Quantifying camouflage and conspicuousness using visual salience

Being able to quantify the conspicuousness of animal and plant colouration is key to understanding its evolutionary and adaptive significance. Camouflaged animals, for example, are under strong selection pressure to minimise their conspicuousness to potential predators. However, successful camouflag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Methods in ecology and evolution 2018-08, Vol.9 (8), p.1883-1895
Hauptverfasser: Pike, Thomas W., Hodgson, David (Dave)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1895
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1883
container_title Methods in ecology and evolution
container_volume 9
creator Pike, Thomas W.
Hodgson, David (Dave)
description Being able to quantify the conspicuousness of animal and plant colouration is key to understanding its evolutionary and adaptive significance. Camouflaged animals, for example, are under strong selection pressure to minimise their conspicuousness to potential predators. However, successful camouflage is not an intrinsic characteristic of an animal, but rather an interaction between that animal’s phenotype and the visual environment that it is viewed against. Moreover, the efficacy of any given camouflage strategy is determined not by the signaller’s phenotype per se, but by the perceptual and cognitive capabilities of potential predators. Any attempts to quantify camouflage must therefore take both predator perception and the visual background into account. Here I describe the use of species‐relevant saliency maps, which combine the different visual features that contribute to selective attention (in this case the luminance, colour and orientation contrasts of features in the visual environment) into a single holistic measure of target conspicuousness. These can be tuned to the specific perceptual capabilities of the receiver, and used to derive a quantitative measure of target conspicuousness. Furthermore, I provide experimental evidence that these computed measures of conspicuousness significantly predict the performance of both captive and wild birds when searching for camouflaged artificial prey. By allowing the quantification of prey conspicuousness, saliency maps provide a useful tool for understanding the evolution of animal signals. However, this is not limited to inconspicuous visual signals, and the same approach could be readily used for quantifying conspicuous visual signals in a wide variety of contexts, including, for example, signals involved in mate choice and warning colouration.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/2041-210X.13019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2083613356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2083613356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-b8e23b299cbe8c4124ea1d88713ae7195d4c74dc50481b93558161413a7f1c293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN9LwzAQx4MoOOaefS343C2XpG3ypoz5AyYiKPgW0jQdGV06e4uy_97Wivjm9-WOu8_3Dr6EXAKdQ68FowJSBvRtDpyCOiGT38npn_6czBC3tBeXijIxIdfP0YSDr48-bBJrdm2sG7NxiQlVYtuAe29jGzE4xCTiAH14jKZJ0DTeBesuyFltGnSznzolr7erl-V9un66e1jerFPLs0KlpXSMl0wpWzppBTDhDFRSFsCNK0BllbCFqGxGhYRS8SyTkIPot0UNlik-JVfj3X3XvkeHB71tYxf6l5pRyXPgPMt7ajFStmsRO1frfed3pjtqoHpISg9Z6CEL_Z1U78hHx6dv3PE_XD-uVnw0fgEDc2m_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2083613356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying camouflage and conspicuousness using visual salience</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pike, Thomas W. ; Hodgson, David (Dave)</creator><contributor>Hodgson, David (Dave)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pike, Thomas W. ; Hodgson, David (Dave) ; Hodgson, David (Dave)</creatorcontrib><description>Being able to quantify the conspicuousness of animal and plant colouration is key to understanding its evolutionary and adaptive significance. Camouflaged animals, for example, are under strong selection pressure to minimise their conspicuousness to potential predators. However, successful camouflage is not an intrinsic characteristic of an animal, but rather an interaction between that animal’s phenotype and the visual environment that it is viewed against. Moreover, the efficacy of any given camouflage strategy is determined not by the signaller’s phenotype per se, but by the perceptual and cognitive capabilities of potential predators. Any attempts to quantify camouflage must therefore take both predator perception and the visual background into account. Here I describe the use of species‐relevant saliency maps, which combine the different visual features that contribute to selective attention (in this case the luminance, colour and orientation contrasts of features in the visual environment) into a single holistic measure of target conspicuousness. These can be tuned to the specific perceptual capabilities of the receiver, and used to derive a quantitative measure of target conspicuousness. Furthermore, I provide experimental evidence that these computed measures of conspicuousness significantly predict the performance of both captive and wild birds when searching for camouflaged artificial prey. By allowing the quantification of prey conspicuousness, saliency maps provide a useful tool for understanding the evolution of animal signals. However, this is not limited to inconspicuous visual signals, and the same approach could be readily used for quantifying conspicuous visual signals in a wide variety of contexts, including, for example, signals involved in mate choice and warning colouration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptiveness ; Camouflage ; Cognitive ability ; conspicuousness ; crypsis ; Mate selection ; Orientation behavior ; Phenotypes ; Predators ; Prey ; Salience ; selective attention ; signal evolution ; Visual perception ; visual salience ; Visual signals ; Visual stimuli</subject><ispartof>Methods in ecology and evolution, 2018-08, Vol.9 (8), p.1883-1895</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2018 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2018 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-b8e23b299cbe8c4124ea1d88713ae7195d4c74dc50481b93558161413a7f1c293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-b8e23b299cbe8c4124ea1d88713ae7195d4c74dc50481b93558161413a7f1c293</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6942-0498</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F2041-210X.13019$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F2041-210X.13019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Hodgson, David (Dave)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pike, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, David (Dave)</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying camouflage and conspicuousness using visual salience</title><title>Methods in ecology and evolution</title><description>Being able to quantify the conspicuousness of animal and plant colouration is key to understanding its evolutionary and adaptive significance. Camouflaged animals, for example, are under strong selection pressure to minimise their conspicuousness to potential predators. However, successful camouflage is not an intrinsic characteristic of an animal, but rather an interaction between that animal’s phenotype and the visual environment that it is viewed against. Moreover, the efficacy of any given camouflage strategy is determined not by the signaller’s phenotype per se, but by the perceptual and cognitive capabilities of potential predators. Any attempts to quantify camouflage must therefore take both predator perception and the visual background into account. Here I describe the use of species‐relevant saliency maps, which combine the different visual features that contribute to selective attention (in this case the luminance, colour and orientation contrasts of features in the visual environment) into a single holistic measure of target conspicuousness. These can be tuned to the specific perceptual capabilities of the receiver, and used to derive a quantitative measure of target conspicuousness. Furthermore, I provide experimental evidence that these computed measures of conspicuousness significantly predict the performance of both captive and wild birds when searching for camouflaged artificial prey. By allowing the quantification of prey conspicuousness, saliency maps provide a useful tool for understanding the evolution of animal signals. However, this is not limited to inconspicuous visual signals, and the same approach could be readily used for quantifying conspicuous visual signals in a wide variety of contexts, including, for example, signals involved in mate choice and warning colouration.</description><subject>Adaptiveness</subject><subject>Camouflage</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>conspicuousness</subject><subject>crypsis</subject><subject>Mate selection</subject><subject>Orientation behavior</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Salience</subject><subject>selective attention</subject><subject>signal evolution</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>visual salience</subject><subject>Visual signals</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><issn>2041-210X</issn><issn>2041-210X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkN9LwzAQx4MoOOaefS343C2XpG3ypoz5AyYiKPgW0jQdGV06e4uy_97Wivjm9-WOu8_3Dr6EXAKdQ68FowJSBvRtDpyCOiGT38npn_6czBC3tBeXijIxIdfP0YSDr48-bBJrdm2sG7NxiQlVYtuAe29jGzE4xCTiAH14jKZJ0DTeBesuyFltGnSznzolr7erl-V9un66e1jerFPLs0KlpXSMl0wpWzppBTDhDFRSFsCNK0BllbCFqGxGhYRS8SyTkIPot0UNlik-JVfj3X3XvkeHB71tYxf6l5pRyXPgPMt7ajFStmsRO1frfed3pjtqoHpISg9Z6CEL_Z1U78hHx6dv3PE_XD-uVnw0fgEDc2m_</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Pike, Thomas W.</creator><creator>Hodgson, David (Dave)</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-0498</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Quantifying camouflage and conspicuousness using visual salience</title><author>Pike, Thomas W. ; Hodgson, David (Dave)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-b8e23b299cbe8c4124ea1d88713ae7195d4c74dc50481b93558161413a7f1c293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adaptiveness</topic><topic>Camouflage</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>conspicuousness</topic><topic>crypsis</topic><topic>Mate selection</topic><topic>Orientation behavior</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Salience</topic><topic>selective attention</topic><topic>signal evolution</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>visual salience</topic><topic>Visual signals</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pike, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, David (Dave)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pike, Thomas W.</au><au>Hodgson, David (Dave)</au><au>Hodgson, David (Dave)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying camouflage and conspicuousness using visual salience</atitle><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1883</spage><epage>1895</epage><pages>1883-1895</pages><issn>2041-210X</issn><eissn>2041-210X</eissn><abstract>Being able to quantify the conspicuousness of animal and plant colouration is key to understanding its evolutionary and adaptive significance. Camouflaged animals, for example, are under strong selection pressure to minimise their conspicuousness to potential predators. However, successful camouflage is not an intrinsic characteristic of an animal, but rather an interaction between that animal’s phenotype and the visual environment that it is viewed against. Moreover, the efficacy of any given camouflage strategy is determined not by the signaller’s phenotype per se, but by the perceptual and cognitive capabilities of potential predators. Any attempts to quantify camouflage must therefore take both predator perception and the visual background into account. Here I describe the use of species‐relevant saliency maps, which combine the different visual features that contribute to selective attention (in this case the luminance, colour and orientation contrasts of features in the visual environment) into a single holistic measure of target conspicuousness. These can be tuned to the specific perceptual capabilities of the receiver, and used to derive a quantitative measure of target conspicuousness. Furthermore, I provide experimental evidence that these computed measures of conspicuousness significantly predict the performance of both captive and wild birds when searching for camouflaged artificial prey. By allowing the quantification of prey conspicuousness, saliency maps provide a useful tool for understanding the evolution of animal signals. However, this is not limited to inconspicuous visual signals, and the same approach could be readily used for quantifying conspicuous visual signals in a wide variety of contexts, including, for example, signals involved in mate choice and warning colouration.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/2041-210X.13019</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-0498</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2041-210X
ispartof Methods in ecology and evolution, 2018-08, Vol.9 (8), p.1883-1895
issn 2041-210X
2041-210X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2083613356
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adaptiveness
Camouflage
Cognitive ability
conspicuousness
crypsis
Mate selection
Orientation behavior
Phenotypes
Predators
Prey
Salience
selective attention
signal evolution
Visual perception
visual salience
Visual signals
Visual stimuli
title Quantifying camouflage and conspicuousness using visual salience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T23%3A23%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20camouflage%20and%20conspicuousness%20using%20visual%20salience&rft.jtitle=Methods%20in%20ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Pike,%20Thomas%20W.&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1883&rft.epage=1895&rft.pages=1883-1895&rft.issn=2041-210X&rft.eissn=2041-210X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/2041-210X.13019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2083613356%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2083613356&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true