Learning to Listen: Improving Law Enforcement in Indian Country through Collaboration and Consultation

From 2009 to 2017, U.S. Attorneys embraced legislation and policy that required them to be active partners and active listeners with tribes as they pursued justice in Indian Country. The work that accelerated from 2009 on remains unfinished, Indeed, some of the legislative changes intended to provid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Federal sentencing reporter 2018-02, Vol.30 (3), p.202-206
1. Verfasser: OLSON, WENDY J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 206
container_issue 3
container_start_page 202
container_title Federal sentencing reporter
container_volume 30
creator OLSON, WENDY J.
description From 2009 to 2017, U.S. Attorneys embraced legislation and policy that required them to be active partners and active listeners with tribes as they pursued justice in Indian Country. The work that accelerated from 2009 on remains unfinished, Indeed, some of the legislative changes intended to provide more sovereignty to tribal courts, and better protection for Native American women, have had little impact as many tribes struggle to establish and fund criminal justice systems that provide the required indigent defense protections and jury pools that include non-Indians. Additional work needs to be done in collecting data to assess whether the new approach is working. Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General Report issued in December 2017 noted that the Department had fallen short both in providing resources for Indian Country and in collecting data. After drops from 2011 to 2014, Indian Country declination rates had increased slightly, though not to the 2005-2009 levels. In some districts, follow-up on implementing and updating operational plans was inconsistent. Yet the process is one that U.S. Attorneys cannot and should not abandon.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2081762567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26500064</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26500064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j507-1b10e15c7d163b1121e475f8f9792ffc9a9e777da46e79750e65741fe66e57c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj89LAzEQhYMoWKsX70LBcyCTZGaSoxR_wYKX3pd0O5FddLcm24P_vQv19N7h43u8C7UCdE4HR-5y6QadjoH4Wt3UOhhjvPd2pe4bSWXsx8_NPG2avs4y3qqrnL6q3P3nWu1ennfbN918vL5vnxo9oGENezAC2PEByO0BLIhnzCFHjjbnLqYozHxInoQjoxFC9pCFSJC74Nbq8aw9lunnJHVuh-lUxmWxtSYAk0XihXo4U0Odp9IeS_-dym9rCZcL5N0f5Vo9YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2081762567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning to Listen: Improving Law Enforcement in Indian Country through Collaboration and Consultation</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>OLSON, WENDY J.</creator><creatorcontrib>OLSON, WENDY J.</creatorcontrib><description>From 2009 to 2017, U.S. Attorneys embraced legislation and policy that required them to be active partners and active listeners with tribes as they pursued justice in Indian Country. The work that accelerated from 2009 on remains unfinished, Indeed, some of the legislative changes intended to provide more sovereignty to tribal courts, and better protection for Native American women, have had little impact as many tribes struggle to establish and fund criminal justice systems that provide the required indigent defense protections and jury pools that include non-Indians. Additional work needs to be done in collecting data to assess whether the new approach is working. Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General Report issued in December 2017 noted that the Department had fallen short both in providing resources for Indian Country and in collecting data. After drops from 2011 to 2014, Indian Country declination rates had increased slightly, though not to the 2005-2009 levels. In some districts, follow-up on implementing and updating operational plans was inconsistent. Yet the process is one that U.S. Attorneys cannot and should not abandon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-9867</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: University of California Press</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Indian culture ; Law enforcement ; Learning ; Listening ; Police ; Public prosecutors</subject><ispartof>Federal sentencing reporter, 2018-02, Vol.30 (3), p.202-206</ispartof><rights>2018 Vera Institute of Justice</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26500064$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26500064$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,58019,58252</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>OLSON, WENDY J.</creatorcontrib><title>Learning to Listen: Improving Law Enforcement in Indian Country through Collaboration and Consultation</title><title>Federal sentencing reporter</title><description>From 2009 to 2017, U.S. Attorneys embraced legislation and policy that required them to be active partners and active listeners with tribes as they pursued justice in Indian Country. The work that accelerated from 2009 on remains unfinished, Indeed, some of the legislative changes intended to provide more sovereignty to tribal courts, and better protection for Native American women, have had little impact as many tribes struggle to establish and fund criminal justice systems that provide the required indigent defense protections and jury pools that include non-Indians. Additional work needs to be done in collecting data to assess whether the new approach is working. Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General Report issued in December 2017 noted that the Department had fallen short both in providing resources for Indian Country and in collecting data. After drops from 2011 to 2014, Indian Country declination rates had increased slightly, though not to the 2005-2009 levels. In some districts, follow-up on implementing and updating operational plans was inconsistent. Yet the process is one that U.S. Attorneys cannot and should not abandon.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Indian culture</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Public prosecutors</subject><issn>1053-9867</issn><issn>1533-8363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj89LAzEQhYMoWKsX70LBcyCTZGaSoxR_wYKX3pd0O5FddLcm24P_vQv19N7h43u8C7UCdE4HR-5y6QadjoH4Wt3UOhhjvPd2pe4bSWXsx8_NPG2avs4y3qqrnL6q3P3nWu1ennfbN918vL5vnxo9oGENezAC2PEByO0BLIhnzCFHjjbnLqYozHxInoQjoxFC9pCFSJC74Nbq8aw9lunnJHVuh-lUxmWxtSYAk0XihXo4U0Odp9IeS_-dym9rCZcL5N0f5Vo9YQ</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>OLSON, WENDY J.</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>University of California Press Books Division</general><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Learning to Listen</title><author>OLSON, WENDY J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j507-1b10e15c7d163b1121e475f8f9792ffc9a9e777da46e79750e65741fe66e57c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Indian culture</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Public prosecutors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OLSON, WENDY J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Federal sentencing reporter</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OLSON, WENDY J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Learning to Listen: Improving Law Enforcement in Indian Country through Collaboration and Consultation</atitle><jtitle>Federal sentencing reporter</jtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>202-206</pages><issn>1053-9867</issn><eissn>1533-8363</eissn><abstract>From 2009 to 2017, U.S. Attorneys embraced legislation and policy that required them to be active partners and active listeners with tribes as they pursued justice in Indian Country. The work that accelerated from 2009 on remains unfinished, Indeed, some of the legislative changes intended to provide more sovereignty to tribal courts, and better protection for Native American women, have had little impact as many tribes struggle to establish and fund criminal justice systems that provide the required indigent defense protections and jury pools that include non-Indians. Additional work needs to be done in collecting data to assess whether the new approach is working. Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General Report issued in December 2017 noted that the Department had fallen short both in providing resources for Indian Country and in collecting data. After drops from 2011 to 2014, Indian Country declination rates had increased slightly, though not to the 2005-2009 levels. In some districts, follow-up on implementing and updating operational plans was inconsistent. Yet the process is one that U.S. Attorneys cannot and should not abandon.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-9867
ispartof Federal sentencing reporter, 2018-02, Vol.30 (3), p.202-206
issn 1053-9867
1533-8363
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2081762567
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR
subjects Collaboration
Indian culture
Law enforcement
Learning
Listening
Police
Public prosecutors
title Learning to Listen: Improving Law Enforcement in Indian Country through Collaboration and Consultation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T03%3A30%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20to%20Listen:%20Improving%20Law%20Enforcement%20in%20Indian%20Country%20through%20Collaboration%20and%20Consultation&rft.jtitle=Federal%20sentencing%20reporter&rft.au=OLSON,%20WENDY%20J.&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=202-206&rft.issn=1053-9867&rft.eissn=1533-8363&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26500064%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2081762567&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26500064&rfr_iscdi=true