Usability improvement through A/B testing and refactoring
Usability evaluation is an essential task in web application development. There have been several attempts to integrate user-centered design with agile methods, but it is hard to synchronize their practices. User testing is very valuable to learn from feedback of actual use, but it remains expensive...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Software quality journal 2019-03, Vol.27 (1), p.203-240 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 240 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 203 |
container_title | Software quality journal |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Firmenich, Sergio Garrido, Alejandra Grigera, Julián Rivero, José Matías Rossi, Gustavo |
description | Usability evaluation is an essential task in web application development. There have been several attempts to integrate user-centered design with agile methods, but it is hard to synchronize their practices. User testing is very valuable to learn from feedback of actual use, but it remains expensive to find and solve usability problems. Furthermore, the high cost of usability evaluation forces small/medium-sized companies to trust the first solution applied, without actually testing the success of the solution or considering a possible regression in usability, as could be highlighted by an iterative testing method. In this article, we advocate for a usability improvement cycle oriented by user feedback, and compatible with an agile development process. We propose an iterative method supported by a toolkit that allows usability experts to design user tests, run them remotely, analyze results, and assess alternative solutions to usability problems similarly to A/B testing. Each solution is created by applying client-side web refactorings, i.e., changes to the web pages in the client which are meant to improve usability. The main benefit of our approach is that it reduces the overall cost of user testing and particularly, A/B testing, by applying refactorings to create alternative solutions without modifying the application’s server code. By making it affordable for usability experts to apply the method in parallel with the development cycle, we aim to encourage them to incorporate user feedback and try different ideas to discover the best-performing solution in terms of the metrics of interest. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11219-018-9413-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2082397679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2082397679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-d4a6e693a944f589f076716c58143583b6d78ef825971db2c49ce93692a1f5ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1qwzAQhEVpoWnaB-jN0LMarSVL2mMa-geBXpqzUGw5cUjsVJILfvvKuNBTT8vCfrMzQ8g9sEdgTC0CQA5IGWiKAjgdLsgMCsUpcKkuyYyh5BQ5iGtyE8KBsZESM4KbYLfNsYlD1pzOvvt2J9fGLO591-_22XLxlEUXYtPuMttWmXe1LWPn035Lrmp7DO7ud87J5uX5c_VG1x-v76vlmpa8wEgrYaWTyC0KURcaa6akAlkWGgQvNN_KSmlX67xABdU2LwWWDrnE3EJd2IrPycOkm9x99cmLOXS9b9NLkzOdc0x6mK5guip9F0Kyac6-OVk_GGBmzGqmhkxqyIwNmSEx-cSE8xjI-T_l_6EfZs5oLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2082397679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usability improvement through A/B testing and refactoring</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Firmenich, Sergio ; Garrido, Alejandra ; Grigera, Julián ; Rivero, José Matías ; Rossi, Gustavo</creator><creatorcontrib>Firmenich, Sergio ; Garrido, Alejandra ; Grigera, Julián ; Rivero, José Matías ; Rossi, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><description>Usability evaluation is an essential task in web application development. There have been several attempts to integrate user-centered design with agile methods, but it is hard to synchronize their practices. User testing is very valuable to learn from feedback of actual use, but it remains expensive to find and solve usability problems. Furthermore, the high cost of usability evaluation forces small/medium-sized companies to trust the first solution applied, without actually testing the success of the solution or considering a possible regression in usability, as could be highlighted by an iterative testing method. In this article, we advocate for a usability improvement cycle oriented by user feedback, and compatible with an agile development process. We propose an iterative method supported by a toolkit that allows usability experts to design user tests, run them remotely, analyze results, and assess alternative solutions to usability problems similarly to A/B testing. Each solution is created by applying client-side web refactorings, i.e., changes to the web pages in the client which are meant to improve usability. The main benefit of our approach is that it reduces the overall cost of user testing and particularly, A/B testing, by applying refactorings to create alternative solutions without modifying the application’s server code. By making it affordable for usability experts to apply the method in parallel with the development cycle, we aim to encourage them to incorporate user feedback and try different ideas to discover the best-performing solution in terms of the metrics of interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-9314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1367</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11219-018-9413-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Compilers ; Computer Science ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Feedback ; Interpreters ; Operating Systems ; Programming Languages ; Regression analysis ; Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems ; Test procedures ; Usability ; User feedback</subject><ispartof>Software quality journal, 2019-03, Vol.27 (1), p.203-240</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Software Quality Journal is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-d4a6e693a944f589f076716c58143583b6d78ef825971db2c49ce93692a1f5ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-d4a6e693a944f589f076716c58143583b6d78ef825971db2c49ce93692a1f5ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5052-705X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11219-018-9413-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11219-018-9413-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Firmenich, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrido, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigera, Julián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivero, José Matías</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><title>Usability improvement through A/B testing and refactoring</title><title>Software quality journal</title><addtitle>Software Qual J</addtitle><description>Usability evaluation is an essential task in web application development. There have been several attempts to integrate user-centered design with agile methods, but it is hard to synchronize their practices. User testing is very valuable to learn from feedback of actual use, but it remains expensive to find and solve usability problems. Furthermore, the high cost of usability evaluation forces small/medium-sized companies to trust the first solution applied, without actually testing the success of the solution or considering a possible regression in usability, as could be highlighted by an iterative testing method. In this article, we advocate for a usability improvement cycle oriented by user feedback, and compatible with an agile development process. We propose an iterative method supported by a toolkit that allows usability experts to design user tests, run them remotely, analyze results, and assess alternative solutions to usability problems similarly to A/B testing. Each solution is created by applying client-side web refactorings, i.e., changes to the web pages in the client which are meant to improve usability. The main benefit of our approach is that it reduces the overall cost of user testing and particularly, A/B testing, by applying refactorings to create alternative solutions without modifying the application’s server code. By making it affordable for usability experts to apply the method in parallel with the development cycle, we aim to encourage them to incorporate user feedback and try different ideas to discover the best-performing solution in terms of the metrics of interest.</description><subject>Compilers</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Interpreters</subject><subject>Operating Systems</subject><subject>Programming Languages</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>User feedback</subject><issn>0963-9314</issn><issn>1573-1367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1qwzAQhEVpoWnaB-jN0LMarSVL2mMa-geBXpqzUGw5cUjsVJILfvvKuNBTT8vCfrMzQ8g9sEdgTC0CQA5IGWiKAjgdLsgMCsUpcKkuyYyh5BQ5iGtyE8KBsZESM4KbYLfNsYlD1pzOvvt2J9fGLO591-_22XLxlEUXYtPuMttWmXe1LWPn035Lrmp7DO7ud87J5uX5c_VG1x-v76vlmpa8wEgrYaWTyC0KURcaa6akAlkWGgQvNN_KSmlX67xABdU2LwWWDrnE3EJd2IrPycOkm9x99cmLOXS9b9NLkzOdc0x6mK5guip9F0Kyac6-OVk_GGBmzGqmhkxqyIwNmSEx-cSE8xjI-T_l_6EfZs5oLw</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Firmenich, Sergio</creator><creator>Garrido, Alejandra</creator><creator>Grigera, Julián</creator><creator>Rivero, José Matías</creator><creator>Rossi, Gustavo</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5052-705X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Usability improvement through A/B testing and refactoring</title><author>Firmenich, Sergio ; Garrido, Alejandra ; Grigera, Julián ; Rivero, José Matías ; Rossi, Gustavo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-d4a6e693a944f589f076716c58143583b6d78ef825971db2c49ce93692a1f5ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Compilers</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Interpreters</topic><topic>Operating Systems</topic><topic>Programming Languages</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>User feedback</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Firmenich, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrido, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigera, Julián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivero, José Matías</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Software quality journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Firmenich, Sergio</au><au>Garrido, Alejandra</au><au>Grigera, Julián</au><au>Rivero, José Matías</au><au>Rossi, Gustavo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usability improvement through A/B testing and refactoring</atitle><jtitle>Software quality journal</jtitle><stitle>Software Qual J</stitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>203-240</pages><issn>0963-9314</issn><eissn>1573-1367</eissn><abstract>Usability evaluation is an essential task in web application development. There have been several attempts to integrate user-centered design with agile methods, but it is hard to synchronize their practices. User testing is very valuable to learn from feedback of actual use, but it remains expensive to find and solve usability problems. Furthermore, the high cost of usability evaluation forces small/medium-sized companies to trust the first solution applied, without actually testing the success of the solution or considering a possible regression in usability, as could be highlighted by an iterative testing method. In this article, we advocate for a usability improvement cycle oriented by user feedback, and compatible with an agile development process. We propose an iterative method supported by a toolkit that allows usability experts to design user tests, run them remotely, analyze results, and assess alternative solutions to usability problems similarly to A/B testing. Each solution is created by applying client-side web refactorings, i.e., changes to the web pages in the client which are meant to improve usability. The main benefit of our approach is that it reduces the overall cost of user testing and particularly, A/B testing, by applying refactorings to create alternative solutions without modifying the application’s server code. By making it affordable for usability experts to apply the method in parallel with the development cycle, we aim to encourage them to incorporate user feedback and try different ideas to discover the best-performing solution in terms of the metrics of interest.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11219-018-9413-y</doi><tpages>38</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5052-705X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-9314 |
ispartof | Software quality journal, 2019-03, Vol.27 (1), p.203-240 |
issn | 0963-9314 1573-1367 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2082397679 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Compilers Computer Science Data Structures and Information Theory Feedback Interpreters Operating Systems Programming Languages Regression analysis Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems Test procedures Usability User feedback |
title | Usability improvement through A/B testing and refactoring |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A22%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usability%20improvement%20through%20A/B%20testing%20and%20refactoring&rft.jtitle=Software%20quality%20journal&rft.au=Firmenich,%20Sergio&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=203-240&rft.issn=0963-9314&rft.eissn=1573-1367&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11219-018-9413-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2082397679%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2082397679&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |