How Stable Is Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? A Cross-Time, Cross-National Analysis
Research on issue ownership is accelerating and so is its use in studies of voting and party behaviour. Yet we do not know how stable issue ownership is. Does it describe a solid, persistent association between a party and an issue in the eyes of the electorate, or does it describe a more fluid and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Political studies 2017-06, Vol.65 (2), p.475-492 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 492 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 475 |
container_title | Political studies |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Seeberg, Henrik Bech |
description | Research on issue ownership is accelerating and so is its use in studies of voting and party behaviour. Yet we do not know how stable issue ownership is. Does it describe a solid, persistent association between a party and an issue in the eyes of the electorate, or does it describe a more fluid and fragile issue reputation of a party among the electorate? Theoretical and empirical work suggests both stability and variability in issue ownership. To get closer to an answer, this article presents and analyses unprecedented comprehensive data on issue ownership. The analysis identifies stability rather than change in issue ownership over time and similarity more than difference across countries, and therefore suggests that issue ownership is a general and long-term rather than a local and short-term phenomenon. The implications for how voters perceive parties are important. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0032321716650224 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2084870119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0032321716650224</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2084870119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-ebbf7d139c9b9588142300532d55b3733677db02fa3ce6aa34aada18aa469e933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd49BrwazSTZZPckpagtFFuwHjwts7tZTdl2a7Kl9Obf8O_5S9ylBUHwMjPM--DxCLkEfgNgzC3nUkgBBrSOuBDqiPRAacMSoeJj0utg1uGn5CyEBecghVY98jqqt_S5wayydBzorK5c43Ks6Ax942z4_vxq_2Fj6XS7sj68u_UdHdChr0Ngc7e014f7CRtXr1rhoB274MI5OSmxCvbisPvk5eF-PhyxyfRxPBxMWC4jaJjNstIUIJM8yZIojkEJyXkkRRFFmTRSamOKjIsSZW41olSIBUKMqHRiEyn75Grvu_b1x8aGJl3UG9-GCKngsYoNB0haFt-z8i6tt2W69m6JfpcCT7sC078FthK2lwR8s7-m__J_AItvbws</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2084870119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Stable Is Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? A Cross-Time, Cross-National Analysis</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Seeberg, Henrik Bech</creator><creatorcontrib>Seeberg, Henrik Bech</creatorcontrib><description>Research on issue ownership is accelerating and so is its use in studies of voting and party behaviour. Yet we do not know how stable issue ownership is. Does it describe a solid, persistent association between a party and an issue in the eyes of the electorate, or does it describe a more fluid and fragile issue reputation of a party among the electorate? Theoretical and empirical work suggests both stability and variability in issue ownership. To get closer to an answer, this article presents and analyses unprecedented comprehensive data on issue ownership. The analysis identifies stability rather than change in issue ownership over time and similarity more than difference across countries, and therefore suggests that issue ownership is a general and long-term rather than a local and short-term phenomenon. The implications for how voters perceive parties are important.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0032321716650224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; International comparisons ; Ownership ; Political parties ; Reputations ; Variability ; Voter behavior ; Voters ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Political studies, 2017-06, Vol.65 (2), p.475-492</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-ebbf7d139c9b9588142300532d55b3733677db02fa3ce6aa34aada18aa469e933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-ebbf7d139c9b9588142300532d55b3733677db02fa3ce6aa34aada18aa469e933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0032321716650224$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032321716650224$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seeberg, Henrik Bech</creatorcontrib><title>How Stable Is Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? A Cross-Time, Cross-National Analysis</title><title>Political studies</title><description>Research on issue ownership is accelerating and so is its use in studies of voting and party behaviour. Yet we do not know how stable issue ownership is. Does it describe a solid, persistent association between a party and an issue in the eyes of the electorate, or does it describe a more fluid and fragile issue reputation of a party among the electorate? Theoretical and empirical work suggests both stability and variability in issue ownership. To get closer to an answer, this article presents and analyses unprecedented comprehensive data on issue ownership. The analysis identifies stability rather than change in issue ownership over time and similarity more than difference across countries, and therefore suggests that issue ownership is a general and long-term rather than a local and short-term phenomenon. The implications for how voters perceive parties are important.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>International comparisons</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0032-3217</issn><issn>1467-9248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd49BrwazSTZZPckpagtFFuwHjwts7tZTdl2a7Kl9Obf8O_5S9ylBUHwMjPM--DxCLkEfgNgzC3nUkgBBrSOuBDqiPRAacMSoeJj0utg1uGn5CyEBecghVY98jqqt_S5wayydBzorK5c43Ks6Ax942z4_vxq_2Fj6XS7sj68u_UdHdChr0Ngc7e014f7CRtXr1rhoB274MI5OSmxCvbisPvk5eF-PhyxyfRxPBxMWC4jaJjNstIUIJM8yZIojkEJyXkkRRFFmTRSamOKjIsSZW41olSIBUKMqHRiEyn75Grvu_b1x8aGJl3UG9-GCKngsYoNB0haFt-z8i6tt2W69m6JfpcCT7sC078FthK2lwR8s7-m__J_AItvbws</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Seeberg, Henrik Bech</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>How Stable Is Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? A Cross-Time, Cross-National Analysis</title><author>Seeberg, Henrik Bech</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-ebbf7d139c9b9588142300532d55b3733677db02fa3ce6aa34aada18aa469e933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>International comparisons</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seeberg, Henrik Bech</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seeberg, Henrik Bech</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Stable Is Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? A Cross-Time, Cross-National Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Political studies</jtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>475</spage><epage>492</epage><pages>475-492</pages><issn>0032-3217</issn><eissn>1467-9248</eissn><abstract>Research on issue ownership is accelerating and so is its use in studies of voting and party behaviour. Yet we do not know how stable issue ownership is. Does it describe a solid, persistent association between a party and an issue in the eyes of the electorate, or does it describe a more fluid and fragile issue reputation of a party among the electorate? Theoretical and empirical work suggests both stability and variability in issue ownership. To get closer to an answer, this article presents and analyses unprecedented comprehensive data on issue ownership. The analysis identifies stability rather than change in issue ownership over time and similarity more than difference across countries, and therefore suggests that issue ownership is a general and long-term rather than a local and short-term phenomenon. The implications for how voters perceive parties are important.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0032321716650224</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-3217 |
ispartof | Political studies, 2017-06, Vol.65 (2), p.475-492 |
issn | 0032-3217 1467-9248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2084870119 |
source | Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Comparative analysis International comparisons Ownership Political parties Reputations Variability Voter behavior Voters Voting |
title | How Stable Is Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? A Cross-Time, Cross-National Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A59%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Stable%20Is%20Political%20Parties%E2%80%99%20Issue%20Ownership?%20A%20Cross-Time,%20Cross-National%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Political%20studies&rft.au=Seeberg,%20Henrik%20Bech&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=475&rft.epage=492&rft.pages=475-492&rft.issn=0032-3217&rft.eissn=1467-9248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0032321716650224&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2084870119%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2084870119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0032321716650224&rfr_iscdi=true |