Analytic Samplers and the Combinatorial Rejection Method

Boltzmann samplers, introduced by Duchon et al. in 2001, make it possible to uniformly draw approximate size objects from any class which can be specified through the symbolic method. This, through by evaluating the associated generating functions to obtain the correct branching probabilities. But t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2014-11
Hauptverfasser: Bodini, Olivier, Lumbroso, Jérémie, Rolin, Nicolas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Bodini, Olivier
Lumbroso, Jérémie
Rolin, Nicolas
description Boltzmann samplers, introduced by Duchon et al. in 2001, make it possible to uniformly draw approximate size objects from any class which can be specified through the symbolic method. This, through by evaluating the associated generating functions to obtain the correct branching probabilities. But these samplers require generating functions, in particular in the neighborhood of their sunglarity, which is a complex problem; they also require picking an appropriate tuning value to best control the size of generated objects. Although Pivoteau~\etal have brought a sweeping question to the first question, with the introduction of their Newton oracle, questions remain. By adapting the rejection method, a classical tool from the random, we show how to obtain a variant of the Boltzmann sampler framework, which is tolerant of approximation, even large ones. Our goal for this is twofold: this allows for exact sampling with approximate values; but this also allows much more flexibility in tuning samplers. For the class of simple trees, we will try to show how this could be used to more easily calibrate samplers.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2084882111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2084882111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20848821113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzLEKwjAUQNEgCBbtPwScC8lLq1mlKC4u6l6e7ZOmpElN0sG_18EPcLrL4S5YBkrJQpcAK5bHOAghYLeHqlIZ0weH9p1My284TpZC5Og6nnritR8fxmHywaDlVxqoTcY7fqHU-27Dlk-0kfJf12x7Ot7rczEF_5oppmbwc_jOYwNCl1qDlFL9pz49mzX7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2084882111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analytic Samplers and the Combinatorial Rejection Method</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Bodini, Olivier ; Lumbroso, Jérémie ; Rolin, Nicolas</creator><creatorcontrib>Bodini, Olivier ; Lumbroso, Jérémie ; Rolin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><description>Boltzmann samplers, introduced by Duchon et al. in 2001, make it possible to uniformly draw approximate size objects from any class which can be specified through the symbolic method. This, through by evaluating the associated generating functions to obtain the correct branching probabilities. But these samplers require generating functions, in particular in the neighborhood of their sunglarity, which is a complex problem; they also require picking an appropriate tuning value to best control the size of generated objects. Although Pivoteau~\etal have brought a sweeping question to the first question, with the introduction of their Newton oracle, questions remain. By adapting the rejection method, a classical tool from the random, we show how to obtain a variant of the Boltzmann sampler framework, which is tolerant of approximation, even large ones. Our goal for this is twofold: this allows for exact sampling with approximate values; but this also allows much more flexibility in tuning samplers. For the class of simple trees, we will try to show how this could be used to more easily calibrate samplers.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Combinatorial analysis ; Mathematical analysis ; Rejection ; Samplers ; Tuning</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2014-11</ispartof><rights>2014. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bodini, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbroso, Jérémie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><title>Analytic Samplers and the Combinatorial Rejection Method</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Boltzmann samplers, introduced by Duchon et al. in 2001, make it possible to uniformly draw approximate size objects from any class which can be specified through the symbolic method. This, through by evaluating the associated generating functions to obtain the correct branching probabilities. But these samplers require generating functions, in particular in the neighborhood of their sunglarity, which is a complex problem; they also require picking an appropriate tuning value to best control the size of generated objects. Although Pivoteau~\etal have brought a sweeping question to the first question, with the introduction of their Newton oracle, questions remain. By adapting the rejection method, a classical tool from the random, we show how to obtain a variant of the Boltzmann sampler framework, which is tolerant of approximation, even large ones. Our goal for this is twofold: this allows for exact sampling with approximate values; but this also allows much more flexibility in tuning samplers. For the class of simple trees, we will try to show how this could be used to more easily calibrate samplers.</description><subject>Combinatorial analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Rejection</subject><subject>Samplers</subject><subject>Tuning</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzLEKwjAUQNEgCBbtPwScC8lLq1mlKC4u6l6e7ZOmpElN0sG_18EPcLrL4S5YBkrJQpcAK5bHOAghYLeHqlIZ0weH9p1My284TpZC5Og6nnritR8fxmHywaDlVxqoTcY7fqHU-27Dlk-0kfJf12x7Ot7rczEF_5oppmbwc_jOYwNCl1qDlFL9pz49mzX7</recordid><startdate>20141113</startdate><enddate>20141113</enddate><creator>Bodini, Olivier</creator><creator>Lumbroso, Jérémie</creator><creator>Rolin, Nicolas</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141113</creationdate><title>Analytic Samplers and the Combinatorial Rejection Method</title><author>Bodini, Olivier ; Lumbroso, Jérémie ; Rolin, Nicolas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20848821113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Combinatorial analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Rejection</topic><topic>Samplers</topic><topic>Tuning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bodini, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbroso, Jérémie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bodini, Olivier</au><au>Lumbroso, Jérémie</au><au>Rolin, Nicolas</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Analytic Samplers and the Combinatorial Rejection Method</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2014-11-13</date><risdate>2014</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Boltzmann samplers, introduced by Duchon et al. in 2001, make it possible to uniformly draw approximate size objects from any class which can be specified through the symbolic method. This, through by evaluating the associated generating functions to obtain the correct branching probabilities. But these samplers require generating functions, in particular in the neighborhood of their sunglarity, which is a complex problem; they also require picking an appropriate tuning value to best control the size of generated objects. Although Pivoteau~\etal have brought a sweeping question to the first question, with the introduction of their Newton oracle, questions remain. By adapting the rejection method, a classical tool from the random, we show how to obtain a variant of the Boltzmann sampler framework, which is tolerant of approximation, even large ones. Our goal for this is twofold: this allows for exact sampling with approximate values; but this also allows much more flexibility in tuning samplers. For the class of simple trees, we will try to show how this could be used to more easily calibrate samplers.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2014-11
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2084882111
source Free E- Journals
subjects Combinatorial analysis
Mathematical analysis
Rejection
Samplers
Tuning
title Analytic Samplers and the Combinatorial Rejection Method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A07%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Analytic%20Samplers%20and%20the%20Combinatorial%20Rejection%20Method&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Bodini,%20Olivier&rft.date=2014-11-13&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2084882111%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2084882111&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true