Price Pressure on the NYSE and Nasdaq: Evidence from S&P 500 Index Changes
Using additions of NYSE- and Nasdaq-listed firms to the S&P 500, between 1989 and 2000, we explore the price effects of noninformation related demand shocks. After controlling for various firm characteristics, index fund growth, and arbitrage risk, we find that NYSE stocks suffer less pronounced...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Financial management 2003-10, Vol.32 (3), p.85-99 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 99 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | Financial management |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Elliott, William B. Warr, Richard S. |
description | Using additions of NYSE- and Nasdaq-listed firms to the S&P 500, between 1989 and 2000, we explore the price effects of noninformation related demand shocks. After controlling for various firm characteristics, index fund growth, and arbitrage risk, we find that NYSE stocks suffer less pronounced price effects than do Nasdaq stocks on the day stocks are added to the Index. For NYSE stocks, this effect is reversed immediately, but Nasdaq stocks show a partial reversal taking place over several days. We interpret this result as evidence of the superiority of the specialist system over the dealer system in mitigating price pressures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3666385 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_208181431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3666385</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3666385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-f6980a3315dc7cb638d296a2e2473ea3a17e0a922cdf793f9f0d2eba1a2951423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90MFKAzEQBuAgCtYqvoCH4EFPq5PJJrvxJqVqpdRCFfS0pJuJbbG7bbIVfXtXWj3NYT7-GX7GTgVcoYTsWmqtZa72WEdkSiWg5Os-6wCkOpG5wUN2FOMCQCCg7rDHcZiXxMeBYtwE4nXFmxnx0dukz23l-MhGZ9c3vP85d1S10od6yScXY64A-KBy9MV7M1u9UzxmB95-RDrZzS57ues_9x6S4dP9oHc7TEoJ2CRemxyslEK5Miun7a8OjbZImGaSrLQiI7AGsXQ-M9IbDw5paoVFo0SKssvOt7mrUK83FJtiUW9C1Z4sEHKRi1SKFl1uURnqGAP5YhXmSxu-CwHFb0_FrqdWnm3lIjZ1-Gd_6x927F-4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208181431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Price Pressure on the NYSE and Nasdaq: Evidence from S&P 500 Index Changes</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Elliott, William B. ; Warr, Richard S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elliott, William B. ; Warr, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><description>Using additions of NYSE- and Nasdaq-listed firms to the S&P 500, between 1989 and 2000, we explore the price effects of noninformation related demand shocks. After controlling for various firm characteristics, index fund growth, and arbitrage risk, we find that NYSE stocks suffer less pronounced price effects than do Nasdaq stocks on the day stocks are added to the Index. For NYSE stocks, this effect is reversed immediately, but Nasdaq stocks show a partial reversal taking place over several days. We interpret this result as evidence of the superiority of the specialist system over the dealer system in mitigating price pressures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-3892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-053X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3666385</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tampa: Financial Management Association</publisher><subject>Arbitrage ; Demand shocks ; Index funds ; Investment advisors ; Investment risk ; Liquidity ; Nasdaq Composite Index ; New stock market listings ; Securities markets ; Securities trading ; Statistical discrepancies ; Stock exchanges ; Stock market indices ; Stock prices ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Financial management, 2003-10, Vol.32 (3), p.85-99</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Financial Management Association International</rights><rights>Copyright Financial Management Association Autumn 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-f6980a3315dc7cb638d296a2e2473ea3a17e0a922cdf793f9f0d2eba1a2951423</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3666385$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3666385$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elliott, William B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warr, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><title>Price Pressure on the NYSE and Nasdaq: Evidence from S&P 500 Index Changes</title><title>Financial management</title><description>Using additions of NYSE- and Nasdaq-listed firms to the S&P 500, between 1989 and 2000, we explore the price effects of noninformation related demand shocks. After controlling for various firm characteristics, index fund growth, and arbitrage risk, we find that NYSE stocks suffer less pronounced price effects than do Nasdaq stocks on the day stocks are added to the Index. For NYSE stocks, this effect is reversed immediately, but Nasdaq stocks show a partial reversal taking place over several days. We interpret this result as evidence of the superiority of the specialist system over the dealer system in mitigating price pressures.</description><subject>Arbitrage</subject><subject>Demand shocks</subject><subject>Index funds</subject><subject>Investment advisors</subject><subject>Investment risk</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Nasdaq Composite Index</subject><subject>New stock market listings</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Securities trading</subject><subject>Statistical discrepancies</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Stock market indices</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0046-3892</issn><issn>1755-053X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo90MFKAzEQBuAgCtYqvoCH4EFPq5PJJrvxJqVqpdRCFfS0pJuJbbG7bbIVfXtXWj3NYT7-GX7GTgVcoYTsWmqtZa72WEdkSiWg5Os-6wCkOpG5wUN2FOMCQCCg7rDHcZiXxMeBYtwE4nXFmxnx0dukz23l-MhGZ9c3vP85d1S10od6yScXY64A-KBy9MV7M1u9UzxmB95-RDrZzS57ues_9x6S4dP9oHc7TEoJ2CRemxyslEK5Miun7a8OjbZImGaSrLQiI7AGsXQ-M9IbDw5paoVFo0SKssvOt7mrUK83FJtiUW9C1Z4sEHKRi1SKFl1uURnqGAP5YhXmSxu-CwHFb0_FrqdWnm3lIjZ1-Gd_6x927F-4</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>Elliott, William B.</creator><creator>Warr, Richard S.</creator><general>Financial Management Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>Price Pressure on the NYSE and Nasdaq: Evidence from S&P 500 Index Changes</title><author>Elliott, William B. ; Warr, Richard S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-f6980a3315dc7cb638d296a2e2473ea3a17e0a922cdf793f9f0d2eba1a2951423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Arbitrage</topic><topic>Demand shocks</topic><topic>Index funds</topic><topic>Investment advisors</topic><topic>Investment risk</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Nasdaq Composite Index</topic><topic>New stock market listings</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Securities trading</topic><topic>Statistical discrepancies</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Stock market indices</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elliott, William B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warr, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>European Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Financial management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elliott, William B.</au><au>Warr, Richard S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Price Pressure on the NYSE and Nasdaq: Evidence from S&P 500 Index Changes</atitle><jtitle>Financial management</jtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>85-99</pages><issn>0046-3892</issn><eissn>1755-053X</eissn><abstract>Using additions of NYSE- and Nasdaq-listed firms to the S&P 500, between 1989 and 2000, we explore the price effects of noninformation related demand shocks. After controlling for various firm characteristics, index fund growth, and arbitrage risk, we find that NYSE stocks suffer less pronounced price effects than do Nasdaq stocks on the day stocks are added to the Index. For NYSE stocks, this effect is reversed immediately, but Nasdaq stocks show a partial reversal taking place over several days. We interpret this result as evidence of the superiority of the specialist system over the dealer system in mitigating price pressures.</abstract><cop>Tampa</cop><pub>Financial Management Association</pub><doi>10.2307/3666385</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-3892 |
ispartof | Financial management, 2003-10, Vol.32 (3), p.85-99 |
issn | 0046-3892 1755-053X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_208181431 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Arbitrage Demand shocks Index funds Investment advisors Investment risk Liquidity Nasdaq Composite Index New stock market listings Securities markets Securities trading Statistical discrepancies Stock exchanges Stock market indices Stock prices Studies |
title | Price Pressure on the NYSE and Nasdaq: Evidence from S&P 500 Index Changes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A34%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Price%20Pressure%20on%20the%20NYSE%20and%20Nasdaq:%20Evidence%20from%20S&P%20500%20Index%20Changes&rft.jtitle=Financial%20management&rft.au=Elliott,%20William%20B.&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=85-99&rft.issn=0046-3892&rft.eissn=1755-053X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3666385&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3666385%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208181431&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3666385&rfr_iscdi=true |