A Proactive Telephone-Delivered Risk Communication Intervention for Smokers Participating in Lung Cancer Screening: A Pilot Feasibility Trial
Introduction: Many barriers exist to integrating smoking cessation into delivery of lung cancer screening including limited provider time and patient misconceptions. Aims: To demonstrate that proactive outreach from a telephone counsellor outside of the patient's usual care team is feasible and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of smoking cessation 2018-09, Vol.13 (3), p.137-144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 144 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 137 |
container_title | Journal of smoking cessation |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Zeliadt, Steven B. Greene, Preston A. Krebs, Paul Klein, Deborah E. Feemster, Laura C. Au, David H. Slatore, Christopher G. Heffner, Jaimee L. |
description | Introduction: Many barriers exist to integrating smoking cessation into delivery of lung cancer screening including limited provider time and patient misconceptions. Aims: To demonstrate that proactive outreach from a telephone counsellor outside of the patient's usual care team is feasible and acceptable to patients. Methods: Smokers undergoing lung cancer screening were approached for a telephone counselling study. Patients agreeing to participate in the intervention (n = 27) received two telephone counselling sessions. A 30-day follow-up evaluation was conducted, which also included screening participants receiving usual care (n = 56). Results/Findings: Most (89%) intervention participants reported being satisfied with the proactive calls, and 81% reported the sessions were helpful. Use of behavioural cessation support programs in the intervention group was four times higher (44%) compared to the usual care group (11%); Relative Risk (RR) = 4.1; 95% CI: 1.7 to 9.9), and seven-day abstinence in the intervention group was double (19%) compared to the usual care group (7%); RR = 2.6; 95% CI: 0.8 to 8.9). Conclusions: This practical telephone-based approach, which included risk messages clarifying continued risks of smoking in the context of screening results, suggests such messaging can boost utilisation of evidence-based tobacco treatment, self-efficacy, and potentially increase the likelihood of successful quitting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/jsc.2017.16 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2083522410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_jsc_2017_16</cupid><sourcerecordid>2083522410</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-48c0dc9854e0e5fbe2610a49bd519d5c6289a285b91bbc3a040cc8617dd724903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1KAzEUhYMoWKsrXyDgUqYmmX93pVotFCxa1yGTuVPTziRjMlPoQ_jOpragC1fn_nycyz0IXVMyooSmd2snR8wXI5qcoAHNwihgCWWnf-pzdOHcmpCE5XE6QF9jvLBGyE5tAS-hhvbDaAgeoPYDCyV-VW6DJ6Zpeq2k6JTReKY7sFvQP01lLH5rzAaswwthOyVV6zG9wkrjee91IrQED0kLoP3iHvubqjYdnoJwqlC16nZ4aZWoL9FZJWoHV0cdovfp43LyHMxfnmaT8TyQYZh0QZRJUso8iyMgEFcF-MeIiPKijGlexjJhWS5YFhc5LQoZChIRKbOEpmWZsign4RDdHHxbaz57cB1fm95qf5IzkoUxYxHdU7cHSlrjnIWKt1Y1wu44JXyfN_d5833enCaeDo60aAqryhX8mv7HfwMZhYPD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2083522410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Proactive Telephone-Delivered Risk Communication Intervention for Smokers Participating in Lung Cancer Screening: A Pilot Feasibility Trial</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Zeliadt, Steven B. ; Greene, Preston A. ; Krebs, Paul ; Klein, Deborah E. ; Feemster, Laura C. ; Au, David H. ; Slatore, Christopher G. ; Heffner, Jaimee L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zeliadt, Steven B. ; Greene, Preston A. ; Krebs, Paul ; Klein, Deborah E. ; Feemster, Laura C. ; Au, David H. ; Slatore, Christopher G. ; Heffner, Jaimee L.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Many barriers exist to integrating smoking cessation into delivery of lung cancer screening including limited provider time and patient misconceptions. Aims: To demonstrate that proactive outreach from a telephone counsellor outside of the patient's usual care team is feasible and acceptable to patients. Methods: Smokers undergoing lung cancer screening were approached for a telephone counselling study. Patients agreeing to participate in the intervention (n = 27) received two telephone counselling sessions. A 30-day follow-up evaluation was conducted, which also included screening participants receiving usual care (n = 56). Results/Findings: Most (89%) intervention participants reported being satisfied with the proactive calls, and 81% reported the sessions were helpful. Use of behavioural cessation support programs in the intervention group was four times higher (44%) compared to the usual care group (11%); Relative Risk (RR) = 4.1; 95% CI: 1.7 to 9.9), and seven-day abstinence in the intervention group was double (19%) compared to the usual care group (7%); RR = 2.6; 95% CI: 0.8 to 8.9). Conclusions: This practical telephone-based approach, which included risk messages clarifying continued risks of smoking in the context of screening results, suggests such messaging can boost utilisation of evidence-based tobacco treatment, self-efficacy, and potentially increase the likelihood of successful quitting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1834-2612</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1834-2612</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/jsc.2017.16</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Clinics ; Counseling ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Intervention ; Lung cancer ; Medicaid ; Medical screening ; Original Articles ; Patients ; R&D ; Research & development ; Smoking cessation ; Studies ; Tobacco ; Veterans</subject><ispartof>Journal of smoking cessation, 2018-09, Vol.13 (3), p.137-144</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-48c0dc9854e0e5fbe2610a49bd519d5c6289a285b91bbc3a040cc8617dd724903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-48c0dc9854e0e5fbe2610a49bd519d5c6289a285b91bbc3a040cc8617dd724903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1834261217000160/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zeliadt, Steven B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Preston A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Deborah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feemster, Laura C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Au, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slatore, Christopher G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffner, Jaimee L.</creatorcontrib><title>A Proactive Telephone-Delivered Risk Communication Intervention for Smokers Participating in Lung Cancer Screening: A Pilot Feasibility Trial</title><title>Journal of smoking cessation</title><addtitle>J. Smok Cessat</addtitle><description>Introduction: Many barriers exist to integrating smoking cessation into delivery of lung cancer screening including limited provider time and patient misconceptions. Aims: To demonstrate that proactive outreach from a telephone counsellor outside of the patient's usual care team is feasible and acceptable to patients. Methods: Smokers undergoing lung cancer screening were approached for a telephone counselling study. Patients agreeing to participate in the intervention (n = 27) received two telephone counselling sessions. A 30-day follow-up evaluation was conducted, which also included screening participants receiving usual care (n = 56). Results/Findings: Most (89%) intervention participants reported being satisfied with the proactive calls, and 81% reported the sessions were helpful. Use of behavioural cessation support programs in the intervention group was four times higher (44%) compared to the usual care group (11%); Relative Risk (RR) = 4.1; 95% CI: 1.7 to 9.9), and seven-day abstinence in the intervention group was double (19%) compared to the usual care group (7%); RR = 2.6; 95% CI: 0.8 to 8.9). Conclusions: This practical telephone-based approach, which included risk messages clarifying continued risks of smoking in the context of screening results, suggests such messaging can boost utilisation of evidence-based tobacco treatment, self-efficacy, and potentially increase the likelihood of successful quitting.</description><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><issn>1834-2612</issn><issn>1834-2612</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1KAzEUhYMoWKsrXyDgUqYmmX93pVotFCxa1yGTuVPTziRjMlPoQ_jOpragC1fn_nycyz0IXVMyooSmd2snR8wXI5qcoAHNwihgCWWnf-pzdOHcmpCE5XE6QF9jvLBGyE5tAS-hhvbDaAgeoPYDCyV-VW6DJ6Zpeq2k6JTReKY7sFvQP01lLH5rzAaswwthOyVV6zG9wkrjee91IrQED0kLoP3iHvubqjYdnoJwqlC16nZ4aZWoL9FZJWoHV0cdovfp43LyHMxfnmaT8TyQYZh0QZRJUso8iyMgEFcF-MeIiPKijGlexjJhWS5YFhc5LQoZChIRKbOEpmWZsign4RDdHHxbaz57cB1fm95qf5IzkoUxYxHdU7cHSlrjnIWKt1Y1wu44JXyfN_d5833enCaeDo60aAqryhX8mv7HfwMZhYPD</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Zeliadt, Steven B.</creator><creator>Greene, Preston A.</creator><creator>Krebs, Paul</creator><creator>Klein, Deborah E.</creator><creator>Feemster, Laura C.</creator><creator>Au, David H.</creator><creator>Slatore, Christopher G.</creator><creator>Heffner, Jaimee L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>A Proactive Telephone-Delivered Risk Communication Intervention for Smokers Participating in Lung Cancer Screening: A Pilot Feasibility Trial</title><author>Zeliadt, Steven B. ; Greene, Preston A. ; Krebs, Paul ; Klein, Deborah E. ; Feemster, Laura C. ; Au, David H. ; Slatore, Christopher G. ; Heffner, Jaimee L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-48c0dc9854e0e5fbe2610a49bd519d5c6289a285b91bbc3a040cc8617dd724903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeliadt, Steven B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Preston A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Deborah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feemster, Laura C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Au, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slatore, Christopher G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffner, Jaimee L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of smoking cessation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeliadt, Steven B.</au><au>Greene, Preston A.</au><au>Krebs, Paul</au><au>Klein, Deborah E.</au><au>Feemster, Laura C.</au><au>Au, David H.</au><au>Slatore, Christopher G.</au><au>Heffner, Jaimee L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Proactive Telephone-Delivered Risk Communication Intervention for Smokers Participating in Lung Cancer Screening: A Pilot Feasibility Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of smoking cessation</jtitle><addtitle>J. Smok Cessat</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>137-144</pages><issn>1834-2612</issn><eissn>1834-2612</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Many barriers exist to integrating smoking cessation into delivery of lung cancer screening including limited provider time and patient misconceptions. Aims: To demonstrate that proactive outreach from a telephone counsellor outside of the patient's usual care team is feasible and acceptable to patients. Methods: Smokers undergoing lung cancer screening were approached for a telephone counselling study. Patients agreeing to participate in the intervention (n = 27) received two telephone counselling sessions. A 30-day follow-up evaluation was conducted, which also included screening participants receiving usual care (n = 56). Results/Findings: Most (89%) intervention participants reported being satisfied with the proactive calls, and 81% reported the sessions were helpful. Use of behavioural cessation support programs in the intervention group was four times higher (44%) compared to the usual care group (11%); Relative Risk (RR) = 4.1; 95% CI: 1.7 to 9.9), and seven-day abstinence in the intervention group was double (19%) compared to the usual care group (7%); RR = 2.6; 95% CI: 0.8 to 8.9). Conclusions: This practical telephone-based approach, which included risk messages clarifying continued risks of smoking in the context of screening results, suggests such messaging can boost utilisation of evidence-based tobacco treatment, self-efficacy, and potentially increase the likelihood of successful quitting.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/jsc.2017.16</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1834-2612 |
ispartof | Journal of smoking cessation, 2018-09, Vol.13 (3), p.137-144 |
issn | 1834-2612 1834-2612 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2083522410 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Clinics Counseling Disease control Disease prevention Intervention Lung cancer Medicaid Medical screening Original Articles Patients R&D Research & development Smoking cessation Studies Tobacco Veterans |
title | A Proactive Telephone-Delivered Risk Communication Intervention for Smokers Participating in Lung Cancer Screening: A Pilot Feasibility Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T10%3A37%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Proactive%20Telephone-Delivered%20Risk%20Communication%20Intervention%20for%20Smokers%20Participating%20in%20Lung%20Cancer%20Screening:%20A%20Pilot%20Feasibility%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20smoking%20cessation&rft.au=Zeliadt,%20Steven%20B.&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=137-144&rft.issn=1834-2612&rft.eissn=1834-2612&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/jsc.2017.16&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2083522410%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2083522410&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_jsc_2017_16&rfr_iscdi=true |