Anticipatory Uncertainty: How Academic and Industry Researchers in the Life Sciences Experience and Manage the Uncertainties of the Research Process Differently
The institutional contexts of research increasingly require researchers to anticipate their productivity and the uncertainties inherent in their research. This applies to both academic researchers and to researchers in start-up companies. This creates a specific kind of uncertainty, anticipatory unc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science as culture 2018-07, Vol.27 (3), p.349-374 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 374 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 349 |
container_title | Science as culture |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Fochler, Maximilian Sigl, Lisa |
description | The institutional contexts of research increasingly require researchers to anticipate their productivity and the uncertainties inherent in their research. This applies to both academic researchers and to researchers in start-up companies. This creates a specific kind of uncertainty, anticipatory uncertainty, that we define as the state of being uncertain as to whether research processes will be productive in a specific time frame and along situated definitions of good performance. In the life sciences, this anticipatory uncertainty is experienced and managed differently, depending on how research is organized and the cultural resources available in specific institutional contexts. In biotechnology companies, there is a readiness to embrace dynamic changes in both research strategies and the organization of work in response to new developments in the progress of the overall research agenda. In academia, the ability of research groups to react with similar flexibility seems significantly constrained by the individual attribution of research work and credit, and the correspondingly high level of individual anticipatory uncertainty. This raises questions about how far the current organization of academic research allows epistemic uncertainty to be embraced and corresponding risks to be taken, rather than safe questions to be pursued. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09505431.2018.1485640 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2082819717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2082819717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-4c1797044ee05a5111c68efefe546fbce58590fa7f44ac3a1d28b956ee2d8ad33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvEzEQhS1EJULhJyBZ4rzB3rWzXk5EpdBKQVQtPVtT75i6SuwwdlT23_BTcZJW3NAcZjT63nuHx9g7KeZSGPFBDFpo1cl5K6SZS2X0QokXbCZVLxopzfCSzfZMs4desdc5P4hKisHM2J9lLMGFLZREE7-NDqlAiGX6yC_SI186GHETHIc48ss47nKp2DVmBHL3SJmHyMs98lXwyG9cwOqQ-fnvLdLhPgi_QYSfeOD-JYTKJX94PvvxK0pVnvnn4D0SxrKe3rATD-uMb5_2Kbv9cv7j7KJZff96ebZcNa4zujTKyX7ohVKIQoOWUrqFQV9Hq4W_c6iNHoSH3isFrgM5tuZu0AvEdjQwdt0pe3_03VL6tcNc7EPaUayRthWmNXLoZV8pfaQcpZwJvd1S2ABNVgq7L8M-l2H3ZdinMqru01EXok-0gcdE69EWmNaJPEF0Idvu_xZ_Ab_vk8E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2082819717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anticipatory Uncertainty: How Academic and Industry Researchers in the Life Sciences Experience and Manage the Uncertainties of the Research Process Differently</title><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Fochler, Maximilian ; Sigl, Lisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Fochler, Maximilian ; Sigl, Lisa</creatorcontrib><description>The institutional contexts of research increasingly require researchers to anticipate their productivity and the uncertainties inherent in their research. This applies to both academic researchers and to researchers in start-up companies. This creates a specific kind of uncertainty, anticipatory uncertainty, that we define as the state of being uncertain as to whether research processes will be productive in a specific time frame and along situated definitions of good performance. In the life sciences, this anticipatory uncertainty is experienced and managed differently, depending on how research is organized and the cultural resources available in specific institutional contexts. In biotechnology companies, there is a readiness to embrace dynamic changes in both research strategies and the organization of work in response to new developments in the progress of the overall research agenda. In academia, the ability of research groups to react with similar flexibility seems significantly constrained by the individual attribution of research work and credit, and the correspondingly high level of individual anticipatory uncertainty. This raises questions about how far the current organization of academic research allows epistemic uncertainty to be embraced and corresponding risks to be taken, rather than safe questions to be pursued.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-5431</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2018.1485640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>anticipation ; Biology ; Biotechnology ; biotechnology (business) ; comparison ; Life sciences ; Productivity ; research management ; Researchers ; Strategies ; Uncertainty ; Work organization</subject><ispartof>Science as culture, 2018-07, Vol.27 (3), p.349-374</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2018</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-4c1797044ee05a5111c68efefe546fbce58590fa7f44ac3a1d28b956ee2d8ad33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-4c1797044ee05a5111c68efefe546fbce58590fa7f44ac3a1d28b956ee2d8ad33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9255-8420 ; 0000-0002-8601-3210</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09505431.2018.1485640$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09505431.2018.1485640$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33751,59620,60409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fochler, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigl, Lisa</creatorcontrib><title>Anticipatory Uncertainty: How Academic and Industry Researchers in the Life Sciences Experience and Manage the Uncertainties of the Research Process Differently</title><title>Science as culture</title><description>The institutional contexts of research increasingly require researchers to anticipate their productivity and the uncertainties inherent in their research. This applies to both academic researchers and to researchers in start-up companies. This creates a specific kind of uncertainty, anticipatory uncertainty, that we define as the state of being uncertain as to whether research processes will be productive in a specific time frame and along situated definitions of good performance. In the life sciences, this anticipatory uncertainty is experienced and managed differently, depending on how research is organized and the cultural resources available in specific institutional contexts. In biotechnology companies, there is a readiness to embrace dynamic changes in both research strategies and the organization of work in response to new developments in the progress of the overall research agenda. In academia, the ability of research groups to react with similar flexibility seems significantly constrained by the individual attribution of research work and credit, and the correspondingly high level of individual anticipatory uncertainty. This raises questions about how far the current organization of academic research allows epistemic uncertainty to be embraced and corresponding risks to be taken, rather than safe questions to be pursued.</description><subject>anticipation</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>biotechnology (business)</subject><subject>comparison</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>research management</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Work organization</subject><issn>0950-5431</issn><issn>1470-1189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFvEzEQhS1EJULhJyBZ4rzB3rWzXk5EpdBKQVQtPVtT75i6SuwwdlT23_BTcZJW3NAcZjT63nuHx9g7KeZSGPFBDFpo1cl5K6SZS2X0QokXbCZVLxopzfCSzfZMs4desdc5P4hKisHM2J9lLMGFLZREE7-NDqlAiGX6yC_SI186GHETHIc48ss47nKp2DVmBHL3SJmHyMs98lXwyG9cwOqQ-fnvLdLhPgi_QYSfeOD-JYTKJX94PvvxK0pVnvnn4D0SxrKe3rATD-uMb5_2Kbv9cv7j7KJZff96ebZcNa4zujTKyX7ohVKIQoOWUrqFQV9Hq4W_c6iNHoSH3isFrgM5tuZu0AvEdjQwdt0pe3_03VL6tcNc7EPaUayRthWmNXLoZV8pfaQcpZwJvd1S2ABNVgq7L8M-l2H3ZdinMqru01EXok-0gcdE69EWmNaJPEF0Idvu_xZ_Ab_vk8E</recordid><startdate>20180703</startdate><enddate>20180703</enddate><creator>Fochler, Maximilian</creator><creator>Sigl, Lisa</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-8420</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-3210</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180703</creationdate><title>Anticipatory Uncertainty: How Academic and Industry Researchers in the Life Sciences Experience and Manage the Uncertainties of the Research Process Differently</title><author>Fochler, Maximilian ; Sigl, Lisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-4c1797044ee05a5111c68efefe546fbce58590fa7f44ac3a1d28b956ee2d8ad33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>anticipation</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>biotechnology (business)</topic><topic>comparison</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>research management</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Work organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fochler, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigl, Lisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Science as culture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fochler, Maximilian</au><au>Sigl, Lisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anticipatory Uncertainty: How Academic and Industry Researchers in the Life Sciences Experience and Manage the Uncertainties of the Research Process Differently</atitle><jtitle>Science as culture</jtitle><date>2018-07-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>349-374</pages><issn>0950-5431</issn><eissn>1470-1189</eissn><abstract>The institutional contexts of research increasingly require researchers to anticipate their productivity and the uncertainties inherent in their research. This applies to both academic researchers and to researchers in start-up companies. This creates a specific kind of uncertainty, anticipatory uncertainty, that we define as the state of being uncertain as to whether research processes will be productive in a specific time frame and along situated definitions of good performance. In the life sciences, this anticipatory uncertainty is experienced and managed differently, depending on how research is organized and the cultural resources available in specific institutional contexts. In biotechnology companies, there is a readiness to embrace dynamic changes in both research strategies and the organization of work in response to new developments in the progress of the overall research agenda. In academia, the ability of research groups to react with similar flexibility seems significantly constrained by the individual attribution of research work and credit, and the correspondingly high level of individual anticipatory uncertainty. This raises questions about how far the current organization of academic research allows epistemic uncertainty to be embraced and corresponding risks to be taken, rather than safe questions to be pursued.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09505431.2018.1485640</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-8420</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-3210</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-5431 |
ispartof | Science as culture, 2018-07, Vol.27 (3), p.349-374 |
issn | 0950-5431 1470-1189 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2082819717 |
source | Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles); Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | anticipation Biology Biotechnology biotechnology (business) comparison Life sciences Productivity research management Researchers Strategies Uncertainty Work organization |
title | Anticipatory Uncertainty: How Academic and Industry Researchers in the Life Sciences Experience and Manage the Uncertainties of the Research Process Differently |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A19%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anticipatory%20Uncertainty:%20How%20Academic%20and%20Industry%20Researchers%20in%20the%20Life%20Sciences%20Experience%20and%20Manage%20the%20Uncertainties%20of%20the%20Research%20Process%20Differently&rft.jtitle=Science%20as%20culture&rft.au=Fochler,%20Maximilian&rft.date=2018-07-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=349-374&rft.issn=0950-5431&rft.eissn=1470-1189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09505431.2018.1485640&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2082819717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2082819717&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |