Anticipatory Uncertainty: How Academic and Industry Researchers in the Life Sciences Experience and Manage the Uncertainties of the Research Process Differently

The institutional contexts of research increasingly require researchers to anticipate their productivity and the uncertainties inherent in their research. This applies to both academic researchers and to researchers in start-up companies. This creates a specific kind of uncertainty, anticipatory unc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science as culture 2018-07, Vol.27 (3), p.349-374
Hauptverfasser: Fochler, Maximilian, Sigl, Lisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 374
container_issue 3
container_start_page 349
container_title Science as culture
container_volume 27
creator Fochler, Maximilian
Sigl, Lisa
description The institutional contexts of research increasingly require researchers to anticipate their productivity and the uncertainties inherent in their research. This applies to both academic researchers and to researchers in start-up companies. This creates a specific kind of uncertainty, anticipatory uncertainty, that we define as the state of being uncertain as to whether research processes will be productive in a specific time frame and along situated definitions of good performance. In the life sciences, this anticipatory uncertainty is experienced and managed differently, depending on how research is organized and the cultural resources available in specific institutional contexts. In biotechnology companies, there is a readiness to embrace dynamic changes in both research strategies and the organization of work in response to new developments in the progress of the overall research agenda. In academia, the ability of research groups to react with similar flexibility seems significantly constrained by the individual attribution of research work and credit, and the correspondingly high level of individual anticipatory uncertainty. This raises questions about how far the current organization of academic research allows epistemic uncertainty to be embraced and corresponding risks to be taken, rather than safe questions to be pursued.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09505431.2018.1485640
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2082819717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2082819717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-4c1797044ee05a5111c68efefe546fbce58590fa7f44ac3a1d28b956ee2d8ad33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvEzEQhS1EJULhJyBZ4rzB3rWzXk5EpdBKQVQtPVtT75i6SuwwdlT23_BTcZJW3NAcZjT63nuHx9g7KeZSGPFBDFpo1cl5K6SZS2X0QokXbCZVLxopzfCSzfZMs4desdc5P4hKisHM2J9lLMGFLZREE7-NDqlAiGX6yC_SI186GHETHIc48ss47nKp2DVmBHL3SJmHyMs98lXwyG9cwOqQ-fnvLdLhPgi_QYSfeOD-JYTKJX94PvvxK0pVnvnn4D0SxrKe3rATD-uMb5_2Kbv9cv7j7KJZff96ebZcNa4zujTKyX7ohVKIQoOWUrqFQV9Hq4W_c6iNHoSH3isFrgM5tuZu0AvEdjQwdt0pe3_03VL6tcNc7EPaUayRthWmNXLoZV8pfaQcpZwJvd1S2ABNVgq7L8M-l2H3ZdinMqru01EXok-0gcdE69EWmNaJPEF0Idvu_xZ_Ab_vk8E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2082819717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anticipatory Uncertainty: How Academic and Industry Researchers in the Life Sciences Experience and Manage the Uncertainties of the Research Process Differently</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Fochler, Maximilian ; Sigl, Lisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Fochler, Maximilian ; Sigl, Lisa</creatorcontrib><description>The institutional contexts of research increasingly require researchers to anticipate their productivity and the uncertainties inherent in their research. This applies to both academic researchers and to researchers in start-up companies. This creates a specific kind of uncertainty, anticipatory uncertainty, that we define as the state of being uncertain as to whether research processes will be productive in a specific time frame and along situated definitions of good performance. In the life sciences, this anticipatory uncertainty is experienced and managed differently, depending on how research is organized and the cultural resources available in specific institutional contexts. In biotechnology companies, there is a readiness to embrace dynamic changes in both research strategies and the organization of work in response to new developments in the progress of the overall research agenda. In academia, the ability of research groups to react with similar flexibility seems significantly constrained by the individual attribution of research work and credit, and the correspondingly high level of individual anticipatory uncertainty. This raises questions about how far the current organization of academic research allows epistemic uncertainty to be embraced and corresponding risks to be taken, rather than safe questions to be pursued.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-5431</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2018.1485640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>anticipation ; Biology ; Biotechnology ; biotechnology (business) ; comparison ; Life sciences ; Productivity ; research management ; Researchers ; Strategies ; Uncertainty ; Work organization</subject><ispartof>Science as culture, 2018-07, Vol.27 (3), p.349-374</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2018</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-4c1797044ee05a5111c68efefe546fbce58590fa7f44ac3a1d28b956ee2d8ad33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-4c1797044ee05a5111c68efefe546fbce58590fa7f44ac3a1d28b956ee2d8ad33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9255-8420 ; 0000-0002-8601-3210</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09505431.2018.1485640$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09505431.2018.1485640$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33751,59620,60409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fochler, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigl, Lisa</creatorcontrib><title>Anticipatory Uncertainty: How Academic and Industry Researchers in the Life Sciences Experience and Manage the Uncertainties of the Research Process Differently</title><title>Science as culture</title><description>The institutional contexts of research increasingly require researchers to anticipate their productivity and the uncertainties inherent in their research. This applies to both academic researchers and to researchers in start-up companies. This creates a specific kind of uncertainty, anticipatory uncertainty, that we define as the state of being uncertain as to whether research processes will be productive in a specific time frame and along situated definitions of good performance. In the life sciences, this anticipatory uncertainty is experienced and managed differently, depending on how research is organized and the cultural resources available in specific institutional contexts. In biotechnology companies, there is a readiness to embrace dynamic changes in both research strategies and the organization of work in response to new developments in the progress of the overall research agenda. In academia, the ability of research groups to react with similar flexibility seems significantly constrained by the individual attribution of research work and credit, and the correspondingly high level of individual anticipatory uncertainty. This raises questions about how far the current organization of academic research allows epistemic uncertainty to be embraced and corresponding risks to be taken, rather than safe questions to be pursued.</description><subject>anticipation</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>biotechnology (business)</subject><subject>comparison</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>research management</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Work organization</subject><issn>0950-5431</issn><issn>1470-1189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFvEzEQhS1EJULhJyBZ4rzB3rWzXk5EpdBKQVQtPVtT75i6SuwwdlT23_BTcZJW3NAcZjT63nuHx9g7KeZSGPFBDFpo1cl5K6SZS2X0QokXbCZVLxopzfCSzfZMs4desdc5P4hKisHM2J9lLMGFLZREE7-NDqlAiGX6yC_SI186GHETHIc48ss47nKp2DVmBHL3SJmHyMs98lXwyG9cwOqQ-fnvLdLhPgi_QYSfeOD-JYTKJX94PvvxK0pVnvnn4D0SxrKe3rATD-uMb5_2Kbv9cv7j7KJZff96ebZcNa4zujTKyX7ohVKIQoOWUrqFQV9Hq4W_c6iNHoSH3isFrgM5tuZu0AvEdjQwdt0pe3_03VL6tcNc7EPaUayRthWmNXLoZV8pfaQcpZwJvd1S2ABNVgq7L8M-l2H3ZdinMqru01EXok-0gcdE69EWmNaJPEF0Idvu_xZ_Ab_vk8E</recordid><startdate>20180703</startdate><enddate>20180703</enddate><creator>Fochler, Maximilian</creator><creator>Sigl, Lisa</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-8420</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-3210</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180703</creationdate><title>Anticipatory Uncertainty: How Academic and Industry Researchers in the Life Sciences Experience and Manage the Uncertainties of the Research Process Differently</title><author>Fochler, Maximilian ; Sigl, Lisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-4c1797044ee05a5111c68efefe546fbce58590fa7f44ac3a1d28b956ee2d8ad33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>anticipation</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>biotechnology (business)</topic><topic>comparison</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>research management</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Work organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fochler, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigl, Lisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Science as culture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fochler, Maximilian</au><au>Sigl, Lisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anticipatory Uncertainty: How Academic and Industry Researchers in the Life Sciences Experience and Manage the Uncertainties of the Research Process Differently</atitle><jtitle>Science as culture</jtitle><date>2018-07-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>349-374</pages><issn>0950-5431</issn><eissn>1470-1189</eissn><abstract>The institutional contexts of research increasingly require researchers to anticipate their productivity and the uncertainties inherent in their research. This applies to both academic researchers and to researchers in start-up companies. This creates a specific kind of uncertainty, anticipatory uncertainty, that we define as the state of being uncertain as to whether research processes will be productive in a specific time frame and along situated definitions of good performance. In the life sciences, this anticipatory uncertainty is experienced and managed differently, depending on how research is organized and the cultural resources available in specific institutional contexts. In biotechnology companies, there is a readiness to embrace dynamic changes in both research strategies and the organization of work in response to new developments in the progress of the overall research agenda. In academia, the ability of research groups to react with similar flexibility seems significantly constrained by the individual attribution of research work and credit, and the correspondingly high level of individual anticipatory uncertainty. This raises questions about how far the current organization of academic research allows epistemic uncertainty to be embraced and corresponding risks to be taken, rather than safe questions to be pursued.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09505431.2018.1485640</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-8420</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-3210</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-5431
ispartof Science as culture, 2018-07, Vol.27 (3), p.349-374
issn 0950-5431
1470-1189
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2082819717
source Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles); Sociological Abstracts
subjects anticipation
Biology
Biotechnology
biotechnology (business)
comparison
Life sciences
Productivity
research management
Researchers
Strategies
Uncertainty
Work organization
title Anticipatory Uncertainty: How Academic and Industry Researchers in the Life Sciences Experience and Manage the Uncertainties of the Research Process Differently
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A19%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anticipatory%20Uncertainty:%20How%20Academic%20and%20Industry%20Researchers%20in%20the%20Life%20Sciences%20Experience%20and%20Manage%20the%20Uncertainties%20of%20the%20Research%20Process%20Differently&rft.jtitle=Science%20as%20culture&rft.au=Fochler,%20Maximilian&rft.date=2018-07-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=349-374&rft.issn=0950-5431&rft.eissn=1470-1189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09505431.2018.1485640&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2082819717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2082819717&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true