Robustness against Power is PSPACE-complete

Power is a RISC architecture developed by IBM, Freescale, and several other companies and implemented in a series of POWER processors. The architecture features a relaxed memory model providing very weak guarantees with respect to the ordering and atomicity of memory accesses. Due to these weaknesse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2014-04
Hauptverfasser: Derevenetc, Egor, Meyer, Roland
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Derevenetc, Egor
Meyer, Roland
description Power is a RISC architecture developed by IBM, Freescale, and several other companies and implemented in a series of POWER processors. The architecture features a relaxed memory model providing very weak guarantees with respect to the ordering and atomicity of memory accesses. Due to these weaknesses, some programs that are correct under sequential consistency (SC) show undesirable effects when run under Power. We call these programs not robust against the Power memory model. Formally, a program is robust if every computation under Power has the same data and control dependencies as some SC computation. Our contribution is a decision procedure for robustness of concurrent programs against the Power memory model. It is based on three ideas. First, we reformulate robustness in terms of the acyclicity of a happens-before relation. Second, we prove that among the computations with cyclic happens-before relation there is one in a certain normal form. Finally, we reduce the existence of such a normal-form computation to a language emptiness problem. Altogether, this yields a PSPACE algorithm for checking robustness against Power. We complement it by a matching lower bound to show PSPACE-completeness.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2084007980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2084007980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20840079803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mTQDspPKi0uyUstLlZITE_MzCsuUQjIL08tUsgsVggIDnB0dtVNzs8tyEktSeVhYE1LzClO5YXS3AzKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXgjAwsTAwNzSwsDY-JUAQAkjDDG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2084007980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robustness against Power is PSPACE-complete</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Derevenetc, Egor ; Meyer, Roland</creator><creatorcontrib>Derevenetc, Egor ; Meyer, Roland</creatorcontrib><description>Power is a RISC architecture developed by IBM, Freescale, and several other companies and implemented in a series of POWER processors. The architecture features a relaxed memory model providing very weak guarantees with respect to the ordering and atomicity of memory accesses. Due to these weaknesses, some programs that are correct under sequential consistency (SC) show undesirable effects when run under Power. We call these programs not robust against the Power memory model. Formally, a program is robust if every computation under Power has the same data and control dependencies as some SC computation. Our contribution is a decision procedure for robustness of concurrent programs against the Power memory model. It is based on three ideas. First, we reformulate robustness in terms of the acyclicity of a happens-before relation. Second, we prove that among the computations with cyclic happens-before relation there is one in a certain normal form. Finally, we reduce the existence of such a normal-form computation to a language emptiness problem. Altogether, this yields a PSPACE algorithm for checking robustness against Power. We complement it by a matching lower bound to show PSPACE-completeness.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Computation ; Computer memory ; Lower bounds ; Robustness (mathematics)</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2014-04</ispartof><rights>2014. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Derevenetc, Egor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Roland</creatorcontrib><title>Robustness against Power is PSPACE-complete</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Power is a RISC architecture developed by IBM, Freescale, and several other companies and implemented in a series of POWER processors. The architecture features a relaxed memory model providing very weak guarantees with respect to the ordering and atomicity of memory accesses. Due to these weaknesses, some programs that are correct under sequential consistency (SC) show undesirable effects when run under Power. We call these programs not robust against the Power memory model. Formally, a program is robust if every computation under Power has the same data and control dependencies as some SC computation. Our contribution is a decision procedure for robustness of concurrent programs against the Power memory model. It is based on three ideas. First, we reformulate robustness in terms of the acyclicity of a happens-before relation. Second, we prove that among the computations with cyclic happens-before relation there is one in a certain normal form. Finally, we reduce the existence of such a normal-form computation to a language emptiness problem. Altogether, this yields a PSPACE algorithm for checking robustness against Power. We complement it by a matching lower bound to show PSPACE-completeness.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computer memory</subject><subject>Lower bounds</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mTQDspPKi0uyUstLlZITE_MzCsuUQjIL08tUsgsVggIDnB0dtVNzs8tyEktSeVhYE1LzClO5YXS3AzKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXgjAwsTAwNzSwsDY-JUAQAkjDDG</recordid><startdate>20140428</startdate><enddate>20140428</enddate><creator>Derevenetc, Egor</creator><creator>Meyer, Roland</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140428</creationdate><title>Robustness against Power is PSPACE-complete</title><author>Derevenetc, Egor ; Meyer, Roland</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20840079803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computer memory</topic><topic>Lower bounds</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Derevenetc, Egor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Roland</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Derevenetc, Egor</au><au>Meyer, Roland</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Robustness against Power is PSPACE-complete</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2014-04-28</date><risdate>2014</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Power is a RISC architecture developed by IBM, Freescale, and several other companies and implemented in a series of POWER processors. The architecture features a relaxed memory model providing very weak guarantees with respect to the ordering and atomicity of memory accesses. Due to these weaknesses, some programs that are correct under sequential consistency (SC) show undesirable effects when run under Power. We call these programs not robust against the Power memory model. Formally, a program is robust if every computation under Power has the same data and control dependencies as some SC computation. Our contribution is a decision procedure for robustness of concurrent programs against the Power memory model. It is based on three ideas. First, we reformulate robustness in terms of the acyclicity of a happens-before relation. Second, we prove that among the computations with cyclic happens-before relation there is one in a certain normal form. Finally, we reduce the existence of such a normal-form computation to a language emptiness problem. Altogether, this yields a PSPACE algorithm for checking robustness against Power. We complement it by a matching lower bound to show PSPACE-completeness.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2014-04
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2084007980
source Free E- Journals
subjects Algorithms
Computation
Computer memory
Lower bounds
Robustness (mathematics)
title Robustness against Power is PSPACE-complete
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A36%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Robustness%20against%20Power%20is%20PSPACE-complete&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Derevenetc,%20Egor&rft.date=2014-04-28&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2084007980%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2084007980&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true