Membership categorization analysis as an important qualitative method in evaluation
•Membership Categorization Analysis (MCA) is a rigorous, underused methodology.•MCA shows the boundaries within which program participants allow themselves to act.•MCA provides unique insights into barriers to successful interventions. This paper presents Membership Categorization Analysis (MCA) as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evaluation and program planning 2018-04, Vol.67, p.138-145 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 145 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 138 |
container_title | Evaluation and program planning |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Paulsen, Justin |
description | •Membership Categorization Analysis (MCA) is a rigorous, underused methodology.•MCA shows the boundaries within which program participants allow themselves to act.•MCA provides unique insights into barriers to successful interventions.
This paper presents Membership Categorization Analysis (MCA) as a useful qualitative methodology in evaluation study. MCA is closely connected to Conversation Analysis and is most frequently used in Sociology studies. MCA provides evaluators unique insights into the boundaries different categories (e.g. teachers, students) place on themselves and their actions. The paper includes an illustrated example of the value added of MCA in an evaluation of an early childhood educator improvement program. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2083806304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149718917302161</els_id><sourcerecordid>2083806304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-705256ad81bcb355146c81c0d71312e66a68c76e14cf7651b78e1399f7b93d503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1P3DAQhq0KVBbav1BF5ZwwEye2w62C8iGBemh7thxnFrzKF7azEv319bIUcaw00lye1_P6YewrQoGA4mxT0Nb0s58e5t6MRQmoCsACgH9gK1SS51JJOGArwKrJJarmiB2HsAGAqpHVR3ZUNhxFDXzFft7T0JIPj27OrIn0MHn3x0Q3jZkZTf8cXMhMmjFzwzz5aMaYPS2mdzFBW8oGio9Tl7kx23VaXpKf2OHa9IE-v-4T9vvq-6-Lm_zux_Xtxbe73FagYi6hLmthOoWtbXldYyWsQgudRI4lCWGEslIQVnYtRY2tVIS8adaybXiX2p-w0_27ScXTQiHqzbT41DroEhRXIDhUiTrfU9ZPIXha69m7wfhnjaB3PvVGv_epdz41oE4-U_jL64mlHah7i_4TmIDLPUDpo1tHXgfraLTUOU826m5y_3PnL0-OjiI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2083806304</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Membership categorization analysis as an important qualitative method in evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Paulsen, Justin</creator><creatorcontrib>Paulsen, Justin</creatorcontrib><description>•Membership Categorization Analysis (MCA) is a rigorous, underused methodology.•MCA shows the boundaries within which program participants allow themselves to act.•MCA provides unique insights into barriers to successful interventions.
This paper presents Membership Categorization Analysis (MCA) as a useful qualitative methodology in evaluation study. MCA is closely connected to Conversation Analysis and is most frequently used in Sociology studies. MCA provides evaluators unique insights into the boundaries different categories (e.g. teachers, students) place on themselves and their actions. The paper includes an illustrated example of the value added of MCA in an evaluation of an early childhood educator improvement program.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7870</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29316503</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Child Behavior ; Child, Preschool ; Childhood ; Classification ; Communication ; Conversation analysis ; Curriculum ; Early childhood education ; Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Membership ; Membership categorization analysis ; Professional development ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Qualitative methods ; Qualitative Research ; School Teachers - psychology ; Sociology ; Teacher evaluations ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>Evaluation and program planning, 2018-04, Vol.67, p.138-145</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-705256ad81bcb355146c81c0d71312e66a68c76e14cf7651b78e1399f7b93d503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-705256ad81bcb355146c81c0d71312e66a68c76e14cf7651b78e1399f7b93d503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,30982,33757,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316503$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paulsen, Justin</creatorcontrib><title>Membership categorization analysis as an important qualitative method in evaluation</title><title>Evaluation and program planning</title><addtitle>Eval Program Plann</addtitle><description>•Membership Categorization Analysis (MCA) is a rigorous, underused methodology.•MCA shows the boundaries within which program participants allow themselves to act.•MCA provides unique insights into barriers to successful interventions.
This paper presents Membership Categorization Analysis (MCA) as a useful qualitative methodology in evaluation study. MCA is closely connected to Conversation Analysis and is most frequently used in Sociology studies. MCA provides evaluators unique insights into the boundaries different categories (e.g. teachers, students) place on themselves and their actions. The paper includes an illustrated example of the value added of MCA in an evaluation of an early childhood educator improvement program.</description><subject>Child Behavior</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Conversation analysis</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Early childhood education</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Membership</subject><subject>Membership categorization analysis</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Qualitative methods</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>School Teachers - psychology</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Teacher evaluations</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>0149-7189</issn><issn>1873-7870</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1P3DAQhq0KVBbav1BF5ZwwEye2w62C8iGBemh7thxnFrzKF7azEv319bIUcaw00lye1_P6YewrQoGA4mxT0Nb0s58e5t6MRQmoCsACgH9gK1SS51JJOGArwKrJJarmiB2HsAGAqpHVR3ZUNhxFDXzFft7T0JIPj27OrIn0MHn3x0Q3jZkZTf8cXMhMmjFzwzz5aMaYPS2mdzFBW8oGio9Tl7kx23VaXpKf2OHa9IE-v-4T9vvq-6-Lm_zux_Xtxbe73FagYi6hLmthOoWtbXldYyWsQgudRI4lCWGEslIQVnYtRY2tVIS8adaybXiX2p-w0_27ScXTQiHqzbT41DroEhRXIDhUiTrfU9ZPIXha69m7wfhnjaB3PvVGv_epdz41oE4-U_jL64mlHah7i_4TmIDLPUDpo1tHXgfraLTUOU826m5y_3PnL0-OjiI</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Paulsen, Justin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Membership categorization analysis as an important qualitative method in evaluation</title><author>Paulsen, Justin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-705256ad81bcb355146c81c0d71312e66a68c76e14cf7651b78e1399f7b93d503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Child Behavior</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Conversation analysis</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Early childhood education</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Membership</topic><topic>Membership categorization analysis</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Qualitative methods</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>School Teachers - psychology</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Teacher evaluations</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paulsen, Justin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paulsen, Justin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Membership categorization analysis as an important qualitative method in evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Program Plann</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>67</volume><spage>138</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>138-145</pages><issn>0149-7189</issn><eissn>1873-7870</eissn><abstract>•Membership Categorization Analysis (MCA) is a rigorous, underused methodology.•MCA shows the boundaries within which program participants allow themselves to act.•MCA provides unique insights into barriers to successful interventions.
This paper presents Membership Categorization Analysis (MCA) as a useful qualitative methodology in evaluation study. MCA is closely connected to Conversation Analysis and is most frequently used in Sociology studies. MCA provides evaluators unique insights into the boundaries different categories (e.g. teachers, students) place on themselves and their actions. The paper includes an illustrated example of the value added of MCA in an evaluation of an early childhood educator improvement program.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29316503</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-7189 |
ispartof | Evaluation and program planning, 2018-04, Vol.67, p.138-145 |
issn | 0149-7189 1873-7870 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2083806304 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Child Behavior Child, Preschool Childhood Classification Communication Conversation analysis Curriculum Early childhood education Evaluation Female Humans Interpersonal Relations Interviews as Topic Male Membership Membership categorization analysis Professional development Program Evaluation - methods Qualitative methods Qualitative Research School Teachers - psychology Sociology Teacher evaluations Teachers |
title | Membership categorization analysis as an important qualitative method in evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T04%3A12%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Membership%20categorization%20analysis%20as%20an%20important%20qualitative%20method%20in%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20and%20program%20planning&rft.au=Paulsen,%20Justin&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=67&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=138-145&rft.issn=0149-7189&rft.eissn=1873-7870&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2083806304%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2083806304&rft_id=info:pmid/29316503&rft_els_id=S0149718917302161&rfr_iscdi=true |