Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability

This paper focuses on resource and structural factors to explore the relationship between organizational improvisation and innovation capability. Although the role of improvisation has attracted increasing academic attention in fast-changing environments, little is known about the conditions under w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Technovation 2018-06, Vol.74-75, p.32-41
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Yang, Lv, Diwei, Ying, Ying, Arndt, Felix, Wei, Jiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 41
container_issue
container_start_page 32
container_title Technovation
container_volume 74-75
creator Liu, Yang
Lv, Diwei
Ying, Ying
Arndt, Felix
Wei, Jiang
description This paper focuses on resource and structural factors to explore the relationship between organizational improvisation and innovation capability. Although the role of improvisation has attracted increasing academic attention in fast-changing environments, little is known about the conditions under which firms benefit from improvisation. This paper addresses this gap using an organizational learning perspective that explains the role of a firm's organizational structure and organizational resources for improvisation and innovation. A large-scale survey in China finds that firms vary in their levels of (I) centralization and formalization of decision making and (II) resource slack and investment irreversibility and that these factors moderate the relationship between improvisation and innovation capability in distinct ways. Consistent with our theorizing, improvisation enhances innovation capability when firms have a decentralized but formalized structure or pursue the dual goals of maximizing resource slack and minimizing investment irreversibility. [Display omitted] •Slack resources and minimization of irreversible investment increase the efficiency of improvisation.•A decentralized but formalized firms' improvisation positively influences innovation capabilities.•Data from 146 high-tech firms in China are used to test hypotheses.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2082283393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0166497218301275</els_id><sourcerecordid>2082283393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-7ae5b5a284290f723bac936048b76bc437b0e75a8111a63a2b3b0d66d68aa7d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1P3DAQhq2KSl2g_8Fqz0nHdtZxuFV8tEhIvcDZmjiT4lWwt7Z3Bf--plukPXKay_s-M_Mw9kVAK0Dob5u2kHsMcY_Fx9BKEKYF2YKAD2wlTD80Uhl1wlY1rJtu6OUndprzBgAG2cGKPd8-bVPc-_wPwOeYuA9vvAt-_0jcxVB8-E2h8BQX4nHmiXLcJUccw8RzSTtXdgkXPqMrMeWK4PS8XdCHWjwCcodbHP3iy8s5-zjjkunz_3nGHm6u7y9_Nne_ftxefr9rXKd0aXqk9bhGaTo5wNxLNaIblIbOjL0ea6Yfgfo1GiEEaoVyVCNMWk_aIPaTVmfs64Fb3_yzo1zspp4e6korwUhplBpUTV0cUi7FnBPNdpv8E6YXK8C-mrYbe2zavpq2IG01XctXhzLVP_aeks3OU3A0-USu2Cn692D-Ao1okX8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2082283393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Liu, Yang ; Lv, Diwei ; Ying, Ying ; Arndt, Felix ; Wei, Jiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yang ; Lv, Diwei ; Ying, Ying ; Arndt, Felix ; Wei, Jiang</creatorcontrib><description>This paper focuses on resource and structural factors to explore the relationship between organizational improvisation and innovation capability. Although the role of improvisation has attracted increasing academic attention in fast-changing environments, little is known about the conditions under which firms benefit from improvisation. This paper addresses this gap using an organizational learning perspective that explains the role of a firm's organizational structure and organizational resources for improvisation and innovation. A large-scale survey in China finds that firms vary in their levels of (I) centralization and formalization of decision making and (II) resource slack and investment irreversibility and that these factors moderate the relationship between improvisation and innovation capability in distinct ways. Consistent with our theorizing, improvisation enhances innovation capability when firms have a decentralized but formalized structure or pursue the dual goals of maximizing resource slack and minimizing investment irreversibility. [Display omitted] •Slack resources and minimization of irreversible investment increase the efficiency of improvisation.•A decentralized but formalized firms' improvisation positively influences innovation capabilities.•Data from 146 high-tech firms in China are used to test hypotheses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-4972</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Centralization ; Changing environments ; China ; Companies ; Decentralization ; Decision making ; Formalization ; Improvisation ; Innovation ; Innovation capabilities ; Innovations ; Investment ; Organizational learning ; Organizational structure ; Resource slack</subject><ispartof>Technovation, 2018-06, Vol.74-75, p.32-41</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jun/Jul 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-7ae5b5a284290f723bac936048b76bc437b0e75a8111a63a2b3b0d66d68aa7d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-7ae5b5a284290f723bac936048b76bc437b0e75a8111a63a2b3b0d66d68aa7d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Diwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arndt, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jiang</creatorcontrib><title>Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability</title><title>Technovation</title><description>This paper focuses on resource and structural factors to explore the relationship between organizational improvisation and innovation capability. Although the role of improvisation has attracted increasing academic attention in fast-changing environments, little is known about the conditions under which firms benefit from improvisation. This paper addresses this gap using an organizational learning perspective that explains the role of a firm's organizational structure and organizational resources for improvisation and innovation. A large-scale survey in China finds that firms vary in their levels of (I) centralization and formalization of decision making and (II) resource slack and investment irreversibility and that these factors moderate the relationship between improvisation and innovation capability in distinct ways. Consistent with our theorizing, improvisation enhances innovation capability when firms have a decentralized but formalized structure or pursue the dual goals of maximizing resource slack and minimizing investment irreversibility. [Display omitted] •Slack resources and minimization of irreversible investment increase the efficiency of improvisation.•A decentralized but formalized firms' improvisation positively influences innovation capabilities.•Data from 146 high-tech firms in China are used to test hypotheses.</description><subject>Centralization</subject><subject>Changing environments</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Formalization</subject><subject>Improvisation</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovation capabilities</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Resource slack</subject><issn>0166-4972</issn><issn>1879-2383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1P3DAQhq2KSl2g_8Fqz0nHdtZxuFV8tEhIvcDZmjiT4lWwt7Z3Bf--plukPXKay_s-M_Mw9kVAK0Dob5u2kHsMcY_Fx9BKEKYF2YKAD2wlTD80Uhl1wlY1rJtu6OUndprzBgAG2cGKPd8-bVPc-_wPwOeYuA9vvAt-_0jcxVB8-E2h8BQX4nHmiXLcJUccw8RzSTtXdgkXPqMrMeWK4PS8XdCHWjwCcodbHP3iy8s5-zjjkunz_3nGHm6u7y9_Nne_ftxefr9rXKd0aXqk9bhGaTo5wNxLNaIblIbOjL0ea6Yfgfo1GiEEaoVyVCNMWk_aIPaTVmfs64Fb3_yzo1zspp4e6korwUhplBpUTV0cUi7FnBPNdpv8E6YXK8C-mrYbe2zavpq2IG01XctXhzLVP_aeks3OU3A0-USu2Cn692D-Ao1okX8</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Liu, Yang</creator><creator>Lv, Diwei</creator><creator>Ying, Ying</creator><creator>Arndt, Felix</creator><creator>Wei, Jiang</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability</title><author>Liu, Yang ; Lv, Diwei ; Ying, Ying ; Arndt, Felix ; Wei, Jiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-7ae5b5a284290f723bac936048b76bc437b0e75a8111a63a2b3b0d66d68aa7d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Centralization</topic><topic>Changing environments</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Formalization</topic><topic>Improvisation</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovation capabilities</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Resource slack</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Diwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arndt, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jiang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Technovation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Yang</au><au>Lv, Diwei</au><au>Ying, Ying</au><au>Arndt, Felix</au><au>Wei, Jiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability</atitle><jtitle>Technovation</jtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>74-75</volume><spage>32</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>32-41</pages><issn>0166-4972</issn><eissn>1879-2383</eissn><abstract>This paper focuses on resource and structural factors to explore the relationship between organizational improvisation and innovation capability. Although the role of improvisation has attracted increasing academic attention in fast-changing environments, little is known about the conditions under which firms benefit from improvisation. This paper addresses this gap using an organizational learning perspective that explains the role of a firm's organizational structure and organizational resources for improvisation and innovation. A large-scale survey in China finds that firms vary in their levels of (I) centralization and formalization of decision making and (II) resource slack and investment irreversibility and that these factors moderate the relationship between improvisation and innovation capability in distinct ways. Consistent with our theorizing, improvisation enhances innovation capability when firms have a decentralized but formalized structure or pursue the dual goals of maximizing resource slack and minimizing investment irreversibility. [Display omitted] •Slack resources and minimization of irreversible investment increase the efficiency of improvisation.•A decentralized but formalized firms' improvisation positively influences innovation capabilities.•Data from 146 high-tech firms in China are used to test hypotheses.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.010</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0166-4972
ispartof Technovation, 2018-06, Vol.74-75, p.32-41
issn 0166-4972
1879-2383
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2082283393
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Centralization
Changing environments
China
Companies
Decentralization
Decision making
Formalization
Improvisation
Innovation
Innovation capabilities
Innovations
Investment
Organizational learning
Organizational structure
Resource slack
title Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A42%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvisation%20for%20innovation:%20The%20contingent%20role%20of%20resource%20and%20structural%20factors%20in%20explaining%20innovation%20capability&rft.jtitle=Technovation&rft.au=Liu,%20Yang&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=74-75&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=32-41&rft.issn=0166-4972&rft.eissn=1879-2383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2082283393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2082283393&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0166497218301275&rfr_iscdi=true