some predictive value, they are not ideally suited for the prediction of developmental and reproductive toxicology (DART). This is because they often lack biotransformation capacity, multicellular or multi- organ complexity, for example, the hypothalamus pituitary gonad (HPG) axis and the complete life cycle of whole organisms. To try to overcome some of these limitations in this study, we have used Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode) and Danio rerio embryos (zebrafish) as alternative assays for DART hazard assessment of some candidate chemicals being considered for a new commercial application. Nematodes exposed to Piperazine and one of the analogs tested showed a slight delay in development compared to untreated animals but only at high concentrations and with Piperazine as the most sensitive compound. Total brood size of the nematodes was also reduced primarily by Piperazine and one of the analogs. In zebrafish Piperazine and analogs showed developmental delays. Malformations and mortality in individual fish were also scored. Significant malformations were most sensitively identified with Piperazine, significant mortality was only observed in Piperazine and only at the higest dose. Thus, Piperazine seemed the most toxic compound for both nematodes and zebrafish. The results of the nematode and zebrafish studies were in alignment with data obtained from conventional mammalian toxicity studies indicating that these have potential as developmental toxicity screening systems. The results of these studies also provided reassurance that none of the Piperazines tested are likely to have any significant developmental and/or reproductive toxicity issues to humans when used in their commercial applications. •Nematodes and zebrafish embryos can be used to prioritize Piperazine analogs for DART.•Piperazine shows mild DART effects in mammals like in the 3R systems from this study.•Piperazine analogs are unlikely to have strong DART issues based on data from this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-2333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3177</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.06.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28595837</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analogs ; Animal welfare ; Animals ; Assaying ; Biotransformation ; Caenorhabditis elegans ; Caenorhabditis elegans - drug effects ; Caenorhabditis elegans - embryology ; Cell culture ; Chemicals ; Danio rerio ; Data processing ; Development ; Ecological risk assessment ; Embryo, Nonmammalian ; Embryonic Development - drug effects ; Embryos ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental hazards ; Hazard assessment ; Health hazards ; Hypothalamus ; Life cycle engineering ; Life cycles ; Models, Animal ; Mortality ; Nematode ; Nematodes ; Organic chemistry ; Piperazine ; Piperazines - toxicity ; Pituitary ; Predictions ; Reproduction ; Reproduction - drug effects ; Screening ; Toxicity ; Toxicology ; Zebrafish ; Zebrafish - embryology</subject><ispartof>Toxicology in vitro, 2017-10, Vol.44, p.11-16</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-d60845b19ec8c9263d0a151c9d85d86feaf0fa7f155b1872c61e8fdc7c9868793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-d60845b19ec8c9263d0a151c9d85d86feaf0fa7f155b1872c61e8fdc7c9868793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2017.06.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28595837$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Racz, Peter I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wildwater, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooseboom, Martijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerkhof, Engelien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieters, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yebra-Pimentel, Elena Santidrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dirks, Ron P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spaink, Herman P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smulders, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whale, Graham F.</creatorcontrib><title>Application of Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode) and Danio rerio embryo (zebrafish) as model systems to screen for developmental and reproductive toxicity of Piperazine compounds</title><title>Toxicology in vitro</title><addtitle>Toxicol In Vitro</addtitle><description>To enable selection of novel chemicals for new processes, there is a recognized need for alternative toxicity screening assays to assess potential risks to man and the environment. For human health hazard assessment these screening assays need to be translational to humans, have high throughput capability, and from an animal welfare perspective be harmonized with the principles of the 3Rs (Reduction, Refinement, Replacement). In the area of toxicology a number of cell culture systems are available but while these have some predictive value, they are not ideally suited for the prediction of developmental and reproductive toxicology (DART). This is because they often lack biotransformation capacity, multicellular or multi- organ complexity, for example, the hypothalamus pituitary gonad (HPG) axis and the complete life cycle of whole organisms. To try to overcome some of these limitations in this study, we have used Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode) and Danio rerio embryos (zebrafish) as alternative assays for DART hazard assessment of some candidate chemicals being considered for a new commercial application. Nematodes exposed to Piperazine and one of the analogs tested showed a slight delay in development compared to untreated animals but only at high concentrations and with Piperazine as the most sensitive compound. Total brood size of the nematodes was also reduced primarily by Piperazine and one of the analogs. In zebrafish Piperazine and analogs showed developmental delays. Malformations and mortality in individual fish were also scored. Significant malformations were most sensitively identified with Piperazine, significant mortality was only observed in Piperazine and only at the higest dose. Thus, Piperazine seemed the most toxic compound for both nematodes and zebrafish. The results of the nematode and zebrafish studies were in alignment with data obtained from conventional mammalian toxicity studies indicating that these have potential as developmental toxicity screening systems. The results of these studies also provided reassurance that none of the Piperazines tested are likely to have any significant developmental and/or reproductive toxicity issues to humans when used in their commercial applications. •Nematodes and zebrafish embryos can be used to prioritize Piperazine analogs for DART.•Piperazine shows mild DART effects in mammals like in the 3R systems from this study.•Piperazine analogs are unlikely to have strong DART issues based on data from this study.</description><subject>Analogs</subject><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Biotransformation</subject><subject>Caenorhabditis elegans</subject><subject>Caenorhabditis elegans - drug effects</subject><subject>Caenorhabditis elegans - embryology</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>Danio rerio</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Embryo, Nonmammalian</subject><subject>Embryonic Development - drug effects</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental hazards</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Hypothalamus</subject><subject>Life cycle engineering</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nematode</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Piperazine</subject><subject>Piperazines - toxicity</subject><subject>Pituitary</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproduction - drug effects</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Zebrafish</subject><subject>Zebrafish - embryology</subject><issn>0887-2333</issn><issn>1879-3177</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2OFCEURonROD2tD-DGkLgZF1UC9QMVV5PWUZNJdKFrQsHFoVMFJVAdex7LJ5S2R5duYHPu4X58CL2gpKaE9m_2dXaHmhHKa9LXhLBHaEMFH6qGcv4YbYgQvGJN01ygy5T2hJBOMPIUXTDRDZ1o-Ab9ul6WyWmVXfA4WLxT4EO8U6Nx2SUME3xXPuErD7PKwcBrrLzB75R3AUeI5YR5jMeAr-5hjMq6dFeQhOfCTjgdU4Y54Rxw0hHAYxsiNnCAKSwz-KymP74ISwxm1SUOFPin0y4fT-t8cQtEde88YB3mJazepGfoiVVTgucP9xZ9u3n_dfexuv384dPu-rbSLWtzZXoi2m6kA2ihB9Y3hijaUT0Y0RnRW1CWWMUt7QokONM9BWGN5noQffnEZotenb1ltx8rpCz3YY2-PCkZER1t26ZYt4ieKR1DShGsXKKbVTxKSuSpJbmXJZY8tSRJL0tLZeblg3kdZzD_Jv7WUoC3ZwBKvoODKJN24DUYF0FnaYL7j_43H_im6A</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Racz, Peter I.</creator><creator>Wildwater, Marjolein</creator><creator>Rooseboom, Martijn</creator><creator>Kerkhof, Engelien</creator><creator>Pieters, Raymond</creator><creator>Yebra-Pimentel, Elena Santidrian</creator><creator>Dirks, Ron P.</creator><creator>Spaink, Herman P.</creator><creator>Smulders, Chantal</creator><creator>Whale, Graham F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Application of Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode) and Danio rerio embryo (zebrafish) as model systems to screen for developmental and reproductive toxicity of Piperazine compounds</title><author>Racz, Peter I. ; Wildwater, Marjolein ; Rooseboom, Martijn ; Kerkhof, Engelien ; Pieters, Raymond ; Yebra-Pimentel, Elena Santidrian ; Dirks, Ron P. ; Spaink, Herman P. ; Smulders, Chantal ; Whale, Graham F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-d60845b19ec8c9263d0a151c9d85d86feaf0fa7f155b1872c61e8fdc7c9868793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analogs</topic><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Biotransformation</topic><topic>Caenorhabditis elegans</topic><topic>Caenorhabditis elegans - drug effects</topic><topic>Caenorhabditis elegans - embryology</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>Danio rerio</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Embryo, Nonmammalian</topic><topic>Embryonic Development - drug effects</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental hazards</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Hypothalamus</topic><topic>Life cycle engineering</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nematode</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Piperazine</topic><topic>Piperazines - toxicity</topic><topic>Pituitary</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproduction - drug effects</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Zebrafish</topic><topic>Zebrafish - embryology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Racz, Peter I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wildwater, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooseboom, Martijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerkhof, Engelien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieters, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yebra-Pimentel, Elena Santidrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dirks, Ron P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spaink, Herman P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smulders, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whale, Graham F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Toxicology in vitro</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Racz, Peter I.</au><au>Wildwater, Marjolein</au><au>Rooseboom, Martijn</au><au>Kerkhof, Engelien</au><au>Pieters, Raymond</au><au>Yebra-Pimentel, Elena Santidrian</au><au>Dirks, Ron P.</au><au>Spaink, Herman P.</au><au>Smulders, Chantal</au><au>Whale, Graham F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode) and Danio rerio embryo (zebrafish) as model systems to screen for developmental and reproductive toxicity of Piperazine compounds</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology in vitro</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol In Vitro</addtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>44</volume><spage>11</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>11-16</pages><issn>0887-2333</issn><eissn>1879-3177</eissn><abstract>To enable selection of novel chemicals for new processes, there is a recognized need for alternative toxicity screening assays to assess potential risks to man and the environment. For human health hazard assessment these screening assays need to be translational to humans, have high throughput capability, and from an animal welfare perspective be harmonized with the principles of the 3Rs (Reduction, Refinement, Replacement). In the area of toxicology a number of cell culture systems are available but while these have some predictive value, they are not ideally suited for the prediction of developmental and reproductive toxicology (DART). This is because they often lack biotransformation capacity, multicellular or multi- organ complexity, for example, the hypothalamus pituitary gonad (HPG) axis and the complete life cycle of whole organisms. To try to overcome some of these limitations in this study, we have used Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode) and Danio rerio embryos (zebrafish) as alternative assays for DART hazard assessment of some candidate chemicals being considered for a new commercial application. Nematodes exposed to Piperazine and one of the analogs tested showed a slight delay in development compared to untreated animals but only at high concentrations and with Piperazine as the most sensitive compound. Total brood size of the nematodes was also reduced primarily by Piperazine and one of the analogs. In zebrafish Piperazine and analogs showed developmental delays. Malformations and mortality in individual fish were also scored. Significant malformations were most sensitively identified with Piperazine, significant mortality was only observed in Piperazine and only at the higest dose. Thus, Piperazine seemed the most toxic compound for both nematodes and zebrafish. The results of the nematode and zebrafish studies were in alignment with data obtained from conventional mammalian toxicity studies indicating that these have potential as developmental toxicity screening systems. The results of these studies also provided reassurance that none of the Piperazines tested are likely to have any significant developmental and/or reproductive toxicity issues to humans when used in their commercial applications. •Nematodes and zebrafish embryos can be used to prioritize Piperazine analogs for DART.•Piperazine shows mild DART effects in mammals like in the 3R systems from this study.•Piperazine analogs are unlikely to have strong DART issues based on data from this study.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28595837</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tiv.2017.06.002</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-2333
ispartof Toxicology in vitro, 2017-10, Vol.44, p.11-16
issn 0887-2333
1879-3177
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2085144326
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Analogs
Animal welfare
Animals
Assaying
Biotransformation
Caenorhabditis elegans
Caenorhabditis elegans - drug effects
Caenorhabditis elegans - embryology
Cell culture
Chemicals
Danio rerio
Data processing
Development
Ecological risk assessment
Embryo, Nonmammalian
Embryonic Development - drug effects
Embryos
Environmental assessment
Environmental hazards
Hazard assessment
Health hazards
Hypothalamus
Life cycle engineering
Life cycles
Models, Animal
Mortality
Nematode
Nematodes
Organic chemistry
Piperazine
Piperazines - toxicity
Pituitary
Predictions
Reproduction
Reproduction - drug effects
Screening
Toxicity
Toxicology
Zebrafish
Zebrafish - embryology
title Application of Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode) and Danio rerio embryo (zebrafish) as model systems to screen for developmental and reproductive toxicity of Piperazine compounds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A51%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20Caenorhabditis%20elegans%20(nematode)%20and%20Danio%20rerio%20embryo%20(zebrafish)%20as%20model%20systems%20to%20screen%20for%20developmental%20and%20reproductive%20toxicity%20of%20Piperazine%20compounds&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20in%20vitro&rft.au=Racz,%20Peter%20I.&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=44&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=11-16&rft.issn=0887-2333&rft.eissn=1879-3177&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tiv.2017.06.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2085144326%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2085144326&rft_id=info:pmid/28595837&rft_els_id=S0887233317301510&rfr_iscdi=true