Arbitrage and Valuation in the Market for Standard and Poor's Depositary Receipts

This paper examines pricing in the market for depositary receipts, securities designed to track the performance of a stock index that trade like shares of stock. Arbitrage costs are low because these assets have low fundamental risk, low transactions costs, and high dividend yields. We find that Sta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Financial management 2000-10, Vol.29 (3), p.71-87
Hauptverfasser: Ackert, Lucy F., Tian, Yisong S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 87
container_issue 3
container_start_page 71
container_title Financial management
container_volume 29
creator Ackert, Lucy F.
Tian, Yisong S.
description This paper examines pricing in the market for depositary receipts, securities designed to track the performance of a stock index that trade like shares of stock. Arbitrage costs are low because these assets have low fundamental risk, low transactions costs, and high dividend yields. We find that Standard and Poor's Depositary Receipts (SPDRs), or spiders, do not trade at economically significant discounts, unlike closed-end mutual fund shares. Although individual investors invest much more heavily in SPDRs than in S&P500 stock, investor sentiment is not an important determinant of the discount. The SPDRs redemption feature facilitates arbitrage so that sophisticated traders can take advantage of and eliminate mispricing. However, we also report a larger, economically significant discount for MidCap SPDRs. MidCap SPDRs are designed to track the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 index, an index of moderate capitalization firms, and are expected to have higher arbitrage costs. Finally, we find that SPDRs and MidCap SPDRs returns are not excessively volatile, also unlike closed-end funds.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3666230
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_208186904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3666230</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3666230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-3d768535b6522b80522379f23624218cb45d252568083bdb607758c9d8be347a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtPwzAMAOAIgcQYiD_AIYLDTgUnaR49ThsvaYg34lYlbQodoylJduDfE9jgxsW25E-2bIT2CRxTBvKECSFSsYEGRHKeAWfPm2gAkIuMqYJuo50Q5gCEAhUDdDv2po1ev1isuxo_6cVSx9Z1uO1wfLX4Svs3G3HjPL6PSWhf_8Ab5_wo4KntXWij9p_4zla27WPYRVuNXgS7t85D9Hh2-jC5yGbX55eT8SyrGIOYsVoKxRk3glNqFKTIZNFQJmhOiapMzmvKKRcKFDO1ESAlV1VRK2NZLjUbosPV3N67j6UNsZy7pe_SypKCIkoUkCd09B8itOBQpGUyqdFKVd6F4G1T9r59T0eVBMrvp5brpyZ5sJLzEJ3_Y7_tL2nxboY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1295092427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arbitrage and Valuation in the Market for Standard and Poor's Depositary Receipts</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Ackert, Lucy F. ; Tian, Yisong S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ackert, Lucy F. ; Tian, Yisong S.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines pricing in the market for depositary receipts, securities designed to track the performance of a stock index that trade like shares of stock. Arbitrage costs are low because these assets have low fundamental risk, low transactions costs, and high dividend yields. We find that Standard and Poor's Depositary Receipts (SPDRs), or spiders, do not trade at economically significant discounts, unlike closed-end mutual fund shares. Although individual investors invest much more heavily in SPDRs than in S&amp;P500 stock, investor sentiment is not an important determinant of the discount. The SPDRs redemption feature facilitates arbitrage so that sophisticated traders can take advantage of and eliminate mispricing. However, we also report a larger, economically significant discount for MidCap SPDRs. MidCap SPDRs are designed to track the performance of the S&amp;P MidCap 400 index, an index of moderate capitalization firms, and are expected to have higher arbitrage costs. Finally, we find that SPDRs and MidCap SPDRs returns are not excessively volatile, also unlike closed-end funds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-3892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-053X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3666230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Albany, N.Y: Financial Management Association</publisher><subject>American Depositary Receipts ; Arbitrage ; Baskets ; Closed end investment companies ; Costs ; Discounts ; Dividends ; Efficiency ; Efficient markets ; Hypotheses ; Investors ; Market prices ; Mid cap investments ; Mutual funds ; Noise ; Profitability ; Receipts ; Securities markets ; Standard and Poors 500 Index ; Stock exchanges ; Stock market indices ; Stock prices ; Stock shares ; Studies ; Valuation ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Financial management, 2000-10, Vol.29 (3), p.71-87</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 Financial Management Association International</rights><rights>Copyright Financial Management Association Autumn 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-3d768535b6522b80522379f23624218cb45d252568083bdb607758c9d8be347a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3666230$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3666230$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27848,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ackert, Lucy F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Yisong S.</creatorcontrib><title>Arbitrage and Valuation in the Market for Standard and Poor's Depositary Receipts</title><title>Financial management</title><description>This paper examines pricing in the market for depositary receipts, securities designed to track the performance of a stock index that trade like shares of stock. Arbitrage costs are low because these assets have low fundamental risk, low transactions costs, and high dividend yields. We find that Standard and Poor's Depositary Receipts (SPDRs), or spiders, do not trade at economically significant discounts, unlike closed-end mutual fund shares. Although individual investors invest much more heavily in SPDRs than in S&amp;P500 stock, investor sentiment is not an important determinant of the discount. The SPDRs redemption feature facilitates arbitrage so that sophisticated traders can take advantage of and eliminate mispricing. However, we also report a larger, economically significant discount for MidCap SPDRs. MidCap SPDRs are designed to track the performance of the S&amp;P MidCap 400 index, an index of moderate capitalization firms, and are expected to have higher arbitrage costs. Finally, we find that SPDRs and MidCap SPDRs returns are not excessively volatile, also unlike closed-end funds.</description><subject>American Depositary Receipts</subject><subject>Arbitrage</subject><subject>Baskets</subject><subject>Closed end investment companies</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Discounts</subject><subject>Dividends</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Efficient markets</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Market prices</subject><subject>Mid cap investments</subject><subject>Mutual funds</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Receipts</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Standard and Poors 500 Index</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Stock market indices</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Stock shares</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0046-3892</issn><issn>1755-053X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtPwzAMAOAIgcQYiD_AIYLDTgUnaR49ThsvaYg34lYlbQodoylJduDfE9jgxsW25E-2bIT2CRxTBvKECSFSsYEGRHKeAWfPm2gAkIuMqYJuo50Q5gCEAhUDdDv2po1ev1isuxo_6cVSx9Z1uO1wfLX4Svs3G3HjPL6PSWhf_8Ab5_wo4KntXWij9p_4zla27WPYRVuNXgS7t85D9Hh2-jC5yGbX55eT8SyrGIOYsVoKxRk3glNqFKTIZNFQJmhOiapMzmvKKRcKFDO1ESAlV1VRK2NZLjUbosPV3N67j6UNsZy7pe_SypKCIkoUkCd09B8itOBQpGUyqdFKVd6F4G1T9r59T0eVBMrvp5brpyZ5sJLzEJ3_Y7_tL2nxboY</recordid><startdate>20001001</startdate><enddate>20001001</enddate><creator>Ackert, Lucy F.</creator><creator>Tian, Yisong S.</creator><general>Financial Management Association</general><general>Financial Management Association International</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>ACNBF</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~P6</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001001</creationdate><title>Arbitrage and Valuation in the Market for Standard and Poor's Depositary Receipts</title><author>Ackert, Lucy F. ; Tian, Yisong S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-3d768535b6522b80522379f23624218cb45d252568083bdb607758c9d8be347a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>American Depositary Receipts</topic><topic>Arbitrage</topic><topic>Baskets</topic><topic>Closed end investment companies</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Discounts</topic><topic>Dividends</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Efficient markets</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Market prices</topic><topic>Mid cap investments</topic><topic>Mutual funds</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Receipts</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Standard and Poors 500 Index</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Stock market indices</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Stock shares</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ackert, Lucy F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Yisong S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 6 (2022)</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online (PAO)</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>European Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Financial management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ackert, Lucy F.</au><au>Tian, Yisong S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arbitrage and Valuation in the Market for Standard and Poor's Depositary Receipts</atitle><jtitle>Financial management</jtitle><date>2000-10-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>71-87</pages><issn>0046-3892</issn><eissn>1755-053X</eissn><abstract>This paper examines pricing in the market for depositary receipts, securities designed to track the performance of a stock index that trade like shares of stock. Arbitrage costs are low because these assets have low fundamental risk, low transactions costs, and high dividend yields. We find that Standard and Poor's Depositary Receipts (SPDRs), or spiders, do not trade at economically significant discounts, unlike closed-end mutual fund shares. Although individual investors invest much more heavily in SPDRs than in S&amp;P500 stock, investor sentiment is not an important determinant of the discount. The SPDRs redemption feature facilitates arbitrage so that sophisticated traders can take advantage of and eliminate mispricing. However, we also report a larger, economically significant discount for MidCap SPDRs. MidCap SPDRs are designed to track the performance of the S&amp;P MidCap 400 index, an index of moderate capitalization firms, and are expected to have higher arbitrage costs. Finally, we find that SPDRs and MidCap SPDRs returns are not excessively volatile, also unlike closed-end funds.</abstract><cop>Albany, N.Y</cop><pub>Financial Management Association</pub><doi>10.2307/3666230</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-3892
ispartof Financial management, 2000-10, Vol.29 (3), p.71-87
issn 0046-3892
1755-053X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_208186904
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Business Source Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Periodicals Index Online
subjects American Depositary Receipts
Arbitrage
Baskets
Closed end investment companies
Costs
Discounts
Dividends
Efficiency
Efficient markets
Hypotheses
Investors
Market prices
Mid cap investments
Mutual funds
Noise
Profitability
Receipts
Securities markets
Standard and Poors 500 Index
Stock exchanges
Stock market indices
Stock prices
Stock shares
Studies
Valuation
Volatility
title Arbitrage and Valuation in the Market for Standard and Poor's Depositary Receipts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A48%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arbitrage%20and%20Valuation%20in%20the%20Market%20for%20Standard%20and%20Poor's%20Depositary%20Receipts&rft.jtitle=Financial%20management&rft.au=Ackert,%20Lucy%20F.&rft.date=2000-10-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=71-87&rft.issn=0046-3892&rft.eissn=1755-053X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3666230&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3666230%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1295092427&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3666230&rfr_iscdi=true