Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability
This paper focuses on resource and structural factors to explore the relationship between organizational improvisation and innovation capability. Although the role of improvisation has attracted increasing academic attention in fast-changing environments, little is known about the conditions under w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Technovation 2018-06, Vol.74-75, p.32-41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 41 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 32 |
container_title | Technovation |
container_volume | 74-75 |
creator | Liu, Yang Lv, Diwei Ying, Ying Arndt, Felix Wei, Jiang |
description | This paper focuses on resource and structural factors to explore the relationship between organizational improvisation and innovation capability. Although the role of improvisation has attracted increasing academic attention in fast-changing environments, little is known about the conditions under which firms benefit from improvisation. This paper addresses this gap using an organizational learning perspective that explains the role of a firm's organizational structure and organizational resources for improvisation and innovation. A large-scale survey in China finds that firms vary in their levels of (I) centralization and formalization of decision making and (II) resource slack and investment irreversibility and that these factors moderate the relationship between improvisation and innovation capability in distinct ways. Consistent with our theorizing, improvisation enhances innovation capability when firms have a decentralized but formalized structure or pursue the dual goals of maximizing resource slack and minimizing investment irreversibility.
[Display omitted]
•Slack resources and minimization of irreversible investment increase the efficiency of improvisation.•A decentralized but formalized firms' improvisation positively influences innovation capabilities.•Data from 146 high-tech firms in China are used to test hypotheses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2082283393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0166497218301275</els_id><sourcerecordid>2082283393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-7ae5b5a284290f723bac936048b76bc437b0e75a8111a63a2b3b0d66d68aa7d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1P3DAQhq2KSl2g_8Fqz0nHdtZxuFV8tEhIvcDZmjiT4lWwt7Z3Bf--plukPXKay_s-M_Mw9kVAK0Dob5u2kHsMcY_Fx9BKEKYF2YKAD2wlTD80Uhl1wlY1rJtu6OUndprzBgAG2cGKPd8-bVPc-_wPwOeYuA9vvAt-_0jcxVB8-E2h8BQX4nHmiXLcJUccw8RzSTtXdgkXPqMrMeWK4PS8XdCHWjwCcodbHP3iy8s5-zjjkunz_3nGHm6u7y9_Nne_ftxefr9rXKd0aXqk9bhGaTo5wNxLNaIblIbOjL0ea6Yfgfo1GiEEaoVyVCNMWk_aIPaTVmfs64Fb3_yzo1zspp4e6korwUhplBpUTV0cUi7FnBPNdpv8E6YXK8C-mrYbe2zavpq2IG01XctXhzLVP_aeks3OU3A0-USu2Cn692D-Ao1okX8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2082283393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Liu, Yang ; Lv, Diwei ; Ying, Ying ; Arndt, Felix ; Wei, Jiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yang ; Lv, Diwei ; Ying, Ying ; Arndt, Felix ; Wei, Jiang</creatorcontrib><description>This paper focuses on resource and structural factors to explore the relationship between organizational improvisation and innovation capability. Although the role of improvisation has attracted increasing academic attention in fast-changing environments, little is known about the conditions under which firms benefit from improvisation. This paper addresses this gap using an organizational learning perspective that explains the role of a firm's organizational structure and organizational resources for improvisation and innovation. A large-scale survey in China finds that firms vary in their levels of (I) centralization and formalization of decision making and (II) resource slack and investment irreversibility and that these factors moderate the relationship between improvisation and innovation capability in distinct ways. Consistent with our theorizing, improvisation enhances innovation capability when firms have a decentralized but formalized structure or pursue the dual goals of maximizing resource slack and minimizing investment irreversibility.
[Display omitted]
•Slack resources and minimization of irreversible investment increase the efficiency of improvisation.•A decentralized but formalized firms' improvisation positively influences innovation capabilities.•Data from 146 high-tech firms in China are used to test hypotheses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-4972</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Centralization ; Changing environments ; China ; Companies ; Decentralization ; Decision making ; Formalization ; Improvisation ; Innovation ; Innovation capabilities ; Innovations ; Investment ; Organizational learning ; Organizational structure ; Resource slack</subject><ispartof>Technovation, 2018-06, Vol.74-75, p.32-41</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jun/Jul 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-7ae5b5a284290f723bac936048b76bc437b0e75a8111a63a2b3b0d66d68aa7d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-7ae5b5a284290f723bac936048b76bc437b0e75a8111a63a2b3b0d66d68aa7d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Diwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arndt, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jiang</creatorcontrib><title>Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability</title><title>Technovation</title><description>This paper focuses on resource and structural factors to explore the relationship between organizational improvisation and innovation capability. Although the role of improvisation has attracted increasing academic attention in fast-changing environments, little is known about the conditions under which firms benefit from improvisation. This paper addresses this gap using an organizational learning perspective that explains the role of a firm's organizational structure and organizational resources for improvisation and innovation. A large-scale survey in China finds that firms vary in their levels of (I) centralization and formalization of decision making and (II) resource slack and investment irreversibility and that these factors moderate the relationship between improvisation and innovation capability in distinct ways. Consistent with our theorizing, improvisation enhances innovation capability when firms have a decentralized but formalized structure or pursue the dual goals of maximizing resource slack and minimizing investment irreversibility.
[Display omitted]
•Slack resources and minimization of irreversible investment increase the efficiency of improvisation.•A decentralized but formalized firms' improvisation positively influences innovation capabilities.•Data from 146 high-tech firms in China are used to test hypotheses.</description><subject>Centralization</subject><subject>Changing environments</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Formalization</subject><subject>Improvisation</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovation capabilities</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Resource slack</subject><issn>0166-4972</issn><issn>1879-2383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1P3DAQhq2KSl2g_8Fqz0nHdtZxuFV8tEhIvcDZmjiT4lWwt7Z3Bf--plukPXKay_s-M_Mw9kVAK0Dob5u2kHsMcY_Fx9BKEKYF2YKAD2wlTD80Uhl1wlY1rJtu6OUndprzBgAG2cGKPd8-bVPc-_wPwOeYuA9vvAt-_0jcxVB8-E2h8BQX4nHmiXLcJUccw8RzSTtXdgkXPqMrMeWK4PS8XdCHWjwCcodbHP3iy8s5-zjjkunz_3nGHm6u7y9_Nne_ftxefr9rXKd0aXqk9bhGaTo5wNxLNaIblIbOjL0ea6Yfgfo1GiEEaoVyVCNMWk_aIPaTVmfs64Fb3_yzo1zspp4e6korwUhplBpUTV0cUi7FnBPNdpv8E6YXK8C-mrYbe2zavpq2IG01XctXhzLVP_aeks3OU3A0-USu2Cn692D-Ao1okX8</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Liu, Yang</creator><creator>Lv, Diwei</creator><creator>Ying, Ying</creator><creator>Arndt, Felix</creator><creator>Wei, Jiang</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability</title><author>Liu, Yang ; Lv, Diwei ; Ying, Ying ; Arndt, Felix ; Wei, Jiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-7ae5b5a284290f723bac936048b76bc437b0e75a8111a63a2b3b0d66d68aa7d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Centralization</topic><topic>Changing environments</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Formalization</topic><topic>Improvisation</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovation capabilities</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Resource slack</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Diwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arndt, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jiang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Technovation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Yang</au><au>Lv, Diwei</au><au>Ying, Ying</au><au>Arndt, Felix</au><au>Wei, Jiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability</atitle><jtitle>Technovation</jtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>74-75</volume><spage>32</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>32-41</pages><issn>0166-4972</issn><eissn>1879-2383</eissn><abstract>This paper focuses on resource and structural factors to explore the relationship between organizational improvisation and innovation capability. Although the role of improvisation has attracted increasing academic attention in fast-changing environments, little is known about the conditions under which firms benefit from improvisation. This paper addresses this gap using an organizational learning perspective that explains the role of a firm's organizational structure and organizational resources for improvisation and innovation. A large-scale survey in China finds that firms vary in their levels of (I) centralization and formalization of decision making and (II) resource slack and investment irreversibility and that these factors moderate the relationship between improvisation and innovation capability in distinct ways. Consistent with our theorizing, improvisation enhances innovation capability when firms have a decentralized but formalized structure or pursue the dual goals of maximizing resource slack and minimizing investment irreversibility.
[Display omitted]
•Slack resources and minimization of irreversible investment increase the efficiency of improvisation.•A decentralized but formalized firms' improvisation positively influences innovation capabilities.•Data from 146 high-tech firms in China are used to test hypotheses.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.010</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0166-4972 |
ispartof | Technovation, 2018-06, Vol.74-75, p.32-41 |
issn | 0166-4972 1879-2383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2082283393 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Centralization Changing environments China Companies Decentralization Decision making Formalization Improvisation Innovation Innovation capabilities Innovations Investment Organizational learning Organizational structure Resource slack |
title | Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A42%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvisation%20for%20innovation:%20The%20contingent%20role%20of%20resource%20and%20structural%20factors%20in%20explaining%20innovation%20capability&rft.jtitle=Technovation&rft.au=Liu,%20Yang&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=74-75&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=32-41&rft.issn=0166-4972&rft.eissn=1879-2383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2082283393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2082283393&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0166497218301275&rfr_iscdi=true |