Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis
Corporate foresight is applied with the expectation that it will help firms to break away from path dependency, help decision makers to define superior courses of action, and ultimately enable superior firm performance. To empirically test this assumption, we developed a model that judges a firm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Technological forecasting & social change 2018-04, Vol.129, p.105-116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 116 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | Technological forecasting & social change |
container_volume | 129 |
creator | Rohrbeck, René Kum, Menes Etingue |
description | Corporate foresight is applied with the expectation that it will help firms to break away from path dependency, help decision makers to define superior courses of action, and ultimately enable superior firm performance. To empirically test this assumption, we developed a model that judges a firm's future preparedness (FP) by assessing the need for corporate foresight (CF) and comparing it to the maturity of its CF practices. We apply a longitudinal research design in which we measure future preparedness in 2008 and its impact on firm performance in 2015. The results indicated future preparedness to be a powerful predictor for becoming an outperformer in the industry, for attaining superior profitability, and for gaining superior market capitalization growth. In the article, we also calculate the average bonus/discount that can be expected by sufficiently/insufficiently future-prepared firms.
•We developed a model for assessing the future preparedness (FP) of a firm•We match FP data from 2008 and performance in 2015•Future-prepared firms outperformed the average by a 33% higher profitability•Future-prepared firms outperform the average by a 200% higher growth•Firms with deficiencies face with a performance discount of 37% to 108%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2084459728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0040162517302287</els_id><sourcerecordid>2084459728</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a59cb8837183e661cd9b3bf8f74033bcda912dfa066d74375c899b799ddf2c1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BQm4bs2jbRJXDoMvGJiNrkOax0xK29QkI_jv7TC6dnU353zc8wFwi1GJEW7uuzJbvXch2pIgzEpMSoTpGVhgzmhR10icgwVCFSpwQ-pLcJVShxBilDcLsF2HOIWosoVHQvK7fYZqNNDnBP0wKZ1hGKHzcYCTjXNmUKO2D3AF-zDufD4YP6p-rqj-O_l0DS6c6pO9-b1L8PH89L5-LTbbl7f1alPoiqBcqFrolnPKMKe2abA2oqWt445ViNJWGyUwMU6hpjGsoqzWXIiWCWGMIxobugR3J-4Uw-fBpiy7cIjzE0kSxKuqFozwOdWcUjqGlKJ1cop-UPFbYiSP8mQn_-TJozyJiZzlzcXHU9HOG768jTJpb-fhxkerszTB_4f4AS0ZfCc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2084459728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Rohrbeck, René ; Kum, Menes Etingue</creator><creatorcontrib>Rohrbeck, René ; Kum, Menes Etingue</creatorcontrib><description>Corporate foresight is applied with the expectation that it will help firms to break away from path dependency, help decision makers to define superior courses of action, and ultimately enable superior firm performance. To empirically test this assumption, we developed a model that judges a firm's future preparedness (FP) by assessing the need for corporate foresight (CF) and comparing it to the maturity of its CF practices. We apply a longitudinal research design in which we measure future preparedness in 2008 and its impact on firm performance in 2015. The results indicated future preparedness to be a powerful predictor for becoming an outperformer in the industry, for attaining superior profitability, and for gaining superior market capitalization growth. In the article, we also calculate the average bonus/discount that can be expected by sufficiently/insufficiently future-prepared firms.
•We developed a model for assessing the future preparedness (FP) of a firm•We match FP data from 2008 and performance in 2015•Future-prepared firms outperformed the average by a 33% higher profitability•Future-prepared firms outperform the average by a 200% higher growth•Firms with deficiencies face with a performance discount of 37% to 108%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-1625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Behavioural theory of the firm ; Capitalization ; Corporate foresight ; Decision making ; Dependence ; Firm performance ; Future preparedness ; Organizational effectiveness ; Profitability ; Research design ; Studies ; Technological change ; Technology adoption</subject><ispartof>Technological forecasting & social change, 2018-04, Vol.129, p.105-116</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a59cb8837183e661cd9b3bf8f74033bcda912dfa066d74375c899b799ddf2c1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a59cb8837183e661cd9b3bf8f74033bcda912dfa066d74375c899b799ddf2c1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,33772,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rohrbeck, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kum, Menes Etingue</creatorcontrib><title>Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis</title><title>Technological forecasting & social change</title><description>Corporate foresight is applied with the expectation that it will help firms to break away from path dependency, help decision makers to define superior courses of action, and ultimately enable superior firm performance. To empirically test this assumption, we developed a model that judges a firm's future preparedness (FP) by assessing the need for corporate foresight (CF) and comparing it to the maturity of its CF practices. We apply a longitudinal research design in which we measure future preparedness in 2008 and its impact on firm performance in 2015. The results indicated future preparedness to be a powerful predictor for becoming an outperformer in the industry, for attaining superior profitability, and for gaining superior market capitalization growth. In the article, we also calculate the average bonus/discount that can be expected by sufficiently/insufficiently future-prepared firms.
•We developed a model for assessing the future preparedness (FP) of a firm•We match FP data from 2008 and performance in 2015•Future-prepared firms outperformed the average by a 33% higher profitability•Future-prepared firms outperform the average by a 200% higher growth•Firms with deficiencies face with a performance discount of 37% to 108%.</description><subject>Behavioural theory of the firm</subject><subject>Capitalization</subject><subject>Corporate foresight</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Firm performance</subject><subject>Future preparedness</subject><subject>Organizational effectiveness</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><issn>0040-1625</issn><issn>1873-5509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BQm4bs2jbRJXDoMvGJiNrkOax0xK29QkI_jv7TC6dnU353zc8wFwi1GJEW7uuzJbvXch2pIgzEpMSoTpGVhgzmhR10icgwVCFSpwQ-pLcJVShxBilDcLsF2HOIWosoVHQvK7fYZqNNDnBP0wKZ1hGKHzcYCTjXNmUKO2D3AF-zDufD4YP6p-rqj-O_l0DS6c6pO9-b1L8PH89L5-LTbbl7f1alPoiqBcqFrolnPKMKe2abA2oqWt445ViNJWGyUwMU6hpjGsoqzWXIiWCWGMIxobugR3J-4Uw-fBpiy7cIjzE0kSxKuqFozwOdWcUjqGlKJ1cop-UPFbYiSP8mQn_-TJozyJiZzlzcXHU9HOG768jTJpb-fhxkerszTB_4f4AS0ZfCc</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Rohrbeck, René</creator><creator>Kum, Menes Etingue</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis</title><author>Rohrbeck, René ; Kum, Menes Etingue</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a59cb8837183e661cd9b3bf8f74033bcda912dfa066d74375c899b799ddf2c1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Behavioural theory of the firm</topic><topic>Capitalization</topic><topic>Corporate foresight</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Firm performance</topic><topic>Future preparedness</topic><topic>Organizational effectiveness</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rohrbeck, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kum, Menes Etingue</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Technological forecasting & social change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rohrbeck, René</au><au>Kum, Menes Etingue</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis</atitle><jtitle>Technological forecasting & social change</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>129</volume><spage>105</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>105-116</pages><issn>0040-1625</issn><eissn>1873-5509</eissn><abstract>Corporate foresight is applied with the expectation that it will help firms to break away from path dependency, help decision makers to define superior courses of action, and ultimately enable superior firm performance. To empirically test this assumption, we developed a model that judges a firm's future preparedness (FP) by assessing the need for corporate foresight (CF) and comparing it to the maturity of its CF practices. We apply a longitudinal research design in which we measure future preparedness in 2008 and its impact on firm performance in 2015. The results indicated future preparedness to be a powerful predictor for becoming an outperformer in the industry, for attaining superior profitability, and for gaining superior market capitalization growth. In the article, we also calculate the average bonus/discount that can be expected by sufficiently/insufficiently future-prepared firms.
•We developed a model for assessing the future preparedness (FP) of a firm•We match FP data from 2008 and performance in 2015•Future-prepared firms outperformed the average by a 33% higher profitability•Future-prepared firms outperform the average by a 200% higher growth•Firms with deficiencies face with a performance discount of 37% to 108%.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.013</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-1625 |
ispartof | Technological forecasting & social change, 2018-04, Vol.129, p.105-116 |
issn | 0040-1625 1873-5509 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2084459728 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Behavioural theory of the firm Capitalization Corporate foresight Decision making Dependence Firm performance Future preparedness Organizational effectiveness Profitability Research design Studies Technological change Technology adoption |
title | Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T16%3A18%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corporate%20foresight%20and%20its%20impact%20on%20firm%20performance:%20A%20longitudinal%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Technological%20forecasting%20&%20social%20change&rft.au=Rohrbeck,%20Ren%C3%A9&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=129&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=105-116&rft.issn=0040-1625&rft.eissn=1873-5509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2084459728%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2084459728&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0040162517302287&rfr_iscdi=true |